• Theocrat's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:29 AM
    "Oh, but Trump is against the TPP." :rolleyes:
    21 replies | 420 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-25-2016, 11:25 AM
    Pretty stupid way to go about handling liability, by making it so no one can help without obtaining a license to help in a disaster that might happen once every 5 years. I blame lawyers and politicians, and especially those who are both. People find liability in everything these days. Hell, I'll probably get sued for what I just said. I might even get sued because I said I might get sued. Let me just stop here. Wait, what if I get sued for stopping?
    13 replies | 415 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-24-2016, 06:15 AM
    This is definitely a "must-see" video for everyone:
    7 replies | 226 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-23-2016, 08:47 AM
    It's the same reasoning used to justify voting for the lesser of two evils. We hear it over and over during every Presidential election cycle. Donald Trump is evil, just as Hillary Clinton is evil. Nothing is going to change with either of them in the Oval Office, and even Dr. Ron Paul recognizes that.
    123 replies | 2312 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-22-2016, 08:23 AM
    Like phill4paul, I'm anti-Trump, too, but if Trump loses and we end up with Hillary as our next gun-grabbing President, then it will be the fault of the Republican Party and Republican voters who continue to tolerate, endorse, support, and vote for unprincipled, big-government candidates just so we don't end up with a stinking Democrat in the Oval Office. The GOP should have promoted Sen. Rand Paul when it had the chance because he would do far better against Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump can. And, of course, Sen. Paul has a much better record on gun rights than Donald Trump has.
    66 replies | 1311 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-21-2016, 06:28 AM
    Danke, I heard you got fired from a calendar factory for taking a day off.
    217 replies | 4581 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-21-2016, 06:14 AM
    I was writing down a joke with my pencil, when, suddenly, the tip broke. Then I realized there was no point to it.
    217 replies | 4581 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-20-2016, 08:10 AM
    Not sure. Democrats are socialists but American socialists have figured out that you have to have private industry between you and the voters to deflect the blame. We go to single payer and that damn system fails, there's no Aetna to point to and say, "Oooh, evil evil private rich people did this." There's no one to blame between politicians and voters in single-payer. They will put bandaids on the current system for as long as possible.
    14 replies | 537 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-19-2016, 07:46 AM
    Well, if Trump loses, then blame the Republican Party for it. For years in these Presidential races, the leaders of the party (with the help of the mainstream media) have shunned, isolated, humiliated, lied, ignored, and ridiculed principled, moral candidates like Dr. Ron Paul and Sen. Rand Paul. Then when those candidates finally drop out of the race (to the GOP's delight), then conservatives are left with establishment-friendly, unprincipled, flip-flopping, egotistical, power-hungry candidates that are used to vote against the excrement that comes out of the donkey's ass on the Democratic side, always with the reasoning that if we don't vote for the Republican candidate, then a Democratic victory will spell the doom for us all. Thus, we always get enticed to vote for the lesser of two evils. So, you know what? If Trump loses, then we all deserve the consequences of it, especially the Republican Party. Don't expect me to vote for the Republican when the Republican Party does all it can to rid itself of statesmen who rightly deserve the title as "President of the United States," like Drs. Ron and Rand Paul, and then uses scare tactics to try to force the public that a Republican douchebag is now better than the Democratic douchebag. Enjoy your chains. You wear them well.
    35 replies | 707 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-17-2016, 06:38 AM
    Oh come on. People judge you based on how you behave, how you dress, how you interact with others. It doesn't have to be between cops and citizens. This is pretty much a fact of life regardless of who you cross paths with. Say, if this Smith kid had come in for a job interview with saggy pants, cap turned sideways, fake gold teeth, giving everyone that punk-*ss 'I'm cool' gangsta smirk, I'm not hiring the guy. It doesn't exactly inspire the best of impressions. Maybe you would, because somehow you can manage to see past all that and find the upstanding citizen on the inside, but I'd be willing to bet MOST of us would not be calling him back with an offer. It's not like we're witnessing the proud Blacks of the 60's dressing up in their Sunday best suits and singing hymns. The guy had a damned selfie gangsta-posing with a handgun pointed at the camera posted on social media. ^ This gives me the impression that the people in the photo have a sense of self-worth and respect.
    97 replies | 2478 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    0 replies | 259 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-17-2016, 04:26 AM
    By the same logic, I would ask Alicia Dearn why she supports the "emotional harm" inflicted upon Christian bakers from homosexuals, demanding them to provide a good (a gay wedding cake) towards an event which those Christians cannot support in good conscience because of their Biblical convictions.
    16 replies | 413 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-17-2016, 04:12 AM
    Yeah, that's all well and good, except for the fact that Trump also believes we should "bomb the shit" out of certain countries and take their oil.
    35 replies | 623 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-16-2016, 07:02 AM
    And we know they left the Koreans alone, because they stood guard on their business rooftops with shotguns and pistols ready to filter the gene pool.
    97 replies | 2478 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-16-2016, 12:44 AM
    Your statement above proves again what I mean by your being blinded of Trump's tyrannical nature because of your pragmatism. There is no "overall usefulness" to Trump's candidacy to the "liberty movement" because Trump does not stand for liberty. Just because the establishment types in both parties don't like Trump does not make him pro-liberty. In fact, the leader of the "liberty movement," Dr. Ron Paul, has even mentioned several times that Trump is just as much of an authoritarian as the establishment folks who are against him. But the fact that you can overlook Trump's obvious carelessness towards principles like the right to private property for the sake of his "overall usefulness to the movement" really demonstrates that you're not seeking to advance "the movement" at all. That's what we critics of Trump and his supporters (including Dr. Ron Paul) keep trying to tell you; your pragmatism does not protect the very things (like respect for private property) that you believe it does. In fact, it undermines those principles, and stifles what the "liberty movement" is all about.
    104 replies | 1604 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-15-2016, 08:53 PM
    Any man who has a history of using the government to take away private property for his own commercial interests, as well as supporting foreign invasions just so we can take a country's national resources is a tyrant. If you can't see that, then you're simply blinded by your pragmatism.
    104 replies | 1604 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-15-2016, 09:28 AM
    He's already been caught and arrested. $15,000 reward for info leading to the arrest was offered and Telfair county ain't exactly the richest county in the poor state of Georgia. Maybe someone collected. http://www.macon.com/news/local/crime/article95695947.html
    2 replies | 190 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-15-2016, 09:20 AM
    Still makes more sense for me to stay where I'm at. There's a reason I come to RPF for information on what's going on in the world, instead of going somewhere like Daily Kos or HuffPo. That reason is simply that more people I encounter here have similar ideals and values to me, than I would find on some crap liberal blog. Nations, cultures, laws, traditions—they kind of work like websites. Don't like what you find? Don't go there. It's really that easy. But there are those who think themselves justified by plopping themselves down on someone else's turf and demand everything be done their way, and that's where common sense goes out the window in exchange for egotistical self-righteousness, which tends to piss off more people than it wins over. It's no surprise the French respond with these kinds of laws, and the more people whine and cry about it than try to assimilate into French culture, the more resentful the hosts become.
    18 replies | 347 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-15-2016, 08:58 AM
    I mean, we can have a discussion about liberty, and liberty will always win on those terms, but we should expect some degree of common sense to be exercised. Don't move to a country that hates you and then be surprised when they hate you. There's a reason I haven't packed my shit up and moved to KilltheInfidelistan.
    18 replies | 347 view(s)
  • nobody's_hero's Avatar
    08-15-2016, 08:39 AM
    Yeah this is gonna win over a lot of hearts and minds.
    17 replies | 356 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-14-2016, 04:53 AM
    Take the quiz at ISideWith.com, and post your results. Here are mine:
    16 replies | 290 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-14-2016, 04:20 AM
    Yes, it's almost like they're afraid to admit that someone can be both physically and emotionally attracted to little boys and little girls, which, if they did concede, it would open the door to the acceptance of pedophilia, too.
    28 replies | 646 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 07:32 PM
    The misusage of Jeremiah 31 is a common error of Dispensationalism, used to show some sort of disparity between the nature of the Old Covenant and the New Covenant. However, the writer of Hebrews uses Jeremiah 31 to prove his case in Hebrews 8 that what makes the two covenants different is that there is a new priesthood, which is founded in Christ, after the order of Melchizedek. Thus, what makes the New Covenant different from the Old Covenant has nothing to do with the former being internalized versus the latter being externalized. In fact, in the Old Covenant, there were saints who already had the law "written in their hearts," like King David. Psalm 40:8 says, "I delight to do Thy will, O my God; yea, Thy law is within my heart." We even see God calling upon Old Covenant Christians who had God's law in their hearts, stating, "Hearken unto Me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is My law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings." So, you're totally wrong that the Old Covenant people are different from the New Covenant people because of some internalization of spiritual life in the people of the former. Both covenants had people with the law written in their hearts and minds. The difference is that under the Old Covenant, there was a separate priesthood (Levites) who had the laws of God and whose job was to explain the law to the people of God. In the New Covenant, there is no longer that kind of priesthood because Christ, being the Word, now imparts His word to all covenant people, without the need of a tribal priesthood, and especially, without daily and yearly sacrifices to atone for sins. So, once again, there is no difference between Old Covenant Christians and New Covenant Christians. They are both in the Father, through Christ, and in the power of the Holy Spirit. The same laws in the Old Testament can be applied to New Testament Christians, through Christ, because Christ is the One Who not only nailed the Law to cross when He died, but resurrected the Law in His resurrection and ascension. But it takes wisdom.
    390 replies | 5804 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 03:14 AM
    It bears repeating that just because a person appears to be "antiestablishment," it doesn't mean that that person is also "pro-liberty." In my opinion, Trump is not antiestablishment; he just wants to create another kind of establishment. He's also at war...with himself: And, the most antiestablishment statesman to ever sit in a seat of Congress has exposed Trump for who is really is--an authoritarian:
    38 replies | 629 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-13-2016, 02:48 AM
    Explain to me, again, how drugs are extremely damaging to society.
    247 replies | 3602 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 10:26 PM
    I can't look at that without wondering how the transgender priests differentiate between "masculinity" and "femininity." If they want to create a dichotomy between "sex" and "gender," then what makes a male "male," and a female "female," apart from biology?
    28 replies | 646 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 10:03 PM
    That's true, but for many parents, it has been difficult for them to see the "golden calves" which the public schools have made their kids worship at...until now.
    28 replies | 646 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    08-12-2016, 09:24 PM
    By: Matt Walsh Click here to read his post on The Blaze.
    28 replies | 646 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    20 replies | 590 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Don't give up!!! The revolution starts with education even in the face of denial. Facts will prevail.
  2. check back
  3. View Conversation
    Nice profile pic!
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About nobody's_hero

Basic Information

Signature


If something bad happens, we will be blamed. If something good happens, we will get no credit. If nothing happens, we will be forgotten.

The Principles that Govern Social Interaction

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
7,506
Posts Per Day
2.39
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
07-07-2011 07:49 PM
General Information
Last Activity
08-25-2016 11:33 AM
Join Date
01-23-2008
Referrals
0

5 Friends

  1. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline

    Member

    CaptainAmerica
  2. georgiapeach georgiapeach is offline

    Member

    georgiapeach
  3. HarrySeaward HarrySeaward is offline

    Member

    HarrySeaward
  4. RCA RCA is offline

    Member

    RCA
  5. Theocrat Theocrat is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Theocrat
    Theocrat
Showing Friends 1 to 5 of 5
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

08-18-2016


08-15-2016


08-01-2016


07-30-2016


07-25-2016


07-23-2016


07-05-2016


07-02-2016


06-29-2016


06-25-2016


06-24-2016


05-26-2016


05-25-2016



Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast