05-27-2016, 04:04 PM
Nicer? Maybe. That's mostly subjective anyway. More intelligent? No way.
Milo has prove himself when debating feminists, both on television and in formal, academic settings. I've never seen him lose a debate. It's true that he has a flamboyant persona that he plays up, but he has it where it counts, intellectually. Sargon on the hand, is bad at debating SJWs. Really bad. He debated Kristi Winters very recently, and he got smacked around. While watching it, my mind was flooded with counter-arguments to what she was saying, that Sargon never brought up. It was a sad sight.
Sargon is a 2nd Wave feminist, as are most MRAs, MGTOWs and so-called "anti-feminists". They're still buying into social justice narratives and claim to fight for "equality". This applies to Milo too, but not anywhere near as badly. This is why people to the right have had such a hard time debating with leftists; they cede pretty much all of the narrative, and just try to debate the conclusions. Milo isn't there yet; he's only about half as right wing as I am, but at least he debates the presuppositions instead of just trying to get to a different place from the same starting point.