Tab Content
  • Valli6's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:52 AM
    Thank you, but would you mind posting a few examples (before and after) to illustrate the change I'm supposed to make to the URL? Do I just replace with any of the many urls listed on that page? or are there other steps? No download required? ------- Also ------- My own twitter update ----- About 2 weeks ago, I noticed that - even though I have no twitter account - I can now see the latest tweets of Thomas Massie and Rand Paul (still can't see the replies though.) It seems some change has been made which allows non-accounts to view their new tweets - Maybe there is some provision which allows an exception for official congress member/senators accounts? Perhaps an account holder can set an option that allows this? These are the only 2 accounts I've experienced this with - I still can't see anyone else's new tweets.
    27 replies | 1140 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-19-2024, 12:21 PM
    Things did change a lot after the 70s. I attribute it to the end of Bretton Woods in 1971. I think it took the whole decade for the resulting damage to snowball, and really become apparent to non-rich people. It’s not like they warned the general population outright about how bad things were about to get. Inflation became more and more significant throughout the 70s. It was discussed constantly! It was a favorite topic of comedians (See old Johnny Carson monologues.) Every politician promised they were going to stop inflation. By the mid 70s, "shrinkflation" was already a thing. I can't remember when penny candy became extinct - I think it was the 80s. Don’t know what part of the country your brothers were in, but in my neck of the woods things were not that rosy. As a young person it was not possible to pay rent AND save up money to buy a brand new car with cash, or make a down payment on a house while you were still in your early 20s. For above-minimum-wage pay, you had to “know” someone (a relative or family friend) that could get you into a higher paying job. This was the case even if you just wanted any factory job with decent benefits, say, at the Ford plant or Westinghouse. (This was once a reliable way to support your family.) During the 70s the factories had already started closing down. There was no such thing as an "apprenticeship" and if "internships" happened, they weren't advertising for them in the papers. You had to be accepted by a union, so you had to either know someone, or fulfill a quota to get hired. (The concept of racial DEI isn’t new, it just wasn’t admitted to.) No one remembers that every day, the media was always using terms like “joblessness” and “unemployment crisis”. Of course, I’m from a state that’s always had a lot of corruption and that has it’s effect.
    13 replies | 384 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-18-2024, 03:24 PM
    Yes - I recall reading quotes someone had posted from the 60s, of some college students saying that their degrees didn't guarantee that they would find work anymore and they felt scammed. There's always been someone pushing this notion that the previous generation had it so much easier than those just starting out and I think it's intentionally deceitful. It's probably the reason the "elites" started dividing us up with terms like "baby boomer", generation X, millennial. etc., Rather than blaming the corrupt elites that fucked us over during the previous generation(s) - say, by murdering our president, or stealing our gold, or ending bretton-woods, or sending our jobs overseas (all without us being quite aware of what they are pulling till it's too late) - they obscure/deny the past hardships ever existed and condition each generation to believe the previous one simply had an easy time. You grow up following a certain path, only to find out after it's too late, that that path doesn't work at all. You've been exploited and other people got rich exploiting you. In this way they scam us all, while making each generation blame, and feel resentful towards, those before them.
    13 replies | 384 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-18-2024, 01:46 PM
    ...since the 80s in many fields.
    13 replies | 384 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-10-2024, 09:15 AM
    Thomas Massie is key to restoring our republic.
    32 replies | 2780 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-09-2024, 07:52 PM
    "the will of Congress"? Since when is that a thing? The correct expression is "the will of the people" but neither Johnson or Biden are considering that. Traitors!
    8 replies | 295 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-08-2024, 08:34 PM
    (DailyCaller - Nicole Silverio) May 08, 2024 - 5:41 PM ET Gaetz has an interesting point in that he assumes there are 2-3 republicans who are ripe for bribing. It's as if he has specific people in mind.
    54 replies | 3018 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-08-2024, 07:51 PM
    Lew Rockwell posted this brief video of Butler talking to Bonus marchers in 1932.
    24 replies | 2773 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-08-2024, 05:55 PM
    Not happy with Trump's truthsocial response! :/ I know he's got a lot to deal with right now, but this makes it sound like he doesn't grasp the situation at all - that is - that Johnson is a backstabber who went out of his way to vote with the dems for legislation that we don't want; still spying on us, yet again splurging on extremely excessive foreign aid, and failing to acknowledge that we have been invaded. "Mike Johnson is a good man who is trying very hard." WTF?! Mike Johnson is a weak piece of shit who is indifferent to the well-being of American citizens! Did he delegate this response to still-incompetent staff?! Or must I accept that he will definitely be stabbing us in the back?
    54 replies | 3018 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-08-2024, 04:13 PM
    1788327114497810462 Biggs Burlison Crane Davidson Gosar Greene Massie
    54 replies | 3018 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    05-01-2024, 07:29 AM
    She says that next week she will be calling for the motion to vacate. video: 1785655081762955311
    54 replies | 3018 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    04-28-2024, 07:24 PM
    That sounds reasonable for an actual hunter and it's how I’ve always seen it depicted on the screen and in books - but - the story says she took the dog on a hunt so it could learn from the other dogs. Instead it acted nuts and ruined the whole hunt, spoiling her fun. Does not sound like she took the dog's training very seriously. I suppose training an animal is less fun than shooting them. I think she's a poser and a show-off. If Trump picked her as his VP she’d be worse than Pence - if that is even possible! - and it would make me seriously doubt Trump’s ability to ever be even a half-way decent president. She’s part of a cult, too. This is crazy talk. This sounds accurate. My dog bit me once (not badly) - it was a case of displaced aggression and I wouldn't have dreamed of killing him for it (RIP - He lived to a ripe old age and was put to sleep at the vet's office). In the original Guardian story, it is implied that she spoke about this because she believes it proves she can ‘do anything “difficult, messy and ugly” if it simply needs to be done’... as if this is a great leadership quality.
    86 replies | 3687 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    04-28-2024, 10:35 AM
    Admittedly, not into hunting culture, but… If you’ve trained the dog to hunt pheasant, why would you be surprised when it goes after chickens too? Aren’t they both ground birds? She had just positively enforced the dog to hunt ground birds, then failed to secure the excited dog in her truck while she stopped to bullshit with a chicken-owning friend. Her own stupidity, but the big brat kills the dog for embarrassing her. …and hunting pheasant? with a pack of dogs? What is she, a fucking duke?! Does she wear a red jacket and jodhpurs for this? Yelling “Tally-ho”? I have noticed she does love playing dress up and let’s pretend, much like Justin Trudeau. Seen her wearing many “cute” outfits portraying her as a state trooper, plumber, other stuff - always perfectly tailored for her. What a priss! Was her former career being a beauty pageant contestant? I’ll speculate that the male goat was likely there to sire some fun and adorable baby goats and once his job was done, it’s time to kill his inconvenient ass. This woman is vile.
    86 replies | 3687 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    17 replies | 847 view(s)
  • Valli6's Avatar
    04-27-2024, 10:19 AM
    1783814926596743281 This is the sense I get about these protests. They’re contrived by government operatives and carried out by the coddled, conformist, rich (and otherwise entitled) kids who inhabit the universities - all to distract attention from the abuse being heaped on American citizens. The fact that Mike Johnson made a point of speaking at a university - as if this is America’s #1 issue! - reiterates that he’s a complete and utter asshole. I think they expect us to now unite and defend him from the response he predictably received, as if he’s “our team” and we’re supposed to be offended for him. Pffft.
    187 replies | 9855 view(s)
No More Results

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF!
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About Valli6

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
07-02-2010 10:15 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 07:04 PM
Join Date










No results to display...
Page 1 of 50 12311 ... LastLast












Page 1 of 50 12311 ... LastLast