Tab Content
  • Weston White's Avatar
    Today, 03:34 AM
    https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html.en https://www.hidemyass.com/proxy http://www.mask-myip.com/ http://www.online-tech-tips.com/computer-tips/how-to-change-mac-address/ For a fee services:
    2 replies | 205 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    Today, 12:47 AM
    https://www.infowars.com/house-intelligence-committee-chairman-trump-transition-team-was-under-surveillance/ https://www.infowars.com/fox-news-pulls-napolitano-after-his-trump-wiretap-claims/ https://www.infowars.com/rand-paul-somebody-was-spying-on-the-trump-campaign-flynn-lost-his-job-because-of-it/ https://www.infowars.com/maxine-waters-to-trump-get-ready-for-impeachment/
    37 replies | 679 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-14-2017, 06:58 AM
    American citizens are being taxed $MILLIONS to provide health-care to illegal aliens and their children! See Senate report: Illegal immigrants benefited from up to $750M in ObamaCare subsidies ”The report, produced by Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, examined Affordable Care Act tax credits meant to defray the cost of insurance premiums. It found that as of June 2015, “the Administration awarded approximately $750 million in tax credits on behalf of individuals who were later determined to be ineligible because they failed to verify their citizenship, status as a national, or legal presence.” The review found the credits went to more than 500,000 people – who are illegal immigrants or whose legal status was unclear due to insufficient records.” How does Paul Ryan's Bill address this?
    9 replies | 404 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-10-2017, 08:36 AM
    See: Kevin Brady Scolds Conservatives: 'No More Fiddling Around' “No more excuses, no more fiddling around," Brady said. "Today, we begin the repeal of Obamacare." Brady defended against conservatives' criticism that the plan doesn't include everything out of the gate — malpractice insurance reform and selling across state lines, e.g.” It is absolutely stunning how many swamp creatures have invaded the “conservative movement”, and use their position to attack “conservatives’ an those who support and defend our Constitution.
    9 replies | 404 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-10-2017, 07:13 AM
    What provision in Ryan’s health insurance replacement Bill makes it a criminal offense and/or prevents illegal aliens and their children from receiving taxpayer financed health care, except in life death situations? JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax slaves and forced to finance the personal economic needs of millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders.
    9 replies | 404 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-10-2017, 12:21 AM
    Shouldn't it depict the name "Barry Soetoro"?
    61 replies | 1308 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 05:20 PM
    I think they used the nuclear option to change the Senate cloture rule. But I could be wrong. JWK
    9 replies | 404 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 04:57 PM
    Seems that Paul Ryan is once again conning us. This afternoon while on the Sean Hannity show Paul Ryan indicated a number of things which “conservatives” want with respect to replacing Obamcare will probably be met with resistance in the Senate by Democrats using the filibuster. But that assertion is being completely disingenuous considering the nuclear options is available, and especially so because the Democrats used it in 2013 to get their way. Paul Ryan needs to stop snow-jobbing us and pretending the filibuster is an obstacle to “conservative” ideas being adopted in the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. Use the nuclear option and tell the Democrats to go pound sand! The America People voted to get rid of Obamacare, and one of Trump’s requirements in getting rid of Obamacare was the assurance of purchasing health insurance across state lines. Trump needs to take Paul Ryan to the wood-shed and deal with this swamp creature who is the darling of the Washington Establishment.
    9 replies | 404 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 09:08 AM
    Oh yea, total BS: http://www.nytimes.com/1995/10/15/world/emerging-role-for-the-cia-economic-spy.html https://www.wired.com/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/
    142 replies | 4467 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    96 replies | 1097 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 01:40 AM
    Then we need to have a serious discussion on what it is to act appropriately and under what circumstances less-lethal options should be deployed (e.g., as an alternative to being shot under circumstances that would justify the use of such force, but not simply because you want to be done with the call so you can go have a jellyroll or because you don't want to break a sweat by tussling a suspect.)
    17 replies | 470 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 01:19 AM
    Heh, was thinking it sounded like some new X-Box game or something.
    142 replies | 4467 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 01:05 AM
    To throw an additional consideration into the mix, I had a thought as to another thought, the case being that so much of this is about social equality and the like, and yet Obamacare while providing, supposedly, health coverage for many millions more individuals, it at the same time alienates individuals that practice any degree of homeopathy or alternative medical treatments. As shown from a 2008 Wapo article, up to 38% of adults and 12% of children practice some form of non-AMA approved treatments: Thus, if courts have been ruling things unconstitutional because they do not "fairly" consider fictional gender-roles or same-sex relationships, and whatnot, shouldn't Obamacare be found unconstitutional on the basis that it does not also "fairly" consider individuals that practice non-conventional medicine and medical treatments? See also: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/10/AR2008121001601.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/homeopathic-medicine-euro_b_402490.html http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/americans-spend-30-billion-year-alternative-medicine-n596976
    57 replies | 1398 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 12:39 AM
    WTH? Are you are spam bot, I literally just posted this.
    294 replies | 6265 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-09-2017, 12:37 AM
    Admitting to your denial is the first step to your recovery. ...That or it's a river in Egypt?
