Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:38 AM
    It was determined at trial that the ringleader and the trigger man were two different people. If I plan a murder I'm just as culpable. As for group membership, it is fair to say that the actions of radical animal rights activists who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical animal rights activists who don't mind killing in the name of their cause. It is fair to say that the actions of radical Muslims who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical Muslims who don't mind killing in the name of their cause. It is fair to say that the actions of radical Catholics who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical Catholics who don't mind killing in the name of their cause. It is fair to say that the actions of radical Protestants who don't mind killing in the name of their cause reflect on all radical Protestants who don't mind killing in the name of their cause.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:32 AM
    So when president Trump stumps for bumpfire bans by executive order and assault weapons bans by legislation.....how is he buying us time? Thankfully on issues like that the feckless GOP leadership has shown a willingness not to follow Trump. I wish they would follow him when he is right like on criminal justice reform.
    9 replies | 108 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:25 AM
    The French were able trade with the indigenous Americans without savagery. Same with Roger Williams' purchase of Rhode Island. The savage Roman Empire was conquered through the opposite of savagery, namely Christian idealism. When the barbarian Germanic hordes overran the christianized Roman Empire, they soon became converted to it.
    102 replies | 1032 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:14 AM
    There wasn't one "killer." It was a group of killers and illegal immigration was their rallying point. If these were a group of vegetarian PETA radicals who killed some cattle ranchers I don't think you would even be debating what the motivation was. Not all who are against illegal immigration are for extrajudicial killing. So are for it as long as you killing happens when people are actively crossing the border. Some are against extra judicial killing altogether.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:09 AM
    LOL @ Van Jones running from Peter Schiff.
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:07 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to jkr again.
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 10:01 AM
    That's the way you do things. It's not the way I do them. Again, no hunters were shot on our property. And considering the race ratio where we live that was most likely smart of us. And also considering that we later needed these same trespassing hunters when we had a house fire, as they made up the volunteer fire department, not shooting them was also smart of us. Had they had a 9 year old with them, gun or no gun, if he wasn't actively shooting I me I wouldn't have shot him. That doesn't mean I don't support property rights. If you can understand that great. If you can't...well that's fine too.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 09:53 AM
    I have taken a hard line on this, because this is an invasion, organized by enemies of the United States, for the purpose of achieving a political and military goal. I don't think it would come to shooting, if things are handled properly. Like you stated, you tell them to leave. But in the final analysis, if you (meaning an intruder/invader), after being asked to leave, then told to leave, still insist on kicking down my front door, then yes, you're going to get shot. Don't want to get shot?
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 09:52 AM
    Did you get your degree from Bill Nye the Science guy?^
    10 replies | 290 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:44 AM
    I think reasonable people can disagree about the wall. Ron and I are against it. You two and others are for it. I think there is a line where nativist sentiment turns violent and dangerous and that line should be called out. I don't think the people who cross that line are evil, just misguided by their own logic. Back to the wall. Do you understand why Ron is against it? It's not going to be "impersonal and inert" like the Great Wall Of China. It will be manned by human and electronic surveillance. It will split in half land owned by American citizens. (That's already happened). It won't stop the flow of illicit drugs coming through without inspection on NAFTA trucks. (Unless Trump changed that in his new NAFTA deal which everyone on both sides of the argument says is the same as the old NAFTA deal). And in a SHTF scenario, it can be used to box us in. Trump already added face scanning cameras at airports in the name of fighting illegal immigration. The very policies that you believe will protect your liberty can be used to take it away.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 09:43 AM
    That should tell you all you need to know. Vote no.
    13 replies | 94 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:32 AM
    Not to condemn it. To clarify it. For some extrajudicial killing of illegal border crossers isn't murder because "they broke a law." Since angelatc wants the context, here it is. So. Again, I don't believe in shooting unarmed children. Period. In their own house. Crossing my property. Crossing the border. I didn't kill adult hunters who were trespassing, I sure as hell ain't gonna shoot some kid. If that means I don't support personal property, okay. How extremely liberal of me. /sarcasm.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:21 AM
    Hmmm....I just looked that up. Sadly it looks like they are holding up the legislation because they want to include reparations for black people for the disproportionate effect of the drug war. https://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2018/09/black_leader_legalizing_weed_should_come_with_repa.html So...rather than stop the harm as soon as possible....use this as an opportunity to demand money. Yeah...makes sense. /sarc
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:18 AM
    Is this in flight groper named Bill Clinton?
    2 replies | 33 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:15 AM
    Portugal decriminalized drugs but you can still get arrested in Portugal for drug trafficking. See: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/05/portugals-radical-drugs-policy-is-working-why-hasnt-the-world-copied-it
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:14 AM
    *sigh* You're fighting the wrong battle and beating the wrong dead horse and trying to flag down a ship that's already long sailed. The government already regulates marijuana. It's "regulation" is that it is illegal. The federal government "regulation" of drugs is based on a bad twisting of interstate commerce clause. The constitution had to be amended to prohibit alcohol and the same should have happened with drugs but didn't because of FDR, Wickard v Filburn and the new deal. Wickard v Filburn was quoted in the 2005 upholding federal prosecution of medical marijuana even in a state where it was legal. (See: https://www.cannalawblog.com/gonzales-v-raich-545-u-s-1-2005/) Legalization / decriminalization / whatever may be done represents a reduction in regulation, not the creation of it. Your argument would be akin to saying Trump shouldn't roll back EPA regulations on CO2 because...that means accepting more government regulation on CO2.
    21 replies | 102 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:05 AM
    If the shoe doesn't fit don't wear it. It's that simple.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 09:02 AM
    Except: A) A RPF member approved the killing in the name of border security because "they broke a law." B) Other members approved the idea of the killing as long as it happened on the border itself. C) The killers who did it, did it in the name of border security. D) If we were really talking about "invaders" (Red Dawn scenario), then it would be appropriate to break into the invaders homes and kill them. Now. You apparently don't approve of A or B. Fine. You don't. The shoe doesn't fit. Quit trying to wear it.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:57 AM
    It's not a strawman poll. Again, you apparently lack the intelligence to know what a strawman is. Golly. Maybe you shouldn't have assumed that a thread that wasn't about you somehow is. Then...you're a grown woman have have the full right to act retarded.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:56 AM
    That support what? Being against extra judicial killing? That's "squirrely leftist?" Ummm....okay. And for the record the reason Ron Paul said mass deportation is not practical is because it would require a police state. You understand that right? He's not saying "Oh it's just too expensive." Similarly he sees police state ramifications in border walls. Some of us aren't willing to sacrifice essential liberty for the illusion of security. I didn't say anything against deportations. The "strawman" is the one you are building. Border security is fine. But there has to be a limit. Mine is extrajudicial killing. Since you say you are for due process I will assume you are against extra judicial killing as well.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:52 AM
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Influenza again.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:52 AM
    If you support due process then you are not on the same side as the RPF members I was addressing who claimed that if you don't support extrajudicial killing of people crossing the border then you don't support property rights. So...what the hell are you babbling about? The shoe doesn't fit. Quit trying to wear it.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:49 AM
    My poll came straight from conversations with people on this forum which means it is not a strawman. In fact.....I don't think you even know what a strawman is. For the record, a strawman is an argument that nobody has made. People here have made the argument that if you don't support private militias killing unarmed illegal immigrants then you don't support property rights. It is the closed border side that created the strawman. This poll exposes it. If the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:48 AM
    LOL. So quoting RP is "clutching pearls?" Really? You're just being obtuse and dishonest which is okay. I've seen you get that way on other issues. Ron Paul didn't say "We should do mass deportation but just make sure there is due process." And shooting an unarmed person crossing the border is not due process. I didn't call you out and say that you supported that because I have not seen any place that you do. So....why do you have your panties in a knot? Why defend an indefensible position that you didn't take?
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:44 AM
    The reality is you didn't answer the poll and now you are fabricating reality claiming that Influenza was trying to make you choose sides.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:43 AM
    Ron Paul 2015. On Trump's plan to round up and deport 15 million people: Ron Paul: How practical do you think this would be to round up 15 million people without any consideration for due process? McAdams: You’d essentially need a police state because you’d practically have to be going to go door to door almost, because they don’t keep track of these people. Ron Paul: I think it’s impossible.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:42 AM
    Ron Paul 2015. On Trump's plan to round up and deport 15 million people: Ron Paul: How practical do you think this would be to round up 15 million people without any consideration for due process? McAdams: You’d essentially need a police state because you’d practically have to be going to go door to door almost, because they don’t keep track of these people. Ron Paul: I think it’s impossible.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:41 AM
    In other words you are afraid to actually answer the poll. Got it.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:40 AM
    Correction. Your signature has part of Ron Paul's position in it. Leaving out the other part and pretending he didn't say it is dishonest on your part.
    66 replies | 242 view(s)
More Activity

78 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Hey, I picked up and played a 12 string acoustic the other day. Now I want one.
  2. View Conversation
    You asked via rep where I found the St Basil The Great prayer after communion-it's here: http://www.ourcatholicprayers.com/pr...-st-basil.html I have other prayers by Saints in my orthodox prayer book, but I'm too lazy to type them out ATM.
  3. View Conversation
    Here's a 12 pack of different colors. Glad you liked it. https://www.amazon.com/Pick-Jesus-Gu.../dp/B003H96ZK0
  4. View Conversation
    Nevermind the last thing. I thought he was banned and he was playing mischief. The name change might have been for other reasons.
  5. View Conversation
    --------
  6. View Conversation
    Thank you so much, TER, I really appreciate your prayers and kind words. My Dad is doing better, praise God, and we're taking things day by day.
  7. View Conversation
    Ha. You old fart. Still in the pit in 2016, huh. That's cool, man. I didn't know that Axl could still hold a note. Cool stuff. I keep forgetting you were in an AOR/Melodic band back in the day. Hey, I tried to pm you a while back but you were full. Just about stuff around here.
  8. View Conversation
    ....
  9. View Conversation
    Brother, I uploaded a vid of Fr. Chris' homily from this week in my DL thread if you're interested. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...20#post5894920 ~hugs~
  10. View Conversation
    I double checked, and it appears I got the right Cyril according to the OCA. http://oca.org/saints/lives/2015/05/11 Thanks for keeping me in check with the +rep, though! ~hugs~
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 78
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
About TER

