nobody's_hero
Member

I think it has more to do with men (even liberal men) wanting women who aren't incredibly flighty. Having kids is one thing but man first we gotta talk about finding a woman you'd actually commit to starting a family with. Conservative women are in the minority, which means you'll have to retrain a liberal which is going to be rather mind-numbing at times assuming you (both) can stick with it. If she already has kids of her own you can forget the family thing, because marriage is likely to disqualify her from collecting her baby mama money. Too easy for her to ditch out and go on welfare at the slightest hint of "for worse". It's better to not have kids at all IMO than to recklessly procreate with no intention of seeing it through. EDIT: Posted before watching the video and I'm not surprised that he nailed the same point. "Western white women are undatable."

I wish there was reliable polling within the GOP on who got vaxxed between Trump supporters and the never-Trumpers. All I have is anecdotal, but based on the one's I've met at rallies (to be fair, I only went to 2), it's typically the Trump people who didn't get vaxxed. At the very least, they feel like it should be a choice. Now among rank-and-file Republicans who tow the party establishment lines, I suspect the vaccination rates are much higher, with or without the good-cop/bad-cop theory. So even if Trump did try to promote the vaccine, I doubt the effectiveness of his influence on his followers. But again, no one has really studied that.

Still it perplexes me: If he was playing along with the scheme, it didn't make much sense to cheat him out of a 2nd term. Then again the MIC probably had a bigger role in that than pharma (though they probably overlap). Jimmy Dore's had a few episodes out with evidence that Trump's instincts seemed to go against the people who advised him on the vaccine. If people want to argue that he shouldn't have caved, I'll buy that, and if you could find me a candidate who is running who wouldn't, I'll vote for that. (any word on Rand? He's pretty good at body slamming Fauci in hearings, but is he gonna try for an office where he has some authority to do something besides ask questions and embarrass these crooks?)

Hate to break any hearts but it is probably gonna be the same (or very similar) situation here in Georgia. You have a case being held in the most corrupt county in the state which the rest of the state, much less the rest of the country, doesn't care about. Apparently the head of the jury is some witch or other clownery. If the libs are smart they'll just let that case die quietly.

Meh, Canada wouldn't be my first choice, lol.

3:58 I've been trying to figure that out for 6 years, Ron.

Hopefully NY secedes over this. I share the outrage. Now, where is the suitcase? Did New York pack enough socks? Don't forget your toothbrush!

Troll level 1,000+

They'll release a headline and then on page six the next week they'll put a correction (if at all, usually not) in fine print. By then the damage is done.

I kinda agree though? TPTB would love an opportunity to re-do Jan 6th since it's becoming revealed that they blew it the first time. I'm starting to wonder if it isn't better to just let the dems keep throwing themselves against the wall. The MSM still has a bit way too much credibility (still the #1 threat to our freedom, IMO). I wouldn't protest this. I'd let the dems make fools of themselves (again) with another witch hunt, and then ask if people are ready to stop believing the news. (they won't be, but I doubt a protest would convince them otherwise anyway, protests are really only good for letting you know that you aren't alone (which is nice in itself, don't get me wrong), but it's pretty rare that they cause any real changes) You know what, I take it back. I don't agree with the premise that they want people to 'sit down and shut up'. I think they want to spark something so they can 'put the rabid dog down.' They need a Reichstag fire.

In my best TheTexan impersonation: He will be elected president again though, just to be clear on that.

I would say at the very least Tucker understands blowback with regard to foreign policy, which is probably more palatable than 'jet fuel can't melt steel'. You'll never get most people to agree that 9/11 was an inside job but you might at this point get many to agree that our government tends to swat at hornet nests until someone gets stung. (which is precisely what they're doing in Ukraine atm)

Well, we've made progress. Even theCount admits Trump is the president.

This goes here:

I mean it's still pretty evident that Fox has no qualms about quickly calling elections in favor of liberals. That probably pisses off Fox viewers more than anything else. And it's most likely because they would rather side with the leftist establishment, if it can in any way help preserve what's left of the right's establishment. Pick any issue of substance and Fox will fail you when it matters most. What's funny is that the leftists can't (or won't) differentiate between Tucker and the water-carrying neocons on Fox. They also intend to preserve the establishment if it means crushing alternative viewpoints (whether sincere or not). (which is why I wish the democrats wouldn't even comment on what goes on in the right, because basically their interference in the debate amounts to nothing more than "noise". Like, 'fk off, NPCs; trying to have an adult conversation here. Go play in the street or something.')

Saw it tagged on Greenwald's twitter feed. Greenwald seems to think it's sincere.

My mother has an account with Truist. I've been trying to get her to close her accounts and join a credit union for ages. When their predecessor Suntrust got a bailout in the '08 fiasco, that was when I joined a credit union. I told the associate at Suntrust (not that she had anything to do with it) that if they could get a bailout, then they obviously didn't need my deposits.

Well it wasn't Biden or Obama.

Thought this was kinda interesting today, while scrolling through GG's twitter feed: 1636473094830190593

I wonder who helped change it?

That's pretty awesome to watch I must admit. Here we are marking targets for Ukraine with our drones, and Russia is coming up with creative ways to try to take our drone down without using weapons. IMO Putin has shown incredible restraint in the face of NATO's antics. If he wanted to expand this war he's had numerous opportunities to do so.

Let's gooooooo! 1636010504719155200

I think you can edit your own titles if you click 'go advanced' when editing.

Might be about to find out the difference between two administrations handling the same situation here:

Pretty sure if you invest in whatever Pelosi is investing in, it won't fail. Just make sure you take the money out whenever she does also. It's like she has some sort of savvy crystal ball about what's gonna happen in the future. It's like the woman is some investment wizard or something, lol. /s

I saw that one and burst out laughing.

I think it's both. Sounds like they were kinda reckless with new-age get-rich-(and broke)-quick schemes like crypto but perhaps thought the bonds would give them flexibility. But somehow they had $15 billion in unrealized losses floating around.

Continued at link: https://mises.org/power-market/id-buy-dollar

Good 'ol Massie. Look at the 7 million views. 1635074378454147074