Tab Content
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    Today, 09:31 AM
    TER, I want to point out an assumption that you've made in your statement above. When you accuse CL of "not addressing this topic as a Christian, but more as an Israelite of the Old Testament," you are assuming that Israelites were not Christians under the Old Covenant. But if that were true, then it would mean that no Israelite was connected to the Messiah by faith (which would include church fathers like Abraham, Moses, and David). In effect, you are creating a false dichotomy between the people of God in the Old Testament and the people of God in the New Testament, even though both groups worship the same triune God. If you want to understand how the laws in the Old Testament apply today, then you have to study them through the eyes of Christ (cf. John 5:45-47), since Christ was the One Who established them with the Father and the Holy Spirit in the Old Covenant. Thus, the ethical principle imbibed in laws such as the ones in Deuteronomy still remain true and relevant for all people today (since Christ has all authority in Heaven and on Earth ). Even the apostle Paul compared New Testament Christians to Old Testament Christians in 1 Corinthians 10:1-4, illustrating that God interacts with His people the same way through covenant blessings and curses. So, you have no Biblical basis to make contrasts between Christians in the New Testament and Israelites in the Old Testament, as if God's Law had authority over the latter group but not the former. The laws do apply today, but in the greater revelation from Christ in the New Covenant, it takes greater wisdom to understand how they apply today. Once again, all of the laws in the Old Testament have an ethical implication to them, and ethics are eternal since they reflect the character of the triune God. Thus, CL has every right to discern and develop civil laws from laws in the Old Testament. Otherwise, the alternative is appealing to the relative morality of secular humanism (atheism) to frame civil statutes.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Today, 06:01 AM
    Calling people names has been against the site guidelines for almost a decade. Anyone who left because of it would have done so out of their own ignorance. I do no think there was one case post Rand dropping out where there was a name calling report that was not properly managed. So the site is being run fine, no victims here. In general, people need to learn to deal with reality, even when it doesn't favor their political narrative. The site has done an evaluation and doesn't support Trump. As with many other candidates before, that doesn't mean we can't post news about what they are doing, we're not going to allow pro-Trump puff pieces but general news and negative commentary is fine. If there are false statements they can and should be called out. More posts where deleted. Everyone needs to go read the Community Guidelines and follow them: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/content.php?1989
    77 replies | 1073 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:41 PM
    http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/city-of-phoenix-to-consider-closing-hiking-trails-during-extreme-heat The proposal would have Phoenix trails closed when the temperature reaches 110 degrees or higher. "Under the proposal, hikers would also not be allowed to bring dogs on trails when the temperature is at or above 100 degrees. The city has not said what consequences would be for people who violate these rules if they’re put in place." the nanny state is happening in Az. This is the first time living here I have ever seen such a law proposed for parks . This state is quickly taking a nose dive into socialism and statism.
    11 replies | 94 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:45 PM
    Thread cleaned up. If you think a user is causing problems please bring the issue to the staff or put them on ignore. Do not attack other members. Unless it's based on hate or violence, nobody gets banned for voicing opinions. That was certainly not the case here.
    77 replies | 1073 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:42 PM
    http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/32257692/at-least-4-hikers-died-during-record-heat-in-arizona these people have no clue..."water water water" has nothing to do with core body temperatures. UGH...the city should stop promoting hiking for families.its not a family activity in the desert period.
    11 replies | 173 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:27 PM
    http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/city-of-phoenix-to-consider-closing-hiking-trails-during-extreme-heat The proposal would have Phoenix trails closed when the temperature reaches 110 degrees or higher. "Under the proposal, hikers would also not be allowed to bring dogs on trails when the temperature is at or above 100 degrees. The city has not said what consequences would be for people who violate these rules if they’re put in place." the nanny state is happening in Az. This is the first time living here I have ever seen such a law proposed for parks . This state is quickly taking a nose dive into socialism and statism.
    11 replies | 173 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    06-28-2016, 10:00 PM
    2 replies | 184 view(s)
  • CaseyJones's Avatar
    06-28-2016, 08:49 PM
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megaphone_desktop_tool