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.

Signature


+
'These things I command you, that you love one another.' - Jesus Christ

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
17,231
Posts Per Day
4.38
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
78
Most Recent Message
12-19-2016 12:08 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 08:21 PM
Join Date
01-11-2008
Referrals
1

34 Friends

  1. Alternative 336 Alternative 336 is offline

    Member

    Alternative 336
  2. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. Confederate Confederate is offline

    Banned

    Confederate
  5. Danke Danke is offline

    Goldmember

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  6. donnay donnay is offline

    Member

    donnay
  7. Dr.3D Dr.3D is online now

    Member

    Dr.3D
  8. dreamzilver dreamzilver is offline

    New Member

    dreamzilver
  9. eduardo89 eduardo89 is offline

    Banned

    eduardo89
  10. green73 green73 is offline

    Member

    green73
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 34
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View TER's Blog

Recent Entries

Satan’s Sin

by TER on 09-17-2018 at 04:30 PM
Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TER View Post
No it isn’t.
Yes it is. The intellect is the part of soul which studies and understands God's WORD. There is also a mortal soul and a immortal soul.
You said the intellect was the spirit. You are now changing definitions.

Also, there are not two souls
Categories
Uncategorized

09-10-2018


08-18-2018


08-13-2018


08-12-2018


07-16-2018

  • 08:12 PM - Hidden

05-21-2018


04-07-2018


03-17-2018


12-27-2017


12-24-2017


09-20-2017


04-16-2017


04-04-2017


12-12-2016


12-11-2016


09-19-2016


No results to display...
Page 1 of 63 1231151 ... LastLast

10-07-2018


10-06-2018


09-27-2018


09-26-2018


09-18-2018



Page 1 of 63 1231151 ... LastLast