• dannno's Avatar
    Today, 03:27 PM
    Wow looks like The Collins is in the first video. (5:04)
    2 replies | 75 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Today, 02:04 PM
    I don't think you understand quite how this works... :D
    38 replies | 495 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:26 PM
    That, and federal discrimination laws force employers to use degree requirements instead of intelligence tests. Damn hippie liberals made a simple IQ/aptitude test (or very rough equivalent thereof) cost 5-6 figures and 4 years you'll never get back. :p
    15 replies | 218 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:49 PM
    McMaster has tried to start like 5 wars...
    8 replies | 173 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    22 replies | 655 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:56 PM
    +rep Last I heard, the MCCD *wants* to get 4 year programs (particularly at Phoenix College), but hasn't quite yet. Know what sucks about transferring credits? If you do it at ASU, they severely limit the amount you can transfer in your major(general requirements they're cool about) so you have to spend a ton on coursework and materials that just isn't worth what it costs. :p
    15 replies | 218 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:39 PM
    Community colleges only offer 2 year degrees. (unless you have some exceptional ones in your area I've never heard of) 2 year degrees are good for a number of things, but not everything. It's common for design firms to require a BA nowadays for example, even though you don't actually need to get one to develop the skills for the job. Easy way to narrow down the field of applicants, but often shuts out good people. #doubleedgedsword
    15 replies | 218 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:48 PM
    Most of these are businesses and growers who were in the medicinal industry which was working relatively well and have now been placed under the umbrella of all these new regulations, most of which weren't even in the legalization bill that was voted on.
    3 replies | 143 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:16 PM
    Who could have predicted this :confused:
    3 replies | 143 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:13 PM
    797 replies | 26012 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:27 AM
    Right, it's in the blockchain, I think part B in the NYT diagram.
    797 replies | 26012 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:21 AM
    I made a typo and sent 'em to the wrong wallet address
    797 replies | 26012 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 08:44 PM
    Yes, we plan to scam the government by providing alternative currencies to the marketplace so that the people can have the option of casting away government currencies.
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 08:35 PM
    Ya, tens of thousands of lives have already been saved, my evil master plan is unfolding quite nicely.
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 08:28 PM
    Bitcoin may be more real than aliens in our galaxy, lol.. But there is also FLDC Folding Coin Folding@Home from Stanford University, they are using the computing power to solve complex protein sequencing to help discover cures for cancer and other diseases while simultaneously maintaining the blockchain. I bought like $40 worth a few years ago, a month ago it was worth $20k lol..thanks presence
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • heavenlyboy34's Avatar
    6 replies | 250 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 07:45 PM
    A lot. Some people's lives have depended on it, others not so much, just using it as a rebellious act against the system.. some using it to by drugs, etc.
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 06:57 PM
    There is no need to convert bitcoin to FRNs, unless you want to. You can trade bitcoin directly for goods and services including gold and silver. That is the goal. However, retailers who accept bitcoin generally make rent payments and such in FRNs, so they would need to convert at least some of their BTC to FRNs to cover costs and such.
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 06:56 PM
    Data on computers can be easily copied, thus if you created a digital currency without protections in place you would have a major problem with counterfeiting. The miners help validate the blockchain to ensure that there is no double spending by the people with the coins, so you couldn't say transact $200 to two people at the same time, they think they have your money but it turns out it was just a copy. So you could have a centralized computer like at the bank that keeps track and ensures there is no double spending, but then they control the servers and can erase your funds... So what Satoshi did was create an open source, decentralized ledger that is maintained and verified by thousands of computers all over the world that help track each transaction and ensure there is no fraud. That is essentially what the miners do, by solving these cryptographic puzzles. They get paid in bitcoin, which causes a known, fixed, small amount of inflation. But they can also get paid miner fees that come from transaction fees, as the amount of bitcoin rewarded for solving a block halves every now and then, eventually approaching zero.
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 05:48 PM
    Highly efficient psychopaths.
    78 replies | 1003 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 05:30 PM
    Of course I do, read what I said again carefully, you misunderstood as there is an either/or here, and then read the next sentence: My point was that a guy who is deceiving a girl into a one night stand is going to look the same as a guy who is convincing a girl to begin a long lasting relationship. If they didn't, then the guy who is having a one night stand would not likely be successful. So no, a romantic relationship would not likely begin with deception, it would begin with a man who are more genuine.. but it's not the PUA who is teaching their clientele to be deceptive or genuine, just how to start things off and get things going. PUAs do not generally train their clientele for either track, that is for the client to decide if they want to have a long term relationship or a one night stand. The reason they are paying is to get to the point where they can make the decision themselves rather than just being alone.
