Tab Content
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    39 replies | 769 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    07-15-2018, 10:10 PM
    Why not simply write powers of attorney for each other instead of begging the government for permission to love one another?
    270 replies | 11183 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-23-2018, 12:28 PM
    GunnyFreedom replied to a thread For Sale: Feb 01 I expanded space in Marketplace
    I would totally buy some of this from a website. Driving to Indiana may be a bridge too far. Ever thought about putting up an online storefront?
    40 replies | 2671 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-21-2018, 05:13 PM
    Unplug it and put it in the microwave.
    5 replies | 140 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-20-2018, 12:21 PM
    Liberty people eat their own worse than any other group.
    53 replies | 1010 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-20-2018, 12:14 PM
    There are hashbrowns beneath the sausage gravy.... You can see one of them on the right hand side bottom of the image.
    59 replies | 1220 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:42 AM
    Because you understand the Constitution better than they guy who actually wrote it. Got it. :D
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:34 AM
    called. it. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?523327-Trump-to-start-US-Space-Force&p=6642262&viewfull=1#post6642262
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:22 AM
    And before you make a snide remark about flintlocks and quill pens, the Framer's original intent was that the right to bear arms extended to the equal armament common to military use, and the original intent of freedom of speech extended to all manner of expression. Whereas the original intent of the Army was a land based combat force, and the Navy a sea based combat force. Original intent is a thing. maybe you should look it up.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:18 AM
    Voyager sent linguistic messages in all human languages.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:17 AM
    The Constituion clearly authorizes two Departments. Army, and Navy. This covers land and sea. If they want a force for the Air, they need to amend the Constitution. If they want a force for Space, they need to amend the Constitution. Original Intent. The Framers did not originally intend aircraft and spaceships.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:08 AM
    .... until there is a 'public' on Mars, which seems to be in the works as we speak, so his point remains.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:06 AM
    lol! out of ammo...
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-19-2018, 12:05 AM
    You don't get to wish whatever you want into the Constitution. The Constitution authorized two branches. An Army branch and a Navy branch. Any military force must either reside under one of the two Constitutionally authorized branches, or a Constitutional Amendment must be made to amend the Constitution to authorize a third branch. This isn't rocket science, and I know you are smarter than this. Is this deliberate, or is this just an example of Trumgasming?
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:58 PM
    So yeah, you are claiming to understand the Constitution better than the guy who wrote it. James Madison wrote in The Virginia Report, 1800, by the Virginia House of Delegates, that the Sedition Act was unconstitutional.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:54 PM
    All of this was during James Madison's Presidency. Again, the guy who actually....wrote....the Constitution: From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#Establishment_of_the_modern_Marine_Corps
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:51 PM
    You should demand a refund from your history professor. That base in Georgia that James Madison established in 1811 for Marines to operate out of? Yeah, you didn't know anything about that at all, did you?
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:50 PM
    LMAO! James Madison wrote the Constitution, but Swordsmyth here understands it better than the guy who...you know...actually wrote it... John Adams signed the Act into law to form the Marines in 1798. James Madison served 1809-1817 and continued to utilize the Marines in 1811. Clearly the guy who wrote the Constitution thought they were Constitutional.... Because they were organized under the Constitutional Department of the Navy. smdh.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:43 PM
    No, the Army and Navy provisions are organizational. The Army Air Corps was organized under the Department of the Army. The same people who wrote the Constitution also created the Marine Corps and put them under the Department of the Navy. Are you claiming that the same people who wrote the Constitution did not know how to understand the words that they, themselves wrote?
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:41 PM
    The Marine Corps was raised up by an Act of the Continental Congress on 10 November 1775, and then again in the Constitutional era on 27 March 1794. The Marines were used extensively as an “Army Afloat” for amphibious raids and land marches like the assault on Derna right from the start. Their role did not actually depend on the Navy from the origins of the organization. If what you were claiming was correct, then Congress would have formed the Marines as a “Water Army” branch instead of putting them under the Department of the Navy in order to retain full Constitutionality. The proper method of Constitutional interpretation is Original Intent. The same people who wrote the Constitution had already dealt with the formation of another kind of military branch, and we can see that original intent in that act. Only two military departments are authorized in the Constitution. If you want more than two, amend it. I happen to agree that that we need an Air Force. Until we amend the Constitution, it needs to remain under the Department of the Army.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:23 PM
    Why not have 80 Departments of the Army? You are doing the the exact same bizarre interpretation dance that gave us the FDA, Department of Education, the Drug War, Wickard v Filburn and more. That’s not the way the Constitution is supposed to work. You can’t just retcon whatever you want into the Constitution. That’s how the Swamp operates.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:18 PM
    That sounds like justification for anything you can dream of. After all, the drug war is just a function of interstate commerce, right? Sorry, words have meaning. You don’t get to run around changing the meaning of words in order to shoe-horn whatever the hell you want I to the Constitution. That’s how the left is trying to neuter the Second Amendment. “Regulated” and all that. Article 1 Section 8 authorizes ONE Army and ONE Navy, so even if we took your absurdity as an “Air Army” it still doesn’t work. The provision is organizational, not connotative. When it was the Army Air Corps it was under the Department of the Army and therefore Constitutional. In order to become it’s own organizational branch it requires a Constitutional Amendment. This should be blatant on it’s face. Don’t get carried away by wishful thinking.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:05 PM
    Just because the government does it, doesn’t automagically make it Constitutional. In order to have a US Air Force that is not the Army Air Corps, requires a Constitutional Amendment. If you seriously got an Air Force out of Article 1 Section 8, then I don’t think I’ve got anything to help you.
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 11:03 PM
    And Iím the a-hole for recognizing it in 2015....
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
  • GunnyFreedom's Avatar
    06-18-2018, 10:56 PM
    Pretty sure this requires a Constitutional Amendment...
    97 replies | 1885 view(s)
No More Results

1 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    thank you for the message. I wrote a response on my "visitor messages" page above your message
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
About Bill M DC

Basic Information

Date of Birth
February 5
About Bill M DC
Interests:
Liberty
Occupation:
Courier
Political Campaign Skills
Campaign Workers:
Fund Raiser
Copywriters:
Speech Writer, Editor, Language Skill, Proofreading, Researcher
Entertainers and Events:
Logistic, Security
Transportation:
Driver

Signature


The ultimate test of a man's conscience may be his willingness to sacrifice something today for future generations whose words of thanks will not be heard. - Gaylord Nelson

Be the "Change" you want to be...

Contact


This Page
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/member.php?11261-Bill-M-DC&s=0695a8843fa83e544df1d9aa028ef8a4
Instant Messaging

Send an Instant Message to Bill M DC Using...

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
433
Posts Per Day
0.11
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
1
Most Recent Message
08-08-2008 12:50 PM
General Information
Last Activity
05-18-2010 03:41 PM
Join Date
12-21-2007
Referrals
0

7 Friends

  1. afmatt afmatt is offline

    Member

    afmatt
  2. berrybunches berrybunches is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via AIM to berrybunches
    berrybunches
  3. Bradley in DC Bradley in DC is offline

    Member

    Bradley in DC
  4. GunnyFreedom GunnyFreedom is offline

    Agent of Freedom

    GunnyFreedom
  5. Kokesh Rawks! Kokesh Rawks! is offline

    Banned

    Kokesh Rawks!
  6. ronpaulhawaii ronpaulhawaii is offline

    Member

    ronpaulhawaii
  7. yongrel yongrel is offline

    Member

    yongrel
Showing Friends 1 to 7 of 7
No results to display...
No results to display...
No results to display...