    77 replies | 1073 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    06-28-2016, 04:40 PM
    I'm not sure of your point here, but I have certainly meant everything that I have said. What there is certainly some room for basic banter in threads there is validity in having discussion and analysis on this topic, which can be done without supporting Trump. While the site does not support Trump it is foolhardy to dismiss everything he says, or in this case, the 7 point plan he presents. It's worthy of analysis to ID points of possible value and points of weakness. This analysis will provide intellectual value and help people understand good policy. That still doesn't mean one has to or should support Trump even if he has some good points on some issues. Could we please get some more analysis on these points? Are any more details provided?
    96 replies | 1155 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    06-27-2016, 04:15 PM
    I certainly disagree with your characterization, but you're welcome to point out flaws in the moderation; I understand things aren't perfect and we aim to do better. Brian pointed out the issues here. I don't deny that some members are using arguments that I do not see as helpful to our movement. I do not question their intent or motives however, it doesn't matter if I did anyway. With the right due-process, long time members can be banned but I'm not going to railroad anyone who has been here 5+ years. They have earned more than that, just like you have earned more than that. Still, I'm not afraid to hit anyone up side the head with good arguments.
    144 replies | 2123 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    06-27-2016, 12:14 PM
    I'm honest about enforcing the guidelines, and there are many violations here-- not that they were flagged, which is extremely helpful for the site to be run properly since the staff can't read everything. And no, it is not acceptable to call members in good standing "trolls"; nor does it really make sense to call someone that who has been here for 9 years. I have reviewed much of the discussion and agree you make some excellent points here. Sometimes we allows some latitude of discussion if there is a large degree of value and there can be some positive education on the matter within our member base. It just helps to know how to get people to change their perspective on some things, mocking them and calling them trolls doesn't help. If you want to make a different you need to challenge people intellectually. For example, here's is an attempt on that for this thread: I would agree this is what is going on, any most specifically, the elites don't care about race issues, they care about control issues and they will destroy what is needed to get what they want. Many races have fallen victim to this and more will in the future if they are not stopped.
    144 replies | 2123 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 09:11 AM
    I believe in the decentralization of power, which is a Biblical principle, first derived in Genesis with the formation of the tribes of Israel (I don't have time to delve deeply into that, but it can be proven). So, to answer your question, I would advocate a system that is similar to what we had in our early republic, where local, state, and county governments are formed by Christians from various denominations to assess how crimes should be punished within their respective jurisdictions. So, for example, if a Presbyterian is living in a county full of Roman Catholics, and those Catholics have laws which he believes do not square with Biblical justice, then he can find another county where there are mostly Presbyterians and from there, they can work together to apply God's Law based on their Biblical convictions. That's what we had in the earlier days of America, with entire states being composed of one Christian denomination from another state of a different Christian denomination. It's one of the reasons why the First Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," because their definition of "religion" was related to Christian denominations, understanding that each state was by and large composed of a particular Christian denomination.
    70 replies | 1180 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:51 AM
    Because if you want to have a just society, then there needs to be an absolute standard for determining what is just and unjust behavior. Once you have established that, then you can deal with how unjust behavior ought to be punished. Why is that? Because God desires holiness from His creatures, not just internally but also externally, which is why God expects us to put away evil from society as it emerges. And, of course, evil is defined by God's Word, not majority opinion nor by current trends of acceptable behavior.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:45 AM
    If you're a Christian, then you should already know how one determines what governments God has ordained. That's why we have disciplines such as Biblical and systematic theology to delve into the subject on what the Bible teaches about the nature of government. But it is a topic that can be ascertained, and it is one that no other worldview (secular humanism, Islam, etc.) can account for.
    70 replies | 1180 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:24 AM
    No, it doesn't make me an anarchist; it just means that I hold to the view that God rules society, and therefore, He is the One Who delegates authority (those who minister to others) and sets their jurisdictions within a civilized society. That's why an elite subset of society should never manipulate the rest by force. All people should be self-governed by God's Law before they take any position of authority within God-ordained governments (family, church, and state) to ensure that an elite group do not take over society by their own whims. When that happens (as it is currently in American civics), then it is a good indication that people in positions of authority are not self-governing themselves in God's Law.
    70 replies | 1180 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 01:22 AM
    The only way we can answer the question, "Should X be criminalized," is by, first, answering, "What does God say about X?" The two questions go together, when we are discussing what sexual sins should receive civil sanctions. But, of course, it takes wisdom to understand how to apply those sanctions in our modern world, and that can be challenging at times, I admit. But, nonetheless, it still needs to be considered when we're assessing public policy and its relation to sexual taboos. Another thing to keep in mind is that the page marked "New Testament" in our Bibles is not inspired by God. That fact is very important because when we are talking about continuities and discontinuities between the Old and New Covenants, we need to realize that the Old Testament laws still applied when the New Testament was being written. Thus, the authors' approach to how Old Testament laws would apply to them in their own day would not have been riddled with many of the assumptions that we face today in modern Christianity (with ideas such as the "Two-Kingdoms Approach," "Law vs. Gospel" dichotomies, Dispensationalism, and other concepts which inherently but inadvertently pit the Old Testament against the New Testament). Unfortunately, you, yourself, are guilty of those very approaches to the New Testament, which is why you fail at understanding how the Old Testament applies to us today. Remember, "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness..." (2 Timothy 3:16). If sexual acts were condemned with civil penalties in the Old Covenant, then those penalties apply civilly, in some way, in the New Covenant. Otherwise, you would have to say that God made a mistake when He decreed those sexual acts as punishable by civil law under the Old Covenant. But, once again, it takes wisdom to understand how they apply today because the world has changed since the times of the Old Covenant. But the moral indictment against certain sexual behaviors does not change because moral laws are eternal, by nature.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 12:48 AM
    Ronin, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about in relation to Paul's theology. It's funny how you consider yourself more educated about the relationship between Jesus and Paul when world-renown Biblical scholars, such as N.T. Wright, have been applauded for their research and writings about Paul's life and theology. If you have any serious, objective interest in how Paul's theology was consistent with Christ's doctrines, then I recommend that you watch this lecture from one of the best Pauline scholars in the world, and learn something:
    42 replies | 542 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:20 PM
    What "uncontrolled systems" are you referring to, fisharmor?
    70 replies | 1180 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:16 PM
    Exactly, erowe1. That's all Ronin Truth does. He can't give a definitive, comprehensive rebuttal to anything in which he disagrees with. All he knows how to do is copy and paste links. That's why his credibility, especially in these kinds of discussions, is always suspect because of his laziness and ignorant flippancy of facts that he has no intention of researching. He seriously needs to leave these forums and stick to playing Solitaire online or something.
    42 replies | 542 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:56 AM
    Christians have provided evidence that Paul affirmed the doctrines of Christ. It's just that people like yourself refuse to accept the evidence.
    42 replies | 542 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:53 AM
    The claims that Jesus was an anarchist and that Paul was a statist are simply anachronisms. As such, they make both of your assertions moot points, so there's no need to argue with you about the merits of your claims.
    70 replies | 1180 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 04:37 AM
    When you read much of the literature in favor of anarchism, it seems that anarchism starts off with 5 basic assumptions, philosophically speaking: Truth is relative. Life is random. People are basically good. A person can change his own life if he chooses to. The goal of life is self-satisfaction. Building a civic/economic philosophy on those basic assumptions opens the door wide open for an elite group to manipulate society very easily, in my opinion. Thus, anarchism (no matter if it's anarcho-capitalism, anatcho-communism, anarcho-primitivism, or any other school of thought) cannot solve the problem of having an elite manipulating and ruling over society.
    70 replies | 1180 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 03:47 AM
    3825 replies | 163664 view(s)
  • afwjam's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 02:09 PM
    Tear it down, all of it, including trumps wall.
