Tab Content
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:26 PM
    Interesting video. Question for everyone. Say if the FBI "bought" your browsing history from your ISP. No warrant because the didn't do a wiretap or perform a search. Acceptable or not?
    50 replies | 662 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:21 PM
    You must either be single or have a very laid back wife. :cool:
    50 replies | 662 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:20 PM
    Ummmm....okay. Not sure what your point is but okay. Argue on friend....argue on. My point is simple. Company A selling consumer B's private information to company C is a different scenario from Company A selling something to consumer B who sells it to consumer C.
    50 replies | 662 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:16 PM
    I'm all for free markets. My point is that you have to compare apples to apples. Company A selling product to consumer B who then resells the product is one thing. company A selling product to consumer B and then selling consumer B's private information to company C is something altogether different. You have to look at correct analogies to come to correct conclusions. Now, let's look at company A selling consumer B's private information to company C. Sure, consumer B can decide "screw company A" and go with company D. But how is consumer B going to know that his private information is being sold? Surely company A would have a strong incentive to keep that information hidden from the consumer to avoid loss of business while at the same time selling consumer B's information. One way around this would be to require companies to get permission before selling data. Now the ISPs' argument was "Well Facebook gets to sell customer data so why can't we?" But guess what Facebook does when you sign up? It requires you to agree to a privacy policy statement. That statement says how they plan to use your private data. Most people don't read it. Guess what? The ISPs could do the same thing. Most people would just blindly click "yes" and opt in without blinking an eye. You need high speed internet right? So....what were the ISPs really complaining about? What "freedom" has been protected? Oh...and on the flipside I suppose a private watchdog group could try to find out clandestinely which ISPs buy your private information and which don't by trying to buy the information themselves. Anyway, from how I see it, this is much ado about nothing. If you don't assume your ISP, the NSA, major corporations and even decent hackers have access to much of your private information then you haven't been paying attention to anything Edward Snowden and others have had to say.
    50 replies | 662 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:06 PM
    Oh yeah...waiting in the wings.
    9 replies | 135 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:08 PM
    We fight, and preserve this unique culture of individual freedom and independence. Or we die, drowned in a human wave of wretched refuse from around the globe than can not, will not comprehend. What's it gonna be?
    34 replies | 405 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 04:01 PM
    Angels dancing on the head of pin. You have no fucking privacy, in this modern nightmare world, haven't had any in at least twenty years now. And of course, without privacy, without being free in your own home, on your own property, at the very least, to say and do and think whatever you want, you have no freedom either. What's so sad and frustrating is watching AmeriKunts fall all over themselves to be first in line to buy the chains they enslave themselves with. Festoon your home with wireless security cameras that any decent hacker or government goon can tap into? Sure!
    50 replies | 662 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 03:51 PM
    Taxing (and Antiquing) Them Off the Road http://ericpetersautos.com/2017/03/29/taxing-antiquing-off-road/ By: eric March 29, 2017 For planned obsolescence to work, you’ve got to keep the conveyor belt rolling. And most of all, prevent anyone from getting off.
    9 replies | 135 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:16 PM
    Six jobs are eliminated for every robot introduced into the workforce, a new study says https://www.recode.net/2017/3/28/15094424/jobs-eliminated-new-robots-workforce-industrial New research released from the National Bureau of Economic Research yesterday shows that between 1990 and 2007, when one or more industrial robots were introduced into the workforce, it led to the elimination of 6.2 jobs within a local area where people commute for work. The report, which was authored by economists Daron Acemoglu of MIT and Pascual Restrepo of Boston University, found that the wages of workers also declined slightly as a result of robots entering the U.S. economy. Wages dropped between 0.25 percent and 0.50 percent per 1,000 employees when one or more robots came into the picture.
    80 replies | 1326 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:09 PM
    Do you still yourself to full service gas though?
    10 replies | 167 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:02 PM
    Sometimes I wish I had a FedBook account, just to scorch assenholes like that. "Just doing their job"...the siren song of the tyrant.
    22 replies | 341 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 12:01 PM
    And this person would howl blue murder, if a President Paul signed the TSA Elimination Act.
    22 replies | 341 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 11:56 AM
    My reading of subsection (c) leads me to believe this is wholly devoted to matters regarding internal Congressional affairs. The House Post Office scandal, for instance. 18 U.S. Code § 1001 (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
    12 replies | 365 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 11:51 AM
    Please do, I'm curious myself. My understanding of how USC 1001 is being applied and prosecuted these days is that any statement, given to any public official or agency of law enforcement, in person or in writing, that can proved to be, in fact, false, regardless of intent, regardless of actual knowledge and regardless of immateriality, is taken as prima facie evidence of a USC 1001 violation.
    12 replies | 365 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    Today, 08:30 AM
    I'm not saying they don't. I was simply cleaning up a false analogy. Dannno's analogy would apply to someone who bought internet service from an ISP having the right to put up wireless hospot and sell access to it without the ISPs permission. What's at stake is the ISP reselling information garnered from use of their product. Two entirely different things. Now at some point a company shouldn't have the right to sell images of you without your permission. Here's a good example. Say if a department store puts cameras in changing rooms to prevent shop lifting. Should they have the automatic right to sell those pictures/videos? I would say no. Maybe you think otherwise?
    50 replies | 662 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 08:24 AM
    Shots fired near Capitol, suspect in custody: police http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/shots-fired-capitol-suspect-custody/story?id=46444214 By ABC NEWS Mar 29, 2017, 10:03 AM ET U.S. Capitol Police responded to the area at Washington Ave and Independence Ave, which is located near the U.S. Botanic Garden and the Rayburn House Office Building. The suspect apparently struck a Capitol Police cruiser and then tried running over several officers who were on foot, according to Metro DC Police. At one point Capitol Police fired shots, but no one was hit.
    7 replies | 251 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:46 AM
    They warned you... http://thefreethoughtproject.com/infuriating-video-of-tsa-agent-molesting-a-boy-sheds-light-on-american-police-state/
    82 replies | 1863 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:36 AM
    I disagree.
    8 replies | 128 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:31 AM
    "Re-Imagining" they call "It". Stephen King’s clown horror gets its first TERRIFYING teaser http://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/785228/It-movie-trailer-Pennywise-Clown-Stephen-King-Bill-Skarsgard (video at link) They say that nobody does horror like Stephen King.
    10 replies | 167 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:23 AM
    Domino’s Will Begin Using Robots to Deliver Pizzas in Europe https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-29/domino-s-will-begin-using-robots-to-deliver-pizzas-in-europe by Jeremy Kahn ➞ Wednesday, March 29, 2017 5:00:00 AM
    80 replies | 1326 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:18 AM
    Well, that doesn't sound encouraging. Hope everything works out for you.
    26 replies | 448 view(s)
  • Anti Federalist's Avatar
    Today, 07:02 AM
    For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States
    90 replies | 10657 view(s)
More Activity

