afwjam
Member

It was inevitable. But RPF hates orange man more than CRT so I guess we win?

Thats kind of funny considering Massie joined a documentary exposing the ridiculous system of fundraising for committee seats in the party system. And he was rewarded for exposing it by getting the seat he wants. Maybe they think it would shut him up. Congrats to massie though. If hes content with it, I'm proud of him.

Thanks for the note, I was able to get some support added for bitchute and rumble without much problem: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?552331-New-Rumble-and-Bitchute-video-embedding-support X1ZcnqXq0e7C

I don't think that's how it works...

I love Testament

There are a lot of Woodstock 99 videos on YouTube... they are fun to watch, and the comments are even more fun!

Why are libertarians so blind to anything outside of their ideological bubble? Go observe today's GOP grassroots. They want Trump. Those anti-Trump are tainted and vice versa. This is why Liz Cheney and Cindy McCain are censured. As for Rand, I hope he runs, though I have zero expectation of it. We don't even know if hes going to run for Senate again. To be fair, no candidate ever shares the exact same base. You say Rand didn't have some of the base of Ron but Ron also shares a huge base with Trump yet Trump is villified on this forum. Trump's online supporters in general really like Ron and Rand. Support from the traditional party is general and tend to just follow whoever the president is. It can be argued that Trump had a unique grip on the party grassroots. Rand did lose some of the purist libertarians, honestly nobody wants them anyways, they're not influential and aren't productive in this world. Tom Woods refers to them as POVERTARIANS. With the loss of those purists, he gained support in the general GOP base. Rand was considered a top tier candidate and did hit 24% in the crowded field before Trump entered.

1354066564375601152

The left is colonizing red local towns: https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/13/leftists-are-colonizing-red-towns-like-mine-and-local-republicans-are-clueless/ Here is a TED-Talk about how progressives should literally leave cities, invade small towns, run for office, and take over. Didn't realize this was actually a strategy, but apparently it is. And it explains a lot!

How ideologically polarized Americans live different lives: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/13/big-houses-art-museums-and-in-laws-how-the-most-ideologically-polarized-americans-live-different-lives/ Is the migration good for choice or for polarization? https://reason.com/2020/10/19/americans-are-moving-where-they-want-to-live-will-that-be-a-victory-for-choice-or-for-polarization/

Explanation of people leaving NYC: https://nypost.com/2020/08/11/a-mad-rush-for-the-exits-as-new-york-city-goes-down-the-tubes/ Market Watch says NYC is "dead forever?" https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-city-is-dead-forever-according-to-one-lifelong-new-yorker-2020-08-16?siteid=yhoof2

Cue autistic screeching about demoncrats.