Tab Content
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:15 PM
    I certainly disagree with your characterization, but you're welcome to point out flaws in the moderation; I understand things aren't perfect and we aim to do better. Brian pointed out the issues here. I don't deny that some members are using arguments that I do not see as helpful to our movement. I do not question their intent or motives however, it doesn't matter if I did anyway. With the right due-process, long time members can be banned but I'm not going to railroad anyone who has been here 5+ years. They have earned more than that, just like you have earned more than that. Still, I'm not afraid to hit anyone up side the head with good arguments.
    130 replies | 1681 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    Yesterday, 12:14 PM
    I'm honest about enforcing the guidelines, and there are many violations here-- not that they were flagged, which is extremely helpful for the site to be run properly since the staff can't read everything. And no, it is not acceptable to call members in good standing "trolls"; nor does it really make sense to call someone that who has been here for 9 years. I have reviewed much of the discussion and agree you make some excellent points here. Sometimes we allows some latitude of discussion if there is a large degree of value and there can be some positive education on the matter within our member base. It just helps to know how to get people to change their perspective on some things, mocking them and calling them trolls doesn't help. If you want to make a different you need to challenge people intellectually. For example, here's is an attempt on that for this thread: I would agree this is what is going on, any most specifically, the elites don't care about race issues, they care about control issues and they will destroy what is needed to get what they want. Many races have fallen victim to this and more will in the future if they are not stopped.
    130 replies | 1681 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 09:11 AM
    I believe in the decentralization of power, which is a Biblical principle, first derived in Genesis with the formation of the tribes of Israel (I don't have time to delve deeply into that, but it can be proven). So, to answer your question, I would advocate a system that is similar to what we had in our early republic, where local, state, and county governments are formed by Christians from various denominations to assess how crimes should be punished within their respective jurisdictions. So, for example, if a Presbyterian is living in a county full of Roman Catholics, and those Catholics have laws which he believes do not square with Biblical justice, then he can find another county where there are mostly Presbyterians and from there, they can work together to apply God's Law based on their Biblical convictions. That's what we had in the earlier days of America, with entire states being composed of one Christian denomination from another state of a different Christian denomination. It's one of the reasons why the First Amendment says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion," because their definition of "religion" was related to Christian denominations, understanding that each state was by and large composed of a particular Christian denomination.
    67 replies | 1015 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:51 AM
    Because if you want to have a just society, then there needs to be an absolute standard for determining what is just and unjust behavior. Once you have established that, then you can deal with how unjust behavior ought to be punished. Why is that? Because God desires holiness from His creatures, not just internally but also externally, which is why God expects us to put away evil from society as it emerges. And, of course, evil is defined by God's Word, not majority opinion nor by current trends of acceptable behavior.
    130 replies | 1394 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:45 AM
    If you're a Christian, then you should already know how one determines what governments God has ordained. That's why we have disciplines such as Biblical and systematic theology to delve into the subject on what the Bible teaches about the nature of government. But it is a topic that can be ascertained, and it is one that no other worldview (secular humanism, Islam, etc.) can account for.
    67 replies | 1015 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 08:24 AM
    No, it doesn't make me an anarchist; it just means that I hold to the view that God rules society, and therefore, He is the One Who delegates authority (those who minister to others) and sets their jurisdictions within a civilized society. That's why an elite subset of society should never manipulate the rest by force. All people should be self-governed by God's Law before they take any position of authority within God-ordained governments (family, church, and state) to ensure that an elite group do not take over society by their own whims. When that happens (as it is currently in American civics), then it is a good indication that people in positions of authority are not self-governing themselves in God's Law.
    67 replies | 1015 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 01:22 AM
    The only way we can answer the question, "Should X be criminalized," is by, first, answering, "What does God say about X?" The two questions go together, when we are discussing what sexual sins should receive civil sanctions. But, of course, it takes wisdom to understand how to apply those sanctions in our modern world, and that can be challenging at times, I admit. But, nonetheless, it still needs to be considered when we're assessing public policy and its relation to sexual taboos. Another thing to keep in mind is that the page marked "New Testament" in our Bibles is not inspired by God. That fact is very important because when we are talking about continuities and discontinuities between the Old and New Covenants, we need to realize that the Old Testament laws still applied when the New Testament was being written. Thus, the authors' approach to how Old Testament laws would apply to them in their own day would not have been riddled with many of the assumptions that we face today in modern Christianity (with ideas such as the "Two-Kingdoms Approach," "Law vs. Gospel" dichotomies, Dispensationalism, and other concepts which inherently but inadvertently pit the Old Testament against the New Testament). Unfortunately, you, yourself, are guilty of those very approaches to the New Testament, which is why you fail at understanding how the Old Testament applies to us today. Remember, "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness..." (2 Timothy 3:16). If sexual acts were condemned with civil penalties in the Old Covenant, then those penalties apply civilly, in some way, in the New Covenant. Otherwise, you would have to say that God made a mistake when He decreed those sexual acts as punishable by civil law under the Old Covenant. But, once again, it takes wisdom to understand how they apply today because the world has changed since the times of the Old Covenant. But the moral indictment against certain sexual behaviors does not change because moral laws are eternal, by nature.
    130 replies | 1394 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-26-2016, 12:48 AM
    Ronin, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about in relation to Paul's theology. It's funny how you consider yourself more educated about the relationship between Jesus and Paul when world-renown Biblical scholars, such as N.T. Wright, have been applauded for their research and writings about Paul's life and theology. If you have any serious, objective interest in how Paul's theology was consistent with Christ's doctrines, then I recommend that you watch this lecture from one of the best Pauline scholars in the world, and learn something:
    42 replies | 491 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:20 PM
    What "uncontrolled systems" are you referring to, fisharmor?
    67 replies | 1015 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 09:16 PM
    Exactly, erowe1. That's all Ronin Truth does. He can't give a definitive, comprehensive rebuttal to anything in which he disagrees with. All he knows how to do is copy and paste links. That's why his credibility, especially in these kinds of discussions, is always suspect because of his laziness and ignorant flippancy of facts that he has no intention of researching. He seriously needs to leave these forums and stick to playing Solitaire online or something.
    42 replies | 491 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:56 AM
    Christians have provided evidence that Paul affirmed the doctrines of Christ. It's just that people like yourself refuse to accept the evidence.
    42 replies | 491 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 11:53 AM
    The claims that Jesus was an anarchist and that Paul was a statist are simply anachronisms. As such, they make both of your assertions moot points, so there's no need to argue with you about the merits of your claims.
    67 replies | 1015 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 04:37 AM
    When you read much of the literature in favor of anarchism, it seems that anarchism starts off with 5 basic assumptions, philosophically speaking: Truth is relative. Life is random. People are basically good. A person can change his own life if he chooses to. The goal of life is self-satisfaction. Building a civic/economic philosophy on those basic assumptions opens the door wide open for an elite group to manipulate society very easily, in my opinion. Thus, anarchism (no matter if it's anarcho-capitalism, anatcho-communism, anarcho-primitivism, or any other school of thought) cannot solve the problem of having an elite manipulating and ruling over society.
    67 replies | 1015 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-25-2016, 03:47 AM
    3824 replies | 163432 view(s)
  • afwjam's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 02:09 PM
    Tear it down, all of it, including trumps wall.
    19 replies | 356 view(s)
  • afwjam's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 02:06 PM
    I can't give any rep to people in this thread, stop being so right on.
    111 replies | 6417 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 03:08 AM
    The Accountant seems like it's a movie mixture of The Bourne Identity and A Beautiful Mind. Nonetheless, I still want to see it.
    1048 replies | 52615 view(s)
  • Bryan's Avatar
    06-24-2016, 12:11 AM
    I am not an expert, but the experts that I have listened to say the scope you want is a NightForce -- they are expensive (about $1,700+) but you get what you pay for. Optics are first rate, the scopes are really durable and hold their zero. Reports are you can take the scope off, beat someone over the head with it and it will still hold its zero. :D Worth looking into...
    36 replies | 685 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:48 AM
    The bottom line of this discussion is determining whether or not it's good to have laws prohibiting sexual behaviors, in general, and prostitution, in particular. It seems to me that you believe local, state, nor the federal governments should have laws prohibiting sexual behavior. If I'm correct about that, then are you for repealing laws that prohibit sexual acts like rape, child molestation, and bestiality because they have been codified by civil magistrates? I'm just trying to understand where your thinking is on that.
    130 replies | 1394 view(s)
  • Theocrat's Avatar
    06-23-2016, 09:27 AM
    Where did Christian Liberty ever say, "Comply or cooperate with my judgment, or I will murder you," as it pertains to prostitution?
    130 replies | 1394 view(s)
More Activity