    175 replies | 1879 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 04:10 PM
    In the beginning they used graphics cards to solve cryptographic puzzles (essentially guessing a string from a hash, a hash being a portion of the string). They call that hashing. The miner who guesses the correct string gets rewarded bitcoin. Most small miners combine into mining pools so they (the entire pool) has a chance to guess correctly and split the reward accordingly. Mining is what helps verify the transactions on the blockchain (the blockchain is a ledger of all the transactions) so that wallets can read the blockchain and recognize the value that they have in them. Then you can push a transaction onto the blockchain and have it verified by the miners and add to the blockchain. Back then the mining difficulty was low, and you got a lot of bitcoins easily mining on your graphics card. Once more miners came in as the value of bitcoin rose the difficulty increased and eventually they invented specialized processors called ASIC chips and mining bitcoin with a graphics card became obsolete.
    25 replies | 239 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 03:54 PM
    I think what you are doing is separating two things that are integral to each other. Hear me out here cuz I know off the bat you will disagree with this - but attracting a woman for sex vs. a relationship is pretty much the same thing because sex is an integral part of a longterm relationship. Otherwise you are really just friends, and the longer you are friends with a woman rather than romantic partners the more likely it is going to stay that way. A lot of guys who seek advice from PUAs have had many girl friends who have friendzoned them and they are trying to figure out how to take their relationships with women to the physical level SO that they can have a longterm ROMANTIC relationship with them. Sometimes hookups result in one night stands, and sometimes they result in longterm relationships. There is nothing inherently different in the beginning of the process, even if sex is postponed for some length of time due to religious beliefs or otherwise. If there was a difference, girls would pick up on it and avoid the guys who are just manipulating them to have sex, but they don't. That's the whole point of PUA, is to EITHER convince a woman you want a romantic relationship or deceive her. Both of these look the same from the outside and both can be taught by the same practitioner, what changes is what happens after the sex happens and the woman at that point may find out what the man's true intentions were. The other issue is that you never know if the guy who has sex with 20 women is not looking for a relationship at all, or if the women just give away sex to him like crazy so of course he will take it, and then he is just being really picky about who he has longterm relationships with. So it's important not to put guys in the category of "just wanting sex" or "just wanting relationships". I get asked that all the time, I have NEVER in my entire life, EVER been looking for JUST sex OR JUST relationships. It is true that some guys are looking for just one or another, but hard to judge by appearances (and definitely cannot judge them by what they say they are after). It is often said that women are the gatekeepers for sex, and men for relationships. In other words, the woman decides if the guy gets to have sex, and the guy decides if their interactions will develop into a relationship. It's not always the case, but it's a good model to go off of for our purposes, as I get to your next issue:
    175 replies | 1879 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 02:18 PM
    Maybe not, but it does have us all sitting here clicking the refresh button on the thread every 5 seconds.
    175 replies | 1879 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 02:02 PM
    His comment has nothing to do with anything I said. Men who are trying to have romantic relations with women struggle because they cannot attract them, so they go to men who can attract women physically, even if those men in their own practice are only attracting women for a one night stand. Attracting women physically is a major component that is necessary for a longterm relationship OR for a one night stand, there is not much difference between the two if any. I highly recommend NOT watching videos that Jules posts, they are usually really silly extreme examples of things taken out of context narrated by somebody with a really bad fake accent.
    175 replies | 1879 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 01:57 PM
    South Park - Season 14, Episode 14 - Creme Fraiche
    175 replies | 1879 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 01:34 PM
    That isn't where my statement ended.
    28 replies | 265 view(s)
  • dannno's Avatar
    02-16-2018, 01:30 PM
    I don't follow any currently, but of the dozens I have seen over the last decade or so have ALL been dating coaches. MGTOW didn't even exist a decade ago, but there were plenty of PUA dating coaches helping guys who couldn't get laid find women for whatever, in most cases, they wanted a relationship. What you don't seem to realize is that when men meet women, whether it is for sex only or a relationship, the same dynamic plays out. Why? Because whether a man is trying to have a one night stand or start a relationship, he must attract a woman physically. So a man trying to have a relationship with a woman is also trying to have sex with her, otherwise he is likely just going to be friend zoned. That is why men who have a difficult time with this go to men who are extremely proficient at it. The first part is essentially the same. The difference is you might stay after sex, you might cuddle, talk to them the next day, ask them on another date if you are into the relationship. Everything before that is not going to change much.
    175 replies | 1879 view(s)
More Activity

8 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    A Liberty candidate needs your help!

    Donate today to Thomas Massie with $20.12 or something bigger! http://www.thomasmassie.com/

    For Liberty!
  2. View Conversation
    Beautiful, congratulations, etc, etc. Enjoy! Enjoy! But also take great care.

    I speak as a Parent in urging you to reconsider the wisdom of posting a PHOTO OF YOUR CHILD on the internet.

  3. View Conversation
    TACO SOUP (Paula Deen As Messed With by Ruthie)


    Chopped Green Onions
    Grated Cheese
    Sour Cream
    Corn Chips or Nacho Chips or a Nice Crusty Bread

    1 1-ounce package ranch salad dressing mix
    1 1-1/4-ounce package taco seasoning mix
    1/2 cup green olives, sliced (optional)
    1 small can black olives, drained and sliced (optional)
    2 4-1/2 -ounce cans diced green chilies
    1 14-1/2-ounce can tomatoes with chilies
    1 14-1/2-ounce can diced tomatoes
    1 14-1/2-ounce can mexican tomatoes
    1 15-1/4-ounce can whole kernel corn, drained
    2 15-1/2-ounce cans pink kidney beans
    2 15-1/2 ounce cans pinto beans
    2 cups diced onions
    2 lbs ground beef


    Brown the ground beef and onions in a large skillet; drain the excess fat, then transfer the browned beef and onions to a large crockpot or soup pot. Add the beans, corn, green onions, tomatoes, chilies, olives and seasonings, mix together well, and cook on low setting all day (6 to 8 hours) if using a crockpot, or simmer over low heat about one hour in a soup or stockpot on the stove.

    Serve with corn or nacho chips. Top with sour cream, cheese, jalapenos, or whatever you like.

    Ruthie's Note: I only do a little salt and pepper on the meat while browning it, as the seasoning packages in this recipe really do a good job for seasoning the whole thing.

    I cut up the two kinds of olives and serve on the side for people to put on top if they want them; the olives are kind of strong if cooked in the soup.

    I found this recipe needed a bit more liquid, if cooking on stove top, so added one can of beef broth. I don't like it when my soup or chili burns on bottom of pan so always make sure there is enough liquid in the pot to prevent that.

    I also serve the green onions chopped as something you can add as a topping. Cooking them in the soup they get way overcooked.

    I let the soup cook longer than an hour on low, with an occasional bumping up of heat. Sometimes I cook it for 3 hours on low. Just keep an eye on the soup and stir it every now and then. I love to double this recipe and make a huge pot in the winter time.

    You can use any kind of bean you like. I use chili beans, pintos, kidney beans, and
    black beans, also like to put in one can of refried regular beans or refried black beans. Of course, baked beans or navy beans wouldn't work in this, nor would pork and beans. Use the kind of beans you would use in a chili. Also can mess with the kinds of tomatoes you put in. I also like to add some of those canned or bottled roasted red peppers. And you can add hot sauce if you wish, but I usually let people do their own hot sauce in individual servings.

    Just watch the liquid. You don't want it too thick, to avoid burning, but also don't want it too soupy.

    This also freezes well if you have any leftovers.

  4. View Conversation
    I just got your comments on my youtube channel. Thanks! I appreciate you taking the time to listen. Please refer folks you know to my channel and my blog, matveimediaarts.blogspot.com
  5. View Conversation
    good luck in EMT school, bro! That's a very respectable job, IMHO.
  6. View Conversation
    Well, he's beautiful!
  7. View Conversation
    OK, I don't want to derail asimplegirl's thread. What the hell is that avatar??? LOL!
  8. View Conversation
    Yes, I'm the Photoshop nerd who can help you with your jeep pic. When you send it, make sure to send a note describing our conversation. I'll probably forget by then, lol.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 8 of 8
About satchelmcqueen

Basic Information


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
04-26-2012 12:20 AM
General Information
Last Activity
09-26-2017 11:46 AM
Join Date

19 Friends

  1. amy31416 amy31416 is offline


  2. brandon brandon is offline


  3. Bryan Bryan is offline


  4. Conza88 Conza88 is offline


    • Send a message via MSN to Conza88
  5. Cowlesy Cowlesy is offline

    Moderatorus Emeritus

  6. coyote_sprit coyote_sprit is offline


  7. dannno dannno is offline


  8. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline


  9. heavenlyboy34 heavenlyboy34 is online now


  10. Kotin Kotin is offline


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 19
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast



  • 12:11 PM - Hidden


Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast



  • 04:17 AM - Deleted Posts


  • 11:09 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 10:49 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 07:39 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 05:03 PM - Deleted Posts
  • 09:24 AM - Deleted Posts
  • 06:48 AM - Deleted Posts


  • 01:04 PM - Deleted Posts


  • 01:28 PM - Deleted Posts







  • 10:58 PM - Hidden



Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast