Tab Content
  • osan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:13 PM
    A big problem with nearly anything that human beings do centers on insufficiencies in communication. This is especially significant where politics are concerned. Consider the criminal justice system. How many of you are aware that the law dictionaries upon which lawyers and judges rely have absolutely pathetic definitions of terms such as "law" (!!!) and "crime"? Seriously guys, get your hands on copies of various law dictionaries such as Black's and Bouvier's (there are quite a few more, BTW) and look up those two terms. The definitions border on the idiotic. I have been thinking that there exists a set of terms for which scientifically rigorous definitions should exist for many reasons including but not limited to removing the ability of politicians and other agents of the Tyrant from doing what they do so successfully, which is to twist and manipulate word meanings to suit their agendas. What so you all think of the idea and would you be willing to help with it? A list of terms vital to the cause of liberty would be the first step. And if anyone has a better name for this endeavor, I'm all ears.
    0 replies | 36 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-09-2020, 09:15 PM
    I've read several accounts of nurses in various locales sending in unused swabs, every single one of them coming back as positive. While I have no way of confirming the veracity of these reports, I can also not confirm for absolutely certain that I exist. I am, therefore, given to some measure of doubt as to the actual nature of this bug. One thing of which I am confident is that we are being played like cheap fiddles.
    5 replies | 410 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-09-2020, 07:48 PM
    The problem with the article lies in his choice of terms. Attempting to force "social justice" into the libertarian mold only serves to mangle and obfuscate clear semantics and thereby clear communication. I appreciate the spirit of the passage, but in very pragmatic terms it fails, especially given the poor habits and apparently low IQ of the Meaner. IOW, I'm thinking the author is being gratuitously clever to the point many of the people who might benefit from his exposition walk away either bewildered or having grossly misunderstood the message. And I'm not sure what he means by "dwindling MAGAites". I am not convinced that Trump is losing support from his camp, but I am open to fact-based, rationally sound persuasion.
    7 replies | 298 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-09-2020, 04:44 PM
    Formalizing interpersonal violence on any scale would likely decrease it significantly.
    50 replies | 1408 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-08-2020, 04:01 PM
    He also gave us Meathead, so...
    29 replies | 444 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-08-2020, 02:52 PM
    We should formalize deadly violence by bringing back legal duels to the death. They have to be agreed upon with a witness and a contract signed, just like the 18th Century. That's the real problem here; informal violence. We could stream em online too, probably get lots of views. There's never been a more perfect time for it.
    50 replies | 1408 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-07-2020, 09:12 PM
    1280679072444678150 He gave them an in. What a fool.
    43 replies | 1385 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-07-2020, 08:52 PM
    That's it. It's over for him. He has no way to actually engage in the cultural space at all anymore. If he's lucky, he'll still be able to eek out a profession on the tech ghettos like bitchute, relegated to obscurity. Woke capital is coming for people and this is just the beginning.
    43 replies | 1385 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 09:18 PM
    Your quoted passage presents a semantic challenge, specifically in the use of "Lucifer". For one thing, is Luciferianism the same as "satansim"? Since that philosophy interests me not, I don't know. But if I assume they are synonyms, we then have the problem of whose definition of the term is in play. I did read LaVey's "Satanic Bible" long years ago and came to the conclusion that the silly man was simply re-branding anarchism, at least for the most part. There was nothing I can recall of the devil and that sort of rot. Of course, the work could have been a veiled presentation of some form of evil, intended for consumption by irredeemably stoopid American youngsters in seek of free shit, in this case freedom that costs them nothing. I did not, however, come away with the impression that he was peddling traditional notions of the Evil One. The passage doesn't at all sound like LaVey's voice, as I recall it. But what does the speaker mean by "doctrine of Lucifer", exactly? If it's the anarchic creed, so to speak, I have no problem with it because while I strongly subscribe to the Christian ethic, I oppose with equal force what I perceive of the evil applications and lessons of the institutions calling themselves "Christian". Notions of "sin", "original sin", and how to view and deal with basic human nature are all repugnant to me. Humans have problems enough coming up from children into adulthood without having gratuitous and undeserved guilt and shame heaped upon them, so the deprecation and abandonment of institutions who practice such barbarity seems proper to me. Evil is an interesting thing - especially when institutionalized in the sense of there being a powerful cadre working to foist it upon the world. Who can be trusted? Which avenue of belief and, perhaps more importantly, practical application is better/best? I always find myself intrigued and at the same time appalled and in some ways even afeared when I read things such as the passage you quoted. Who is the speaker? What is he truly about? Are the intentions good, v. malevolent, and if the former are they of one competent to architect such broad socio-cultural designs? Sorry to ramble, but expressions such as this intrigue me to no end precisely because they are so difficult to assess for basic value without significantly more and better information. At the end of the day, I believe that teaching children what is right is not terribly difficult. Humans complicate and distort this sort of thing almost as matters of reflex, it often seems. It is such a shame, given that doing it right is so much simpler and easier. As if life weren't difficult enough.
    7 replies | 216 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 06:39 PM
    Theye, having engaged in their sniffing actions to judge our "condition", assuming they deem us sufficiently softened up for the next step in humanity's devolution and diminution, one can but wonder what shall be the truly red delights to which we are to be subjected. Perhaps more war and disease to whittle down the population... i.e., the RIGHT population?
    7 replies | 216 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 06:35 PM
    And yet...
    29 replies | 444 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 06:35 PM
    I'd much preferred Carl remain and Rob go the way of the dodo to his cell in the ninth circle that so eagerly awaits his arrival. Ah well.
    29 replies | 444 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 06:32 PM
    Well that sucks... though not for him. He escaped in time, the lucky bastard.
    29 replies | 444 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 01:10 PM
    I'm telling you, this is a grand-scale size-up. Theye want to measure our "condition". I suspect Theye are very happy with what they see.
    3 replies | 661 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-06-2020, 12:46 AM
    The masses are not who matter.
    33 replies | 751 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-05-2020, 11:34 PM
    This is not a dialectic. You can't out debate a vengeful fundamentalist religion. That the right believes this is a dialectic is the problem. The right is convinced that facts will win the day. They won't. They never do.
    33 replies | 751 view(s)
  • osan's Avatar
    07-04-2020, 09:35 PM
    Thus far, this latest abasement to which we have been subjected has predictably been met with nothing better than complaint. I'd find it amusing, were it not so sad. Once again I am left wondering whether there is any abuse to which we will not approve in full. With each new episode I find myself wondering less and less. But what I wonder more and more is what I would do, were I residing once again in OR or WA. I suspect I'd be in jail... At least, I hope so... not that that would do any good for anyone other than my ego, and that's not much good at all.
    5 replies | 558 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    11 replies | 356 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-02-2020, 06:09 PM
    They can't pick Warren. Not after Klobuchar publicly bowed out, saying that she wants him to pick a "WOC." The jokes and memes write themselves with a Warren pick.
    11 replies | 356 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    07-01-2020, 04:25 PM
    There's not going to be any mass exodus of black voters to Trump. That's a boomer delusion sold to the GOP by Candace Owens. Telling the black middle class they're on plantations isn't a way to sell conservatism, a fact I know will come as a surprise to some.
    115 replies | 6182 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-30-2020, 07:07 PM
    It is. And yet there they are.
    27 replies | 674 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-30-2020, 06:16 PM
    Firing a gun into a passing vehicle is the language of the unheard.
    27 replies | 674 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    17 replies | 507 view(s)
  • ThePaleoLibertarian's Avatar
    06-29-2020, 07:24 PM
    The left still ​can't fucking meme.
    5 replies | 141 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    They closed the thread before I was able to respond to you, so I just wanted to say, I agree with all of your concerns about Rand Paul. I still think he's better than the other options, but he isn't my ideal. I'm most likely going to vote for him, but I don't blame people who won't. And if I was still going to live in NYS in 2016 (I'm moving to Virginia for college, which as we know is a swingy state) I would be less likely to vote for him. Even still, if the LP candidate is too good to pass up (Someone more like Harry Browne than Gary Johnson... the latter of which was more of a lesser of five evils) I would consider voting for them.
  2. View Conversation
    wow these forums are being slowly populated by NeoCons.
  3. View Conversation
    hmmmm, sorry, thought I was in the PM box....
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About susano

Basic Information

Signature


You've got Sharia patrols in the USA..?

No, not in America, only in the big cities. there are no americans there, only democrats.

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
3,985
Posts Per Day
0.84
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
07-30-2014 11:32 AM
General Information
Last Activity
06-22-2020 01:39 PM
Join Date
06-28-2007
Referrals
1

6 Friends

  1. AZJoe AZJoe is offline

    Member

    AZJoe
  2. lynnf lynnf is offline

    Member

    lynnf
  3. merkelstan merkelstan is offline

    Member

    merkelstan
  4. osan osan is offline

    Member

    osan
  5. Razmear Razmear is offline

    Member

    Razmear
  6. ThePaleoLibertarian
Showing Friends 1 to 6 of 6

06-20-2020


04-20-2020


12-09-2019


08-16-2019


06-27-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 41 12311 ... LastLast

07-08-2020


06-24-2020


06-22-2020


06-21-2020


06-20-2020


05-17-2020


05-16-2020



Page 1 of 41 12311 ... LastLast