• sailingaway

    by Published on 03-19-2016 11:40 AM

    By Gregory Krieg
    Sat March 19, 2016




    New York (CNN)Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Friday that the party outsmarted itself in passing a 2012 rule that he said was aimed at blunting his influence on that summer's convention.

    The GOP's "Rule 40(b)" requires candidates win the "support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight or more states" in order to have their named placed on the nominating ballot. The raised threshold -- it had previously been a plurality from five states -- helped to prevent Paul's supporters from upstaging or distracting from the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, on national television.

    "They did not want my name to come up and so they changed the rules because we had the votes," Paul told CNN "At This Hour" anchors Kate Bolduan and John Berman. "We had the numbers to allow my name to be put into nomination, but they wouldn't do it."

    Four years later, the same establishment figures who spearheaded the 2012 rules changes are facing a different kind of challenge: Donald Trump. But this time around, the requirement threatens to undermine a late effort to derail the billionaire front-runner.

    "I think it's a bit of an irony and they deserve the problem," Paul said. "They're terrified of competition, and now the establishment has competition that really looks strong and there's a lot of people behind Trump. So this is a big problem for them."

    more:
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/18/politi...ion/index.html
    by Published on 06-15-2013 09:11 PM

    National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.


    NSA director Keith Alexander says his agency's analysts, which until recently included Edward Snowden among their ranks, take protecting "civil liberties and privacy and the security of this nation to their heart every day."
    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

    If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

    Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

    Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler's disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

    The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

    There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."
    more, and internal links here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...hout-warrants/
    by Published on 06-14-2013 06:28 PM



    Truth as always. He notes as I did as soon as Obama started justifying giving Rebels military aid based on reports of chemical use, that a couple of weeks ago the administration seemed to agree with the UN investigators that it was the Rebels, not Assad using the gas. Not that I think Assad is wonderful, just that we don't want to be responsible for the actions of either.

    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...BjCSeE.twitter
    by Published on 06-02-2013 11:55 PM


    http://the-free-foundation.org/tst6-3-2013.html

    Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism

    May was Iraq’s deadliest month in nearly five years, with more than 1,000 dead – both civilians and security personnel -- in a rash of bombings, shootings and other violence. As we read each day of new horrors in Iraq, it becomes more obvious that the US invasion delivered none of the promised peace or stability that proponents of the attack promised.

    Millions live in constant fear, refugees do not return home, and the economy is destroyed. The Christian community, some 1.2 million persons before 2003, has been nearly wiped off the Iraqi map. Other minorities have likewise disappeared. Making matters worse, US support for the Syrian rebels next door has drawn the Shi’ite-led Iraqi government into the spreading regional unrest and breathed new life into extremist elements.

    The invasion of Iraq opened the door to Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which did not exist beforehand, while simultaneously strengthening the hand of Iran in the region. Were the “experts” who planned for and advocated the US attack really this incompetent?

    Ryan Crocker, who was US Ambassador to Iraq from 2007-2009, still speaks of the Iraqi “surge” as a great reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite in Iraq. He wrote recently that “[t]hough the United States has withdrawn its troops from Iraq, it retains significant leverage there. Iraqi forces were equipped and trained by Americans, and the country’s leaders need and expect our help.” He seems alarmingly out of touch with reality. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...rab-insurgents

    It is clear now that the “surge” and the “Iraqi Awakening” were just myths promoted by those desperate to put a positive spin on the US invasion, which the late General William Odom once called, “the greatest strategic disaster in American history." Aircraft were loaded with $100 dollar bills to pay each side to temporarily stop killing US troops and each other, but the payoff provided a mere temporary break. Shouldn’t the measure of success of a particular policy be whether it actually produces sustained positive results?

    Now we see radical fighters who once shot at US troops in Iraq have spilled into Syria, where they ironically find their cause supported by the US government! Some of these fighters are even greeted by visiting US senators.

    The US intervention in Iraq has created ever more problems. That is clear. The foreign policy “experts” who urged the US attack on Iraq now claim that the disaster they created can only be solved with more interventionism! Imagine a medical doctor noting that a particular medication is killing his patient, but to combat the side effect he orders an increase in dosage of the same medicine. Like this doctor, the US foreign policy establishment is guilty of malpractice. And, I might add, this is just what the Fed does with monetary policy.

