• Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 05:30 AM
    It says I'm dead already.
    5 replies | 117 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    20 replies | 290 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:42 AM
    Because you understand the Constitution better than they guy who actually wrote it. Got it. :D
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:34 AM
    called. it. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523327-Trump-to-start-US-Space-Force&p=6642262&viewfull=1#post6642262
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:22 AM
    And before you make a snide remark about flintlocks and quill pens, the Framer's original intent was that the right to bear arms extended to the equal armament common to military use, and the original intent of freedom of speech extended to all manner of expression. Whereas the original intent of the Army was a land based combat force, and the Navy a sea based combat force. Original intent is a thing. maybe you should look it up.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:18 AM
    Voyager sent linguistic messages in all human languages.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:17 AM
    The Constituion clearly authorizes two Departments. Army, and Navy. This covers land and sea. If they want a force for the Air, they need to amend the Constitution. If they want a force for Space, they need to amend the Constitution. Original Intent. The Framers did not originally intend aircraft and spaceships.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:08 AM
    .... until there is a 'public' on Mars, which seems to be in the works as we speak, so his point remains.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:06 AM
    lol! out of ammo...
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 12:05 AM
    You don't get to wish whatever you want into the Constitution. The Constitution authorized two branches. An Army branch and a Navy branch. Any military force must either reside under one of the two Constitutionally authorized branches, or a Constitutional Amendment must be made to amend the Constitution to authorize a third branch. This isn't rocket science, and I know you are smarter than this. Is this deliberate, or is this just an example of Trumgasming?
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:58 PM
    So yeah, you are claiming to understand the Constitution better than the guy who wrote it. James Madison wrote in The Virginia Report, 1800, by the Virginia House of Delegates, that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:54 PM
    All of this was during James Madison's Presidency. Again, the guy who actually....wrote....the Constitution: From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#Establishment_of_the_modern_Marine_Corps
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:51 PM
    You should demand a refund from your history professor. That base in Georgia that James Madison established in 1811 for Marines to operate out of? Yeah, you didn't know anything about that at all, did you?
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:50 PM
    LMAO! James Madison wrote the Constitution, but Swordsmyth here understands it better than the guy who...you know...actually wrote it... John Adams signed the Act into law to form the Marines in 1798. James Madison served 1809-1817 and continued to utilize the Marines in 1811. Clearly the guy who wrote the Constitution thought they were Constitutional.... Because they were organized under the Constitutional Department of the Navy. smdh.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:43 PM
    No, the Army and Navy provisions are organizational. The Army Air Corps was organized under the Department of the Army. The same people who wrote the Constitution also created the Marine Corps and put them under the Department of the Navy. Are you claiming that the same people who wrote the Constitution did not know how to understand the words that they, themselves wrote?
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:41 PM
    The Marine Corps was raised up by an Act of the Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, and then again in the Constitutional era on 27 March 1794. The Marines were used extensively as an “Army Afloat” for amphibious raids and land marches like the assault on Derna right from the start. Their role did not actually depend on the Navy from the origins of the organization. If what you were claiming was correct, then Congress would have formed the Marines as a “Water Army” branch instead of putting them under the Department of the Navy in order to retain full Constitutionality. The proper method of Constitutional interpretation is Original Intent. The same people who wrote the Constitution had already dealt with the formation of another kind of military branch, and we can see that original intent in that act. Only two military departments are authorized in the Constitution. If you want more than two, amend it. I happen to agree that that we need an Air Force. Until we amend the Constitution, it needs to remain under the Department of the Army.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:23 PM
    Why not have 80 Departments of the Army? You are doing the the exact same bizarre interpretation dance that gave us the FDA, Department of Education, the Drug War, Wickard v Filburn and more. That’s not the way the Constitution is supposed to work. You can’t just retcon whatever you want into the Constitution. That’s how the Swamp operates.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:18 PM
    That sounds like justification for anything you can dream of. After all, the drug war is just a function of interstate commerce, right? Sorry, words have meaning. You don’t get to run around changing the meaning of words in order to shoe-horn whatever the hell you want I to the Constitution. That’s how the left is trying to neuter the Second Amendment. “Regulated” and all that. Article 1 Section 8 authorizes ONE Army and ONE Navy, so even if we took your absurdity as an “Air Army” it still doesn’t work. The provision is organizational, not connotative. When it was the Army Air Corps it was under the Department of the Army and therefore Constitutional. In order to become it’s own organizational branch it requires a Constitutional Amendment. This should be blatant on it’s face. Don’t get carried away by wishful thinking.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:05 PM
    Just because the government does it, doesn’t automagically make it Constitutional. In order to have a US Air Force that is not the Army Air Corps, requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you seriously got an Air Force out of Article 1 Section 8, then I don’t think I’ve got anything to help you.
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:03 PM
    And I’m the a-hole for recognizing it in 2015....
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:56 PM
    Pretty sure this requires a Constitutional Amendment...
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    5 replies | 99 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:18 PM
    Trump is pulling 40 percent favorable on RPF's . That translates to another victory once the DNC selects the opponent .
    67 replies | 743 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:02 PM
    I am prepared to accept north korean surrender .
    4 replies | 66 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:45 PM
    Yes , but there would be lots of nuts in Vegas and when you question a few thousand people it would show up .
    9 replies | 146 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:18 PM
    Rumors are between Danke and the Somalian cab drivers it may have dropped it five spots minimum.
    9 replies | 146 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:58 PM
    Here are 10 of the top 11 nutjob states from a study written about 6/17 /18 for the AP by an Olivia Goodhill, study by Ryan Murphy Southern Methodist University .It includes just 48 states and not DC . Connecticut , California , New Jersey , New York , Maine , Wisconsin , Nevada , Illinois , Virginia and Maryland . Here are the nine with the least nutjobs , West Virginia , Vermont , Tenn , North Carolina , New Mexico , Oklahoma , Montana , Mississippi , Indiana . Danke comes in middle of the road at #32 , not as good as AF ( New Hampshire ) at 11th best . ( Alaska & Hawaii not included but probably full of nutjobs )
    9 replies | 146 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:11 PM
    You think only 4k in a couple months ?
    8 replies | 159 view(s)
  • oyarde's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:08 PM
    Fascinating . I expected all along they would take the stolen tax dollars and use them to fund to take things from space that nobody would protest. I have been expecting this since Ike left office . He was the last president to not spend more than revenue in a fiscal year, that will hold true until utter collapse and a real money replaces the old paper currency .
    81 replies | 631 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:38 PM
    Can we establish that if a guy who when he just starts dating a girl threatens to break up with her if she doesn't have a lot of sex with him that it is her choice to continue in the relationship, and that having sex with him thereafter without the threat of force is not "sexual assault"?? Dunno how much is true, she claims she has evidence of controlling behavior, he claims she cheated on him.. she also claims he blacklisted her, no idea if that is true or not.. but I certainly don't see any criminal acts that took place.
    2 replies | 82 view(s)
More Activity

9 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Greetings. I am curious about your username.
  2. thanks for the link mrsat_98
  3. View Conversation
    http://remediesinrealestate.com/ I think my friend is still involved in this site. email would be david@remeidiesinrealestate.com or sucesstoshare@yahoo.com . As a general rule the bank will offer to settle i.e. will you take 50,000 and keep the house if we leave you alone.
  4. Please visit my Avon Page for holiday gift ideas
  5. View Conversation
    If you're still interested in following my blog, it's here: www.matveimediaarts.blogspot.com
  6. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
  7. View Conversation
    FWIW, I'm impressed that you homeschool! I'm very proud of you, and wish you and the little ones all the best. ~hugs~ HB34.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 9 of 9
About Working Poor

Basic Information

Political Campaign Skills
Copywriters:
Language Skill, Proofreading, Researcher
Graphics:
Garment Printer
Marketers:
Online Marketer
Transportation:
Driver

Signature


Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
8,669
Posts Per Day
2.30
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
9
Most Recent Message
01-25-2012 09:51 AM
General Information
Last Activity
06-16-2018 12:07 PM
Join Date
02-15-2008
Referrals
0
Home Page
http://www.nchaffiliates.com/lisaroberts

21 Friends

  1. kaleidoscope eyes
  2. LibertarianfromGermany
  3. Magicman Magicman is offline

    Member

    Magicman
  4. MsDoodahs MsDoodahs is offline

    Senior

    MsDoodahs
  5. nickcoons nickcoons is offline

    Member

    nickcoons
  6. oyarde oyarde is online now

    Member

    oyarde
  7. sarahdeez sarahdeez is offline

    Member

    sarahdeez
  8. silverhawks silverhawks is offline

    Member

    silverhawks
  9. Theocrat Theocrat is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Theocrat
    Theocrat
  10. torchbearer torchbearer is offline

    Lizard King

    • Send a message via ICQ to torchbearer
    • Send a message via MSN to torchbearer
    • Send a message via AIM to torchbearer
    • Send a message via Yahoo to torchbearer
    torchbearer
Showing Friends 11 to 20 of 21
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

03-17-2018


03-13-2018


No results to display...
Page 2 of 22 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

03-26-2018


03-20-2018


03-18-2018


03-17-2018


03-15-2018


03-13-2018


03-12-2018

  • 06:10 PM - Hidden

03-11-2018

  • 01:59 PM - Hidden
  • 12:12 AM - Hidden

03-10-2018

  • 08:18 PM - Hidden
  • 05:17 PM - Hidden
  • 08:21 AM - Hidden

03-09-2018



Page 2 of 22 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast