Tab Content
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 03:41 PM
    So then we are probably in agreement to the following extent, that our constitutions, state and federal, are not being adhered to by those entrusted to support and defend them. JWK "The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges' views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." -- Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:10 AM
    What is "clear" is, you simply love to make up crap . . . With regard to my understanding of "standing" see my following post HERE JWK
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:17 AM
    But the Constitution, which all States have agreed to, does declare electors are to be appointed in the manner as the State's Legislature may direct . . . not the Court, the people, or Little Bow Peep. "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." ___ my emphasis. JWK When our federal judicial systemignores the rule of law and our written Constitutions, Federal and State, andassents to acts contrary to the rule of law, it not only opens the door toanarchy, but participates in and encourages such treachery.
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-24-2021, 10:58 AM
    Thank you for your personal opinion, but THIS POST supplies the documentation your personal opinion is wrong. JWK When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitution and assents to acts contrary to our Federal and state Constitutions, as it has done in this case, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in and encourages such treachery.
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-24-2021, 09:21 AM
    When a number of states disenfranchise the voters of Texas in a federal election by illegal voting practices in those states, you bet the State of Texas has standing and a judiciable controversy with those states, and, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over such controversies (Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, USC) See Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006) "Confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy. Voter fraud drives honest citizens out of the democratic process and breeds distrust of our government. Voters who fear their legitimate votes will be outweighed by fraudulent ones will feel disenfranchised. “he right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 555 (1964)."
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-22-2021, 10:54 AM
    Of course, Justice Roberts appears to have been threatened in the past, i.e., the Obamacare case. JWK Obamacare by consent of the governed, Article 5, our Constitution`s amendment process. Tyranny by a majority vote in Congress or a Supreme Court's majority vote
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-21-2021, 09:11 AM
    . In response to the State of Texas filing a Motion for leave to File a BILL OF COMPLAINT in which twenty other States joined, our Supreme Court issued the following ORDER dated, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2020. As you can see, the Order offers no legal reasoning to substantiate Texas does not have standing, nor does the ORDER explain why the Court alleges Texas ". . . has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections." On the other hand, the Texas Motion for leave does assert election activities within the Defendant States, which were embraced and condoned by State Government Officials, were in violation of “. . . one or more of the federal requirements for elections (i.e., equal protection, due process, and the Electors Clause) and thus arise under federal law. See Bush v Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 113 (2000) (“significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question”) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring). Plaintiff State respectfully submits that the foregoing types of electoral irregularities exceed the hanging-chad saga of the 2000 election in their degree of departure from both state and federal law. Moreover, these flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.” Additionally, the Texas Bill of Complaint does in fact raise a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which the Defendant States conducted their elections as follows:
    44 replies | 1592 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-12-2021, 10:19 AM
    You might be right but I am now inclined to suspect a sort of narcissistic, high-conflict personality, in the mix. JWK “Until you realize how easy it is for your mind to be manipulated, you remain the puppet of someone else’s game.” ― Evita Ochel
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-12-2021, 09:57 AM
    You lied when you said you didn't take my words out of context. JWK The unavoidable truth is, our socialist/fascist revolutionaries, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, have a plan for “free” college tuition, and cancelling student loan debt. The problem is, it will be paid for by taxing millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-12-2021, 09:13 AM
    Now you are lying. Your wrote: Your statement is inaccurate, because you say "the only punishment," What I actually wrote was:
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-12-2021, 08:10 AM
    So now you are going to take my words out of context. What I actually wrote was: For those unaware, the only punishment provided for a successful impeachment trial is as follows:
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-11-2021, 05:58 PM
    My statement is accurate. I wrote: For those unaware, the only punishment provided for a successful impeachment trial is as follows: “Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States” JWK
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-11-2021, 03:39 PM
    It is now crystal clear in my mind that the 56 Senators who voted to move forward with an impeachment trial for Trump, were never serious about punishing him for “high crimes and misdemeanors” as alleged in the House’s ARTICLES OF IMPEACHEMENT. For those unaware, the only punishment provided for a successful impeachment trial is as follows: “Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States” The fact remains, any real punishment for an office holder who may have committed the act of inciting an insurrection, is to be prosecuted by our judicial system and then punished as prescribed under Title 18. This is where the real punishment is to be administered! 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection.
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-10-2021, 06:14 PM
    In regard to the legitimacy of today’s Senate impeachment trial and Senator Leahy acting as judge, jury and prosecutor, let us never forget that Madison describes such circumstances as follows: "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, selfappointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny ".. . . Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47 Perhaps that is why our wise founding fathers commanded in our Constitution “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside” ___and not a communist/socialist inspired Senator who derides an America First Policy and now presides over an individual who advocates and America First Policy. So, all those Democrats and Republican Senators, who voted in favor of this trial, have not only violated their oath of office, but are now willing accomplices in an act of tyranny. JWK
    24 replies | 463 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-01-2021, 09:34 PM
    JWK Our socialist/fascist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
    61 replies | 5734 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-01-2021, 09:29 PM
    JWK When it comes to healthcare and helping the needy, our socialist Democrat Party Leadership has no moral compass whatsoever. They refuse to make the distinction between CHARITABLE GIVING and tax tyranny to support the health care needs of millions of illegal entrants and foreign aliens who have invaded America’s borders.
    6 replies | 288 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-01-2021, 02:32 PM
    . The arrest of Ricky Vaughn is another example of the FBI being weaponized by the communist/socialist controlled Democrat Party Leadership, and used to attack a political opponent. Here is the FBI's COMPLAINT AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF AN ARREST WARRANT as found HERE So, the use of "memes' as asserted by the FBI Agent, are now a crime. Of course, they are only a crime when used against the communist/socialist controlled Democrat Party Leadership. JWK
    6 replies | 288 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-01-2021, 12:08 PM
    Tell me, do you also see domestic terrorists / black supremacists in the following video?
    6 replies | 288 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    02-01-2021, 11:46 AM
    . . We have recently seen in Volume V of a Senate Report that a number of rogue FBI Agents were probably used as a vehicle by Trump Administration opponents to generate a three year long phony story about Russia Collusion. Page 955 of the report reads as follows: “While this Volume did not find evidence of collusion between President Trump and the Russians, it does detail a stunning accounting of the FBl’s sloppy work and poor judgment. In 2016, the Democratic Party, using a series of arm’s length transactions, hired a foreign citizen to seek out dirt on a political opponent, provided by foreign sources. This Volume confirms that Christopher Steele used information gained from sources in Russia-some with direct ties to the Russian Government. That unverified, uncorroborated, foreign information was then actively circulated with the press to disparage a U.S. political candidate.” And here we are today, with an FBI Agent, suspiciously picking Brandon Straka out of a crowd of hundreds, and charging this high profile figure who has been a thorn in the side of the communist/socialist controlled democrat party leadership who started the Walkaway campaign which “. . . encourages and supports those on the Left to walk away from the divisive tenets endorsed and mandated by the Democratic Party of today . . . “
    6 replies | 288 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-30-2021, 01:12 PM
    . After reviewing the video mentioned in the complaint: . . And reading the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT .
    3 replies | 272 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-30-2021, 08:48 AM
    What is obvious is you never took the time to actually read the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT . I took the time to read the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and it appears Straka never entered the U.S. Capitol, nor is there evidence of him obstructing any law enforcement officers. Additionally, some of the comments made by Straka, which the FBI agent quotes in the complaint, were not even made during the Capitol event. There is a very good chance Straka was targeted for his political views and encouraging people to walk away from the socialist/communist controlled democrat party. Whether you want to admit it or not, the truth is, we are living in dangerous times when our federal government’s agencies are used to silence political speech, and also works in concert with a Fifth Column media and communication tech. giants, to silence the speech of American citizens. JWK
    61 replies | 5734 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-29-2021, 02:28 PM
    I can't answer that question with any certainty, but I can say we are living in dangerous times when our federal government works in concert with a Fifth Column media and communication tech. giants, to silence the speech of American citizens. JWK First the President is cut off from twitter, then Sen. Hawley’s book is cancelled, then the WalkAway Facebook page is taken down, Parler is removed, and even Mike Lindell, our pillow guy, is banned from Twitter by its socialist revolutionary control freaks. And now ‘Walkaway’ founder Brandon Straka is arrested by Biden’s FBI. Is it not self-evident a dangerous and un-American pattern is developing to cancel patriotic conservative speech?
    61 replies | 5734 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-28-2021, 03:52 PM
    Having read the CRIMINAL COMPLAINT against BRANDON STRAKA, it turns out to be trumped up charges. And from the complaint, there is no evidence of Straka ever having entered the U.S. Capitol. Nor is there evidence of him obstructing any law enforcement officers. His only “crime” appears to be exercising freedom of speech. JWK
    61 replies | 5734 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-28-2021, 01:39 PM
    Well then, how about addressing what PA's Constitution actually states? . PA's Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77, which allowed no-excuse ballots, is unconstitutional. Here is why! .
    17 replies | 808 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-28-2021, 12:15 PM
    Our country is looking more and more like Venezuela as each day passes. . .
    61 replies | 5734 view(s)
No More Results

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hi I'm Chowder

    I saw your debate with Wild English nut-job Rose with the Fair Tax. Man you tore him apart!

    Anyway I want to say thanks for the info you posted on the Hannity Forums. I used to be a neo-con but I saw the light around December of last year.

    I also used to support the fair tax and really thought for a while it seemed like a good idea. But your statements have changed my mind.

    Thanks man.

    -Chowder.

    P.S Where is your sources for the info, I would like to read them more closely or did you rely mostly on the Constitution: the one document our Politicians ignore except for Ron Paul.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About johnwk

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
2,453
Posts Per Day
0.53
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
05-18-2011 11:03 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 03:41 PM
Join Date
07-19-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

08-12-2020


08-27-2019


04-06-2018


03-17-2018


03-14-2018


01-26-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 40 12311 ... LastLast

02-26-2021


02-25-2021


02-24-2021


02-22-2021


02-12-2021


02-11-2021


02-10-2021


02-01-2021


01-31-2021


01-30-2021



Page 1 of 40 12311 ... LastLast