Tab Content
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    10-18-2021, 08:12 PM
    I've often wondered what kind of parent would name their kid, Colin when they had a last name that sounded so much like Bowel.
    31 replies | 887 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-17-2021, 07:24 PM
    https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1449898215176871937 1449898215176871937
    145 replies | 15186 view(s)
  • navy-vet's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 06:49 PM
    so true You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Dr.3D again.
    18 replies | 665 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 06:34 PM
    They can't get past the first step.
    18 replies | 665 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 06:05 PM
    There should be a 12 step program for racism. :D
    18 replies | 665 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 01:21 PM
    That same presidential candidate also fully recognized and acknowledged that the low and general (not high and targeted) general tariff he advocated would nevertheless still have all the deleterious effects that I and others have identified in this thread. Which is precisely why ha advocated to keep it as low and general as possible, in order to minimize and more evenly distribute the damage it would inevitably cause. This is tautological, as depending "too much" on anything is problematic - that's what "too much" means, after all. For example, one could just as reasonably say "Depending too much on domestic manufacturing and products can leave you in a bind." How much is "too much" is the very question at issue. The answer changes over time and with circumstances and is best decided by the free market. Unfortunately, we don't have one of those. And no tariff as such is ever going to bring us closer to one.
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 01:15 PM
    Acquiring a thing from "over there" (wherever that is) may be cheaper than making it "right here" (wherever that is). Or it may not. And that might change tomorrow for any of myriad reasons. Or it might not. But mere "geographic scope" (be it "global" or "national" or "local" or whatever) has nothing to do with it, one way or the other. The laws of economics have no more respect for arbitrary geopolitical boundaries than illegal immigrants do. And unlike the latter, the laws of men can do nothing about the former. quod erat demonstrandum
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 11:45 AM
    I'm not entirely sure what "comfortable" or "meaningful" are supposed to denote here. But whatever lack of "comfort" I might have with my guns & ammo coming only from China, should I be any less "uncomfortable" with them coming only from Canada? Or even only from Texas? For example, why should I be more "comfortable" with a tariff of X% imposed on imported armaments than with, say, a tax of X% imposed by Democrats on domestic armaments (which would presumably also apply to imports as well)? Which is all the more reason to oppose tariffs on those items. And in the case of microchips, it's not just a matter of comparative advantage and division of labor. China, Indonesia, et al. have better access to more abundant sources of the necessary natural resources. As I noted in a previous post, there are very good reasons why households no longer make their own clothing. Artificially inducing them to do so again is not going to make them more prosperous in the short or long term. Nor will autarkic tariffs make America (or this or that state/locality) more prosperous or independent - and for exactly the same reasons. It will only serve to induce wasteful misallocations of capital for the sake of enriching some Americans (or state/local factions) at the expense of other Americans (or state/local factions), while making the former more dependent on a brittle tariff regime and the politicians & bureaucrats who implement it.
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 10:35 AM
    I disagree that local production is the primary point of tariffs. But it doesn't actually matter: I previously addressed this:
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 09:44 AM
    But when it comes to hammer tariffs, it is "just Stanley" (and their fellow hammer-makers). All those other employers/employees/consumers/etc. who have to pay the price for Stanley's "tariff privilege" would like to "live a comfortable life and raise a family, and be part of and supportive of our nation and western civilization", too. Do they get to just kick rocks? How does forcibly taking money out of the pockets of American hammer-users and putting it into the pockets of American hammer-makers serve any of the good causes you mentioned? I posted this earlier, but it bears repeating:
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 09:28 AM
    You single out China and California, but my point is that your logic applies just as much to Connecticut as it does to those two popular punching bags - or to any other arbitrary geopolitical divisions. (And the reasons for any given tariff - "protective" or "punitive" or whatever - simply don't matter. They are completely irrelevant to its consequences. A tariff of T% imposed for reason X will have exactly the same effects as a tariff of T% imposed for any other reason Y.) How does it benefit New Hampshire to impose tariffs on goods (including Stanley hammers) from Connecticut, and vice versa? And if it does, should it not also benefit Hillsborough county to impose tariffs on goods from Merrimack county, and vice versa? And if it does, should it not also benefit Manchester to impose tariffs on goods from Nashua, and vice versa? And if it does ...
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 08:58 AM
    Okay. As awful as all that sounds, it doesn't matter. All those things have already been accounted for and subsumed in the stipulated cost of the hammer ($10) and will have no additional relevance to or effect on anything beyond that. But it doesn't reverse that incentive. In fact, since Stanley no longer have to worry about their Chinese competitors underpricing them, it would, if anything, incentivize them to actively reduce the quality of the hammers they already make so that they can make an even healthier profit on each hammer sold
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 07:53 AM
