• phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:28 PM
    Yo mamas chin? Just joking. You know that. Respects to your mom. Weren't her fault you come out the way you did.
    10 replies | 94 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:07 PM
    Happiness isn't enough. Contented is what one should strive for.
    17 replies | 155 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:57 PM
    You can and have fallen over without drinking. Why should drinking make a difference?
    17 replies | 155 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:42 PM
    I don't think it's about Moore bring it forward. However, if he is elected, and denied, the state could bring it before the supreme's and they would have to answer.
    675 replies | 13387 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:11 PM
    We're here for him. We/he will. But, don't get me started. Lotta crap out there how women were abused. Abuse happens in many forms. The wringer this cunts putting him through...I'd rather have a one time ass rape and be done with it.
    17 replies | 199 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:54 PM
    He's Air Farce. The totally un-Constitutional branch. We both know the Navy was mandated by the Constitution. Armies were to be raised and funded for only two years at a time. The Army started the Air Corp. The Army along with the Air Corp. should have been disbanded after WWII. Instead yet another military power was created. Constitutionally the Navy is mandated to use any means necessary to fulfill it's role. Including air power. The Army is way out of it's Constitutional bounds. And the Air Force? Just a step child of unruly, look at me, I'm special, fucks from the Army.
    10 replies | 94 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:45 PM
    Air Force pilots don't have the balls.
    10 replies | 94 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:28 PM
    I hope they get a huge settlement and the insurance company raises it's rates on all their customers to pay for it.
    6 replies | 91 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:40 PM
    Well, the cunt, the soon to be ex of my lady's son, moved out last weekend to an apartment. He brought the kids up here and when he got home he saw just how much the vindictive cunt took with her. He's got Thanksgiving day off so we are renting a truck and with various donated items. Gonna put his house back in order.
    17 replies | 199 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:37 PM
    Malcolm really was a rocker-roller legend. Every guitar player I know says he was one of the best rhythm players in history. He'd compose the songs and the band would fill in their particular niche. There would have been no AC/DC without him.
    37 replies | 1390 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:04 PM
    I'd like to know how the WaPo got 4 accusations from women unfamiliar with each other. I find it hard to believe that 4 different women just, out of the blue, decided to contact WaPo.
    675 replies | 13387 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:15 PM
    More testimonials...http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/roy_moore_announces_12_testimo.html
    675 replies | 13387 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:17 PM
    The Migration or Importation Clause states that “The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.” In and of itself, the Clause does not grant Congress any additional authority. To the contrary, it is a limitation on power. However, it could be argued that the limitation on congressional power to prohibit “migration or importation” of persons until 1808 implies that Congress had such a power to begin with. The word “migration” suggests that that power extended to the prohibition of voluntary immigration, as well as the importation of slaves, which the Migration or Importation Clause was intended to protect. But the inclusion of the term “migration” was not meant to imply a general federal power to restrict migration, but was a euphemism intended to bolster the pretense that the Constitution did not endorse slavery. As John Jay – the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers – pointed out in an 1819 letter discussing the Clause: It will, I presume, be admitted that slaves were the persons intended. The word slaves was avoided, probably on account of the existing toleration of slavery and of its discordance with the principles of the Revolution, and from a consciousness of its being repugnant to the following positions in the Declaration of Independence, viz.: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among them are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’” James Madison similarly argued that the Clause was intended to protect the slave trade against limitation prior to 1808, and that its phrasing was due to “scruples against admitting the term ‘slaves’ into the Instrument. Hence the descriptive phrase ‘migration or importation of persons;’ the term migration allowing those who were scrupulous of acknowledging expressly a property in human beings, to view imported persons as a species of emigrants, while others might apply the same term to foreign malefactors sent or coming into the country.” This suggests it is likely that the term “migration” was included only in order to avoid direct reference to slavery, and did not imply any general congressional power to restrict migration. In Federalist 42, Madison decried “ttempts have been made to pervert this clause into an objection against the Constitution, by representing it…as calculated to prevent voluntary and beneficial emigrations from Europe to America.”
    66 replies | 816 view(s)
  • NorthCarolinaLiberty's Avatar
    7 replies | 190 view(s)
  • phill4paul's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:16 AM
    RIP Malcolm Young. Nov. 18, 2017. :(
    37 replies | 1390 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
  • The Rebel Poet's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 08:46 PM
    This. A few years ago I read a statistic from Barna Group that kids raised in regular church attendance are more likely to become atheists than kids raised religious without regular church attendance.
    20 replies | 264 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 07:03 PM
    https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/17/11/17/2147214/fcc-approves-next-gen-atsc-30-tv-standard Why should you be concerned? Who cares if they know what you watch? By having access to as little as videos you watch, you give them the ability to determine your race, sexual orientation, political bias, gender, age, and a plethora of other things about you. In and of itself, that wouldnt be an issue except that the data about you is sold to those who can use that information to increase prices of seemingly unrelated things like health, car, homeowner / renter insurance, costs for goods and services you buy online. You are the one paying for them to give your data away because when there is a financial incentive to "find something wrong", they most undoubtedly will. Now, as far as that internet ready toilet paper...
    3 replies | 87 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 04:39 PM
    Never said any of that. Just interesting to see you justify the accusations against people you don't like, while also saying that there is no evidence against those you do. HYP.O.CRITE.
    103 replies | 1825 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 04:24 PM
    No asssssshhhhh hooooo, The GIRLS said there was no consent, not me.
    103 replies | 1825 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 04:02 PM
    The Onion is actually getting more viable everyday.
    2 replies | 99 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 04:00 PM
    So, again, in your POV, it's OK for YOU to regurgitate Trump-Talk but if I actually quote him, then I'm regurgitating CNN. Riiiiiight.
    103 replies | 1825 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 03:58 PM
    66 replies | 816 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 03:49 PM
    No, I think for myself. Try it sometime- you might wake up.
    103 replies | 1825 view(s)
  • Ender's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 03:46 PM
    Oooooh, poor widdo dannno- got no argument so name-calling-name-calling. :p It's obvious that Franken was having a joke at her expense- I'm sure she was pissed, but as specsaregood said: And BTW- YOU bathe in the Trump lies on a minute-by-minute basis. He talks about groping women by the pussy and that's OK but when he turns around and chastises Franken, well then Franken is baaaaaad. AGAIN as Madison320 pointed out:
    675 replies | 13387 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 03:16 PM
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-17/demise-dissent-why-web-becoming-homogenized Full article on link. --- Data Mining is now bigger than Big Oil.
    0 replies | 45 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 03:08 PM
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-17/how-uncle-sam-inflates-away-your-life Full article on link. --- Of course Zippy will argue that there is no inflation because the price of TVs has gone down.
    0 replies | 59 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 02:59 PM
    5 replies | 105 view(s)
  • DamianTV's Avatar
    11-17-2017, 02:55 PM
    I'd have to say yes they are. Silicon Valley is now akin to what Big Oil used to be. In fact, Data Mining as an industry, you know, all the shit they record about everything that you do, then sell it, is now BIGGER than Big Oil. So it should come as no surprise that they have intentionally built the infrastructure of your digital prison. But it goes even deeper. Fascism can be most easily described as a merger between government and corporations. According to Princeton, in a governmental system where politicians views represented the will of the people, if 0% of the people supported a particularly nasty bill, then 0% of the votes in govt would be for that system. Opposite of that is if 100% of the people supported a bill, then 100% of the votes in govt would be for that bill. What we have is about 30% of the bills get passed, regardless how much or how little support it has by the public. Smaller bills that dont really matter too much to the public tend to benefit either govt or corporations. The Princeton Study shows that the people in power truly do NOT care what the people want. And that holds true until you get to the top 1%. When you look at the richest 1% of people, then and only then does the voting pattern of govt officials match the will. Govt represents the rich, showing just how incredibly Fascist this country has become. Understanding that corporations truly run this country, you can only understand that they are the ones to build the tools that will support their industry, which is the suppression of your rights against theirs. And the most effective way to do that is to build a Surveillance Society and call it "Social Networking". What people give away for free becomes the very thing that enslaves them to those in power. ---
    6 replies | 175 view(s)
More Activity

20 Visitor Messages

  1. and your PM box is full!
  2. jjdoyle sent me a message on Twitter...she(?) saw our posts the other day calling for her un-ban and wanted to thank all of us (you, me, AF and Carlybee.) She asked me to pass that along.
  3. View Conversation
    Thanks, Phill. I was late.
  4. View Conversation
    Thank you, sir. Working on my second cup of coffee, now. LOL!
  5. View Conversation
    Well, if they're hungry, and you have a can of tuna, I bet you could.
  6. Latest Reputation Received (29928 point(s) total) -- Your Reputation Power: 30
  7. View Conversation
    About the 30 thingy? Are you serious?
  8. View Conversation
    Are you serious?? Or pulling my leg?
  9. View Conversation
    Hey, I hope you know that I don't take any of our disagreements personally and I honestly don't mean to be offensive, but if I do offend you, I am sorry that is not my intention.
  10. View Conversation
    Thank you kind Sir!
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 20
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
About phill4paul

Basic Information

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Profile Sidebar Configuration

Political / Activist Bio:
Designed moneybomb website for Glen Bradley. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?472621-Now-live!-New-user-sidebar-info

Donated to both Ron Paul campaigns.

Ran the local Ron Paul meet-up and activist co-ordination in 2008.

Traveled to the S.C. Debate and brought awareness of Ron Paul.
Activist Reputation (Self-Rated):
Select if you support the site's Mission.:
I support the site Mission. (This will change your user title to "Supporting Member".)
Display site reputation bars.:
Display site reputation bars.
Select if you "Stand with Rand":
I Stand with Rand (This will add a "Stand with Rand" badge by your name badge by yourr name in all posts.)


Theye have refused their Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

Theye have erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

Theye kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies

Theye have combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution,

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

Theye plundered and destroyed the lives of our people.

Theye are at this time transporting Armies of Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized nation.


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
08-07-2015 04:54 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Yesterday 10:30 PM
Join Date

20 Friends

  1. 1stvermont 1stvermont is offline


  2. amy31416 amy31416 is offline


  3. bolil bolil is offline


  4. cajuncocoa cajuncocoa is offline


  5. Cap Cap is offline


  6. ClydeCoulter ClydeCoulter is offline


  7. DamianTV DamianTV is offline


  8. Deborah K Deborah K is offline


    Deborah K
  9. Ender Ender is offline


  10. Joeyblackrose Joeyblackrose is offline

    New Member

Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 20
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast






  • 04:53 PM - Hidden





  • 03:11 AM - Hidden









Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Page 1 of 230 1231151101 ... LastLast





Page 1 of 230 1231151101 ... LastLast