More Activity

10 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    All the cool people are joining Revolution Box.
  2. View Conversation
    I am indeed surprised! I think you'd like it. It's also not a terribly long read like other Rothbard tomes. (you can read it in one sitting, depending on how long your sittings are) Available free in several formats here: http://mises.org/document/1011 I haven't read it in a few years, and probably should again.
  3. View Conversation
    Thanks for the +rep. Here's one of Hoppe's lectures on the failure of Democracy. There are others on youtube, of course. Enjoy!
  4. View Conversation
    Your liberty to swing your arm ends at my nose. Slander and defamation are valid torts with a longstanding history in English common law.

    The reason this method of settling disputes exists is so people don't kill each other over it instead, which historically people have done quite often.

    I gave you neg rep because the thread titles in this forum are tweeted and you just made a public spectacle with an anti-Paul diatribe, when you could have asked your question in a much more civil manner. You deserved it and you should come to terms with that.
  5. View Conversation
    If you're still interested in reading "Chaos Theory", here's a link to the pdf: http://blog.mises.org/6314/chaos-theory-now-online/ Here's the ePub version: http://blog.mises.org/16098/chaos-theory-in-epub/
  6. View Conversation
    IIRC, it was in that thread I first saw him being an ass, and -repped him. Before I pm'ed you about this, he wrote on my profile, “Wrong. Vessol is now a known liar which is quite easy to confirm. Search on my user ID and try to locate the source for Vessol's false attribution of the phrase, "bunch of stuff", to me. Well, you'll find that Vessol is the source for the false attribution. Since you're defending a known liar, your credibility is questionable.”
    Then when I pm'ed you to ask about the issue, he wote on my profile " “Instead of inquiring with Sentient Void about Vessol's lie, all you have to do is search on my UserID. You'll find the original user of the phrase in question was Vessol who falsely attributed it to me. It's not hard. I'm assuming by your question to Sentient Void that you want rumor instead of facts... ”

    He seems rather creeeepy to me. :P
  7. View Conversation
    Hey, man. I want to check with you on a rumor I just heard about RPF member Vessol. According to tpreitzel, he is a "known liar". I don't know tpreitzel or his history well, so I can't vouch for his credibility. WTF is he talking about? Any truth to this?
  8. "ChaosControl is a liberaltarian"

    That's fine. I wish there were more environmentalist libertarians. But if he wishes keep the "-tarian" part, he should brush up on his econ 101.
  9. Heh, he'll still engage in some kind of adhockery in order to make him feel better about his cognitive dissonance... he's emotionally attached to the issue of free trade on a personal level. Something about losing his job due to cheaper foreign labor methinks.
  10. View Conversation
    Turn off the heat, dump it on a plate, and move it down the line, 'cause AF just got served!


    (by you, of course)
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 10
About Sentient Void

Basic Information

About Sentient Void
Biography:
Austro-libertarian, market anarchist / Anarcho-Capitalist.
Displayed Location:
Boston, MA

Signature


"If men are good, then they need no rulers. If men are bad, then governments of men, composed of men, will also be bad - and probably worse, due to the State's amplification of coercive power." - Ozarkia

"Big Brother is watching. So are we." - WikiLeaks

Laissez-nous faire, laissez-nous passer. Le monde va de lui meme.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
2,468
Posts Per Day
1.02
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
10
Most Recent Message
06-23-2012 11:12 AM
General Information
Last Activity
08-30-2014 07:03 AM
Join Date
02-09-2008
Referrals
1

7 Friends

  1. ClayTrainor ClayTrainor is offline

    Member

    ClayTrainor
  2. Flash Flash is offline

    Banned

    Flash
  3. green73 green73 is offline

    Member

    green73
  4. heavenlyboy34 heavenlyboy34 is online now

    Member

    heavenlyboy34
  5. jtstellar jtstellar is offline

    Member

    jtstellar
  6. Travlyr Travlyr is offline

    Anti-Counterfeiter

    Travlyr
  7. Wesker1982 Wesker1982 is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via MSN to Wesker1982
    Wesker1982
Showing Friends 1 to 7 of 7
View Sentient Void's Blog

Recent Entries

has my libertarian card been revoked. has it.

by Sentient Void on 01-24-2014 at 07:09 PM
First, what is 'the NAP' (for those unlikely few of you)?

Quote Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The non-aggression principle (NAP)... is a moral stance which asserts that aggression is inherently illegitimate. NAP and property rights are closely linked, since what aggression is depends on what a person's rights are. Aggression, for the purposes of NAP, is defined as the initiation or threatening of violence against a person or legitimately owned property of another. Specifically, any unsolicited actions of others that

Read More

Updated 01-24-2014 at 07:20 PM by Sentient Void

Categories
Uncategorized

Abortion, rights and libertarianism. How to 'solve' this understandably divisive issue?

by Sentient Void on 08-01-2013 at 05:23 PM
The issue of abortion is one that is constantly brought up and debated about at length within libertarian circles. It is often if not almost always approached as a black and white issue which in my view understandably creates tension and conclusions which cause their own problems. It's time to understand and consider a different approach to this altogether.

There is a common Rothbardian argument with respect to abortion. To the mother (the right and proper owner of her private property,

Read More

Updated 08-01-2013 at 09:42 PM by Sentient Void

Categories
Uncategorized

FACT: The United States actually voted for 'Nobody' in 2012

by Sentient Void on 11-20-2012 at 06:34 PM
FACT: The United States voted 'NOBODY, 2012'

In *2011* the *voting age population* of the USA was 237,657,645. It's obviously even more in 2012.

61,173,739 voted for Obama.
58,167,260 voted for Romney.

That is 119,340,999 out of a total voting age population of 237,657,645.

That means that *more than half* of the population voted for *NOBODY*. Approximately 24.4% of the voting age population voted for Romney. Approximately 25.7%

Read More

Updated 11-20-2012 at 06:47 PM by Sentient Void

Categories
Uncategorized

Just Following Orders.

by Sentient Void on 09-01-2012 at 12:18 AM
When a man claims to be 'just following orders' - he loses a major piece of what makes him a human being. He sheds his humanity because instead of being an individual capable of wisdom, sound moral judgement and/or rational thought, he becomes nothing more than the extension of another man's will. When this happens, he is no longer a thinking man - he becomes simply a tool to be used. Like a machine following a program. Or like a wrench to a nut. The wrench does not think or feel, it is simply used,

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized

How should we Vote if Ron Paul is *NOT* the GOP Nominee???

by Sentient Void on 07-27-2012 at 01:36 AM
We need to have a serious discussion about how we should vote if Ron Paul is not the nominee for the GOP. Between a likely outcome of either Obama or Romney, which is a more preferable outcome, and why?

Before I state who I'd rather have win - give me a second while I change my clothes...

/puts on flame retardant suit

Okay. That's better. Between Romney and Obama, I would rather have Obama win. Now, before I am labeled as a traitor and a hypocrite - hear

Read More

Updated 10-11-2012 at 09:05 PM by Sentient Void

Categories
Uncategorized