    But tariffs on steel imports will do just the opposite - they will result in higher pricing for American-made steel. After all, the whole point of steel tariffs is to prevent steel imports from being cheaper than domestic steel, and thus to allow domestic producers to charge more than they otherwise could have charged. And it's not at all difficult to tell what steel consumers would do under such circumstances. It's simple economics. They will do what buyers always do, ceteris paribus, when prices go up. They will buy less of something. They will buy less steel, or they will buy less labor, or they will curtail expansion, or they will pass the cost on to the consumers of their products (who will in turn buy less of those products, thereby inducing a cascading "ripple" effect ...), or any combination of these or other things. Pre-existing allocations of capital and economies of scale might very well make it cheaper for Oklahoma to "freight raw materials halfway around the world and back" - even without tariffs and duties and all that other bullshit. There are only so many steel mills that are actually needed to meet demands at any given time, and it would make no sense for Oklahoma to expend resources to build new steel mills if they could more cheaply and easily ship raw material to already-existing plants elsewhere and then ship back the refined product. This would allow them to expend those resources on other things rather than on mills that might well end up sitting idle some of the time because there isn't enough for them to do (and that were built just for the sake of "having their own" or "doing it themselves" and not because it made any economic sense). It's basically the same reason that most households don't make their own clothing anymore. Why bother? It's more trouble than it's worth. Comparative advantage and the division of labor are good things. It doesn't make sense to thwart them merely for the sake of localism (which I am all for politically - localism, I mean).
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 07:18 AM
    If imposing production-spurring tariffs on imports from other countries is good for Americans, then it must also be the case that imposing production-spurring tariffs on imports from other states is good for Montanans. And Floridians. And Missourians. And Pennsylvanians. And Californians. And all the way down the line for all 50 states. But if that would be good for all 50 states (which is, after all, just a different way of saying "America"), then why don't the advocates of higher tariffs on goods from other countries also advocate for a Constitutional amendment to allow each state to impose tariffs on goods imported from other states?
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 06:42 AM
    26 replies | 1288 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    49 replies | 2234 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 06:30 AM
    None of that would "eliminat the 'special-interest cronyism'" - it would merely change who the cronies are. It also doesn't answer or address any of the questions I asked. For example, how would the elimination of steel imports "spur production" among American steel consumers? If anything, it would retard steel consumption even more severely than tariffs would. Banning imports would effectively be the same as imposing infinitely high tariffs, with all the same deleterious effects (only greatly magnified and amplified). Absent market-warping regulations, importers are doing nothing objectionable. They are merely selling goods that are being demanded by willing buyers. Also, if importation is bad for America (and "America" here is one hell of a big mouse in the pocket), then American exports must likewise be bad for the countries that import them. IOW: Voluntary exchange must be a "lose-lose" proposition, and that is contrary to all the laws of economics (which, like the laws of physics, do not change just because some arbitrary geopolitical boundary has been crossed). Then by all means, abolish those government regulations. But replacing them with tariffs (or, even worse, slathering tariffs on top of them) isn't going to solve that problem. It will only change who is being expropriated on behalf of someone else.
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 05:44 AM
    https://twitter.com/Mediaite/status/1449127945386160128 1449127945386160128
    173 replies | 21537 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 04:21 AM
    As noted at the source, that's from Chapter 11 of Economics in One Lesson.
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 04:03 AM
    How does making the product of one American industry more expensive to other American industries "spur production" in those other American industries? For example, how does it "spur production" in American steel-consuming industries by making steel more expensive for them - by implementing steel tariffs meant to "spur production" in American steel-producing industries? Outside of special-interest cronyism, why should American steel producers be favored over American steel consumers?
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 03:44 AM
    INCORRECT People who benefit from American tariffs: Americans People who suffer from American tariffs: Foreigners
    100 replies | 2262 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-16-2021, 02:20 AM
    Even assuming Youngkin wins and is able to implement such policies, the "other side" will just undo those things whenever they eventually end up in charge again (just like Biden undid Trump's executive order banning the use of CRT-based DIE materials in federal training programs). Until then, they will sabotage, undermine and/or simply ignore Youngkin's policies. The vast unelected and unaccountable "public" (read: government) education bureaucracy - including the plantation of private-sector (but certainly not free-market) "stakeholders" and other cronies (such as Panorama Education) - will merely "ride out" whatever demagogues happen to get themselves elected until they can once again get a more congenial administration. Wash. Rinse. Repeat. Mass democracy is mass delusion. No one is coming to save us. There is only one viable course.
    7 replies | 390 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    7 replies | 390 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    10-15-2021, 02:00 PM
    He knew he was pregnant, so he shouldn't have accepted the job in the first place.
    20 replies | 706 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    49 replies | 2234 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-14-2021, 09:47 PM
    And Pennsylvania: https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1448846642824744960 1448846642824744960
    65 replies | 3066 view(s)
  • Occam's Banana's Avatar
    10-14-2021, 04:45 PM
    https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1448702322540941317 1448702322540941317
    173 replies | 21537 view(s)
More Activity

