angelatc
Member

War is gay "'What does it mean when my military is saluting a new flag?'you might ask yourself" -- Auron MacIntyre https://twitter.com/usairforce/status/1666491502426480642

THREAD: The Corporate Equality Index and the ESG Racket

THREAD: The Corporate Equality Index and the ESG Racket

What Is A Woman Goes Wide | Part Of The Problem 1002 On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Robbie mourn the cancellation of Kennedy on Fox News, and then the guys get into their thoughts on the wide release of What Is A Woman? on Twitter! This episode was recorded on 6.4.23 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ioa8SupklA

Actual Justice Warrior | Rashad Richey Doubles Down On Bike "Karen" LIE n this video I discuss this INSANE double down by Rashad Richey on the Citi Bike "Karen" myth. https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/rashad-richey-doubles-down-on-bike-karen:9 @actualjusticewarrior:2/rashad-richey-doubles-down-on-bike-karen:9

//

Chris Licht Out at CNN—The Latest Casualty of a Dying Medium, Tucker’s Explosive Return on Twitter, Ukraine’s Terrorist Attack on Russian Dam | SYSTEM UPDATE #94 "CNN's collapse continues. Tucker returns with a Twitter show watched by millions. US and EU elites blame Russia for blowing up a damn despite having zero evidence for their claim. With: @mtracey" -- Glenn Greenwald https://rumble.com/v2sq9tk-system-update-show-94.html v2q4uhe

If the fact that government courts might sometimes need to resolve the question of whether someone is or was "married" in order to dispose of some particular matter is sufficient to establish that government is (or should be) "in the business of marriage", then there is literally nothing that government is not (or should not be) "in the business" of, since a definition of any given thing might sometimes need to be addressed in a government court in order to dispose of some particular matter. Thus, if the aforementioned fact warrants the claim that the government is "in the business of marriage", then that claim is capable of meaning pretty much anything at all (or it is essentially meaningless, which amounts to the same thing). Most marriages have always been in some way explicit, as well as documented and/or witnessed, etc., according to customary sensibilities, traditions, etc. (and this does not for that reason make them any less "objective" than politician-defined marriages). They are perfectly capable of being and remaining so without any need for politicians and bureaucrats to usurp the issue by arrogating to themselves sole (or even any) authority to define or "regularize" the issue for the sake of their own convenience (and power) . If there are those who (due to a lack of such explicitness, documentation, witnesses, etc.) find themselves unable to adequately establish their status as "spouses" to the satisfaction of some court, then that is their problem, not the court's (or, by extension, the government's). Let such people stand as a cautionary example for others, and as an incentive to avoid such problems in case of later disputes (that is, after all, exactly why marriage customs involving documentation, witnessing, etc. came to be adopted in the first place - not because some politicians thought it was a clever new idea no one had come up with before). Such customs, traditions, etc. may (and almost certainly will) vary from time, place and/or culture to time, place and/or culture. For example, San Franciscans might well have different standards for what constitutes (or suffices to establish) a marriage than Peorians do - and that is just as it ought to be. Let the cosmopolitan be cosmopolitan and let the provincial be provincial. There are virtues and faults to be found in either, and outside of initiations of force or acts of aggression , neither should be permitted to dictate to the other what it must value (or disvalue).

"... a fish out of water ..." https://twitter.com/TaylorLorenz/status/1666249625081184256 https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419

In the meantime, enjoy some cope-and-seethe from the self-appointed gatekeepers of legacy media: Tucker Carlson launches first episode of low-budget Twitter show after Fox News firing https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/06/media/tucker-carlson-reliable-sources/index.html Oliver Darcy (06 June 2023) (CNN) Tucker Carlson is back — sort of. Nearly a month after vowing a return to right-wing commentary through a show on Elon Musk’s Twitter, the fired Fox News host made good on his promise Tuesday evening and posted a 10-minute monologue to the social media platform.

84 million views and counting. https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419 If just a fraction of those actually watched the video, it would still beat anything on "prime time" cable news. Part of it may be due to the "novelty" factor, and the number will probably drop off as time goes by - but even allowing for that, I suspect he'll still get numbers that at least 99% of podcasters (and 100% of cable news talking heads) will wish they could get. I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Apparently so (for some definition of "OK" - such as "not dead"):

Just a heads-up: Breaking911 automatically delete their tweets after several weeks, so any embeds of Breaking911 tweets will eventually disappear. Some other accounts - such as Disclose.tv - do the same thing. Thus, if you want videos from those accounts to stick around longer, you'll have to link to or embed them from another source. Sometimes you can find these at the tweet source's web site, if it has one. For example, the corresponding article at the Breaking911 web site has the original video (which is not in a form that can be embedded at RPFs) as well as the following YouTube video: Critical Incident Briefing: SLCPD Use of Force: February 21, 2023 On Wednesday, February 21, 2023, St. Louis County detectives were involved in a use of force that left one suspect suffering from a non-life-threatening injury. At approximately 2:15 pm St. Louis County police detectives observed a 2016 Ford Explorer with expired temporary license plates driving recklessly on Halls Ferry Road near the intersection of Jennings Station Road in the city of Jennings. Detectives watched the speeding vehicle enter the Halls Ferry Circle and then travel west on Riverview Boulevard. Officers attempted to get behind the to conduct a traffic stop. However, due to the suspect’s manner of driving, they were unable to do so until the vehicle turned northbound on McLaran Drive from Riverview Boulevard.

I was drafted.

Maybe the coming collapse, blatant corruption, etc. are the distractions.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1666203439146172419 1666203439146172419 Tucker Carlson drops first episode of ‘Tucker on Twitter’—questions media narrative on Kakhovka Dam Carlson explained that such a catastrophic potential consequence indicates that if done purposefully, such an act was one of "terrorism" rather than a "military tactic." https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-tucker-carlson-drops-first-episode-of-tucker-on-twitter-questions-media-narrative-on-kakhovka-dam?utm_campaign=64483 Darian Douraghy (06 June 2023) Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson dropped the first-ever episode of his new show, "Tucker on Twitter," on Tuesday, following his ousting from Fox News in April this thread - OB].

Given that this is an article about U.S. politics written by a Levantine appearing in a British rag, I am utterly mystified as to whom "we" is supposed to refer. https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/06/at-least-100-million-people-are-eligible-to-run-for-us-president-why-are-we-left-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr https://archive.ph/DKmMC]

Actual Justice Warrior | Oakland Residents RAGE Over Crime In this video, I discuss the recent meeting in Oakland where residents have had enough with the crime spike after a number of violent incidents. https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2/oakland-residents-rage-over-crime:7 @actualjusticewarrior:2/oakland-residents-rage-over-crime:7

What even is a "rightist" anymore?

https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1665884601854709761

https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1665951687742193664

https://twitter.com/neontaster/status/1665819866132037633

Of course, if you actually gave a shit, you could always just stop taking all that money out of "the pockets of everyday New Yorkers" to begin with.

No, no, no, the science is settled. /sarc

Just what we need, more crazy every place else.