Tab Content
  • Athan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:13 AM
    The liberty movement isn't dead. It has mostly shifted to the alt-right. Because too many libertarians like Johnson think being libertarian means letting statist do whatever they want and not fighting them, defeating them, and kicking them out. We KNOW where are problems are in this country are now thanks to Ron Paul, but we shouldn't be regulated ideologically to simply bitch about them.
    56 replies | 796 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-24-2016, 06:15 AM
    This is definitely a "must-see" video for everyone:
    7 replies | 209 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-23-2016, 08:47 AM
    It's the same reasoning used to justify voting for the lesser of two evils. We hear it over and over during every Presidential election cycle. Donald Trump is evil, just as Hillary Clinton is evil. Nothing is going to change with either of them in the Oval Office, and even Dr. Ron Paul recognizes that.
    114 replies | 1868 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-22-2016, 08:23 AM
    Like phill4paul, I'm anti-Trump, too, but if Trump loses and we end up with Hillary as our next gun-grabbing President, then it will be the fault of the Republican Party and Republican voters who continue to tolerate, endorse, support, and vote for unprincipled, big-government candidates just so we don't end up with a stinking Democrat in the Oval Office. The GOP should have promoted Sen. Rand Paul when it had the chance because he would do far better against Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump can. And, of course, Sen. Paul has a much better record on gun rights than Donald Trump has.
    66 replies | 1242 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-22-2016, 08:06 AM
    This year, Johnson did everything to lose my respect and make me think him senile.
    56 replies | 796 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-21-2016, 06:28 AM
    Danke, I heard you got fired from a calendar factory for taking a day off.
    217 replies | 4564 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-21-2016, 06:14 AM
    I was writing down a joke with my pencil, when, suddenly, the tip broke. Then I realized there was no point to it.
    217 replies | 4564 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-19-2016, 07:46 AM
    Well, if Trump loses, then blame the Republican Party for it. For years in these Presidential races, the leaders of the party (with the help of the mainstream media) have shunned, isolated, humiliated, lied, ignored, and ridiculed principled, moral candidates like Dr. Ron Paul and Sen. Rand Paul. Then when those candidates finally drop out of the race (to the GOP's delight), then conservatives are left with establishment-friendly, unprincipled, flip-flopping, egotistical, power-hungry candidates that are used to vote against the excrement that comes out of the donkey's ass on the Democratic side, always with the reasoning that if we don't vote for the Republican candidate, then a Democratic victory will spell the doom for us all. Thus, we always get enticed to vote for the lesser of two evils. So, you know what? If Trump loses, then we all deserve the consequences of it, especially the Republican Party. Don't expect me to vote for the Republican when the Republican Party does all it can to rid itself of statesmen who rightly deserve the title as "President of the United States," like Drs. Ron and Rand Paul, and then uses scare tactics to try to force the public that a Republican douchebag is now better than the Democratic douchebag. Enjoy your chains. You wear them well.
    35 replies | 701 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    0 replies | 201 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-17-2016, 04:26 AM
    By the same logic, I would ask Alicia Dearn why she supports the "emotional harm" inflicted upon Christian bakers from homosexuals, demanding them to provide a good (a gay wedding cake) towards an event which those Christians cannot support in good conscience because of their Biblical convictions.
    16 replies | 408 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-17-2016, 04:12 AM
    Yeah, that's all well and good, except for the fact that Trump also believes we should "bomb the shit" out of certain countries and take their oil.
    35 replies | 602 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-16-2016, 09:06 AM
    Really? Since when was Trump a crime lord?
    47 replies | 622 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-16-2016, 08:41 AM
    I'm for it. We should filter out statists. They have plenty of countries to infest.
    64 replies | 983 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-16-2016, 12:44 AM
    Your statement above proves again what I mean by your being blinded of Trump's tyrannical nature because of your pragmatism. There is no "overall usefulness" to Trump's candidacy to the "liberty movement" because Trump does not stand for liberty. Just because the establishment types in both parties don't like Trump does not make him pro-liberty. In fact, the leader of the "liberty movement," Dr. Ron Paul, has even mentioned several times that Trump is just as much of an authoritarian as the establishment folks who are against him. But the fact that you can overlook Trump's obvious carelessness towards principles like the right to private property for the sake of his "overall usefulness to the movement" really demonstrates that you're not seeking to advance "the movement" at all. That's what we critics of Trump and his supporters (including Dr. Ron Paul) keep trying to tell you; your pragmatism does not protect the very things (like respect for private property) that you believe it does. In fact, it undermines those principles, and stifles what the "liberty movement" is all about.
    104 replies | 1553 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-15-2016, 08:53 PM
    Any man who has a history of using the government to take away private property for his own commercial interests, as well as supporting foreign invasions just so we can take a country's national resources is a tyrant. If you can't see that, then you're simply blinded by your pragmatism.
    104 replies | 1553 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-14-2016, 08:48 PM
    No. It doesn't. Group bias is a evolutionary and biological trait. It has nothing to do with privilege and has everything to do with mating strategies/survival strategies. A tribe of different colored people moving in to your tribe's resource territory? Time to mobilize not just your community, but other communities of your similar color/ethnicity you normally fight over and join forces. If you don't, well you get wiped out like Native Americans who were too busy squabbling with themselves. It is overcomed with civilized superego overriding Id. In other words, "He's American even though he acts odd and doesn't have a similar cultural behaviors I do/same color skin/look appealing, so I shouldn't brush off his criticism of our politics." It isn't confusing, you should call it for what it is and be as overtly racist as you are being instead of trying to hide it. Whites are the only ones actually trying to make some sort of political amends for shit no modern white man has ever done. Every other ethnicity saying the shit you are is purposely trying to take advantage of your generosity and you are too busy thinking they have actual grievances like a naive idiot. They don't. They smell weakness and an opening for taking advantage of you. You are not a white man in 1870. You didn't do shit. Want to tell me otherwise? Why don't you give back massive leagues of stolen Texan land from spanish speakers who had land grants? I'll jump on board with your cause then because it finally will benefit me. And also give back Texas land taken in 1860. Otherwise stop being a maroon. Sweet lord you are high on the sjw juice from infiltrators and co-opters of the liberty movement. Tell me do you think it's wrong for men to complain about being raped in prison? After all it's just an innate racial/gender privilege that they are having forced sex in a way and with individuals they aren't sexually attracted to. Sexual attraction is a biological and evolutionary strategy. It has nothing to do with 'privilege'. Do you even know what the term privilege means?
    9 replies | 347 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-14-2016, 04:53 AM
    Take the quiz at ISideWith.com, and post your results. Here are mine:
    16 replies | 286 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-14-2016, 04:20 AM
    Yes, it's almost like they're afraid to admit that someone can be both physically and emotionally attracted to little boys and little girls, which, if they did concede, it would open the door to the acceptance of pedophilia, too.
    27 replies | 604 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 07:32 PM
    The misusage of Jeremiah 31 is a common error of Dispensationalism, used to show some sort of disparity between the nature of the Old Covenant and the New Covenant. However, the writer of Hebrews uses Jeremiah 31 to prove his case in Hebrews 8 that what makes the two covenants different is that there is a new priesthood, which is founded in Christ, after the order of Melchizedek. Thus, what makes the New Covenant different from the Old Covenant has nothing to do with the former being internalized versus the latter being externalized. In fact, in the Old Covenant, there were saints who already had the law "written in their hearts," like King David. Psalm 40:8 says, "I delight to do Thy will, O my God; yea, Thy law is within my heart." We even see God calling upon Old Covenant Christians who had God's law in their hearts, stating, "Hearken unto Me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is My law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings." So, you're totally wrong that the Old Covenant people are different from the New Covenant people because of some internalization of spiritual life in the people of the former. Both covenants had people with the law written in their hearts and minds. The difference is that under the Old Covenant, there was a separate priesthood (Levites) who had the laws of God and whose job was to explain the law to the people of God. In the New Covenant, there is no longer that kind of priesthood because Christ, being the Word, now imparts His word to all covenant people, without the need of a tribal priesthood, and especially, without daily and yearly sacrifices to atone for sins. So, once again, there is no difference between Old Covenant Christians and New Covenant Christians. They are both in the Father, through Christ, and in the power of the Holy Spirit. The same laws in the Old Testament can be applied to New Testament Christians, through Christ, because Christ is the One Who not only nailed the Law to cross when He died, but resurrected the Law in His resurrection and ascension. But it takes wisdom.
    372 replies | 5225 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 02:42 PM
    Yes, I will pick the poison that won't place me less than a monarch, one that will guarantee me arms to rebel against authority, and one that allows for upward mobility. You can go to england if you want. I'm staying in Texas.
    177 replies | 6949 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 03:14 AM
    It bears repeating that just because a person appears to be "antiestablishment," it doesn't mean that that person is also "pro-liberty." In my opinion, Trump is not antiestablishment; he just wants to create another kind of establishment. He's also at war...with himself: And, the most antiestablishment statesman to ever sit in a seat of Congress has exposed Trump for who is really is--an authoritarian:
    38 replies | 604 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 02:48 AM
    Explain to me, again, how drugs are extremely damaging to society.
    247 replies | 3556 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 10:26 PM
    I can't look at that without wondering how the transgender priests differentiate between "masculinity" and "femininity." If they want to create a dichotomy between "sex" and "gender," then what makes a male "male," and a female "female," apart from biology?
    27 replies | 604 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 10:03 PM
    That's true, but for many parents, it has been difficult for them to see the "golden calves" which the public schools have made their kids worship at...until now.
    27 replies | 604 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 09:24 PM
    By: Matt Walsh Click here to read his post on The Blaze.
    27 replies | 604 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    20 replies | 584 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 12:57 PM
    I don't need to provide much argument. History shows you what happens when a monarchy is created. The class separation and aristocratic beneficiaries and development, the class oppression, democide, economic slavery, slavery to economic orders, heck even extremes like feudalism, and etc. Have you tried looking at history books?
    177 replies | 6949 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 12:55 PM
    It doesn't. It is. I'm a beaner, and your "epiphany" was basically describing "group bias" and describing it as the "white privilege" myth. Women for example, tend to have the most notoriously overt group bias.
    9 replies | 347 view(s)
  • Athan's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 12:46 PM
    Ha ha ha top kek friend. Great joke!
    177 replies | 6949 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About Athan

Basic Information

Signature


For the Republic! For the Cause!
The Truth About Central Banking and Business Cycles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaxIPPMR3fI#t=186

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,330
Posts Per Day
1.08
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
07-01-2010 12:20 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 01:46 PM
Join Date
03-18-2008
Referrals
0

1 Friend

  1. Theocrat Theocrat is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Theocrat
    Theocrat
Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

08-25-2016


08-16-2016


08-14-2016


08-12-2016


08-03-2016


08-02-2016


08-01-2016


07-26-2016


07-03-2016


07-01-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast