Tab Content
  • johnwk's Avatar
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 08:06 PM
    I thought the phrase was familiar but couldn't put my finger on it. After looking it up, I agree! JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 03:52 PM
    I would like to take the liberty to suggest they are "Fifth Column" movement trolls, just as is the majority of our media personalities "Fifth Column" activists. I know the phrase is somewhat dated, but I still remember the phrase being used when I was growing up as was "yellow journalism". I think it's time to reintroduce these phrases as they fit today's circumstances to a tee! JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 01:26 PM
    . Is there no interest in California’s AG threatening local citizens who may cooperate with ICE Agents? JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 01:14 PM
    The problem with your logic is, if the people, including anarchists and those promoting "natural law" would spend more time defending our written Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text, our constitutionally limited system of government may very well be saved. Mark Levin, who you seem to follow by writing "we are living in a post-constitutional United States of America" seems to be part of the problem in that he is promoting an Article V constitutional convention, during which time America's most dangerous enemies would have the opportunity to make constitutional, that which is now un-constitutional. Are you a fan of Mark Levin? BTW, he is very much on target with many things he says. But when it comes to calling a convention, I view him as either ignorant to the dangers such a convention would surely bring, or, perhaps he has been a sleeper for many, many years, giving the impression he is a lover of our Constitution to gain the confidence of unwitting conservatives who are now buying into his call for a convention, which would open the doors to a total re-write of our Constitution and perhaps establishing the Constitution for the Newstates of America as our supreme law of the land. JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 12:46 PM
    It is nice of you to post your opinion. Now, what does our Constitution declare? Does it not articulate a collective right that our federal government "repel Invasions"? Does it not also establish a collective right ". . . of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? I suggest you actually read the Constitution before making comments which are not in harmony with the true intent and meaning of our Constitution. JWK "The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law (1858)
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 06:48 AM
    Huh? Would you elaborate on that for me? I think we agree but I'm not sure what you mean by protecting their business. JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Today, 06:46 AM
    What you quoted had nothing to do with logic. It was a factual statement and suggestion. Simply because anarchists disregard the Constitution, does not mean it's not the rule book we are supposed to be living under. If anarchists spent more time defending the Constitution rather than attacking it and those who support it, we would not be suffering as we are today. JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:06 PM
    See ‘We will prosecute’ employers who help immigration sweeps, California AG says 1/18/2018 ”The state’s top cop issued a warning to California employers Thursday that businesses face legal repercussions, including fines up to $10,000, if they assist federal immigration authorities with a potential widespread immigration crackdown. “It’s important, given these rumors that are out there, to let people know – more specifically today, employers – that if they voluntarily start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office,” state Attorney General Xavier Becerra said at a news conference. “We will prosecute those who violate the law.” What this nitwit AG fails to understand is our court has already indicated state officials cannot require interested parties to not cooperate with federal law enforcement officers.
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:04 PM
    Your question has nothing to do with the rules which govern constitutional construction. JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:01 PM
    And the people of the United States have the collective right to regulate who may enter the borders of the geographical area call the United States of America. If you don't like it, TOUGH ! JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:57 PM
    Rub your natural law on your chest. We are living under the Constitution of the United States of America. And the fact is, the most fundamental rule of constitutional construction requires the documented legislative intent of our Constitution to be adhered to which gives context to its text. The fundamental principle of constitutional construction is that effect must be given to the intent of the framers of the organic law and of the people adopting it. This is the polestar in the construction of constitutions, all other principles of construction are only rules or guides to aid in the determination of the intention of the constitution’s framers.--- numerous citations omitted__ Vol.16 American Jurisprudence, 2d Constitutional law (1992 edition), pages 418-19 - - - Par. 92. Intent of framers and adopters as controlling. JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:33 PM
    In regard to Napolitano, and his disregard for constitutionally limited system of government, while on FoxNews awhile back he indicated the right of a same sex couple to marry is “settled law” and pointed to Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) as his authority that people have a right to marry who they please. However what the Supreme Court ruled in the Loving Case was: Virginia’s statutory scheme to prevent marriages between persons solely on the basis of racial classifications held to violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment What Napolitano forgot to put into context on FoxNews was the Loving Case was an interracial couple and the 14th Amendment was specifically adopted to prevent States from discriminating on the basis of race! The Loving Case had nothing to do with a same sex couple. It should also be noted that in **Standhardt v. Superior Court, October 8, 2003 ** Napolitano’s assertion about “settle law” is proven to be erroneous!
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:17 PM
    Judge Napolitano is a libertarian who constantly ignores the most fundamental rule of constitutional construction. That rule requires the documented legislative intent of our Constitution to be adhered to which gives context to its text. JWK The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASS'N v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:18 AM
    At least I get paid for thinking. :rolleyes:
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 09:12 PM
    Interesting how you confuse powers reserved by the States with States Rights. You really ought to at least read our Constitution before making such sophomoric comments. JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 06:41 PM
    Our Fifth Column open borders crowd heads are exploding over this. GOOD! JWK There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from $#@! hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.
    1 replies | 81 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 06:39 PM
    Any alien who enters our country illegally after they have been caught once, is in fact violating immigration law and can be sent to jail. Stop making crap up. JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 04:16 PM
    SEE ICE, 17 FL sheriffs announce new enforcement partnership 01/17/2018 ”LARGO, Fl. – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced 17 Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) with various Florida sheriffs that aim to prevent the release of criminal aliens back into the community. ICE places a high priority on enhancing public safety through the arrest and removal of criminal aliens from the United States. However, when an alien is arrested on a local criminal charge, all too often, they are subsequently released before ICE has the opportunity to pick them up from a local jail. ICE’s valued state and local law enforcement partners are being challenged in court for facilitating the secure and orderly custodial transfer of criminal aliens to ICE.”
    1 replies | 81 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 12:20 PM
    The Constitution and those laws made in pursuance thereof. JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 11:21 AM
    How about abiding by the law? Eh? JWK
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 11:20 AM
    Your bold words do not increase the size of your penis, sonny boy.
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 11:18 AM
    You should think, and research your opinions, before exhibiting your ignorance. The powers reserved by the States under the Tenth Amendment are not violated by forbidding state political hacks from prohibiting state law enforcement officers from cooperating with federal immigration officers. Now, return to the OP and read! JWK There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from $#@! hole countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-17-2018, 09:10 AM
    See: DOJ Considering Arresting Sanctuary City Politicians January, 2018 ”The Department of Justice is considering subjecting state and local officials to criminal charges if they implement or enforce so-called sanctuary policies that bar jurisdictions from cooperating with immigration authorities. Immigration advocates argue such a move would be illegal.” The irrefutable fact is, federal law, 8 U.S.C. § 1373, prohibits any person, even elected political hacks such as New York City’s communist Mayor Bill de Blasio, California’s socialist Governor Jerry Brown, and even progressive Rahm Emanuel, mayor of Chicago, from prohibiting law enforcement officers from voluntarily cooperating with federal immigration law enforcement officers. To confirm this fact see Judge Harry D. Leinenweber’s WRITTEN OPINION
    126 replies | 1167 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-16-2018, 07:05 AM
    only in your anarchist mind...:rolleyes:
    257 replies | 3970 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    01-16-2018, 12:59 AM
    You got to love it, a felon/dishonorably discharged veteran is ineligible for government employment, yet they can run for public office.
    12 replies | 347 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    01-16-2018, 12:53 AM
    ...How many shithole countries are good candidates from expatriation of libtards?
    18 replies | 281 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    01-16-2018, 12:01 AM
    What a blithering moran! This is like saying I am a Democratic Democrat. Dumb old buffoon he is. WTF!? Socialism inevitably leads to communism, which leads to both mass-democide and genocide. We are suppose to learn from history, not become dumbed down to then repeat it.
    22 replies | 396 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    01-15-2018, 05:29 PM
    What does that have to do with Mia Love and the OP? JWK
    6 replies | 190 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hi I'm Chowder

    I saw your debate with Wild English nut-job Rose with the Fair Tax. Man you tore him apart!

    Anyway I want to say thanks for the info you posted on the Hannity Forums. I used to be a neo-con but I saw the light around December of last year.

    I also used to support the fair tax and really thought for a while it seemed like a good idea. But your statements have changed my mind.

    Thanks man.

    -Chowder.

    P.S Where is your sources for the info, I would like to read them more closely or did you rely mostly on the Constitution: the one document our Politicians ignore except for Ron Paul.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About johnwk

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,720
Posts Per Day
0.50
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
05-18-2011 11:03 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 08:08 PM
Join Date
07-19-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

01-26-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast

01-19-2018


01-18-2018


01-17-2018


01-15-2018


01-12-2018



Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast