• jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 11:21 PM
    How can you support a constitutionalist and not understand how to read a constitution? The clause I quoted is clear. When a slave owner sojourned to any state, not just the home state, his right to his "property" could be "impaired" by the state he of his sojourn. So it would be against the CSA constitution for a state to pass a law that once a slave master "sojourned" to another state, he couldn't force his slave to do labor. In fact, that's the reason slave owners wanted to take their slaves with them on their "sojourns" so they could continue working them. They weren't taking their slaves with them for window dressing. My point exactly. So even if a state under the CSA abolished slavery and even if you are right, which you are not, that under the CSA a state could make it illegal for slave labor to take place in that state, the slave owner could pay the slave (no slave labor) and the confiscate the wages later. Some slave owners did actually let their slaves earn and keep wages by the way.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:49 PM
    Nope. Not the way the CSA is written. That would diminish the property interest of the slave owner and be in direct violation of the clause I quoted to you. Besides the slave owner could "pay" the slave and the confiscate the money as soon as he got back across the border. Nice try though. Edit: Again the quote. Sec. 2. (I) The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired. If you can't make full use of your property, your "right of property" has, by definition, been impaired.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:46 PM
    Well now that the precedent has been set by your pimp daddy Trump it will be easier for the democrat who gets elected in 2020 or 2024 to do it. Unlikely because a republican congress would have gone apesh*t and voted against it. Your pimp daddy Trump got done what Obama dared not do. Face it, you've been had.
    100 replies | 1925 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:41 PM
    :rolleyes: Again HAVE YOU NOT HEARD OF MIGRANT FARM WORKERS! It's not a matter of "catching" the person doing it. It would be TOTALLY LEGAL under the CSA constitution! Migrant farm workers, by definition, "sojourn" from state to state! Come on dude. You can't be that thick.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:39 PM
    Penalty for keeping an out of state license plate? None really if you are not totally stupid. I had an uncle (now deceased) who lived in California but always had out of state license plates to avoid high California license plate fees.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:36 PM
    Coming from you that is a compliment as you are only trying to help people be illogical.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:35 PM
    SMDH. That's only if: 1) You get caught. (People go years without getting resident license plates. That's hard as hell to prove). 2) You actually set up residence. Have you never hear of migrant farm labor? Let's say Mississippi abolished slavery under the confederacy but Alabama did not. A slave owner could live in Alabama then rent his slaves to "sojourn" with him to work crops in Mississippi and then "sojourn" back.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:30 PM
    1) A holding != an "economy." 2) The traitors got their land, which they stole from the indians worked from labor stolen from Africans, back. 3) At the end of the day their sh*thole agriculture economy was transformed into a modern industrial economy. The civil war was the best thing that happened to the south and the southerners.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 10:42 AM
    Only a criminally insane person would believe that a single Trump voter would have voted for Hillary over Cruz.
    702 replies | 8234 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 08:13 AM
    Don't you get it? Most people want the freedom to restrict someone else's freedom.
    702 replies | 8234 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 08:11 AM
    Total BS. Cruz would have mopped the floor with Hillary. Trump is about the only candidate she might have beaten. That's why Bill Clinton asked Donald Trump to run. It was a win/win for progressives as Trump himself is one. Can you think of a single person you know that voted for Trump who would have voted against Hillary? Because I cannot. Your only lame comeback when the rest of us point out how horrible Trump has become is "Well he's not Hillary." Seriously Trump tried to implement gun control by executive order. Trump successfully installed face scanning cameras by executive order. If this was any other president you'd be up in arms. But since you bought the Trump Kool-Aid it's all "Well he isn't Hillary." I'll be honest. Cruz stood a better chance than even Rand at beating Hillary. Rand always has to get beyond the "He ain't a bloodthristy warmonger" badge. Trump, by simultaneously playing the interventionist "Obama didn't react when Syria crossed the red line" and the "Obama shouldn't have attacked Libya" but also "Obama should have attacked Libya and taken the oil" cards, Trump became an empty suit that everyone could project his or her beliefs onto. Seriously I heard a complete dumbass "Christian" pastor on talk Bible radio the other day say "God gave America one more chance after Ronald Reagan through Trump to turn to Him" as if Trump, who said he never even needs to repent to God, is somehow "God's man of the hour." It's really really sad. Trump's latest attack on Syria is totally predictable. All the globalists need to do to keep this war going indefinitely is occasionally do a false flag chemical attack and the missiles will fly even before the inspectors hit the ground.
    702 replies | 8234 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 07:50 AM
    I don't follow his show anymore, but I woke up this morning to this in my YouTube feed: So let me get this straight. Trump attempting to ban bumpfire stocks by executive order wasn't "crapping on us?" (See: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/20/trump-takes-executive-action-ban-bump-stocks-rifles-into-automatic-weapons/354536002/) Trump, by executive order, installing face scanning cameras at airports to "fight illegal immigration" wasn't "crapping on us?"
    100 replies | 1925 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 07:37 AM
    I watched some of the C-SPAN coverage of the senator who proposed this law. He said one of his constituents told him "I found my (missing?) daughter on Backpage and asked them to take the ad down and they wouldn't." Well...if I found my child on Backpage I would call the number, arrange a "date", and show up with the police. Then again...the police might merely arrest the pimp. I might just show up. But I guess common sense isn't common.
    28 replies | 531 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 07:30 AM
    There really wasn't anything worth stealing prior to the civil war. The South was nothing but a slave powered agricultural colony. Without slaves, the South wasn't worth spit because without slaves the south didn't have the manpower to produce its own export which was cotton. After slavery was abolished the South was able to get involved in REAL economic expansion by joining the industrial age. That's when Birmingham became a steel powerhouse. I know because I'm from there. You should visit sometime, and go to the civil right museum. The opening exhibit talks about the economic expansion coming from the steel industry post slavery. One look at pictures from those old steel mills and you'll see why they could NOT work on slave labor. It would have been too easy for a disgruntled slave to loosen the wrong bolt and cause a catastrophe. Loosen a bolt on a farm and the worst that happen is the plow is out of commission for a day. Loosen a bolt in a steel mill and people die and the entire mill is shut down. Really your logic is totally assbackwards. The northern "carpetbaggers" brought in industry. The southern traitors got their plantations back after swearing an oath to the union. Nothing was stolen.
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
  • jmdrake's Avatar
    04-14-2018, 07:21 AM
    The claims are 100% true. You just lack the intellect to understand them. Once again: 1. The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired. Look up the definition of sojourn. Definition of sojourn : a temporary stay a sojourn in the country
    170 replies | 4040 view(s)
No More Results
About GigiBowman

Basic Information

Signature


What do you get for pretending the danger's not real.
Meek and obedient you follow the leader
Down well trodden corridors into the valley of steel.
What a surprise!
A look of terminal shock in your eyes.
Now things are really what they seem.
No, this is not a bad dream.

~Pink Floyd - Sheep

www.liberty-candidates.org

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
103
Posts Per Day
0.03
General Information
Last Activity
08-10-2012 12:38 PM
Join Date
06-15-2007
Referrals
0
Home Page
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/165/

2 Friends

  1. jmdrake jmdrake is offline

    Member

    jmdrake
  2. Tink Tink is offline

    Member

    Tink
Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2
View GigiBowman's Blog

Recent Entries

RLC chair trying to sabotage CPAC vote

by GigiBowman on 01-29-2011 at 02:06 PM
Quote Originally Posted by sailingaway View Post
You know, that is a point to consider. I went back and looked it up and this is what the first ballot at SRLC looked like:


http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time....lc-straw-poll/

And, of course, Ron lost by one vote.

Which is not at all to suggest that Ron owns the vote of Johnson supporters, just that if Ron Paul supporters think it won't matter to divert a little voting Johnson's way, it very well could.

Read More

Categories
Uncategorized
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...