Today, 01:45 AM
Doesn't appear that she gives out any medical advice, TER. She shares articles on health related topics. This is the nature of her first amendment right so long as she is within the parameters of the rules established by the the owner of this platform as it pertains to the flow of information. Quite like when some friends sit there in the religion section talking about how much Baptists or whomever else irritate them for not obliging in some arbitrary/worldly "doctrine" or whatever.
None the less, you've inserted an arbirary projection of the notion that there may be some consequences to her posting of health related articles. So explain, please. Why is it that she should be careful about sharing articles about health related topics? What should donnay be careful of by sharing them? Should she be afraid of something or someone for sharing health related articles, TER? Hm? If so, then what or whom, and why? Specifically, please. Thanks.
Actually, I'm reminded of a thread I posted the other day. I'll share it here since I'm now reminded of it. To some extent anyway.
It was about copyrights and patents in relation to corporate strategy to shut down free speech, discussion, commentary, critical analysis, speculation, and argument.
Killing Conversation: Copyright Criminalization