susano
Member

OOOooo... look everybody, NATO demands... Screw NATO and and the dildos they rode in on. The European imbecile has been through both "world" wars, yet has failed to learn the lesson. Give them more, they will demand again. Rinse, repeat. There is no end to this sort of thing. While I despise Russia, were those avaricious scum to pummel the tar out of Europe for a third time, I would find difficulty in coughing up so much as a tear for Europeans, my entire family included. In spite of two thousand years of raving tyranny, they remain compliant to the fiat of the elite scum. They get riles when their "free" stuff is interrupted, but not when lunatics threaten yet another razing of an entire continent. We as a species are absolutely, clinically insane and long overdue for cleansing. Sadly, those who need most to be killed off are the ones most likely to survive to spread their kind and their diseases of mind into the blue future. This is civilized humanity's universal problem. Civilization is the worst thing we've foisted upon ourselves, as has been made clearly manifest in our barbaric habits toward each other. We have proven ourselves unwilling to do what is necessary to live in accord with the simplest of maxims, the Golden Rule. And here I mean not just the looting tyrants, but the stupid cows who idly allow Themme to do as they wish. We should be extinguishing Theire genetic lines utterly, but idly we stand, all cow-eyed and gushing with willful stupidity, lassitude, trembling fear, and NATO-like avarice as Theye run in ever more roughshod. Time is long past that we become the predatory species we are and start slitting the right throats, but even that will run afoul of the least shred of sense and proportionality as some of us become precisely that against which we'd fight. Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss. And some wonder why interstellar aliens haven't come to visit... They can't be serious.

An image link needs to be a link to an actual image FILE, like a .gif, .png, .jpg, or .webp. NOT to a webpage. Off the top of my head, here's some sites that let you post images. They don't immediately dissappear them, or mangle them like imgur does. https://0x0.st https://catbox.moe https://postimages.org

Do you know what the definition of insanity is, Anti Globalist?

Agreed, and yet that power had to be in someone's hands... I would have included a fourth branch whose sole purpose was the determination of constitutionality. That, of course, is weak tea, but in the absence of a population fit to their freedoms, which we are not, it's about the best with which I can come up.

I must disagree. It is the one clear statement about the free nature of men that is appropriately broad and it is absolutely necessary, especially in a world of dullardly sorts, like the Democrats. Let us hearken back to that which defines a "right". To wit: "A valid claim." Note that when I step up to the soapbox and declare the state of North Carolina as my individual property, it does not follow that everyone must then leave the area when I tell them to do so. My claim is invalid, prima facie, and therefore I have no right to North Carolina. Perhaps I should try Utah... The left does that wishing-well crap now, for Pete's sake. Why do you think their panties are in such a twist over the rightful execution of Roe? At some point, people like you and myownself need to step up and put the looters back into their places. But we don't. We allow them to run amok all willy-nilly for decades on end, in ever intensifying fashion, then wonder why the world has turned to feces? If "government" is indeed BY the people, that would include us. Pimping the responsibilities off onto "professionals" gets us what we now so thoroughly enjoy in our lives: bald-faced tyranny of the worst variety - that which is slathered in a rich cocoa coating... only now they're removing the sweet and leaving the moldy, rotten insides and telling us to eat and be glad about it.

It will be interesting to see whether a challenge makes it to SCOTUS, and if so, what the ruling will be. If they are concerned with credibility, they would have no choice but to strike down the statute. Were I to write an Amendment XXIX, it would eliminate all statute. All bills would have to pass a strict-scrutiny test of sufficiency to qualify as Law. Statutes would no longer hold a whit of authority, as per Marbury. But more relevant to this thread, severability would be banned. If even a single element of a bill is thrown out by a court, the entire statute goes with it.

They never go far enough where the right thing is concerned. But it is - by implication. 9A protects ALL rights in clear and unmistakable language. IMO, an early 1T termination is regrettable. People should be better in control of their behavior than what we typically see, but shit does happen even for the responsible. All else equal, however, waiting until one is four months in to decide clearly seems outside the metes of one's personal prerogative. That we as humans are so degenerated that we feel the need to have to resort to such measures is the real problem. Fix that and the rest resolves without dangerous outside interferences in the lives of freemen. A couple things. Firstly, what you wrote here underscores and nails shut the lid on Tenth Amendment as cancer. There is NO SUCH THING as "states' rights" because there are no such things as states, in sé. Remove humans and anything that might be deemed "state" disappears as if by magic or high-order thermonuclear detonation. It is a bullshit amendment that represents a pinnacle of pooching by the Framers, and should be stricken. The Ninth is perhaps the preeminent element of the BoR because it shorthands that which is normatively and provably absolute in its correctness: human freedom is absolute with the single restrictive proviso that one respect the equally valid claims of his fellows. In this, the English whom I tend to find otherwise so despicable, had it perfectly right when Commonlaw was codified with but three almost childishly simple seeming tenets:

If that be the case, and all else equal, then I would deem it a valid standard. But the yammer about "tradition" is idiotic on its face. Were I a justice and had allowed those flying things escape my yap, I'd resign on the spot for sheer shame and wear a paper bag over my head for the rest of my life, even in the house.

Silly rabbit, failure is the objective.

Validity turns on the precise meaning of "textualism". As for tradition, that should have no part of such decisions.

I just ignore such people. Don't forget that much like bubonic plague, stupidity is highly contagious.

I'm sure I am mistaken, but this sort of tactic has the feel of something that would stand in violation of election statutes along the lines of "undue influence" or "coercion" pursuant to an outcome that otherwise would be unlikely.

If that is true, then you vote NO.

I'll just note here that Madison320's prediction was right. :)

It was a pleasure to read your informed and thoughtfull comments, and special thanks to Swordsmyth for bringing so many pieces of relevant info to the discussion (as usual). Oh ya, I do have a good link. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/when-the-lies-come-home/ General MacGregor thinks New Khazaria's troops are not going to drive Russia out of the seperatist regions. What is looking dire is the fevered demons running our governments trying to pull other nations into the conflict now. UK puppets are now howling about engaging British troops against Russia for the long haul. I do hope these traitors to our countries can be stopped, and that I have been sufficiently judicious in my choice of words.

That seems like breaking medical privacy laws with full foreknowledge and intent.

Agree that we have been told to 'stand up for ourselves', but there's quite a lot to learn about the 'we' and the how/when/what about 'standing up for ourselves'. People can conjecture and imagine what God thinks, or they can study it (correctly contextualized and translated - unlike KJV et al). That last bit is going to be very rough going for believers in Churchianity though, which relies on a mistranslated Bible that they must partially unlearn. Luckily I was agnostic most of my life and only found the correctly translated Bible after 40 years of learning ourstory, which aligns perfectly with it and current events. Some of the big wins -- correctly translated, the Bible: Does not conflict with the (possibly inaccurate) theories of solar systems, planetary formations, galaxies etc. Does not conflict with the fossil record or early hominids

If they're not, they stand to be soon, due thanks to the resumption of Obama's Race To The Bottom. All HAIL progressivism! All HAIL destruction!

Give it time and that figure will come down to one.

Commonlaw? WHAT Commonlaw? The three tenets of commonlaw: Be good for your word

I sadly exclaim BINGO. One has also to wonder about the "discovery" of prions in the 1980s. Were they discovered or were they "discovered", if you catch my drift (no, I didn't fart)? It seems strange to me that something so basic as a prion could have remained sub rosa in the context of a world lousy with wild and furious research in the lines of study that would be most likely to discover such entities. I suppose it is possible, but my statistical sense is non-trivially chafed by this notion. I will also note that so far as I can tell, the very first case of mad-cow ever discovered was in Britain in 1986. If prions have been a natural phenomenon since some ancient eon, how is it that it had managed to go undetected until so late? That fact leaves me suspicious that prions are a man-made contrivance, whether intentionally synthesized, or arrived upon by accident. But nobody's talking, so the truth may never be publicly released.

I'm waiting for the reports to start coming in about rising infertility rates. It will be interesting to see how long it takes and how the phenomenon will be couched. Perhaps Theye will even admit to the "vaccine" as culprit. By then, the damage will be done and Theye will be able to frame up the providers as the evildoers... or simply chalk it up to honest errors... big emergency... had to act fast... blah blah... and every guilty soul is off the hook. "We must look forward for solutions to this dire crisis..." It will all be conveniently forgotten as new crises emerge and in a couple of years all talk of "solutions" will have waned to silence. Entire generations will fail to reproduce and in, say 30-50 years Theye will get their precipitous drop in population. Happy happy, joy joy. What will be further interesting will be if per wild chance Theye were to discover in the interim that stepping the population down is a very bad idea. Then what? Imagine the chaos as all the ***** and tranny sorts are then demonized into the oblivion of closeted existence once more, surviving straight people encouraged and perhaps even required to pump out as many children as possible. Sounds absurd, which is precisely why it is plausible.

Yes, it was clearly done on purpose, and as things currently stand with most people choosing options B or C, engaging in option A constitutes a textbook study in pissing up a rope. Critical mass is required and I do not believe we are even close to it. Three percent was enough in 1776. In 2022, I suspect it is not. I'd be surprised if we would hold a shred of hope at ten or fifteen percent. Tech-enabled tyranny has changed the game in a fundamental way.