Tab Content
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 09:09 PM
    donnay replied to a thread Potato Head in U.S. Political News
    They have been ruining childhood for years. The biggest is compulsory schooling.
    9 replies | 142 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:51 PM
    The man's on top. That's misogenist. And he's to the right. That shows that hetorosexualism is right wing.
    30 replies | 1350 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:28 PM
    Dark horse possibility is GA. Georgia House Weighing Legislation to End Concealed Permit Requirement https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/25/georgia-house-weighing-legislation-to-end-concealed-permit-requirement/ AWR Hawkins 25 Feb 2021 The Georgia House is weighing legislation to end the state’s requirement that law-abiding citizens acquire a permit from the state in order to carry a handgun for self-defense.
    9 replies | 234 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:17 PM
    Yes, and no. Yes, he's being intentionally obtuse, in order to throw up clouds of FUD. Naturally, no, it's a great deal of work to appear sincere while being InSiNcEre. The talking head pundit class, especially those that are part of the Conservative Inc® wing, get paid extremely well to do that year after year after year, causing doubt, uncertainty and frigid apathy in the face of blatant tyranny.
    17 replies | 201 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 07:42 PM
    They have ink.
    13 replies | 130 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 07:15 PM
    The lengths media whores go to promoting this shit is baffling, where's the money? There've been cross-dressers since long before I was born and up until recently they kept to themselves.....I suppose it my generations fault (Boomers) for not continuing to literally beat them back into the shadows whence they came like all the previous generations did. I don't see society as 'better' with sexual dysfunction on full display. Time to get government out of this issue too! Everything government gets involved in it fucks up.
    19 replies | 284 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 06:47 PM
    This idiot is part of the problem. Rep. Newmans son thinks he's a girl and she supports his delusions. There's no "hate" involved other than for Adam Kinzinger for propping up this dysfunctional family. They might deserve pity but definitely not sympathy. It's not bravery when you support or encourage abnormal behavior, especially in children.
    19 replies | 284 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:46 PM
    Wait a minute. There's a trans-flag? I thought they were part of the LGBTQIA flag? This is so confusing. Did the trans-nation secede from the LGBTQIA nation?
    19 replies | 284 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 06:02 PM
    Good for Mike Rowe, but he's being kind here. Fauci flat out lied. When he was asked about his mask flip/flop he said that the reason they said don't wear masks was to save them for the first responders. But the initial story he said was that it was because "Masks are ineffective." He lied. He's still lying. I trust science. I don't blindly trust scientists. It's like I trust God but I don't trust everyone who claims to be a man (or woman) of God.
    2 replies | 157 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:51 PM
    At 2:04 "The specific question was about minors. Let's be a little more specific since you evaded the question." WOW! And yes. Rand is 100% right on this. And it's not just about "against the parents consent." What happens when you have one parent that consents, or worse is PUSHING the child to do this, and another who objects? Rand Paul 2024!
    13 replies | 138 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:33 PM
    There were contracts before there were states. They were called "covenants." You can read about them in the Bible. For example the covenant between Abraham and Lot dividing up pasture land. How were covenants enforced? Mostly by honor. If you were known to be a covenant breaker then other people wouldn't want to do business with you. Loss of reputation, or "loss of face", was how things were generally enforced. Yeah...you could get a bunch of people with swords to enforce your covenant. But even if you didn't have the manpower to do that, simply letting everyone know "You can't trust Mr. X" was a powerful weapon. Now, back to corporations. Why do you believe it is necessary to have a legal entity that you need to have a government license to form called a "corporation?" Are you REALLY a minarchist? Here is a definition I found. https://www.lexico.com/definition/minarchy Minimal government; specifically a (hypothetical) form of government that does not interfere with individual rights and civil liberties, and that has itself no right to levy taxes upon legitimately acquired property. A government created license to limit liability, the very definition of a corporation, interferes with the individual right to have full redress for damages done to him by another individual or individuals who put their assets in that government licensed entity but maintain control over them for their own financial gain. So...how is that compatible with minarchy?
    33 replies | 318 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 05:22 PM
    You mean like Gab or Parler swooping in to take on Twitter? Yeah. Then Gab got kicked off the Apple and Google stores. Then big tech went even further and kicked Parler off of Apple, Google and their hosting platform at Amazon. Sure, they can get another hosting platform. (In fact as of this post they seem to be back up). Still, without a presence in the app stores they are at a significant disadvantage. Of course there are ways around that. Mastodon is a protocol, as opposed to a platform, and it's impossible to ban a protocol. But Mastodon hasn't caught on yet. Meanwhile...as the now infamous Time magazine admitted, this "cabal" (Time's words, not mine) of big tech, big labor, Wallstreet, and "wokestreet" conspired together to control the narrative after (and really before) this last election. I am not sure if anything admitted in that article is per se illegal. But it sure feels wrong.
    33 replies | 318 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 04:28 PM
    Corporations have MORE rights than individuals. That's the problem. Would agree with what? In the above video Dr. Paul was disagreeing with the fact that corporations get a tax break for healthcare spending on adults that individuals in general do not. Do you agree with Dr. Paul? And do you agree that corporations should get liability protection that people who come together and create a partnership by contract do not? Are you a statist? I'm not asking that question as a perjorative. I'm just curious. Do you believe that the state, itself, is necessary? Because without a state, all state created entities, including corporations, could not exist. As long as we have government protection for corporations, and by definition their very existence is a government protection, there should be some government protection FROM corporations as well. Antitrust laws fall into that category. If the state went away there would be no corporations and no antitrust laws either.
    33 replies | 318 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 04:23 PM
    That is, in fact, a partnership. To be a corporation you have to have a GOVERNMENT charter. Period. End of story. And yes, that's true even for non-profit corporations. You can be a church, for example, and never apply for a 501 c(3). You are tax exempt simply by being a church. But you can't apply for those gubmit grants unless you fill out the paperwork, jump through the hoops and become a corporation. Back to your example. None of the contracts these hypothetical individuals draw up can REALLY limit their liability the way a corporation can. The issue with liability isn't just with the people you contract with. It's with people you DON'T contract with! With contracts you can create something called a "limited partnership." But even with a limited partnership, at least one partner always has FULL liability. Let's say persons A, B, C and D form a limited partnership. By contract they can say "Persons B, C and D don't have liability if the partnership gets sued." But person A still has the FULL liability. I learned about all of this when I was a teenager. My aunt and I went to one of those "Start your own business" con-job "we'll sell you a business for $19.95 a month" seminars. The business we decided to buy was one where they would daily fax you a list of distressed and returned merchandise that you could sell. (Yes this was pre-internet). I started reading about corporate structures. I thought a corporation was too complicated and didn't like the idea of double taxation so I looked into limited partnerships. What I was really looking for was an LLC, but those didn't exist at the time. (We ultimately quit the business because. Yeah you would get faxes of stuff you could sell....but without a store to sell the stuff...and pre the internet where you could put up an e-commerce store...it just didn't make sense.) Now, consider the LLC part of the equation. Once again that is something that you have to apply to a GOVERNMENT to start. It just can't be done by "contract." With an LLC or an S-Corp or any other corporate structure, if the driver for your company crashes into a Rolls Royce some full partner in your partnership is personally liable. So when the partnership runs out of assets, the unlimited partners assets become attachable. Yes you can have insurance, but insurance has limits. Sure the unlimited partner can declare bankruptcy, but that affects his PERSONAL credit. By contrast, if the LLC goes bankrupt, everybody in the LLC can walk away clean thanks to the GOVERNMENT CREATED benefit that simply cannot be created through contract. Even if you contract with ALL of your customers and EVERY institution that loans you money and say "You can't come after my personal assets", that doesn't protect you from liability from third parties that don't contract with you. What is the ultimate benefit of this GOVERNMENT protection? Well...corporations can take risks that individuals, or even groups of individuals (partnerships) would never dare take. And that's WHY they can grow so big. Further they can be owned by investors all around the world who don't give a rip what they do in the countries where they operate. Some GOVERNMENTS are the biggest shareholders in the world. But thank you for asking the question. I think that helps to clear up the confusion.
    33 replies | 318 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 04:22 PM
    The Ill. rep felt it important to hang some weirdo pride flag in the hall, not that long ago she'd have been ashamed to show her face in public now she's emboldened enough to trumpet the derangement of her offspring. Who you're fucking and what color/shape underwear you want to wear used to be personal, even more personal was who/what your kid was/is fucking and what their sexual proclivities are. When "people" remove their filters you can expect lots worse. There are lots of different ideologies in this country and those who choose to use sexuality or race to define themselves are in for a rude awakening when the majority of the populace decides it's okay to remove their filters too.
    19 replies | 284 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 04:00 PM
    What do you want to bet their ranks grow by 20% minimum over the next 4 years? It's the only way democrats are assured of power. Annnnnnnnd, it'll only be the creme-dela-creme. (Just like the weirdo Rand put in his place earlier)
    3 replies | 72 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 03:50 PM
    It's a crying shame that simple truths need to be printed out and hung on the wall.
    19 replies | 284 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    3 replies | 72 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 02:51 PM
    Fruitloops don't like to be cornered.. Good job Rand!
    13 replies | 138 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 02:36 PM
    That's probably why they come up with such bills, they are frustrated with themselves.
    3 replies | 92 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:35 PM
    That this is not screaming red DANGER in headlines across every media organ only goes to show how far gone we are. This is insanity.
    13 replies | 282 view(s)
  • tod evans's Avatar
    Today, 12:26 PM
    Giving new life to "Shove it up your ass" And people line up..........
    6 replies | 151 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    0 replies | 53 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 11:13 AM
    Ron Paul is also against you on this.
    33 replies | 318 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 11:10 AM
    Nope. Corporations are NOT inevitable. They would NOT exist without government. They are no more inevitable than drug laws. Marriage? Marriage was a religious institution long before we had the governments we have today. Terrible analogy. The libertarian position on marriage is to get government out of marriage. How do you get government out of a government created institution like a corporation? Rhetorical question. You can't. People coming together to pool their resources are called partnerships. Partnerships existed prior to governments. Corporations are not persons. Oh, and Ron Paul agrees with me on this. See starting at 4:30
    33 replies | 318 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 10:45 AM
    https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/dozens-teachers-italy-sick-after-astrazeneca-vaccine.html
    1 replies | 66 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 10:42 AM
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/twenty-reasons-mandatory-face-masks-are-unsafe-ineffective-and-immoral/5735171
    1 replies | 71 view(s)
  • Dr.3D's Avatar
    Today, 10:10 AM
    A person is supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty. So is it proper for law enforcement to search the home of an innocent person, without a warrant?
    17 replies | 201 view(s)
  • donnay's Avatar
    Today, 10:02 AM
    James 1:13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man.
    1650 replies | 138076 view(s)
More Activity