    294 replies | 6265 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-08-2017, 07:18 PM
    Let us not forget the Democrats had no problem with procedural rules ... they ignored them to push through their socialist, Marxist, big-government takeover of our personal choices and decisions regarding our health-care needs. Paul Ryan and his swamp creature pals, including Mitch McConnell, have no intention to fulfil any promises if the original bill is adopted, and that means there will be no effort to end the insurance industry's exemption from anti-trust laws which all other industries must follow, nor will they work to make sure people can purchase insurance across state lines. JWK
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-08-2017, 07:10 PM
    That's some very clever editing my friend. What I actually wrote in context was "If Trump does not come out and demand a repeal of McCarran - Ferguson to be included in the original Bill, you can bet your bottom dollar President Trump has deceived us, or someone is flimflamming and conning Trump into accepting the “phase two” switch and bait BS which will never happen. I believe the latter is true and Paul Ryan and his swamp creature Establishment pals are behind stripping out a repeal of McCarran-Ferguson so price fixing, restraint of interstate trade and commerce, and monopolizing the insurance industry within the various state borders can continue. It is a very, very profitable way to do business." JWK
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    294 replies | 6265 view(s)
  • Weston White's Avatar
    03-08-2017, 02:17 AM
    Still, you avoided the question, again. Hope you get the help you are so very in need of.
    294 replies | 6265 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-07-2017, 08:01 PM
    Paul Ryan and his swamp creature allies are perpetuating a big lie that they cannot include a repeal of McCarran – Ferguson in the House Bill ___ which would assure the purchase of health insurance across State lines and introduce competition in the insurance industry ___ because of reconciliation and the need to keep a simple majority 51 vote margin to get the Bill passed. The reason this is a big-freaken-lie with regard to the purchase of health insurance across state lines is, while the Democrats controlled the House during the 111thCongress, the desire to address McCarran-Ferguson passed with over 400 votes in its favor! It also passed during the Republican control of the House during the 112th Congress by a voice vote. The fact is, there is bi-partisan support for repealing McCarran-Ferguson, but somewhere along the line it was removed from the current Bill, and there was absolutely no reason to remove it because of its bi-partisan support! As a matter of fact, keeping such a repeal would add to the attractiveness of Ryan’s repeal and replace Bill. Unfortunately, it appears there is evil afoot and someone is protecting the health insurance industry from cross-state competition, and Paul Ryan is apparently doing their bidding and giving us, and probably President Trump, the business ___ that this issue will be addressed in phase two of Ryan’s plan. If Trump does not come out and demand a repeal of McCarran - Ferguson to be included in the original Bill, you can bet your bottom dollar President Trump has deceived us, or someone is flimflamming and conning Trump into accepting the “phase two” switch and bait BS which will never happen. I believe the latter is true and Paul Ryan and his swamp creature Establishment pals are behind stripping out a repeal of McCarran-Ferguson so price fixing, restraint of interstate trade and commerce, and monopolizing the insurance industry within the various state borders can continue. It is a very, very profitable way to do business.
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-07-2017, 05:34 PM
    Stop with your Agent Provocateur posts. If you have nothing productive to offer in the discussion, and are not interested in a productive discussion concerning the issue, have the decency to not post in the thread. JWK Millions of citizens have lost their health-care under Obamacare, and many more millions cannot use Obamacare because of Obamacare’s outrageous premiums and deductible. Repeal and replace Obamacare with nothing, and repeal McCarran-Ferguson.
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-07-2017, 02:09 PM
    Trump's original five core principles for repeal and replacement of Obamacare Trump's outline for replacing Obamacare included: Ensuring people with pre-existing health conditions areguaranteed "access" to health insurance, "and that we have astable transition for Americans currently enrolled in the health-careexchanges. Giving people who buy their own health coverage tax creditsand expanded health savings accounts to help pay for their coverage, as well asflexibility about the design of their plans. Give states "the resources and flexibility" intheir Medicaid programs "to make sure no one is left out." Medicaidcovers primarily poor people.
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-07-2017, 12:17 PM
    . As a result of a Senate investigation in 1888-1889 which found a number of Trusts were interfering with free trade among the States, the Sherman Anti Trust Act was passed to “protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies.” But the Act remained, as noted by Supreme Court Justice Harlan, “a piece of useless legislation.” But in the mid 1940’s a criminal indictment was handed down charging 27 individuals with violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Some of the specific allegations were conspiracy, price fixing, restraint of interstate trade and commerce, and monopolizing trade and commerce. Please keep these charges in mind because they are very pertinent to our current situation and seem to reflect what folks in government have been engaged in. The defendants in the case claimed they were not required to conform to the standards of business conduct established by the Sherman Act because “the business of fire insurance is not commerce.” But the Supreme Court decided the insurance business was in fact commerce and subject to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and Congress’s regulations. See SOUTH-EASTERN UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION, Decided June 5, 1944 Less than a year after the Supreme Court decision was handed down, Congress passed the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 providing that the “business of insurance, and every person engaged therein, shall be subject to the laws of the several States which relate to the regulation or taxation of such business.” In other words Congress decides to overrule the Court’s decision and relinquish its constitutionally assigned duty to regulate commerce “among the States”, but only with regard to the insurance industry! And by neglecting this power the various State Legislatures are allowed to engage in practices which would otherwise be indictable offenses under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, and so, the various State Legislatures decide to engage in such practices e.g., adopting discriminatory laws which work to stifle competition from out-of-state companies (restraint of interstate trade and commerce).
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-07-2017, 07:55 AM
    As I understand it, during the current Bill’s writing there was bi-partisanship support and passage of a provision to repeal a section of the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 with respect to health insurance, and it was included in the current Bill while in committee. In fact, while the Democrats controlled the House during the 111thCongress this desire to address McCarran-Ferguson passed with over 400 votes in favor! It also passed during the Republican control of the House during the 112th Congress by a voice vote. But somewhere along the line it was removed from the current Bill and there was absolutely no reason to remove it because of its bi-partisan support. It appears there is evil afoot and someone is protecting the health insurance industry from cross-state competition. If Trump does not come out and demand a repeal of McCarran - Ferguson be included with respect to health insurance, you can bet your bottom dollar Trump has deceived us or someone is flimflamming and conning Trump! JWK
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-07-2017, 06:16 AM
    The fact is, Ryan's plan does nothing to introduce competition across state lines and allows the insurance industry to continue in its evil ways. If Trump supports this piece of crap he will have reneged on one of his big promises! The proposal also does nothing to stop illegal aliens from receiving taxpayer financed health-care. JWK American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax slaves and forced to finance the personal economic needs of millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders.
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-06-2017, 07:41 PM
    House Speaker Paul Ryan SAID the bill would "drive down costs, encourage competition…” Ryan is full of bull-crap-ski. There is no repeal of the McCarran-Ferguson Act which is necessary to restore competition in the insurance industry. On the other hand, Sen. Rand Paul, said the bill "looks like ObamaCare Lite to me ... It's going to have to be better." I agree with Sen. Rand Paul! JWK
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-06-2017, 05:59 PM
    I found no repeal of the McCarran-Ferguson Act in Paul Ryan’s REPEAL AND REPLACE PLAN Without a repeal of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, the State Legislatures and Insurance Companies will still be able to thwart competition across state lines and “legally” engage in price fixing, restraint of interstate trade and commerce, and monopolizing in the insurance industry within each State’s borders, which are indictable offenses under United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944),. We all knew that Paul Ryan is the Washington Establishment's darling, and now we find his plan gives the Insurance industry a green light to thwart Congress’ power to regulate commerce among the states which was delegated to specifically insure “free trade” among the States. JWK Millions of citizens have lost their health-care under Obamacare, and many more millions cannot use Obamacare because of Obamacare’s outrageous premiums and deductible. Repeal and replace Obamacare with nothing, and repeal McCarran-Ferguson.
    18 replies | 484 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-06-2017, 03:22 PM
    I hereby move to nominate ZippyJuan this forum's "fake news poster" of 2016-17. Anyone second the motion? JWK
    25 replies | 1452 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-04-2017, 03:54 PM
    You alleged illegal entrants "... are not eligible for federal government benefits..." That was fake bull-crap-ski. JWK
    163 replies | 2216 view(s)
  • johnwk's Avatar
    03-04-2017, 07:50 AM
    See Rand Paul: Conservatives Have The Votes To Kill ‘Obamacare-Lite’ "The most recent draft of Obamacare legislation suggested by leadership is “not a complete repeal,” Paul charged, and is a measure “that some of us would refer to as Obamacare-lite.” Top conservatives are working to get the repeal effort back to the form Congress passed last year, which was vetoed by President Obama. Paul, Meadows, and former Freedom Caucus chairman Rep. Jim Jordan*emphasized Thursday that after winning multiple elections based on support for Obamacare repeal, Republican legislation should fully rescind the health-care law." We were warned about giving Paul Ryan, the Establishments' darling, a leadership position. We are now finding out those warnings were accurate and this two headed snake is panhandling the Washington Establishment's Obamacare-lite plan, which keeps the federal governments' fingers in our health-care system.
    13 replies | 347 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hi I'm Chowder

    I saw your debate with Wild English nut-job Rose with the Fair Tax. Man you tore him apart!

    Anyway I want to say thanks for the info you posted on the Hannity Forums. I used to be a neo-con but I saw the light around December of last year.

    I also used to support the fair tax and really thought for a while it seemed like a good idea. But your statements have changed my mind.

    Thanks man.

    -Chowder.

    P.S Where is your sources for the info, I would like to read them more closely or did you rely mostly on the Constitution: the one document our Politicians ignore except for Ron Paul.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About johnwk

Basic Information

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,374
Posts Per Day
0.43
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
05-18-2011 11:03 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 10:12 AM
Join Date
07-19-2008
Referrals
1

1 Friend

  1. Weston White Weston White is offline

    Member

    Weston White
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

01-26-2017


No results to display...
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

03-14-2017


03-08-2017


03-07-2017


03-06-2017


03-04-2017


03-03-2017


03-02-2017


03-01-2017



Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast