Tab Content
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 07:13 PM
    RNC would do the exact same as the DNC. The RNC committee would select and then vote on a candidate to replace Trump as the nominee. This person could be literally any Republican in America, and it would certainly be someone that the status quo RNC establishmentarians liked.
    18 replies | 261 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 07:10 PM
    If Hillary chose to step down (she won't, but if she did) then it would be up to the DNC so select and vote for a new candidate to nominate. That person could be any Democrat they want. I am pretty confident that the DNC establishment would not select Sanders in that situation.
    18 replies | 261 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:25 PM
    Or maybe it's more to do with the "can't turn away from a trainwreck" effect? :D
    74 replies | 727 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:24 PM
    Oh, I know. Sometimes I just get this near autistic compulsion to set records straight and I am incapable of suppressing it, even when I full well know it's a joke. :p
    74 replies | 727 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:20 PM
    His was first, if it gets merged, this thread will be merged into his.
    74 replies | 727 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 06:17 PM
    These are the RonPaulForums. An Internet community risen up around a vocal and unapologetic anti-authoritarian. If you seriously expected to promote a rabid authoritarian on these forums and not get real, serious, and prolonged pushback, then I don't know what to tell you. I wouldn't walk into a lion house with steaks strapped to my body and then complain about getting mauled. There are a thousand places on the Internet you could glory in Trump and sing to the choir all day and night without a peep of resent or rebellion. Instead, you chose to bring a pro-Trump pro-authoritarian message to a forum full of anarchists and radical libertarians and then you are going to wonder why they brought the truncheons out?
    106 replies | 739 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 05:44 PM
    I don't see anyone from RPF's chasing you down trying to stop you voting for your pet tyrant. The most anyone here has asked is you stop spamming us with your invitations to submit to tyranny. If you really want to be commanded by a dictator, well, that's entirely your prerogative. You can probably scratch that same itch in a much less disruptive fashion elsewhere from the Presidency of the United States, but nobody here has even made one one thousandth of an effort to convince you not to vote for Trump. You do you, brother. We'll just sit back and laugh a bit.
    106 replies | 739 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 05:34 PM
    I have no affiliation with that data, I was simply showing you where it was lifted from.
    106 replies | 739 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:54 PM
    I hear an F35 with clusterbombs make for excellent crowd control.
    74 replies | 727 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:53 PM
    https://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/08/did-trump-cuck-on-immigration.html?showComment=1472140668501#c7769250334040150479
    106 replies | 739 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:47 PM
    I do not consider SCOTUS to be any kind of authority on constitutionality. The Constitution does not grant them the authority to decide what is and is not constitutional, that's just something they randomly started doing and at the time nobody called them out on it. By the time someone figured out what they were really doing it had become the status quo. Mostly the justices are just a bunch of self absorbed childish lunatics trying to push their own brand of political authoritarianism.
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:42 PM
    I think I'd prefer microrobotic surgery over macro-invasive surgery, regardless of what the robot looks like. I may personally choose to wait until the miniaturization is improved beyond current, but 99% you will have an actual surgeon controlling every movement, and I can only imagine this would be an order of magnitude less invasive and damaging.
    2 replies | 80 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:28 PM
    Looks to me like Coulter just spun through denial, anger, bargaining, depression and then acceptance in rapid succession. I wouldn't consider that "totally ok," but then I don't have a dog in this fight so my perspective may be a bit less invested than yours.
    106 replies | 739 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 04:22 PM
    It's astonishing. The sheer disconnect from reality being displayed here is mind-blowing, and yet they are acting as if we are the nutters. If I'm honest, I am in awe of the effect this guy has on their minds. If we could figure out how to lock an entire electorate into a meticulously constructed fantasy world this effectively, we might have elected Ron Paul in 2008. I mean, you'd have commies voting for Paul because they thought he was a commie, you have nazis voting for Paul because they thought he was a nazi, you'd have greens voting for Paul because they thought he was a green, you'd have republicans voting for Paul because they thought he was a republican, you'd have democrats voting for Paul because they thought he was a democrat.... Only reason I'm not very eager to distill down whatever it is and use it myself is I half suspect that you have to sell your soul to the devil to obtain such power.
    106 replies | 739 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:58 PM
    When it comes to non-federal property, the vast majority of the States themselves also have an Eminent Domain clause in their respective Constitutions which they exercise. Some of these states have it written so that ED is a lot more tightly controlled than fedgovs, and some are written a lot more poorly so they can get away with more than fedgov. As to where fedgov is allowed to apply ED, this should naturally align with the delineation of federal properties listed in the Constitution, Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17, To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And And it is perhaps possible to connect the federal doctrine of Eminent Domain to the enabling of
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:37 PM
    Most of those fatalities are car accidents and heart attacks from unhealthy living. Actual deliberate homicides of police officers probably average less than 10-20 a year, vs ~500 for citizens killed by the police. So the ratio is between 25 to 1 and 50 to 1. In the actual military, if we are killing the enemy at a rate of more than 25 to 1 and still having problems, we do not consider this issue to be a lack of equipment, but rather an effect of improper tactics or strategy. The heavily imbalanced kill ratio largely indicates that we have all the destructive power we need in our equipment, but something in our tactics or strategy is motivating the enemy to continue fighting despite their obscene losses. There are exceptions to every rule, of course. The Japanese in WW2 took such losses without surrender, not due to our tactics, but due to their training. That's not a condition that can be applied to random people on the streets of the US. The people being killed here are not trained at all.
    74 replies | 727 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:28 PM
    C'mon Drake, it's time to get your hood back out of the dry cleaners for the next klan rally. ;) :p lol
    70 replies | 552 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:18 PM
    He said explicitly that IF it ends up being federal THEN he would require them. #1 - the Constitution does not allow the issue to be federalized. There is no "if" about it. "If" it ends up federal, then he needs to reject the idea that fedgov has the authority, not enforce vaccines at gunpoint. #2 - the fedgov is already claiming the authority via handouts to require school districts to require vaccinations, so despite it's desperate unconstitutionality, the issue has ALREADY been federalized. #3 - even IF the issue were federalized, the Constitution still does not delegate authority to Washington to even have an opinion on the matter, much less the power to make them mandatory, as Johnson suggests, "science" or otherwise.
    215 replies | 3120 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:11 PM
    Well. This is just about the dumbest thing I've ever read. An elected person represents ALL of their constituents, not just the ones that gave him money or votes. This kind of partisan crap is a big reason why America is dying, and reinforcing such partisan crap will only accelerate the murder of this nation.
    70 replies | 552 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:08 PM
    I, for one, have not supported Johnson in any way shape or form since middle 2011. He was out of my realm of possibilities long before any of this.
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 03:03 PM
    So only a candidate's supporters are allowed to question his policies now?
    70 replies | 552 view(s)
  • ronpaulhawaii's Avatar
    Today, 02:57 PM
    He said he would approach it with skepticism, and has a record of using his veto power when he finds things he doesn't like. He, also, hasn't read it so would be kinda hard for him to comment on its contents... ISTM - The worst people can say at this point is that he is keeping an open mind on the issue. It'll be a strange world where reserving final judgment til all the evidence is in can be considered a bad thing...
    9 replies | 239 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:57 PM
    Even GOD said it was a horrible idea, but go ahead and do it anyway.
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:49 PM
    I believe that Hillary will probably be permanently hospitalized with some neurological disease (maybe Parkinson's?) within 3 years. So I do not believe she is guaranteed 8 years in office. She will probably be dead in 5 to 6 years.
    95 replies | 1146 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:47 PM
    A potted plant may be more libertarian than Johnson/Weld. If you read what I have written, I have in the last hour stated multiple times - in this very thread (including a chart!!) that Goldwater is not a libertarian, and yet, he is more "libertarian" than a lot of the members of these forums.
    502 replies | 22907 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:44 PM
    I don't think it's that cut and dried. If we continue to abandon the Constitution we will end up with no property rights at all regardless of the motivation behind such abandonment. So while on the face of it the rejection of ED may appear to be more property-friendly than Castle's recognition of it's Constitutionality, the long term effects of further abandoning the Constitution will do more damage to property rights than Castle's correct assessment of ED ever will. So while for the short term (instant gratification) Johnson's position looks more property friendly, it ends up long term that Castle's position does 100-fold more to actually protect property by upholding the actual Constitution.
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:39 PM
    You are still spinning. You don't have to think something is a good idea to vote for, to vote for it. You can think something is a horrible idea and still vote for it. You can think it is a horrible idea to vote for something and still vote for it. The prophet/judge Samuel thought it was a horrible idea to anoint a King over Israel and he still did it. The fact that he did it did not reflect his thinking that ANY of it was a 'good' idea.
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:37 PM
    I have never considered BG a libertarian. I do not even consider myself a libertarian. What relevance does the social conservative Ted Cruz have to any of this?
    502 replies | 22907 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    Today, 02:31 PM
    That's one of the areas where I think if we actually followed the principles of the Constitution it would not be as big a deal as it is now. Eminent Domain I think is horrible mostly because it's being abused not obeyed. Fundamentally and philosophically, I'm not a fan of the doctrine because at heart it allows a government to seize private property without permission, which thing is horrible on it's face...but at the same time I think the actual non-abusive use of Eminent Domain while extremely rare, is probably a lot less infringing than what we have come to know as the 'ordinary' abuse of Eminent Domain today. I'm not a fan of the doctrine, but yet I think if the actual principles were upheld it wouldn't be 1/10 as tyrannical as it is today. So basically I think 90% of the problem with Eminent Domain just goes away if we could figure out how to prevent it's abuse. That doesn't mean it's NOT a problem, of course, just that it's only 1/10 of the problem it looks like today, because 90% of Eminent Domain use today is abusive.
    65 replies | 593 view(s)
More Activity

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Please help! I'm counting on RPF! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=251175
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About jacque

Basic Information

About jacque
Biography:
Vance County C4L Coordinator, Glen Bradley Treasurer, Vance County GOP Chairman
Occupation:
Accountant

Signature


Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,253
Posts Per Day
0.40
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
07-02-2010 06:53 PM
General Information
Last Activity
11-03-2014 07:20 PM
Join Date
01-30-2008
Referrals
0
Home Page
http://glenbradley.net/

5 Friends

  1. GunnyFreedom GunnyFreedom is offline

    Agent of Freedom

    GunnyFreedom
  2. JordonMGreene JordonMGreene is offline

    Member

    JordonMGreene
  3. ronpaulhawaii ronpaulhawaii is offline

    Moderator

    ronpaulhawaii
  4. Southron Southron is offline

    Member

    Southron
  5. TCE TCE is offline

    Member

    TCE
Showing Friends 1 to 5 of 5
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...