81 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Did you see the new thread I made for our discussion?

    A new system of government

  2. View Conversation
    I posted some things I found there but I haven't tried to contact you specifically
  3. View Conversation
    I'll tell Champ you are interested and he can send you an invite here
  4. View Conversation
    Hey, I picked up and played a 12 string acoustic the other day. Now I want one.
  5. View Conversation
    You asked via rep where I found the St Basil The Great prayer after communion-it's here: http://www.ourcatholicprayers.com/pr...-st-basil.html I have other prayers by Saints in my orthodox prayer book, but I'm too lazy to type them out ATM.
  6. View Conversation
    Here's a 12 pack of different colors. Glad you liked it. https://www.amazon.com/Pick-Jesus-Gu.../dp/B003H96ZK0
  7. View Conversation
    Nevermind the last thing. I thought he was banned and he was playing mischief. The name change might have been for other reasons.
  8. View Conversation
    --------
  9. View Conversation
    Thank you so much, TER, I really appreciate your prayers and kind words. My Dad is doing better, praise God, and we're taking things day by day.
  10. View Conversation
    Ha. You old fart. Still in the pit in 2016, huh. That's cool, man. I didn't know that Axl could still hold a note. Cool stuff. I keep forgetting you were in an AOR/Melodic band back in the day. Hey, I tried to pm you a while back but you were full. Just about stuff around here.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 81
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
About TER

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
1
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.

Signature


+
'These things I command you, that you love one another.' - Jesus Christ

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
17,936
Posts Per Day
3.74
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
81
Most Recent Message
07-18-2019 02:42 AM
General Information
Last Activity
01-15-2021 05:39 PM
Join Date
01-11-2008
Referrals
1

34 Friends

  1. Alternative 336 Alternative 336 is offline

    Member

    Alternative 336
  2. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Member

    Anti Federalist
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. Confederate Confederate is offline

    Banned

    Confederate
  5. Danke Danke is offline

    Top Rated Influencer

    • Send a message via Skype™ to Danke
    Danke
  6. donnay donnay is online now

    Member

    donnay
  7. Dr.3D Dr.3D is online now

    Member

    Dr.3D
  8. dreamzilver dreamzilver is offline

    New Member

    dreamzilver
  9. eduardo89 eduardo89 is offline

    Banned

    eduardo89
  10. green73 green73 is offline

    Member

    green73
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 34
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
View TER's Blog

Recent Entries

Satan’s Sin

by TER on 09-17-2018 at 04:30 PM
Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TER View Post
No it isn’t.
Yes it is. The intellect is the part of soul which studies and understands God's WORD. There is also a mortal soul and a immortal soul.
You said the intellect was the spirit. You are now changing definitions.

Also, there are not two souls
Categories
Uncategorized
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

12-05-2020


12-04-2020


11-22-2020


08-23-2020


08-21-2020


08-16-2020


04-19-2020


04-10-2020


03-18-2020

  • 02:58 PM - Deleted Posts

02-06-2020


01-23-2020

  • 08:59 PM - Hidden

11-13-2019


11-10-2019


09-06-2019

  • 08:10 PM - Hidden

08-28-2019


08-27-2019


08-18-2019

  • 03:53 PM - Hidden

08-09-2019


07-19-2019


07-14-2019



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 86 1231151 ... LastLast

01-16-2021


01-15-2021


12-26-2020


12-05-2020


12-04-2020


12-03-2020



Page 1 of 86 1231151 ... LastLast