Tab Content
  • Lamp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:53 PM
    Lamp replied to a thread What's for dinner? in Open Discussion
    Fried eggs and ketchup is a heresy against fried eggs
    3021 replies | 114991 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:52 PM
    Lamp replied to a thread What's for dinner? in Open Discussion
    3021 replies | 114991 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:51 PM
    They'd more than likely crash just trying the maneuver.
    12 replies | 118 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:48 PM
    Worthless toxic poison. Hope your "son in law" gets back on his feet unscathed.
    17 replies | 200 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    12 replies | 118 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:43 PM
    NAVY ADMITS TO BEING INVOLVED IN OBSCENE SKYDRAWINGS SPOTTED IN OKANOGAN CO. In a statement to KREM 2 News navy officials said, "The Navy holds its aircrew to the highest standards and we find this absolutely unacceptable, of zero training value and we are holding the crew accountable." Author: Kaitlin Riordan , KREM
    12 replies | 118 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:32 PM
    Officer Obie I can understand you want to take my wallet so I don't have any money to spend in jail, but what do you want my belt for? Kid, we don't want any hangins' Obie did you really think I was gonna hang myself for littering? Happy Thanksgiving brother.
    17 replies | 200 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:08 PM
    Not quite. WTI has been stable at $45-55 a bbl. for the last few years, and production has exploded. This is due to new finds in Texas, the Dakotas, Montana and Wyoming. Reductions in regulations and decreased "prohibited areas" will increase that production, and that does not include deepwater offshore which is dead because oil is stuck at that $50 range.
    14 replies | 213 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:02 PM
    BOOM goes the dynamite.
    14 replies | 213 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:00 PM
    And how is the person called supposed to know whether the call was legitimately from the WaPo?
    675 replies | 13421 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:17 PM
    The Migration or Importation Clause states that “The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.” In and of itself, the Clause does not grant Congress any additional authority. To the contrary, it is a limitation on power. However, it could be argued that the limitation on congressional power to prohibit “migration or importation” of persons until 1808 implies that Congress had such a power to begin with. The word “migration” suggests that that power extended to the prohibition of voluntary immigration, as well as the importation of slaves, which the Migration or Importation Clause was intended to protect. But the inclusion of the term “migration” was not meant to imply a general federal power to restrict migration, but was a euphemism intended to bolster the pretense that the Constitution did not endorse slavery. As John Jay – the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers – pointed out in an 1819 letter discussing the Clause: It will, I presume, be admitted that slaves were the persons intended. The word slaves was avoided, probably on account of the existing toleration of slavery and of its discordance with the principles of the Revolution, and from a consciousness of its being repugnant to the following positions in the Declaration of Independence, viz.: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among them are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’” James Madison similarly argued that the Clause was intended to protect the slave trade against limitation prior to 1808, and that its phrasing was due to “scruples against admitting the term ‘slaves’ into the Instrument. Hence the descriptive phrase ‘migration or importation of persons;’ the term migration allowing those who were scrupulous of acknowledging expressly a property in human beings, to view imported persons as a species of emigrants, while others might apply the same term to foreign malefactors sent or coming into the country.” This suggests it is likely that the term “migration” was included only in order to avoid direct reference to slavery, and did not imply any general congressional power to restrict migration. In Federalist 42, Madison decried “ttempts have been made to pervert this clause into an objection against the Constitution, by representing it…as calculated to prevent voluntary and beneficial emigrations from Europe to America.”
    66 replies | 821 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:43 PM
    4512 replies | 222307 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:34 AM
    I'm keeping that one.
    20 replies | 363 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:02 AM
    I'm tired of being one of the lone nuts on the fringe screaming warnings and dire predictions and grim forecasts. I wanna jump on the team and come on in for the big win, just once in my life.
    37 replies | 639 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:19 AM
    Unemployment rate hit record low in 13 states this year BY REID WILSON - 11/17/17 01:25 PM EST 471 Unemployment rate hit record low in 13 states this year © Bureau of Labor Statistics Thirteen states this year have seen their unemployment rates drop to the lowest levels ever recorded since the federal government began keeping track of state-level data more than four decades ago. Eight years after the bottom of the worst recession in modern history, the states seeing economic booms range from the bluest of the blue, like Hawaii and California, to the deepest shades of red, like Idaho and Texas.
    14 replies | 213 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:14 AM
    So, have Romney and McPain and McConnell and Loafers Graham called for his resignation or removal from the Senate?
    103 replies | 1830 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:45 AM
    I was afraid that was why this thread was bumped. At their very best:
    37 replies | 1392 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:13 AM
    Oh yeah true. I thought that this was to prevent child molesters from tracking down children.
    5 replies | 107 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 10:09 PM
    No this is in response to another guy
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 09:22 PM
    1 replies | 96 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 09:17 PM
    Anyone heard of this hip hop group called "Hamilton" I feel like more people should know what this is.
    1 replies | 96 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 07:28 PM
    This wouldn't be a big deal if people had a sense of history and didn't just feel to be unnecessarily reactionary and gravitate towards government social engineering to maintain some sort of cultural hegemony because it makes them feel at home.
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 07:25 PM
    I think India would be largely better off without Christian influence from other countries without intensive screening on India's part but I am generally approving of Nasranis/Syrian Orthodox Christians since they generally refrain from stirring up communal hatred. I'm generally have a fondness for Indian literature like the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, stories in general that I grew up with but I dislike when it goes over into politics.
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
  • Lamp's Avatar
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
More Activity

