A new bill introduced in the Minnesota House would allow gun owners to pursue civil litigation if they suffer an injury, or worse, while in a gun-free zone.
The bill, House File 3051, would provide for a civil course of action “when a person who is prohibited from carrying a firearm on a property suffers a loss by not having the firearm.”
“A property owner or entity who prohibits the carrying of firearms by a person who is otherwise authorized to carry a firearm or who is not otherwise prohibited from carrying a firearm shall assume absolute custodial responsibility for the safety and defense of the unarmed person while the person is located on the owner’s or entity’s property that is posted with a sign prohibiting firearms,” states the bill.
The bill was introduced last week by Rep. Jeremy Munson (R-Lake Crystal) and has four Republican co-sponsors.
“In Minnesota we have now over 300,000 citizens who have a permit to carry a gun so a lot of people carry a gun for self-defense. More and more businesses are putting gun-free zone signs on their business—it really is a way to market to people who don’t like guns,” Munson said in a recent interview.
continued..
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/02/18...innesota-bill/
The "TikTok ban" goes beyond TikTok. It is another huge step toward total control.
Thread Starter: Anti-NeoconSee this great Twitter thread by the LP's Mises Caucus: https://twitter.com/LPMisesCaucus/status/1639934790026555394 But sure, let's talk about Trump and DeSantis and wokeness. Sickening, right under our noses apparently. This is basically the new Patriot Act.
Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 05:50 AM