• Lucille

      by Published on 04-17-2014 09:49 PM

      "We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it."

      Yes We Can!
      Second Amendment and gun-rights activists loudly objected to New York’s legislative mandate that they register all “assault weapons” by Tuesday.

      “Nobody is going to comply with this,” Tim Swedenhjelm told the Buffalo News of the looming SAFE Act provision deadline. “We don’t call them ‘assault rifles’ because they’re not ‘assault rifles.’ Assault rifles are automatic weapons. These are not automatic weapons. When I hear politicians call them assault rifles, you know they don’t know what they’re talking about.”

      Erie County Sheriff Timothy B. Howard told the News that he would not require his deputies to enforce the requirement.

      “I am not encouraging them to do it,” he said. “At the same time, their own consciences should be their guide.”
      [....]
      “There’s a lot of hyperbole and misinformation floating around,” New Yorkers Against Gun Violence’s executive director, Leah Gunn Barrett, stated. “People who owned these weapons before Jan. 15, 2013, can keep them. All they need to do is register them. It is painless, easy and costs nothing.”

      But gun-rights proponents scoffed at such reasoning.

      “We believe the law is not just, it is not the government’s business,” said Lisa Donovan, spokeswoman for NY2A, or the New York 2nd Amendment Coalition. “Registration is confiscation.”

      Plenty of others agree.

      “They have been shredding the Constitution for years,” said tea party activist Rus Thompson, who led a rally of about 70 protesters in front of Buffalo’s Mahoney State Office Building.
      Full story: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/...n-forms-112883
      by Published on 04-17-2014 07:46 PM

      Great piece. Lots more at the link.
      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...ovement-rising
      "Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing." - Thomas Paine

      The label of “fringe” is a common one used by statists, bureaucrats and paid shills in order to marginalize those who would stand against government corruption. The primary assertion being sold is that the “majority” joyously supports the establishment; and the majority, of course, is always right.

      The liberty movement, which is a collection of numerous freedom organizations and political activists brought together by a shared philosophical bond, has been accused of “fringe” status for quite some time. With corporatist dominance over the mainstream media for decades backing an elitist machine in Washington and a global banking cartel footing the bill with money created from thin air, any such accusation can be made to seem “real” to those who are unaware.

      The problem has always been a matter of physical action giving rise to an acknowledgment of numbers.
      Full piece: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...ovement-rising
      by Published on 04-16-2014 11:31 AM

      I'm sure everyone here is as shocked as I am.

      http://www.strike-the-root.com/

      "A Bay Area federal judge says the Obama administration can keep secret a memo spelling out the legal rationale for a 2011 drone attack in Yemen that killed a U.S. citizen and alleged terrorist mastermind. The Justice Department was entitled to withhold the memo on the grounds of national security and lawyer-client confidentiality, Chief U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken of Oakland said Friday."
      http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/articl...-S-5401933.php
      by Published on 04-15-2014 09:53 AM
      Article Preview

      That's the "affordable" part of O's Orwellian "PPACA."

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014...ip-in-decades/



      A recent survey of 148 insurance brokers shows that ObamaCare is sending premiums rising at the fastest clip in decades.

      "For the last, about, five years they've been doing this survey, so this was the largest percentage increase in any quarter since they've been doing (it)," said Scott Gottlieb of the American Enterprise Institute.

      "But at 12 percent, 11 percent increase on average across all the states -- that puts it at the upper end of any increase we've seen for decades."

      That is the national
      ...
      by Published on 04-14-2014 07:43 PM

      The creepy surveillance state has taken on a life of its own, and no one is doing anything to stop it. It grows and grows. What can you do but pray for an act of God?

      http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/14/fb...s-in-facial-re

      The Federal Bureau of Investigation's plan to tag and track us all is going swimmingly, from a creepy, voyeuristic perspective, according to federal documents. Released by the FBI in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the records reveal plans to stick the mugs of almost one in six Americans into the Next Generation Identification (NGI) program's facial recognition database by next year.

      Combined with the more than 120 million faces in state databases and the feds' tolerance for a remarkably high false-positive rate, your chances of getting fingered for somebody else's misdeeds are getting pretty good.
      ...
      The sources for the images are varied, and a bit vague.
      • 46 million criminal images
      • 4.3 million civil images
      • 215,000 images from the Repository for Individuals of Special Concern (RISC)
      • 750,000 images from a "Special Population Cognizant" (SPC) category
      • 215,000 images from "New Repositories"

      https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/0...base-next-year
      Currently, if you apply for any type of job that requires fingerprinting or a background check, your prints are sent to and stored by the FBI in its civil print database. However, the FBI has never before collected a photograph along with those prints. This is changing with NGI. Now an employer could require you to provide a “mug shot” photo along with your fingerprints. If that’s the case, then the FBI will store both your face print and your fingerprints along with your biographic data.

      In the past, the FBI has never linked the criminal and non-criminal fingerprint databases. This has meant that any search of the criminal print database (such as to identify a suspect or a latent print at a crime scene) would not touch the non-criminal database. This will also change with NGI. Now every record—whether criminal or non—will have a “Universal Control Number” (UCN), and every search will be run against all records in the database. This means that even if you have never been arrested for a crime, if your employer requires you to submit a photo as part of your background check, your face image could be searched—and you could be implicated as a criminal suspect—just by virtue of having that image in the non-criminal file.
      by Published on 04-08-2014 05:19 PM

      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...es-bankster-tu

      We wonder: why does the truth about the broken system, as witnessed and experienced by individual employees, always wait until said employee is about to depart their employer or just after? Obviously that is rhetorical. However, it is worth mentioning, because in the latest such revelation, a retiring SEC trail attorney veteran, James Kidney, who had been with the agency since 1986 and retired this month, just crucified his now former employer for doing precisely all those thing that outside critics - notably Zero Hedge - have accused the most co-opted, clueless, corrupt and criminal regulators of doing. Only he said it in a way that not even we could have phrased.

      From Bloomberg:

      The SEC has become “an agency that polices the broken windows on the street level and rarely goes to the penthouse floors,” Kidney said, according to a copy of his remarks obtained by Bloomberg News. “On the rare occasions when enforcement does go to the penthouse, good manners are paramount. Tough enforcement, risky enforcement, is subject to extensive negotiation and weakening.”

      Kidney said his superiors were more focused on getting high-paying jobs after their government service than on bringing difficult cases. The agency’s penalties, Kidney said, have become “at most a tollbooth on the bankster turnpike.”
      Wow: another "erudite" former cog in the systemic wheel goes off the reservation and gets all tinfoil bloggy on us. He goes on:

      Kidney said in the interview that he will always be an SEC loyalist and was trying to offer constructive criticism that could help the agency. He said he wasn’t singling out any specific cases or officials in his comments.

      “I don’t think we did a very aggressive job with all the major players in the crash of ’08,” he said, noting that as a civil enforcement agency, the commission does not need to prove its cases beyond a reasonable doubt like the Justice Department does. “The SEC has a lower burden of proof and we should be pushing the envelope a bit.”
      You mean, pretending to regulate the same people where SEC staffers wish to work will no longer fool most of the people all of the time? The horror... The horror.
      by Published on 04-08-2014 12:15 PM

      SMH.

      http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/08/br...nt-have-nice-t

      Officials at Salem High School in Plymouth, Michigan, have agreed to take down bleachers and a score board paid for and built by parents for the school's baseball team. After an anonymous complaint, the U.S. Education Department's Office for Civil Rights found the school was in violation of federal law because the baseball facilities are now superior to the girl's softball field. The school can't afford to upgrade the softball field, so it had to take down the amenities at the baseball field.
      http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/highsc...210604955.html

      Six years ago, parents of Plymouth High's boys' varsity team raised money and built stadium seating so they could watch from above a black chain-link fence that made spectating difficult, according to WJBK-TV. The parents also installed a new scoreboard for the baseball field.

      Now, the school must tear it all down. The U.S. Education Department's Office for Civil Rights opened an investigation following an anonymous complaint. Ultimately, officials demanded that the seating and scoreboard be torn down because the upgrades are superior to Plymouth's girls' softball facilities (pictured). The boys' seating is also not handicap accessible, which is a separate violation of government regulations.
      [...]
      There are obvious Title IX implications to this story, as federally funded schools are required to provide equal opportunity for both boys' and girls' sports. Forty-two years after the law was passed, schools and colleges across the country are still struggling to comply with the rules in the face of shrinking budgets. Plymouth joins a long list of schools that may be in violation of Title IX, whether they realize it or not.

      Of course, there could be a quick resolution to this controversy. The girls' softball parents might also think about raising money to build their own stadium seating. It seemed to work for the boys' baseball parents for six years.
      by Published on 04-05-2014 02:42 PM

      http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...79700454846082

      Put aside the numbers for a moment, and the daily argument.

      "Seven point one million people have signed up!"

      "But six million people lost their coverage and were forced onto the exchanges! That's no triumph, it's a manipulation. And how many of the 7.1 million have paid?"

      "We can't say, but 7.1 million is a big number and redeems the program."

      "Is it a real number?"

      "Your lack of trust betrays a dark and conspiratorial right-wing mindset."

      As I say, put aside the argument, step back and view the thing at a distance. Support it or not, you cannot look at ObamaCare and call it anything but a huge, historic mess. It is also utterly unique in the annals of American lawmaking and government administration.
      Full story: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...79700454846082
      by Published on 04-04-2014 01:56 PM

      http://news.yahoo.com/why-does-john-...193629143.html

      Reacting to the shooting at Fort Hood on Wednesday, House Speaker John Boehner reiterated a popular NRA talking point: "There’s no question that those with mental health issues should be prevented from owning weapons or being able to purchase weapons." Those suffering the same diagnosed illnesses as the shooter — depression and anxiety — might be surprised by Boehner's willingness to take away their Second Amendment rights.
      [...]
      An estimated one-in-10 Americans suffers from depression, according to the Centers for Disease Control. That's about 31 million people, skewed told older people and women. The National Institutes of Health puts those suffering from "major depressive
      ...
      by Published on 04-03-2014 07:45 PM

      They seized not only the artifacts, but his HOME.

      http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/03/in...i-raid-of-doom

      He’s a “real life Indiana Jones,” trumpets a Time headline today. The publication is referring to Don Miller, a 91-year-old Indiana man. We have no idea what sort of inventive traps and possessive, violent aboriginal warriors (or Nazis!) he may have had to overcome to amass his huge collection of artifacts, but he can now say he knows what it’s like to be the target of a raid.

      On Wednesday, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) descended on his home and seized it and all his belongings, including thousands of historical and cultural artifacts obtained over the past 80 years.

      The FBI believes some of them were obtained illegally, but they don’t know which ones (if any), and it may take them months—or even years—to find out.
      [...]
      Miller has not been charged with any crimes. Indeed, according to the Star, this entire raid is to determine whether any of the artifacts were illegally obtained:

      The aim of the investigation is to determine what each artifact is, where it came from and how Miller obtained it, Jones said, to determine whether some of the items might be illegal to possess privately.

      Jones acknowledged that Miller might have acquired some of the items before the passage of U.S. laws or treaties prohibited their sale or purchase.
      So because they don’t know whether Miller had obtained any of these artifacts illegally, they seized an elderly man’s home and his property to find out.
      Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
    • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!







    • Tom Woods's - Liberty Classroom