3 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Look up Pastor Anderson Youtubes.
  2. View Conversation
    You're welcome. And thanks
  3. View Conversation
    Thank you for the +rep and the vote of confidence. It is greatly appreciated.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 3 of 3
About DGambler

Basic Information

Signature


“…I believe that at this point in history, the greatest danger to our freedom and way of life comes from the reasonable fear of omniscient State powers kept in check by nothing more than policy documents.”

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
1,208
Posts Per Day
0.36
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
3
Most Recent Message
10-23-2012 10:09 AM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 10:32 AM
Join Date
01-08-2008
Referrals
0

9 Friends

  1. acptulsa acptulsa is offline

    Member

    acptulsa
  2. aGameOfThrones aGameOfThrones is offline

    Member

    aGameOfThrones
  3. Anti Federalist Anti Federalist is offline

    Needs a bigger boat...

    Anti Federalist
  4. DamianTV DamianTV is offline

    Member

    DamianTV
  5. donnay donnay is offline

    Member

    donnay
  6. DonVolaric DonVolaric is offline

    Member

    DonVolaric
  7. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  8. John F Kennedy III
  9. pcosmar pcosmar is offline

    Member

    pcosmar
Showing Friends 1 to 9 of 9
No results to display...
No results to display...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

03-24-2017


03-14-2017


03-13-2017


03-12-2017


02-24-2017


02-02-2017


01-26-2017


01-25-2017


01-17-2017


01-16-2017


01-15-2017


12-23-2016


12-21-2016

  • 09:40 PM - Hidden

12-09-2016


12-07-2016



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast