Tab Content
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 03:49 PM
    Heh, that sense of humor. I love it!
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 03:48 PM
    Yea, then all bangers should be running around as genius Einsteins. Clearly, such is not the case. Sadly?
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 03:19 PM
    Okay, that was totally awesome, I admit. And degree of flop-sweat: ZERO.
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 03:04 PM
    People are arleady dumb enough on average, they need no further aid from stavia-indica.
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 03:01 PM
    Well, in fairness, it is at least somewhat new. Which is unlike your tired, dried, and worn out arguments on just about everything else, in existence, about anything and everything that has or had or ever will had, ever exist or ever will or shall exist, or come to become into existence, ever.
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 02:57 PM
    Oh from January , I just noticed 18 and 2018, thought it was from two days ago. lolz.
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 02:55 PM
    Absolutely, just seems like he is regressing. You know? He just cannot be that fucking dumb.
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 02:53 PM
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    04-20-2018, 02:49 PM
    Alright, so Adam Kokesh, who had seemingly disappeared after his shotgun stunt several years back now, is now running for "non-president"/"president" and has already been arrested on (spoiler alert) drug charges and stopped twice on the same day. https://kokeshforpresident.com/ SMGDH!!!
    28 replies | 396 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-18-2018, 02:14 PM
    Stop with the bull-crap-ski, and deflections. :rolleyes: JWK John Adams was absolutely correct when he pointed that "democracy will envy all, contend with all, endeavor to pull down all; and when by chance it happens to get the upper hand for a short time, it will be revengeful, bloody, and cruel...". Witness today the suicidal path America has chosen, supported by a Fifth Colum media and Yellow Journalists.
    12 replies | 230 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-18-2018, 06:39 AM
    Why did you alter what I wrote and then quoted me as if I wrote those words? What I actually wrote was: "Only if a majority of the people subscribe to that notion. The fact is, the Constitution is still there and waiting for the people to demand the enforcement of its text and documented legislative intent which gives context to its text." JWK
    12 replies | 230 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-17-2018, 02:27 PM
    Only if a majority of the people subscribe to that notion. The fact is, the Constitution is still there and waiting for the people to demand the enforcement of its text and documented legislative intent which gives context to its text. JWK "The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law (1858)
    12 replies | 230 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-17-2018, 11:31 AM
    There is merit to what you think, especially when several generations of children have been brainwashed in our government schools by useful idiots masquerading as teachers while still others intentionally work to have students attack our Constitution and embrace the evil philosophy of communism, socialism and progressivism. JWK The unavoidable truth is, our social democrat political leaders’ plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by confiscating the paychecks of millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.
    12 replies | 230 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-17-2018, 06:06 AM
    From what I have observed over the years, the most vocal advocates of calling this convention, especially those who have access to media outlets, constantly insult those who oppose calling a convention and refuse to engage in a dialogue concerning the various unanswered questions and dangers attached to the idea. All they do is engage in name calling and make insulting remarks about those who question the call for a constitutional convention. Keep in mind the same crowd that gave us the United Nation's Charter, the Sixteenth Amendment, the Federal Reserve paper money system, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and more recently the NAFTA, have been behind the call for a convention to rewrite our Constitution. One of its principle advocates was Rexford Guy Tugwell, one of the three original members of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal “brains trust,” and he authored The Constitution of the New States of America which seems to be the goal of the globalists behind the movement. JWK At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 18, 1787, a Mrs. Powel anxiously awaited the results and as Benjamin Franklin emerged from the long task now finished asked him directly, `Well, Doctor, what have we got? A republic or a monarchy?' `A republic, if you can keep it,' responded Franklin.
    12 replies | 230 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-16-2018, 08:22 AM
    SEE: David Horowitz: Why Conservatives Need to Amend the Constitution Now Mr. Horowitz begins his article by writing: ”What do the John Birch Society, Eagle Forum, Common Cause and Planned Parenthood have in common? They all oppose the states’ use of Article V of our Constitution to impose and enforce constitutional limits on Washington.” Mr. Horowitz goes on to write, ”While it is no surprise that Marxist-leaning groups would fight, tooth and nail, to resist any plan for breaking the federal government’s virtual monopoly on policy-making, all conservatives agree that this monopoly is a perversion of our federal system. But, sadly, the Left’s propaganda and junk history have brainwashed some conservatives into opposing the states’ use of constitutional power to check federal overreach.” Indeed, in Mr. Horowitz’s view, that conservatives who oppose the call for a convention under Article V have been “brainwashed” by, “the Left’s propaganda and junk history”, is absurd and disingenuous to say the least. In fact, conservatives who oppose the call base their reasoning on historical facts and unanswered questions which Mr. Horowitz should address rather than insulting these patriotic Americans and portray the opponents of an Article V convention as sympathizing with “Marxist-leaning groups” and “the radical Left”. Hey, Mr. Horowitz, how about addressing a few of the unanswered questions and dangers of calling a “convention of states”, which I might add is found nowhere in the text of the Constitution? The Constitution merely declares that Congress shall “call a Convention for proposing Amendments” if the required number of State Legislatures make application.
    12 replies | 230 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-15-2018, 09:35 PM
    . This evening (4/15/18) on Life, Liberty and Levin, Daniel Horowitz, an author at Conservative Review, asserted we need a “Convention of States”. Mr. Levin quickly chimed in, giving his approval. But don’t expect Mr. Horowitz, or Mr. Levin for that matter, to address the many unanswered questions and dangers which arise should the Legislatures of two thirds of the States make application for an Article V convention as mentioned in our Federal Constitution. Whether knowing or unknowing, Daniel Horowitz is promoting an idea which would open the door for the enemies of our Constitution to re-write its provisions, the violation of which is the basis of Daniel wanting a Convention. So, why on earth would Daniel want a convention to re-write our Constitution when the fault is not found in our existing Constitution, but in a failure to enforce its provisions and the legislative intent behind those provisions? I’m having a difficult time understanding why Mr. Horowitz has fallen for the dangerous idea of calling a convention to re-write our Constitution when he has not fallen for the Republican concocted and fraudulent Balanced Budget Amendment which would actually make it constitutional for Congress to not balance the budget on an annual basis, in addition to allowing taxes to be raised by a simple majority vote. How has Mr. Horowitz seen through the rope-a-dope BBA cooked up by Republican swamp creatures, and not realized that calling a convention under Article V at this point in time is a Pandora’s Box which every conservative and freedom loving person in America should recoil from? I’m hoping Mr. Horowitz will take the time to actually research the work of a number of constitutional conservatives, e.g., the late Conservative icon, Phyllis Schlafly, who was one of its most outspoken opponents, and carefully laid out a number of reasons for opposing it. But for now, perhaps Mr. Horowitz will consider James Madison’s fears to calling a convention under Article V when he was asked:
    0 replies | 75 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 04:19 PM
    What does all that have to do with 45 percent of our nation's population paying no taxes on incomes and yet they get to vote for members of Congress who decide how tax revenue is spent? JWK Are you really ok with 45 percent of our nation’s population who pay no taxes on incomes being allowed to vote for representatives who spend federal revenue which the remaining 55 percent of our nation’s hard working and productive population has contributed into our federal treasury via taxes on incomes when our Constitution requires “Representatives and direct taxes Shall be apportioned among the Several States”?
    8 replies | 196 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    8 replies | 196 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 03:12 PM
    Freedom to go on the public dole. JWK There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from poverty stricken countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.
    704 replies | 8746 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 02:09 PM
    And the swamp creature leaders live on! JWK Are we really ok with 45 percent of our nation’s population who pay no taxes on incomes being allowed to vote for representatives who spend federal revenue which the remaining 55 percent of our nation’s hard working and productive population has contributed into our federal treasury via taxes on incomes when our Constitution requires “Representatives and direct taxes Shall be apportioned among the Several States”?
    8 replies | 196 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:47 AM
    . Well, the Republican drafted balanced budget amendment was defeated in the House on Thursday, 4/12/18. But what is interesting is, even if the Amendment were adopted into our Constitution, Congress would still not be required to balance the Budget on an annual basis! Our Republican swamp creatures concocted an amendment which would actually make it constitutional for Congress to not balance the Budget! See: H.J. RES. 2 Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States for the actual text of this rope-a-dope amendment. It is intentionally designed to con the American People into thinking those in Congress who support the proposal actually want to force Congress to start acting fiscally responsible, while they nefariously have created an amendment which allows Congress to continue its reckless spending and borrowing without having to balance the annual budget, nor face a year end moment of accountability for spending more than is brought in from federal taxes. If these members of Congress actually wanted to have the budged balanced on an annual basis, they would have voted on the “Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment” which appears in a Committee on Ways and Means report in 1995 and in 1996 titled “Replacing The Federal Income Tax”.
    8 replies | 196 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 09:15 AM
    See: House committee defeats resolution calling for constitutional convention Feb 10, 2018 ” BOISE - Idaho will not be joining other states in calling for an Article V convention to amend the U.S. Constitution. Despite heartfelt pleas for faith, inspiration, trust and patriotism, the House State Affairs Committee defeated an Article V resolution on a 10-5 vote Friday.”
    0 replies | 63 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 07:58 AM
    I wonder what Ron Paul's view are with regard to people being free to mutually agree in a contract to regulate who may enter upon a geographical area they inhabit. Has he ever discussed the matter? JWK
    704 replies | 8746 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 07:51 AM
    And Congress is specifically authorized by the Constitution to "coin money". JWK "Of all the contrivances for cheating the laboring class of mankind, none have been more effectual than that which deludes them with paper money. This is the most effectual of inventions to fertilize the rich man's field by the sweat of the poor man's brow."_____ Daniel Webster.
    20 replies | 677 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-13-2018, 05:01 PM
    I think more to the point is the question of allowing foreigners to enter our country without any regulations designed to preserve the general welfare of the United States. JWK
    704 replies | 8746 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-13-2018, 03:19 PM
    You just can't control yourself. Can you? :rolleyes: JWK
    704 replies | 8746 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-13-2018, 02:23 PM
    I wonder if the Trump Administration will ever address this unconstitutional spending. JWK
    20 replies | 677 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-13-2018, 02:18 PM
    I wonder if the Trump Administration will do anything about this unconstitutional department. JWK
    3 replies | 500 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-13-2018, 02:08 PM
    Because Ender alleges to not have seen any posts from me about our federal government engaging in unconstitutional activities, does not mean such posts do not exists. In fact, I have a long history in this forum for documenting numerous activities engaged in by our federal government which violate both the text and legislative intent of our federal Constitution. Included in those posts are some of the very subjects Ender alleges to not have seen. Instead of actually addressing the post Ender quoted from, he uses the forum to engage in an old and tired stupid debating trick creating a false innuendo and then goes on to post an extremely insulting remark which has no basis in fact. I do not think this forum was created to invite such nonsense which disrupts civil discourse. JWK "The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges' views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." -- Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
    704 replies | 8746 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    04-13-2018, 08:07 AM
    There you go again, posting an unsubstantiated assertion. It just so happens that my priority in such matters is to adhere to the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text. Applying this priority to immigration/migration, I side with one of our forefathers. Let us recall what Representative BURKE says during our Nations` first debate on a RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790 Mr. BURKE thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor.
    704 replies | 8746 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hi I'm Chowder

    I saw your debate with Wild English nut-job Rose with the Fair Tax. Man you tore him apart!

    Anyway I want to say thanks for the info you posted on the Hannity Forums. I used to be a neo-con but I saw the light around December of last year.

    I also used to support the fair tax and really thought for a while it seemed like a good idea. But your statements have changed my mind.

    Thanks man.

    -Chowder.

    P.S Where is your sources for the info, I would like to read them more closely or did you rely mostly on the Constitution: the one document our Politicians ignore except for Ron Paul.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About johnwk

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,875
Posts Per Day
0.53
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
05-18-2011 11:03 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:13 AM
Join Date
07-19-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

04-06-2018


03-17-2018


03-14-2018


01-26-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast

04-18-2018


04-17-2018


04-14-2018


04-13-2018


04-11-2018


04-10-2018


04-09-2018


04-07-2018



Page 1 of 23 12311 ... LastLast