phill4paul
Member

It depends on how much controversy the media can manage to milk this for. If enough people are like, "Meh. That asshole was asking for it, because baby hostage", then nothing happens. But Antifa/BLM types have become sufficiently unhinged that even that may not matter anymore. We'll just have to wait and see.

Clearly, Rand Paul is seditious scum and a tool of the Democrats.

Police shooter was on the force for 4-years. I'm gonna bet he was a vet of Afghan or Iraq. No hesitation. Calm, cool, collected. One shot, one kill. With an hostage at body level. Not a Spec. Force operator though. The sling was deployed. Most Specs. know to bind the sling with "Ranger Bands" so it doesn't get caught up on anything. Guessing just a 16-20 yrd shot. Just observations.

Ha ha ha! Rand first says Biden hates black teens, and now this. I'd say he's getting more assertive than 2016, and getting reading for a different 2024 run.

That's because he is reading them uncritically. That's the whole point. He isn't trying to take sides. (You know, sort of like how actual journalism is supposed to be done ...) So ... he's "biased" because he isn't being critical of Dominion, but is just reporting the details of Dominion's suit and the specific allegations Dominion is making? :confused: How does that work? :confused:

I agree.

From the quotes in my OP “The Chief Justice’s absence demonstrate that this is not a trial of the president, but one of a private citizen,” Paul said in an address to the Senate floor Tuesday. “Therefore I make a point of order that this proceeding, which would try a private citizen and not a president, a vice president or civil officer violates the Constitution, and is not an order.”

LOL- beat me to it!

Chop wood. Carry water. Embrace the suck.

Fucking read the article. Or research others. Or just fuck off with your bullshit.

Dominion is Suing Rudy Giuliani for $1.3 BILLION! Lawyer Explains - Viva Frei Vlawg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NFPsrtG2LY

Not really. He was physically able to over-power her and grab the toddler. He CHOSE to pull a gun, fire off some shots and attempt a car-jacking and use his son as a shield. After the fact.

Well, he had the kid. After slamming her to the pavement. He chose to then pull a gun, fire off some shots, and it would seem, pull a car jacking. He chose poorly.

Ding we have a winner! Although #2 is a close second. Although there is this... Which, had it been a Sheriff, or Deputy, I'd give more praise.

Sorry Comrade! Thank you for the kind unbad correction to my abhorrent thinking!

Right back at it. No the Thread Title does NOT state the Facts.

Stating something that has not been determined in a COURT OF LAW as OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE. They would have originally made the statement because they BELIEVE the statement they made to be true, and were coerced into redaction. It is NOT FACT. Look, I believe that YOU believe Trump lost, and there is no election fraud. And you can believe that. You can even express those beliefs all you want. But now youre basically demanding that "False Claims" are Objective in their nature and we must change ourselves to suit your view of the world. You are twisting information to suit your narrative. That is called BIAS. And exactly WHY we have such a problem with MSM. Youre merely repeating what the MSM has said because you believe it. Fine if you believe it but it does not make it Objective or True. The type of thinking down the road will lead you to want to pass laws to censor us, but it will backfire on you and you wont be given permission to speak either. If this was Twitter, everyone who has expressed doubt in you would already be banned and ONLY YOU would remain. Fortunately for all of us we have some great Moderators here, and they are not about to ban us. Kind of like the Fact Checkers ONLY "Fact Checking" those expressing Conservative views, but anyone on the Left gets a Free Pass. And for the record, "Fact Check" just means they googled something, which, again does NOT make it true. I am not sure that you understand the difference between Objective and Subjective.

Like most things you got it ass-backwards.

Ministry of Truth has regained power?

Pfffftt!! That's all in the past. Fact checking will no longer be necessary. They promise ... https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1353879721361219584 1353879721361219584

You just did.

Again BULLSHIT. You can NOT use the phrasing of a Title as evidence that there is no election fraud. -REP

OMG Dominion sues Rudy Giuliani therefore Giuliani MUST BE LYING! Rudy Giuliani Sued by Dominion Voting Systems For Defamation https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/rudy-giuliani-sued-by-dominion-voting-systems-for-defamation See? Since they are suing then there can not be ANY election fraud!

Bullshit. "American Thinker Statement Retracting False Claims about Dominion" The difference between False and Not False is subjective. The thread title is presented as Objective, as if it is Fact and Evidence. I believe Trump WON the election. And I believe there IS massive election fraud.

One other thing that needs to be pointed out is Correlation does NOT mean Causation. Here is an example of how that can go wrong. Statistically crime is much higher in summer than winter. Also, ice cream sales are much higher in summer than winter. Thus, Ice Cream CAUSES Crime. That is associating Correlation and Causation. Same thing as a Correlation is being manufactured between Republican / Libertarian / Christian / Conservative and Terrorist. The two terms are not mutually exclusive. The Title of the thread is using that Correlation as Causation. This is akin to using the number of people that believe that there is Election Fraud as evidence. They are pissed, I believe they do believe, but it is NOT evidence. With the Title of this thread, the Correlation is that American Journal withdrew their statement as evidence. It is not evidence, they simply redacted their statement because it was challenged, but does not mean that the statements were in fact "False". Period.

Its a setup. When the vaccines start killing people en masse, the plan is going to be to blame it on some new strain of COVID. Thing is, I think there very well may be a very dangerous bioweapon that is planned to be deployed, but it sure as fuck aint COVID. COVID is just an excuse to deprive the people of their property and ability to pursue life, liberty, and happiness. ... which are now words of Terrorists.