181 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    Got a great score on my MCATS so yeah it's looking like Dr.Kotin will be a thing hehe
  2. View Conversation
    It is great, thanks!

    And my avatar is bigger! Thank you!
  3. View Conversation
    To both Josh and Bryan (I'll repost on Bryan's) my box is full (my paid member status went away, not an emergency at all but I'm not getting messages if you sent them to mods). I took a bunch off but I'm going to wait before purging as drastically as I would have to to make it work. One guy's name is on who paid to have it removed, and he might have more reason to need attention, I reported his post to the report forum and will move it to mod forum.

    Meanwhile if this goes down again I recommend you use the Forum Twitter account: https://twitter.com/RonPaulForums you can get a message out to me and others who use twitter and we'll spread it. I'm @usernamenuse https://twitter.com/usernamenuse
  4. View Conversation
    Live well.

    Couldn't agree more.

    Let me know if I can help out getting things back up and running.
  5. View Conversation
    Dear Admin,
    How are you?
    My name is Sally from a Chinese B2C online store---www.dailyshop.com. Our online store is new and recently we want to promote our site, let more forum members to know us, so I'm contacting you for cooperation.
    I wonder if you permit a give-away activity held in your forum? If yes, we will choose one item from our online store to give the forum members for free, of course, we will consult with you firstly about what kind of items will be beneficial for your members, if this activity is hold in your forum successfully, we can build a long-term cooperation and provide much more benefits to our members. How do you think?


    Do you mind to give me your personal contact information? We can talk about the details online. And we believe it will also bring your forum more new members and daily visitors. Thanks!
    My contact information:
    Skype:sallycui3
    Gmail: sallycui3@gmail.com
    hotmail: sallycui3@hotmail.com
    ICQ:645828097


    Sally
  6. View Conversation
    Oh my God, Josh - we need to talk apparently. I'm sarcastic, but I have more hope for the movement now than most of the people in the thread. I hope you're PMing them to remind them that Ron Paul said our best hope is to stay active in the party.
  7. View Conversation
    That was uncalled for. She and I have a history. She is a democrat, who thinks she's entitled to Social Security because she was a financially irresponsible single Mom. Now she's here talking people into leaving the GOP - the direct opposite of what Ron Paul says in both instances. (And by the way, I don't give negs. In my experience, it's an asshole move.)
  8. View Conversation
    Josh, the RNC is trying to block the festival. http://communities.washingtontimes.c...n-block-event/

    Can you help me apply some pressure by bringing some attention to it? Thanks so much. ~deb
  9. View Conversation
    We could really use the Moneybomb widget at the top of the forum with only a week left. It's vital for building fans and pledges to maximize our fundraising total. Here's a link to the thread or you can check the messsages I sent you. Thanks.
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 181
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 19 12311 ... LastLast
About JoshLowry

Basic Information

Political Campaign Skills
Graphics:
Graphic Artist, Graphic Designer, Web Designer / Developer, Sign Printer
Video and Audio:
Video Producer
Marketers:
Online Marketer

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
10,793
Posts Per Day
3.23
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
181
Most Recent Message
06-13-2016 01:11 AM
General Information
Join Date
05-10-2007
Referrals
13
Home Page
http://www.stateofbrain.com

36 Friends

  1. afwjam afwjam is offline

    McAfee 2016

    afwjam
  2. Anthony T Anthony T is offline

    Member

    Anthony T
  3. bobbyw24 bobbyw24 is offline

    Banned

    bobbyw24
  4. brenton brenton is offline

    Member

    brenton
  5. Bryan Bryan is offline

    Admin

    Bryan
  6. Bsouljah Bsouljah is offline

    New Member

    Bsouljah
  7. CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica is offline

    Member

    CaptainAmerica
  8. CaseyJones CaseyJones is offline

    Member

    CaseyJones
  9. Chainspell Chainspell is offline

    Member

    • Send a message via MSN to Chainspell
    Chainspell
  10. ClydeCoulter ClydeCoulter is offline

    Member

    ClydeCoulter
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 36
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
No results to display...
No results to display...

06-21-2016

  • 07:14 PM - Hidden

06-16-2016

  • 11:06 PM - Hidden
  • 04:41 PM - Hidden

06-15-2016

  • 01:58 PM - Hidden

06-14-2016

  • 02:07 PM - Hidden
  • 01:12 PM - Hidden
  • 11:19 AM - Hidden

06-13-2016

  • 09:52 PM - Hidden
  • 09:47 PM - Hidden
  • 07:33 PM - Hidden
  • 06:50 PM - Hidden
  • 05:56 PM - Hidden
  • 01:39 AM - Hidden

06-12-2016

  • 11:45 PM - Hidden
  • 09:31 PM - Hidden
  • 03:01 PM - Hidden