    19 replies | 371 view(s)
  • afwjam's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 02:06 PM
    I can't give any rep to people in this thread, stop being so right on.
    111 replies | 6432 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 03:08 AM
    The Accountant seems like it's a movie mixture of The Bourne Identity and A Beautiful Mind. Nonetheless, I still want to see it.
    1048 replies | 52686 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 12:11 AM
    I am not an expert, but the experts that I have listened to say the scope you want is a NightForce -- they are expensive (about $1,700+) but you get what you pay for. Optics are first rate, the scopes are really durable and hold their zero. Reports are you can take the scope off, beat someone over the head with it and it will still hold its zero. :D Worth looking into...
    36 replies | 721 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:48 AM
    The bottom line of this discussion is determining whether or not it's good to have laws prohibiting sexual behaviors, in general, and prostitution, in particular. It seems to me that you believe local, state, nor the federal governments should have laws prohibiting sexual behavior. If I'm correct about that, then are you for repealing laws that prohibit sexual acts like rape, child molestation, and bestiality because they have been codified by civil magistrates? I'm just trying to understand where your thinking is on that.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:27 AM
    Where did Christian Liberty ever say, "Comply or cooperate with my judgment, or I will murder you," as it pertains to prostitution?
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:25 AM
    If you're a Christian, then you should have a moral problem with bestiality. If you don't, then you need to study the Scriptures to see what God thinks of it. Now, my reason for asking you about bestiality was to simply show that you do pass judgments on sexual behavior, just as Christian Liberty does. There is no neutrality about it. That brings me to your statement: There is no religious neutrality in public policy. The rejection of a Biblical application to public policy is just the adoption of another religious authority, which in our current state of affairs is secular humanism. Some group of citizens will be judged and sanctioned by the law, based on the religious foundation of those who create laws. That's why homosexuals, for example, are using state and federal legislatures to impose their morality upon Christians (and other groups) through "hate crimes legislation." Once again, that's just a reflection of someone's religious worldview. It's simply inevitable.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 06:41 AM
    Okay, maybe I misunderstood you, so let me back up and ask if you have a problem with sexual acts like bestiality.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 04:13 AM
    29 replies | 384 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 03:52 AM
    It doesn't matter which of the two tod evans was referring to because both of them are judgments of a sexual act. That was simply my point. Now, concerning how that relates to this thread, as Christians, we know the Bible teaches that God is sovereign over His creation, which means that He has authority over every aspect of human life. So, when we are discussing public policy about certain behaviors which are public taboos in our society, then our first question to ask is, "What has God said about it?" From there, we use wisdom from the Scriptures to understand how that behavior ought to be dealt with in society by all levels of government (self, family, church, and civil) in order to please God.
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 02:24 AM
    My point is that you have a moral declaration about a particular sexual behavior, and that declaration is, in fact, passing judgment upon those who engage in the act (which, in the case I quoted you from, was bestiality). In fact, everyone passes judgment on sexual behaviors. I'm sure that no one here accepts that rape is a moral sexual behavior. But, hey, if there is no God, and thus, there is no ultimate ethical standard for sexual behavior, so, therefore, humans are nothing more than evolved bags of meat with electricity running through themselves, then some people can't help their sexual preference to rape others. And we can apply that same reasoning to other sexual behaviors. So, then, where is the room to judge any sexual behavior, if God hasn't set up some rules for standard sexuality? Thus, the prerequisite in this whole discussion is marked by one simple question: "By whose standard?"
    156 replies | 1818 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 01:24 AM
    .308 is designed for hunting. 30-ought 6 is designed to have a trajectory that tumbles slightly down so that you can hit a target over a hill without having to fully see it...if you know what to do
    36 replies | 721 view(s)
  • CaptainAmerica's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 01:21 AM
    If your rifle is for self defense and combat, forget it. Scopes are useless. Get an m1a scout for close quarters to mid range(preferred), or fully loaded model for distance, with classic picatinny peep hole sights with lateral and vertical adjustment for wind and distance accuracy. Forget scopes...., red dot is garbage. Your rifle is only as good as your instinct.
    36 replies | 721 view(s)
More Activity

181 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Got a great score on my MCATS so yeah it's looking like Dr.Kotin will be a thing hehe
  2. View Conversation
    It is great, thanks!

    And my avatar is bigger! Thank you!
  3. View Conversation
    To both Josh and Bryan (I'll repost on Bryan's) my box is full (my paid member status went away, not an emergency at all but I'm not getting messages if you sent them to mods). I took a bunch off but I'm going to wait before purging as drastically as I would have to to make it work. One guy's name is on who paid to have it removed, and he might have more reason to need attention, I reported his post to the report forum and will move it to mod forum.

    Meanwhile if this goes down again I recommend you use the Forum Twitter account: https://twitter.com/RonPaulForums you can get a message out to me and others who use twitter and we'll spread it. I'm @usernamenuse https://twitter.com/usernamenuse
  4. View Conversation
    Live well.

    Couldn't agree more.

    Let me know if I can help out getting things back up and running.
  5. View Conversation
    Dear Admin,
    How are you?
    My name is Sally from a Chinese B2C online store---www.dailyshop.com. Our online store is new and recently we want to promote our site, let more forum members to know us, so I'm contacting you for cooperation.
    I wonder if you permit a give-away activity held in your forum? If yes, we will choose one item from our online store to give the forum members for free, of course, we will consult with you firstly about what kind of items will be beneficial for your members, if this activity is hold in your forum successfully, we can build a long-term cooperation and provide much more benefits to our members. How do you think?


    Do you mind to give me your personal contact information? We can talk about the details online. And we believe it will also bring your forum more new members and daily visitors. Thanks!
    My contact information:
    Skype:sallycui3
    Gmail: sallycui3@gmail.com
    hotmail: sallycui3@hotmail.com
    ICQ:645828097


    Sally
  6. View Conversation
    Oh my God, Josh - we need to talk apparently. I'm sarcastic, but I have more hope for the movement now than most of the people in the thread. I hope you're PMing them to remind them that Ron Paul said our best hope is to stay active in the party.
  7. View Conversation
    That was uncalled for. She and I have a history. She is a democrat, who thinks she's entitled to Social Security because she was a financially irresponsible single Mom. Now she's here talking people into leaving the GOP - the direct opposite of what Ron Paul says in both instances. (And by the way, I don't give negs. In my experience, it's an asshole move.)
  8. View Conversation
    Josh, the RNC is trying to block the festival. http://communities.washingtontimes.c...n-block-event/

    Can you help me apply some pressure by bringing some attention to it? Thanks so much. ~deb
  9. View Conversation
    We could really use the Moneybomb widget at the top of the forum with only a week left. It's vital for building fans and pledges to maximize our fundraising total. Here's a link to the thread or you can check the messsages I sent you. Thanks.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 181
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
About JoshLowry

Basic Information

Political Campaign Skills
Graphics:
Graphic Artist, Graphic Designer, Web Designer / Developer, Sign Printer
Video and Audio:
Video Producer
Marketers:
Online Marketer

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
10,793
Posts Per Day
3.23
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
181
Most Recent Message
06-13-2016 01:11 AM
General Information
Join Date
05-10-2007
Referrals
13
Home Page
http://www.stateofbrain.com

36 Friends

  1. afwjam afwjam is offline

    McAfee 2016

    afwjam
  2. Anthony T Anthony T is offline

    Member

    Anthony T
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. brenton brenton is offline

    Member

    brenton
  5. Bryan Bryan is offline

    Admin

    Bryan
  6. Bsouljah Bsouljah is offline

    New Member

    Bsouljah
  7. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline

    Member

    CaptainAmerica
  8. CaseyJones CaseyJones is offline

    Member

    CaseyJones
  9. Chainspell Chainspell is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via MSN to Chainspell
    Chainspell
  10. ClydeCoulter ClydeCoulter is offline

    Member

    ClydeCoulter
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 36
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...

06-21-2016

  • 07:14 PM - Hidden

06-16-2016

  • 11:06 PM - Hidden
  • 04:41 PM - Hidden

06-15-2016

  • 01:58 PM - Hidden

06-14-2016

  • 02:07 PM - Hidden
  • 01:12 PM - Hidden
  • 11:19 AM - Hidden

06-13-2016

  • 09:52 PM - Hidden
  • 09:47 PM - Hidden
  • 07:33 PM - Hidden
  • 06:50 PM - Hidden
  • 05:56 PM - Hidden
  • 01:39 AM - Hidden

06-12-2016

  • 11:45 PM - Hidden
  • 09:31 PM - Hidden
  • 03:01 PM - Hidden