11 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Thank you! A blessed Christmas to you and your family now and in two weeks!
  2. View Conversation
    The day isn't over yet!
  3. View Conversation
    And a verrry Merry Christmas to thee and thine, dear Old Calenderist!
  4. So... I guess that's a no.
  5. View Conversation
    "Could you please try to understand the opinions you're stooping to name-calling over?" - Nope. An opinion is based on fact. He has no facts. He's just spewing liberal bullshit to stir crap up.

    LIke it or not, SCOTUS never said corporations were people. SCOTUS never said corporations have the same rights that people do. If people are too stupid and / or lazy to actually read what the court said they deserve to be ridiculed and mocked.

    He can have an opinion about whether people in groups lose their rights just because they join a group. But refusing to acknowledge that at no point did the court say the group had rights means he isn't basing his opinion on reality. Therefore he isn't worthy if anything other than ridicule, and is also e too stupid to properly represent the liberty movement.

    Fuck him and his liberal thinking.
  6. View Conversation
    I pleases me to know I'm not the only one
  7. View Conversation
    I completely emptied my inbox and outbox. Please try again
  8. View Conversation
    Damn you!!! I, I demand a conclusion to the groundhog saga!!!
  9. View Conversation
    Hey - regarding your post on tech, I agree in full. Idunno if you know, but I intend to get out of society completely with my wife and going to live on unclaimed or, ideally, gov't-"owned" land and essentially starting our own country with our family.

    I dislike how tech. has been used by society, but I blame society, not tech. and wish society could work with tech, but I don't think it can. This is why I'm leaving society. That solar forge sounds incredibly cool. I plan on loading up with books (e-books, mostly) and going with my wife to live in a cave essentially and we've been going over all sorts of plans to utilize the technology we can afford now to make our lives easier, but I think a lot of the technology used now has made Americans in general fat, boring, and stupid as all fuck.

    I wish technology would be utilized to give us more time to think and allow us to expand our minds. I hope I can help facilitate that and intend to write extensively on our experiment. We have a kid (and more on the way, ideally) on the way, so there will hopefully be a lot to write about. My wife's more the scientist and I'm just a writer and philosopher. I'm so excited to share my experiences and we're just waiting on the birth of our first child.

    -- I'm going way off-topic. Anyway, I just wanted to say I really appreciate your post and hope you'll post more in the future. I had no idea you were so creative and independent. I hope to see more of that, and more of you. I hope you'll share more of your own experiences because I believe in leading through example and I think you're a great speaker for the cause of individualism.

    To your question, I am not at all involved with society atm. I am unemployed except through my political volunteer positions in helping maintain websites. I worked, but I can't anymore knowing what it does -- and I also have a lot of social anxieties which discourage me from working at a "normal" job. Otherwise, we're working on fixing our house up to sell it and eventually want to get out of society completely so we don't have to fund this disgusting government causing the unnecessary deaths of civilians and military personnel.

    I hope to have more to share with you soon and just wanted to you to know how refreshing I found your post today.

    Idunno where you live, but I'd be interested in you and us having a beer together sometime to facilitate an open discussion.

    All the best,

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 11
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About fisharmor

Basic Information

About fisharmor
I am a human living on earth.
Minding my own business.
Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Political Campaign Skills
Computer and Technical:
Programmer, Unix Guru, SQL/Database Expert


There are no crimes against people.
There are only crimes against the state.
And the state will never, ever choose to hold accountable its agents, because a thing can not commit a crime against itself.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
12-24-2016 09:32 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 11:50 AM
Join Date

15 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is offline


  2. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Needs a bigger boat...

    Anti Federalist
  3. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline


  4. Cap Cap is offline


  5. coyote_sprit coyote_sprit is offline


  6. Ender Ender is offline


  7. FortisKID FortisKID is offline


  8. green73 green73 is offline


  9. InTradePro InTradePro is offline


  10. Lamp Lamp is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 15
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast






  • 10:10 PM - Hidden



Page 1 of 42 12311 ... LastLast









Page 1 of 42 12311 ... LastLast