Tab Content
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 05:32 AM
    Interesting there is no response from our Fifth Column open border crowd. I guess they have not yet received their talking points from their masters, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi. JWK If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon the federal government for its subsistence, we can then bribe them for their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s productive population enslaved to pay the bills ____ Our Washington Establishment’s Marxist game plan, a plan to establish a federal plantation and redistribute the bread which labor, business and investors have worked to produce.
    5 replies | 117 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 05:26 AM
    The subject of the thread is, ''DOJ may grow a spine and arrest sanctuary city elected political hacks". Are you suggesting California's AG is not engaging in harboring, which is a criminal offense? JWK There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from $#@! hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:54 PM
    Yea, can you guess what this is? Clue: One word, utter, second word, bollocks. $20,612,549,000,000
    10 replies | 301 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:40 PM
    Didn't you get the memorandum, you have been promoted from sock-puppet extraordinaire to exportation rehabilitation and reintegration specialist third-class.
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:57 PM
    This bill is unconstitutional, i.e., federal supremacy, freedom of association, and First Amend. Let's see them use this tactic with IRS W4 Forms, or hell even police checkpoints, and see how far they get before a judicial review occurs. This bill, clearly, also serves to bog the courts down with warrant hearings and prolong the process for immigration agents because they will first have to obtain a complete list and account and justification for each single suspected employee. Also, this bill seems to obstruct justice by requiring the employer to notify the employee and their representative that they are being looked into by federal immigration agents at Sec. 90.2. (a) (1); also it is a law intending to protect individual's engaging in criminal activity. Also it absconds or aids employers to violate federal laws: 8 U.S. Code § 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens Hmm... I wonder if everyone who was involved in authorizing this bill is prosecutable under 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
    4 replies | 173 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:48 PM
    There you go again switching the subject and posting an unsubstantiated assertion. The subject of the thread is, ''DOJ may grow a spine and arrest sanctuary city elected political hacks". Are you suggesting California's AG is not engaging in harboring, which is a criminal offense? JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:56 PM
    :rolleyes: The subject of the thread is, ''DOJ may grow a spine and arrest sanctuary city elected political hacks". JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:10 PM
    For those who are unfamiliar with the phrase ''Fifth Column''¯, it was often used during the 1940s and 50s when I grew up, and referenced those in our country who were sympathetic to causes which threatened our country's common defense and general welfare. And then there was ''Yellow Journalism''¯, another phrase. This phrase was used to identify media personalities and journalists who would stretch truth and facts, and even fabricate stories, to accomplish nefarious ends. Both of these forces are now actively at work in America! Today, it appears a Fifth Column in our country has been successful in a cause ___ shutting down our federal government ___ which now threatens our nation's common defense and general welfare. And what is their reasoning for doing this? Their justification is a desire to immediately allow the children of illegal entrants to remain in our country, and also open the doors and allow the relatives of these children to flood into our country, regardless if they would be a public burden upon the taxpaying citizens of the United States. Is this not what Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are demanding, or blackmailing members of Congress for in return to allow our federal government to be funded so it may attend to our nation's common defense and general welfare?
    5 replies | 117 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:06 PM
    Name-caller? What name? You posted an opinion piece from the 10th Amendment Center, a piece which offers no argument justifying the actions of California's AG who is threatening American citizens in California who may cooperate with federal law enforcement officers who may make an attempt to round up illegal entrants. Got it? The subject of the thread is, ''DOJ may grow a spine and arrest sanctuary city elected political hacks". JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:22 PM
    Your BS gets deeper as we go. STATES RIGHTS? I believe you may be referring to "powers reserved to the States" by the command of the Tenth Amendment. Aside from that you offered no intelligently presented Tenth Amendment argument justifying the actions of California's AG which is, threatening American citizens in California who may cooperate with federal law enforcement officers who may make an attempt to round up illegal entrants. You seem to be a very confused person, and can't even remember what you posted only a few hours ago. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:41 PM
    So, your fallback is to post an insulting remark. What does your post have to do with the subject of the thread? Are you still waiting for your talking points on this subject to be supplied to you by our nation's Fifth Column leaders? JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:36 PM
    Xavier Becerra's checkered past activities should be added to the threads about his threatening local citizens who dare to cooperate with federal immigration law enforcement officers. JWK
    10 replies | 445 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:26 PM
    And always the same from you ___ a never ending desire to ignore the subject of a thread and switch it's subject to your pet project promoting anarchy. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:14 PM
    Give it a freaken break. Your anarchist responses have nothing to do with the subject of the thread. It's getting old and tired to constantly see you show up in a thread only to blather on and on how you despise our constitutionally limited system of government. Take a chill pill. or get a medical marijuana prescription, which may help you chill out. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:05 PM
    And you butted in with an absurd and adolescent comment. And, I already responded to Ender's anarchist comment. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:21 PM
    So, your version of being serious embraces the absurd assertion that "the Constitution is doing exactly what it was meant to do- install a bunch of elites to a strong central government"? If that is true, then why did our founders explicitly adopt the Tenth Amendment? JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:16 PM
    Actually, I thought discussing the legitimacy of California's law, and its AG enforcing such a law, would make for an interesting discussion. I never thought State elected public servants would take it upon themselves to impose their personal sense of fairness, justice or reasonableness as the "rule of law". "The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges' views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." -- Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
    2 replies | 88 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:56 AM
    In a PRESS CONFERENCE this past Thursday, California’s Attorney General said “Regardless of what the rumors are, the law is the law, the Constitution is the Constitution and people have rights.” I, and many others across the United States of America, see illegal immigration as destructive to the general welfare of the United States, and want all the actors who violate existing immigration law, PUNISHED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW! And this especially applies to those who hold an office of public trust who knowingly and willingly engage in the felonious act of harboring, which is exactly what AG Xavier Becerra is engaged in. It is bad enough when ordinary American citizens flaunt immigration law for their personal gain or interests. But when those who have taken an oath to support our Constitution and those laws made in pursuance thereof break the law, the door to anarchy has been opened and threatens the very system of government we live under. In Federalist Paper No. 47, Madison wrote: "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
    2 replies | 88 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:51 AM
    Only in your foolish anarchist mind. JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:21 AM
    Seems you are having a problem distinguishing truth and facts from Fifth Column media propaganda. Poor you. JWK There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from $#@! hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 08:06 PM
    I thought the phrase was familiar but couldn't put my finger on it. After looking it up, I agree! JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 03:52 PM
    I would like to take the liberty to suggest they are "Fifth Column" movement trolls, just as is the majority of our media personalities "Fifth Column" activists. I know the phrase is somewhat dated, but I still remember the phrase being used when I was growing up as was "yellow journalism". I think it's time to reintroduce these phrases as they fit today's circumstances to a tee! JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 01:26 PM
    . Is there no interest in California’s AG threatening local citizens who may cooperate with ICE Agents? JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 01:14 PM
    The problem with your logic is, if the people, including anarchists and those promoting "natural law" would spend more time defending our written Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text, our constitutionally limited system of government may very well be saved. Mark Levin, who you seem to follow by writing "we are living in a post-constitutional United States of America" seems to be part of the problem in that he is promoting an Article V constitutional convention, during which time America's most dangerous enemies would have the opportunity to make constitutional, that which is now un-constitutional. Are you a fan of Mark Levin? BTW, he is very much on target with many things he says. But when it comes to calling a convention, I view him as either ignorant to the dangers such a convention would surely bring, or, perhaps he has been a sleeper for many, many years, giving the impression he is a lover of our Constitution to gain the confidence of unwitting conservatives who are now buying into his call for a convention, which would open the doors to a total re-write of our Constitution and perhaps establishing the Constitution for the Newstates of America as our supreme law of the land. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 12:46 PM
    It is nice of you to post your opinion. Now, what does our Constitution declare? Does it not articulate a collective right that our federal government "repel Invasions"? Does it not also establish a collective right ". . . of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? I suggest you actually read the Constitution before making comments which are not in harmony with the true intent and meaning of our Constitution. JWK "The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law (1858)
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 06:48 AM
    Huh? Would you elaborate on that for me? I think we agree but I'm not sure what you mean by protecting their business. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-19-2018, 06:46 AM
    What you quoted had nothing to do with logic. It was a factual statement and suggestion. Simply because anarchists disregard the Constitution, does not mean it's not the rule book we are supposed to be living under. If anarchists spent more time defending the Constitution rather than attacking it and those who support it, we would not be suffering as we are today. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-18-2018, 10:06 PM
    See ‘We will prosecute’ employers who help immigration sweeps, California AG says 1/18/2018 ”The state’s top cop issued a warning to California employers Thursday that businesses face legal repercussions, including fines up to $10,000, if they assist federal immigration authorities with a potential widespread immigration crackdown. “It’s important, given these rumors that are out there, to let people know – more specifically today, employers – that if they voluntarily start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office,” state Attorney General Xavier Becerra said at a news conference. “We will prosecute those who violate the law.” What this nitwit AG fails to understand is our court has already indicated state officials cannot require interested parties to not cooperate with federal law enforcement officers.
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-18-2018, 10:04 PM
    Your question has nothing to do with the rules which govern constitutional construction. JWK
    164 replies | 1751 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hi I'm Chowder

    I saw your debate with Wild English nut-job Rose with the Fair Tax. Man you tore him apart!

    Anyway I want to say thanks for the info you posted on the Hannity Forums. I used to be a neo-con but I saw the light around December of last year.

    I also used to support the fair tax and really thought for a while it seemed like a good idea. But your statements have changed my mind.

    Thanks man.

    -Chowder.

    P.S Where is your sources for the info, I would like to read them more closely or did you rely mostly on the Constitution: the one document our Politicians ignore except for Ron Paul.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About johnwk

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,737
Posts Per Day
0.50
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
05-18-2011 11:03 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 06:31 AM
Join Date
07-19-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

01-26-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast

01-21-2018


01-20-2018


01-19-2018



Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast