The One
Member

The US has wanted this for a long time. Much like all our other wars, no votes are needed to engage! Ah, the nostalgia! Remember when McCain really wanted to bomb Iran? Turns out his idea for the song isn't even original!

People still pretending to be undecided:

Or just automating it.

Why do they bring up Project 2025? It seems that no matter how many times they disavow it, the Democrats will continue to bring it and its most radical points up in hopes that people will just assume it was drafted by Trump. What’s that they say about repeating a lie?

I’m in the dark about this one. Enlighten me!

Very likely yes. In the end, however, it doesn't matter what Bibi really believes, since he's really only trying to distract people from his failed policies. It's a deadly distraction, but I have yet to see a government that's above lethal distractions.

I notice all of Israel’s enemies hang out in tunnels under civilians, giving them the apparent right to bomb wherever they want. After all, there MIGHT be tunnels there!

Thank you! I was just about to say this!

I wonder if it'll go anywhere. I hope it does.

My thoughts exactly. Why is there no outrage about this? Does the interference specifically have to come from Iran or Russia in order to qualify?

So, is he going to stop hoarding and selling people's data?

It would be convenient for the Deep State, wouldn’t it? They’d get Trump out of the way and get their war at the same time.

Anyone voting for Kamala should not be considered an American.

I saw this on Clownfish TV and was wondering if anyone would pick it up.

Good question, but I'd argue that off-grid isn't the same as entering another country. Everyone should be allowed to live off-grid, although the government doesn't make it easy. I'm arguing about illegal immigrants, who mostly aren't here living off-grid, hippie lifestyles. Basically, the government shouldn't have the right to hold people in databases, and I'd argue that goes even for people who were convicted of crimes, depending on the nature of the crime and the amount of time passed. I once read somewhere that if a person hasn't committed a new crime within five years, they were only as likely to commit a crime as anyone else who had never been convicted. Even crazier is that the government keeps databases of even people who were never convicted. Because of the 4th Amendment, I would argue that people should have the right to live off-grid. That being said, my argument against Swordsmyth wasn't taking this into consideration, it was about the nature of whether illegals had basic rights as outlined in the Bill of Rights. To sum up, there's a huge difference between going off-grid and jumping the border into another country (which doesn't have open borders) and sapping up their resources. Out of curiosity, are you in favor of open borders, then? Like, as long as someone isn't trying to work a job or pay taxes, they should be free to go in and out as they please? I'm trying to understand your argument, because I might be missing something.

Yet many of these same cops would arrest you on the spot for the same thing.

I'm not a pro-invader person, I'm just someone who understands the intent behind the Constitution. Illegal immigrants have no right to be here; that's the issue at hand. No one has an inborn right to live in any country because the security reasons are so great, they trump even liberty in such cases. As such, deporting people who crossed the border illegally isn't infringing on their human rights. The Bill of Rights lays out what rights people have on the basis of just being people. All people, no matter where you are on this planet, have these rights (and the Bill of Rights isn't considered an exhaustive list): - The freedom to say what they want, publish what they want, meet with whom they want, practice whatever religion they want, and petition the government. - Bear arms, probably all arms including guns, knives, etc. - To not have to house soldiers in your house during peacetime and have your privacy respected. - To be safe from the government coming into your house and searching you, your property, or seizing your stuff. Basically, you have the right to privacy. - To know they can't be locked up without due process and won't be charged multiple times for the same accusations. You also cannot be charged excessive bail and the state cannot inflict cruel and unusual punishment. You can also demand a speedy trial and to demand a jury, which serves a far different purpose than most people realize.

I’m going to have to disagree here. The right to bear arms is considered a natural right. It’s not a privilege granted by any government, it’s inalienable and only brought up in the bill of rights for the same reason as all the others: to demonstrate that our government recognizes that and was formed not to regulate these natural rights but to safeguard them. They aren’t American rights.

They should get it in theaters like that group of veterans did with their John McCain documentary during his POTUS bid.

True. And if they were part of a Latino’s for Trump group, they probably all wanted to be seen standing together. That is, unless they had the stage all to themselves.

On some level this is true. Remember what Noem killing her own young dog and uncastrated goat did to her?

Yes, that's another aspect of being pro-life. Trump believed all the lies that the vaccines were safety-tested, that they were 100% effective against COVID-19, and, most egregiously, that he was responsible for the success of getting the vaccines out through "Operation Warp Speed." He gambled with the lives of desperate Americans, and like you've said, to this day, he prides himself in getting the vaccines pushed through.

Yes, I know that Trump has done way more public engagement than Kamala. My point is Trump was outsmarted by a really stupid candidate because he allowed his own ego to get the best of him and fell into her traps. And it's his ego which will be his undoing, just as his ego kept him from being judged by Republican Primary voters in his refusal to participate in those debates.

It's a single issue which is connected to a network of other positions. That single issue is pro-life. To be pro-life means that you care for the preservation of innocent life both inside and outside of the womb, and that incorporates the prohibition of conflicts and wars which will lead to the unnecessary, if not, unethical, termination of civilians who have nothing to do with posing a national threat. It has been shown countless times that the nation-state of Israel is using certain events to justify a campaign of genocide towards an ethnic/national group of people who are not terrorists. As a Christian, I'm against any candidate who will support another nation killing my people (that is, Palestinian Christians) for political and religious reasons. Trump's unadulterated support of Israel offsets his commitment to end the conflict over in Ukraine and Russia, even if he claims, "I just want the dying to stop." He wants to stop the killing of Ukrainian and Russian lives, but he's okay with Palestinians (and even Israelis) being killed because "Israel needs to be feared by her enemies again." Therefore, as a "sInGlE-iSsUe VoTeR," I feel justified in not supporting Trump at all, and I'm sick and tired of people like you trying to justify "voting for the lesser of two evils."

Absolutely. It would've been worse than January 6, which was worse than 9/11.

I wonder if this is true. It would explain a lot.

Call it "poetic justice." Trump dodged all of the Republican Primary debates, because he was so proud that he had a commanding lead with Republican voters (in the polls and in the eyes of the mainstream media), and he felt that Republican voters didn't need to hear his positions challenged and scrutinized with the other candidates. Now he lost what is probably his last debate to a candidate who, like him, dodged the public, flying high on the polls and favor of the mainstream media and would-be voters. Trump is an arrogant person whose ego got the best of him against a woman who memorized her script and played him by leading him into all the traps that Trump's persona couldn't help.

I'm against Zionism, not Israel because, theologically speaking, the Church is Israel (those who are covenantally united to Christ by faith and through baptism). So I am pro-Israel, in the Biblical sense of the word, not in the nation-state sense of a country which is Atheistic in its entire ethics, civics, etc.

If you're voting for Trump, then don't complain about the conflicts in the Middle East and Israel's campaign to wipe out an entire demographic due to their ethnicity. Trump is a staunch supporter of aiding Israel in all of her military campaigns.