124 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Handy vidya response to quack claims about vitamin "cures" for cancer, etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rKLtLiuldw&t=7s
  2. View Conversation
    Let Suz know I appreciate the appreciation. NatC needs to chill, and a couple jokes at his expense will get him there.
  3. View Conversation
    Hey, I already got my Coach tags in the mail . They sent me two different styles in the right color so I could choose which one I liked best. Nice.
  4. View Conversation
    *waves hi* long time no see!
  5. View Conversation
    Libertarianism and "plumbline" conservatism are mutually exclusive. Conservatism has long been opposed to classical liberalism-the precursor to "plumbline" libertarianism.
  6. View Conversation
    "Thread: If you support Donald Trump, then you are an anticonstitutional blithering idiot HEY! Rand and Ron are conservatives, remember?"
    Can't speak for Rand, but Ron is a well-known libertarian and lifetime member of the LP, FYI.
  7. Oh--by the way, look for it other places than Amazon, you might find it cheaper if you actually intend to buy either one.
  8. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...ilpage_o02_s00

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...ilpage_o02_s00

    Right there is where you find it! It seriously has saved me a lot of money and will pay itself off within a year. I use the washer, then spin "dry," and hang up to finish the drying. It's working great for where we're at right now, my bathroom has turned into the laundry room--much better than spending $$$ on laundromat nastiness. We also have a balcony where I can dry/grow herbs and some tomatoes. I'm making the best of what I've got.
  9. View Conversation
    CDC: says the Flu Shot was only 23% Effective Overall http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...ective-Overall

    My Comment in the Post will get me banned no doubt LOL
  10. Just for you:

    http://www.howdovaccinescauseautism.com/

    Even them there "backwards" Amish are realizing a few things about vaccines: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014...sider-vaccines
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 124
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
About angelatc

Basic Information

Date of Birth
July 4
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
wHO REALLY GIVES A FUCK WHEN SPENDING HOURS BEING INVOLVED GETS YOU THE SAME RANKING AS PEOPLE WHO NEVER DO ANYTHING EXCEPT POST ON FACEBOOK
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
5

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
50,669
Posts Per Day
9.61
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
124
Most Recent Message
01-06-2018 02:22 PM
General Information
Last Activity
11-20-2020 11:45 AM
Join Date
05-15-2007
Referrals
3
Home Page
http://www.redstateeclectic.com

73 Friends

  1. Abe Abe is offline

    Member

    Abe
  2. afwjam afwjam is online now

    Member

    afwjam
  3. american.swan american.swan is offline

    Member

    american.swan
  4. amy31416 amy31416 is offline

    Member

    amy31416
  5. Aratus Aratus is offline

    Member

    Aratus
  6. BamaFanNKy BamaFanNKy is offline

    Member

    BamaFanNKy
  7. biles1234 biles1234 is offline

    Member

    biles1234
  8. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  9. BrendanWenzel BrendanWenzel is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to BrendanWenzel
    BrendanWenzel
  10. brenden.b brenden.b is offline

    Member

    brenden.b
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 73
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
View angelatc's Blog

Recent Entries

potato

by angelatc on 01-23-2016 at 08:40 AM
[IMG]http://www.ronpaulforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4754&stc=1[/IMG]
Categories
Uncategorized

My New Pup!

by angelatc on 01-21-2016 at 06:12 PM
[IMG]http://www.ronpaulforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4751&stc=1[/IMG]
Categories
Uncategorized

Vaccines and Ron Paul Forums

by angelatc on 01-02-2015 at 06:32 PM
If you are a young mother, you need to know, right now, that the advice that DonnaY gives is just horrible. She did not graduate from high school, and considers herself a researcher because she watches YouTube videos and reads conspiracy things. She posts these things because she apparently has a deep seated need to feel smarter than the rest of the world...painting herself as some wise sage in a world gone mad. In fact, she is delisional and dangerous.

The articles that she posts

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Deep in my heart, I know

by angelatc on 12-21-2014 at 01:26 PM
that hosting a picture in a thread isn't this hard for everybody. But linking straight to it was a disaster in that it was HUGE - filled up the whole page on the laptop. I downloaded it and then tried to insert it from my desktop, but no luck.

So here it is: a picture of a[URL="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002QAYJPO/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002QAYJPO&linkCode=as2&tag=indyatticcom-20&linkId=MMOR5HULZIXNAXSG""]

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

Beware the seller giving advice

by angelatc on 02-14-2014 at 10:41 AM
[ATTACH=CONFIG]2150[/ATTACH]
Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

05-14-2021


10-12-2020

  • 06:22 PM - Hidden

08-12-2020


01-26-2020


01-07-2020


12-23-2019


12-20-2019


09-27-2019


09-26-2019


09-19-2019


07-25-2019


04-20-2019


03-12-2019


03-04-2019


02-23-2019


02-22-2019


02-19-2019



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Page 1 of 267 1231151101 ... LastLast

10-17-2021


09-11-2021

  • 12:41 PM - Hidden

05-13-2021


02-06-2021


01-21-2020


01-20-2020


01-19-2020



Page 1 of 267 1231151101 ... LastLast