    From Iraq to Libya to Mali to Syria to Afghanistan, US interventions have an unbroken record of making matters far worse. Yet regardless of the disasters produced, for the interventionists a more aggressive US foreign policy is the only policy they offer.

    We must learn the appropriate lessons from the disaster of Iraq. We cannot continue to invade countries, install puppet governments, build new nations, create centrally-planned economies, engage in social engineering, and force democracy at the barrel of a gun. The rest of the world is tired of US interventionism and the US taxpayer is tired of footing the bill for US interventionism. It is up to all of us to make it very clear to the foreign policy establishment and the powers that be that we have had enough and will no longer tolerate empire-building. We should be more confident in ourselves and stop acting like an insecure bully.

    Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.


    Picture from Ron's facebook page which you can like here: http://facebook.com/ronpaul
    by Published on 05-25-2013 07:52 PM

    "This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the "enabling act” principle.

    The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

    He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

    He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

    He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

    The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal."


    read the rest of the article at the RPI site: http://t.co/K4NouiYwTY

    Ron Paul ‏@RonPaul 4h
    My comments on Obama's recent speeches -- only at my Ron Paul Institute site:
    http://tinyurl.com/qfqp7o5


    https://twitter.com/RonPaul/status/338359742219046912
    by Published on 05-15-2013 10:35 AM



    New Directive:
    Feb. 27, 2013:
    DoD Instruction 3025.21 Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

    [From link below] "...For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

    The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled “Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

    The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

    Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.
    Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

    A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” Moreover, he insists the Pentagon doesn’t “want to get involved in civilian law enforcement. It’s one of those red lines that the military hasn’t signed up for.” Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the new procedures that govern military command on the ground in the event of a civil disturbance relates to authority. Not only does it fail to define what circumstances would be so severe that the president’s authorization is “impossible,” it grants full presidential authority to “Federal military commanders.” According to the defense official, a commander is defined as follows: “Somebody who’s in the position of command, has the title commander. And most of the time they are centrally selected by a board, they’ve gone through additional schooling to exercise command authority.”

    As it is written, this “commander” has the same power to authorize military force as the president in the event the president is somehow unable to access a telephone. (The rule doesn’t address the statutory chain of authority that already exists in the event a sitting president is unavailable.) In doing so, this commander must exercise judgment in determining what constitutes, “wanton destruction of property,” “adequate protection for Federal property,” “domestic violence,” or “conspiracy that hinders the execution of State or Federal law,” as these are the circumstances that might be considered an “emergency.”

    “These phrases don’t have any legal meaning,” says Afran. “It’s no different than the emergency powers clause in the Weimar constitution [of the German Reich]. It’s a grant of emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

    Afran also expresses apprehension over the government’s authority “to engage temporarily in activities necessary to quell large-scale disturbances.”

    “Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” says Afran. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

    The U.S. military is prohibited from intervening in domestic affairs except where provided under Article IV of the Constitution in cases of domestic violence that threaten the government of a state or the application of federal law. This provision was further clarified both by the Insurrection Act of 1807 and a post-Reconstruction law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (PCA). The Insurrection Act specifies the circumstances under which the president may convene the armed forces to suppress an insurrection against any state or the federal government. Furthermore, where an individual state is concerned, consent of the governor must be obtained prior to the deployment of troops. The PCA—passed in response to federal troops that enforced local laws and oversaw elections during Reconstruction—made unauthorized employment of federal troops a punishable offense, thereby giving teeth to the Insurrection Act.

    Together, these laws limit executive authority over domestic military action. Yet Monday’s official regulatory changes issued unilaterally by the Department of Defense is a game-changer.

    The stated purpose of the updated rule is “support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act,” but in reality it undermines the Insurrection Act and PCA in significant and alarming ways. The most substantial change is the notion of “civil disturbance” as one of the few “domestic emergencies” that would allow for the deployment of military assets on American soil.

    To wit, the relatively few instances that federal troops have been deployed for domestic support have produced a wide range of results. Situations have included responding to natural disasters and protecting demonstrators during the Civil Rights era to, disastrously, the Kent State student massacre and the 1973 occupation of Wounded Knee.

    Michael German, senior policy counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), noted in a 2009 Daily Kos article that, “there is no doubt that the military is very good at many things. But recent history shows that restraint in their new-found domestic role is not one of them.”

    At the time German was referring to the military’s expanded surveillance techniques and hostile interventions related to border control and the War on Drugs. And in fact, many have argued that these actions have already upended the PCA in a significant way. Even before this most recent rule change, the ACLU was vocal in its opposition to the Department of Defense (DoD) request to expand domestic military authority “in the event of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents.” The ACLU’s position is that civilian agencies are more than equipped to handle such emergencies since 9/11. (ACLU spokespersons in Washington D.C. declined, however, to be interviewed for this story.)

    But while outcomes of military interventions have varied, the protocol by which the president works cooperatively with state governments has remained the same. The president is only allowed to deploy troops to a state upon request of its governor. Even then, the military—specifically the National Guard—is there to provide support for local law enforcement and is prohibited from engaging in any activities that are outside of this scope, such as the power to arrest.

    Eric Freedman, a constitutional law professor from Hofstra University, also calls the ruling “an unauthorized power grab.” According to Freedman, “The Department of Defense does not have the authority to grant itself by regulation any more authority than Congress has granted it by statute.” Yet that’s precisely what it did. This wasn’t, however, the Pentagon’s first attempt to expand its authority domestically in the last decade.


    the whole thing is worth reading. http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/...s-into-effect/

    Old directive:
    Jan. 15, 1986:
    DoD Instruction 5525.5 DoD Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Officials
    by Published on 05-03-2013 01:15 AM

    MSNBC's Laurence O'Donnell: Ron Paul is a Paranoid Liar: "No Guns Pointed at Families, No Tanks, No Forced Lockdown!"

    video of proof of the truth of Ron's words is interspersed with O Donnell's hit piece. We didn't make this, and I personally would have left out some of the graphics at the end as polarizing, but I'm with it right through the 'it isn't about left or right, but about what is right... and what is wrong...:

    Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
  • Activism News & Discussion

    osan

    WV Bill Proposes to Nullify Fed Gun Laws...

    Thread Starter: osan

    http://www.wnd.com/2018/01/1-state-aims-to-be-sanctuary-state-for-gun-rights/ A West Virginia lawmaker has introduced a bill to the state House that would outlaw enforcement of current and future gun-control laws that violate the U.S. or state constitutions. House Bill 2138, introduced by Republican Del. Pat McGeehan, would effectively nullify all federal gun control within the state’s...

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth 01-18-2018, 04:21 PM Go to last post
  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion

    nikcers

    [VIDEO] CNN Rand How to end shutdown

    Thread Starter: nikcers

    Last Post By: Krugminator2 Today, 02:52 PM Go to last post
    mrsat_98

    Plea Deal for Rene Boucher for attacking Rand

    Thread Starter: mrsat_98

    https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdin/pr/kentucky-man-charged-assaulting-member-congress-0 Department of Justice U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Indiana FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, January 19, 2018 Kentucky Man Charged With Assaulting a Member of Congress Victim attacked while mowing his yard.

    Last Post By: Intoxiklown Today, 01:41 PM Go to last post
    jct74

    Rand Paul Pushes Marijuana Amendments On Funding Bill

    Thread Starter: jct74

    read more: https://www.marijuanamoment.net/rand-paul-pushes-marijuana-amendments-funding-bill/

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Today, 12:53 AM Go to last post
    nikcers

    [Video] Rand no on Budget 1/18/18 Fox

    Thread Starter: nikcers

    Last Post By: Brian4Liberty Yesterday, 11:50 AM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    What To Expect In 2018 - With Special Guest Gerald Celente

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    What To Expect In 2018 - With Special Guest Gerald Celente

    Last Post By: donnay Yesterday, 10:19 AM Go to last post
    nikcers

    [Video] RT Ron Paul FISA corruption

    Thread Starter: nikcers

    Last Post By: nikcers 01-19-2018, 06:46 PM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics

    DamianTV

    US Government Shuts Down (2018)

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    CNN, so take it with a grain of salt... http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/19/politics/government-shutdown-trump-congress-latest/index.html Full article on link. Yes, a CNN link, so feel free to post every other outlet that covers the topic. Year added to title because they do the same $#@! to us every year.

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 03:21 PM Go to last post
    kpitcher

    Doctor in the US for 40 years arrested by ICE for misdemeanor 25 years ago

    Thread Starter: kpitcher

    http://woodtv.com/2018/01/20/kzoo-doctor-detained-by-ice-after-40-years-in-us/

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 03:19 PM Go to last post
    Swordsmyth

    Baltimore's Top Cop Fired After Out-Of-Control Homicides

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    Mayor Catherine Pugh relieved Police Commissioner Kevin Davis of his duties after 2 1/2 years as top cop. Pugh, then announced that Deputy Commissioner Darryl DeSousa, who has been on the force for 30-years, will take Commissioner Kevin Davis‘ spot effective immediately. Commissioner-Designate DeSousa: "Baltimore has long been my home and I've spent my career on its streets and in...

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 03:06 PM Go to last post
    johnwk

    DOJ may grow a spine and arrest sanctuary city elected political hacks.

    Thread Starter: johnwk

    See: DOJ Considering Arresting Sanctuary City Politicians January, 2018 ”The Department of Justice is considering subjecting state and local officials to criminal charges if they implement or enforce so-called sanctuary policies that bar jurisdictions from cooperating with immigration authorities. Immigration advocates argue such a move would be illegal.” The irrefutable fact is, federal...

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 02:54 PM Go to last post
    Swordsmyth

    Republicans Have Four Easy Ways To #ReleaseTheMemo...Not Doing So Will Prove Them Frauds

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    1. Trump can declassify anything he wants. All classification by the U.S. government has no basis in laws passed by Congress (with one tiny exception that is irrelevant here). Rather, all classification is based on presidential executive orders, which rely on the president’s constitutional role as commander in chief of the armed forces. According to the Supreme Court, the presidential power...

    Last Post By: otherone Today, 02:09 PM Go to last post
    enhanced_deficit

    Jared Kushner's High School Is Making Children Write Letters of Support to Donald Trump

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    Some controversial news relating to widely respected White House advisor, zionist leader, anti-corruption/anti-nepotism champion Jared Kushner: Jared Kushner's High School Is Making Children Write Letters of Support to Donald Trump By Jack Moore On 1/17/18 Jared Kushner’s old high school in New Jersey is asking its students to send supportive letters to his father-in-law,...

    Last Post By: Influenza Today, 02:06 PM Go to last post
    r3volution 3.0

    95% of House GOPers (incl. 90% of Freedom Caucus) Vote For Increased Spending

    Thread Starter: r3volution 3.0

    http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/18/politics/house-votes-government-shutdown/index.html224/238 224/238 GOPers voted Yay. 27/31 Freedom Caucus members voted Yay. Freedom Caucus Nays Justin Amash

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 01:52 PM Go to last post
    enhanced_deficit

    Never-Trumpers doing excessive Stormy Daniels porn searches?

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    On a day when gov shutdown and other major national issues are hot topics, how this news made to top part of google news front page? Stormy Daniels porn searches soar over alleged Trump affair New York Post 1h ago The Donald Trump effect on the popularity of porn star Stormy Daniels has been nothing short of “yuge.” Pornhub Insights — the data analytics blog of porn streaming mecca...

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 01:27 PM Go to last post
    johnwk

    Our Fifth Column’s government shut down over DACA

    Thread Starter: johnwk

    For those who are unfamiliar with the phrase ''Fifth Column''ť, it was often used during the 1940s and 50s when I grew up, and referenced those in our country who were sympathetic to causes which threatened our country's common defense and general welfare. And then there was ''Yellow Journalism''ť, another phrase. This phrase was used to identify media personalities and journalists who would...

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 12:49 PM Go to last post
    enhanced_deficit

    Pre-election Trump: It is time to get out of Afghanistan ; Pence: Longest US War will go on

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    Heaven forbid, if conservative media powerhouse Steve Bannon's implied predictions (link Steve Bannon savages 'Javanka') came true and Trump got impeached or stepped downed before end of his first term, will Pence be any better than Trump?

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 11:54 AM Go to last post
  • Gold Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion

    ChooseLiberty

    Market Crash Looming

    Thread Starter: ChooseLiberty

    Wuh Woh It's October, time for a crash. It's not that easy is it? Is it? http://www.safehaven.com/article-14697.htm

    Last Post By: devil21 Yesterday, 08:22 PM Go to last post
    anaconda

    Bitcoin Cracks $5000

    Thread Starter: anaconda

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/cbovaird/2017/09/01/bitcoin-price-tops-5000-as-cryptocurrencies-march-higher/#6d8dc42a5a8e

    Last Post By: TheTexan Yesterday, 02:50 PM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    Apple to invest $350 B in US, "repatriate" $200 B, creating 20,000 new jobs

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Just the proper rhetoric can influence business decisions. Apple Announces $350 Billion Investment in US Economy, 20,000 New Jobs http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/01/17/apple-announces-350-billion-investment-into-us-economy-20000-new-jobs/ Tim Cook The Associated Press

    Last Post By: devil21 01-19-2018, 05:07 PM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Chart

  • Living Free and Healthy

    Intoxiklown

    Flu season VERY volatile this year

    Thread Starter: Intoxiklown

    Posting this as somewhat of a "FYI" for all my liberty cousins here. If you're not aware, the flu season this year has been a very bad one. So everyone should be very mindful of steps to avoid exposure as best they can. This isn't about trying to start a debate between pro-flu shot people and anti-flu shot people. If you don't believe in the flu shot being effective, be sure you're pumping...

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 03:09 PM Go to last post
    donnay

    Good Information on Magnesium

    Thread Starter: donnay

    This is some really good information, and I wanted to pass it on.

    Last Post By: shashank16997 01-19-2018, 09:58 AM Go to last post
    donnay

    How Dangerous Is Fluoride To Your Health?

    Thread Starter: donnay

    How Dangerous Is Fluoride To Your Health? Fluorine is an element. It is a gas, never occurring in its free state. In microscopic amounts complexed with other minerals, it is often listed as a trace mineral, a nutrient for human nutrition. The fluoride added to 90% of drinking water is hydrofluoric acid which is a compound of fluorine that is a chemical byproduct of aluminum, steel,...

    Last Post By: Firestarter 01-19-2018, 03:43 AM Go to last post
  • Education & Thought Power

    Swordsmyth

    O’Sullivan’s First Law

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    O’Sullivan’s First Law, named for John O’Sullivan, former editor of National Review, speechwriter for Margaret Thatcher, and author of the fine book The President, The Pope, and the Prime Minister, goes as follows: Any institution that is not explicitly right wing will become left wing over time. Good example include such seemingly anodyne institutions like the League of Women Voters, PTAs,...

    Last Post By: TheCount Today, 02:47 PM Go to last post
    timosman

    Which branch of the government has the biggest morons?

    Thread Starter: timosman

    Test your knowledge in the attached poll.

    Last Post By: CCTelander Today, 10:09 AM Go to last post
    undergroundrr

    Immigration and the Nanny State

    Thread Starter: undergroundrr

    https://fee.org/articles/freedom-of-association/

    Last Post By: Origanalist Yesterday, 04:52 PM Go to last post
    Firestarter

    Albert Pike –3 world wars letter hoax

    Thread Starter: Firestarter

    Anybody that investigates “conspiracy theories” will sooner or later find the 1871 3 world wars “prediction” or plan by Albert Pike. In November 2016, I still believed in the Albert Pike 3 world wars letter (and even planned to start a thread on it). Then when I searched for information, I found out that the whole story about the supposed evidence is fake, which leads to the inevitable...

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Yesterday, 11:42 AM Go to last post
    1stvermont

    Americas Biblical Government

    Thread Starter: 1stvermont

    The American Union Modeled After Ancient Israel “Our family of states, so many sovereignties governing themselves, yet consenting to be governed, like constellations each with its own order and laws, but all obeying one great rule, suggesting, as organized communities, more than any other nation, the divine pattern of the tribes in the Hebrew commonwealth.” -Nehemiah Adams Pastor Harvard...

    Last Post By: 1stvermont Yesterday, 06:07 AM Go to last post
    Superfluous Man

    The reception of Molyneaux's Art of the Argument

    Thread Starter: Superfluous Man

    I haven't read any books by Molyneaux. On a few occasions I've sat through as much as I could stomach of one of his youtube soliloquies. But I came across this article on how Molyneaux's book, The Art of the Argument: Western Civilization's Last Stand, is being received by people who actually know stuff about argumentation. Since I know one or two folks here continue to parrot Molyneaux, I...

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Yesterday, 02:08 AM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!