• sailingaway

    by Published on 03-19-2016 11:40 AM

    By Gregory Krieg
    Sat March 19, 2016

    New York (CNN)Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Friday that the party outsmarted itself in passing a 2012 rule that he said was aimed at blunting his influence on that summer's convention.

    The GOP's "Rule 40(b)" requires candidates win the "support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight or more states" in order to have their named placed on the nominating ballot. The raised threshold -- it had previously been a plurality from five states -- helped to prevent Paul's supporters from upstaging or distracting from the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, on national television.

    "They did not want my name to come up and so they changed the rules because we had the votes," Paul told CNN "At This Hour" anchors Kate Bolduan and John Berman. "We had the numbers to allow my name to be put into nomination, but they wouldn't do it."

    Four years later, the same establishment figures who spearheaded the 2012 rules changes are facing a different kind of challenge: Donald Trump. But this time around, the requirement threatens to undermine a late effort to derail the billionaire front-runner.

    "I think it's a bit of an irony and they deserve the problem," Paul said. "They're terrified of competition, and now the establishment has competition that really looks strong and there's a lot of people behind Trump. So this is a big problem for them."

    by Published on 06-15-2013 09:11 PM

    National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.

    NSA director Keith Alexander says his agency's analysts, which until recently included Edward Snowden among their ranks, take protecting "civil liberties and privacy and the security of this nation to their heart every day."
    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

    If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

    Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

    Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler's disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

    The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

    There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."
    more, and internal links here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...hout-warrants/
    by Published on 06-14-2013 06:28 PM

    Truth as always. He notes as I did as soon as Obama started justifying giving Rebels military aid based on reports of chemical use, that a couple of weeks ago the administration seemed to agree with the UN investigators that it was the Rebels, not Assad using the gas. Not that I think Assad is wonderful, just that we don't want to be responsible for the actions of either.

    by Published on 06-02-2013 11:55 PM


    Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism

    May was Iraq’s deadliest month in nearly five years, with more than 1,000 dead – both civilians and security personnel -- in a rash of bombings, shootings and other violence. As we read each day of new horrors in Iraq, it becomes more obvious that the US invasion delivered none of the promised peace or stability that proponents of the attack promised.

    Millions live in constant fear, refugees do not return home, and the economy is destroyed. The Christian community, some 1.2 million persons before 2003, has been nearly wiped off the Iraqi map. Other minorities have likewise disappeared. Making matters worse, US support for the Syrian rebels next door has drawn the Shi’ite-led Iraqi government into the spreading regional unrest and breathed new life into extremist elements.

    The invasion of Iraq opened the door to Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which did not exist beforehand, while simultaneously strengthening the hand of Iran in the region. Were the “experts” who planned for and advocated the US attack really this incompetent?

    Ryan Crocker, who was US Ambassador to Iraq from 2007-2009, still speaks of the Iraqi “surge” as a great reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite in Iraq. He wrote recently that “[t]hough the United States has withdrawn its troops from Iraq, it retains significant leverage there. Iraqi forces were equipped and trained by Americans, and the country’s leaders need and expect our help.” He seems alarmingly out of touch with reality. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...rab-insurgents

    It is clear now that the “surge” and the “Iraqi Awakening” were just myths promoted by those desperate to put a positive spin on the US invasion, which the late General William Odom once called, “the greatest strategic disaster in American history." Aircraft were loaded with $100 dollar bills to pay each side to temporarily stop killing US troops and each other, but the payoff provided a mere temporary break. Shouldn’t the measure of success of a particular policy be whether it actually produces sustained positive results?

    Now we see radical fighters who once shot at US troops in Iraq have spilled into Syria, where they ironically find their cause supported by the US government! Some of these fighters are even greeted by visiting US senators.

    The US intervention in Iraq has created ever more problems. That is clear. The foreign policy “experts” who urged the US attack on Iraq now claim that the disaster they created can only be solved with more interventionism! Imagine a medical doctor noting that a particular medication is killing his patient, but to combat the side effect he orders an increase in dosage of the same medicine. Like this doctor, the US foreign policy establishment is guilty of malpractice. And, I might add, this is just what the Fed does with monetary policy.

    From Iraq to Libya to Mali to Syria to Afghanistan, US interventions have an unbroken record of making matters far worse. Yet regardless of the disasters produced, for the interventionists a more aggressive US foreign policy is the only policy they offer.

    We must learn the appropriate lessons from the disaster of Iraq. We cannot continue to invade countries, install puppet governments, build new nations, create centrally-planned economies, engage in social engineering, and force democracy at the barrel of a gun. The rest of the world is tired of US interventionism and the US taxpayer is tired of footing the bill for US interventionism. It is up to all of us to make it very clear to the foreign policy establishment and the powers that be that we have had enough and will no longer tolerate empire-building. We should be more confident in ourselves and stop acting like an insecure bully.

    Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

    Picture from Ron's facebook page which you can like here: http://facebook.com/ronpaul
    by Published on 05-25-2013 07:52 PM

    "This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the "enabling act” principle.

    The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

    He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

    He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

    He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

    The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal."

    read the rest of the article at the RPI site: http://t.co/K4NouiYwTY

    Ron Paul ‏@RonPaul 4h
    My comments on Obama's recent speeches -- only at my Ron Paul Institute site:

    by Published on 05-15-2013 10:35 AM

    New Directive:
    Feb. 27, 2013:
    DoD Instruction 3025.21 Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

    [From link below] "...For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

    The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled “Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

    The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

    Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.
    Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

    A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” Moreover, he insists the Pentagon doesn’t “want to get involved in civilian law enforcement. It’s one of those red lines that the military hasn’t signed up for.” Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the new procedures that govern military command on the ground in the event of a civil disturbance relates to authority. Not only does it fail to define what circumstances would be so severe that the president’s authorization is “impossible,” it grants full presidential authority to “Federal military commanders.” According to the defense official, a commander is defined as follows: “Somebody who’s in the position of command, has the title commander. And most of the time they are centrally selected by a board, they’ve gone through additional schooling to exercise command authority.”

    As it is written, this “commander” has the same power to authorize military force as the president in the event the president is somehow unable to access a telephone. (The rule doesn’t address the statutory chain of authority that already exists in the event a sitting president is unavailable.) In doing so, this commander must exercise judgment in determining what constitutes, “wanton destruction of property,” “adequate protection for Federal property,” “domestic violence,” or “conspiracy that hinders the execution of State or Federal law,” as these are the circumstances that might be considered an “emergency.”

    “These phrases don’t have any legal meaning,” says Afran. “It’s no different than the emergency powers clause in the Weimar constitution [of the German Reich]. It’s a grant of emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

    Afran also expresses apprehension over the government’s authority “to engage temporarily in activities necessary to quell large-scale disturbances.”

    “Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” says Afran. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

    The U.S. military is prohibited from intervening in domestic affairs except where provided under Article IV of the Constitution in cases of domestic violence that threaten the government of a state or the application of federal law. This provision was further clarified both by the Insurrection Act of 1807 and a post-Reconstruction law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (PCA). The Insurrection Act specifies the circumstances under which the president may convene the armed forces to suppress an insurrection against any state or the federal government. Furthermore, where an individual state is concerned, consent of the governor must be obtained prior to the deployment of troops. The PCA—passed in response to federal troops that enforced local laws and oversaw elections during Reconstruction—made unauthorized employment of federal troops a punishable offense, thereby giving teeth to the Insurrection Act.

    Together, these laws limit executive authority over domestic military action. Yet Monday’s official regulatory changes issued unilaterally by the Department of Defense is a game-changer.

    The stated purpose of the updated rule is “support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act,” but in reality it undermines the Insurrection Act and PCA in significant and alarming ways. The most substantial change is the notion of “civil disturbance” as one of the few “domestic emergencies” that would allow for the deployment of military assets on American soil.

    To wit, the relatively few instances that federal troops have been deployed for domestic support have produced a wide range of results. Situations have included responding to natural disasters and protecting demonstrators during the Civil Rights era to, disastrously, the Kent State student massacre and the 1973 occupation of Wounded Knee.

    Michael German, senior policy counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), noted in a 2009 Daily Kos article that, “there is no doubt that the military is very good at many things. But recent history shows that restraint in their new-found domestic role is not one of them.”

    At the time German was referring to the military’s expanded surveillance techniques and hostile interventions related to border control and the War on Drugs. And in fact, many have argued that these actions have already upended the PCA in a significant way. Even before this most recent rule change, the ACLU was vocal in its opposition to the Department of Defense (DoD) request to expand domestic military authority “in the event of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents.” The ACLU’s position is that civilian agencies are more than equipped to handle such emergencies since 9/11. (ACLU spokespersons in Washington D.C. declined, however, to be interviewed for this story.)

    But while outcomes of military interventions have varied, the protocol by which the president works cooperatively with state governments has remained the same. The president is only allowed to deploy troops to a state upon request of its governor. Even then, the military—specifically the National Guard—is there to provide support for local law enforcement and is prohibited from engaging in any activities that are outside of this scope, such as the power to arrest.

    Eric Freedman, a constitutional law professor from Hofstra University, also calls the ruling “an unauthorized power grab.” According to Freedman, “The Department of Defense does not have the authority to grant itself by regulation any more authority than Congress has granted it by statute.” Yet that’s precisely what it did. This wasn’t, however, the Pentagon’s first attempt to expand its authority domestically in the last decade.

    the whole thing is worth reading. http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/...s-into-effect/

    Old directive:
    Jan. 15, 1986:
    DoD Instruction 5525.5 DoD Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Officials
    by Published on 05-03-2013 01:15 AM

    MSNBC's Laurence O'Donnell: Ron Paul is a Paranoid Liar: "No Guns Pointed at Families, No Tanks, No Forced Lockdown!"

    video of proof of the truth of Ron's words is interspersed with O Donnell's hit piece. We didn't make this, and I personally would have left out some of the graphics at the end as polarizing, but I'm with it right through the 'it isn't about left or right, but about what is right... and what is wrong...:

    Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
  • Top Activist Efforts

  • Activism News & Discussion

    John F Kennedy III

    If anyone feels like debating...

    Thread Starter: John F Kennedy III

    Leftists I'd like some help. They are actually saying what Trump said in that tape is worse than Hillary getting a child rapist off. Even defending Hillary saying she was just doing her job. You'd need to make an account. Political discussion is in the "Flea Bottom" area in the 2016 Election thread. Current discussion is on page 38. http://thelasthearth.freeforums.net

    Last Post By: AZJoe 10-20-2016, 06:26 AM Go to last post

    Documented People

    Thread Starter: ProudAmericanFirst

    The government needs more DOCUMENTED people. Whether you are from here, or there, it really doesn't matter. If you are a democrat, you are fine with this. If you are a republican, well, I guess many are fine with this too. Democrat, or republican, doesn't matter, as long as the D or R "JARGON" that you listen too makes a believable case to you. When you are documented, you are put into a...

    Last Post By: presence 10-19-2016, 12:35 PM Go to last post

    How SJWs neutralize rival institutions

    Thread Starter: Lucille

    This is about GamerGate but the same methods are used here, there, and everywhere. RPF has $#@!posters with reps beyond repute, FFS! (See the Ego section for that.) Not only do we have to contend with govt-paid POS provocateurs, we have to deal with these SJW control-freak clowns. Sadly, they have been effective as hell. ...

    Last Post By: Jerry C 10-19-2016, 11:44 AM Go to last post
  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion


    Sen. Paul Keeps Pledge to Support Trump Despite Controversies

    Thread Starter: jct74

    video at link http://www.tristatehomepage.com/news/local-news/sen-paul-keeps-pledge-to-support-trump-despite-controversies

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Today, 01:27 PM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist


    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist


    Last Post By: The Rebel Poet Today, 12:25 PM Go to last post
    Jesse James

    Is Ron Paul a libertarian?

    Thread Starter: Jesse James

    some say no, he's a constitutionalist. some say yes, he's a libertarian. some even say he's a neo-confederate, what that has to do with political views i dunno..... well what do you think? :toady:

    Last Post By: cajuncocoa Today, 08:19 AM Go to last post
    The One

    Ron Paul drinks Fiji water

    Thread Starter: The One

    I just saw RP on Cspan taking a swig from a bottle of Fiji water. That is my favorite bottled water also. I'm beginning to think there's nothing about this man I don't agree with. I'm sorry....I know this was pointless and silly. I'm laid up sick, and I'm a little bored right now.:D:D:D

    Last Post By: The One Yesterday, 07:47 PM Go to last post

    Are The Russians Rigging Our Elections?

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    Are The Russians Rigging Our Elections?

    Last Post By: Brian4Liberty Yesterday, 09:48 AM Go to last post
  • 2016 Presidential Election


    WAPO: Vulgar video of Trump Recorded in 2005

    Thread Starter: jllundqu

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-recorded-having-extremely-lewd-conversation-about-women-in-2005/2016/10/07/3b9ce776-8cb4-11e6-bf8a-3d26847eeed4_story.html Releasing this before the debate is purely coindidental.... I'm sure. This is really bad though.... he starts talking about "grabbing her by the pussy" "bitch" etc. etc. This is very bad optics and horrible for his...

    Last Post By: The Rebel Poet 10-15-2016, 07:04 PM Go to last post

    Hillary Clinton just left 9/11 ceremony w/medical episode

    Thread Starter: Petar

    Really hope that it's true. https://twitter.com/RickLeventhal/status/774965031943438336 How to embed tweets?

    Last Post By: enhanced_deficit 10-16-2016, 03:38 PM Go to last post

    Final presidential debate 10/19/16 - Official thread

    Thread Starter: jct74

    will be aired on all the major networks as with the previous debates, here are the details http://www.mediaite.com/online/what-time-is-the-trumpclinton-presidential-debate-3/

    Last Post By: Antischism 10-20-2016, 04:41 PM Go to last post

    Bizarre Behavior, Seizure Allegations Raise Doubts About Hillary Clinton's Health

    Thread Starter: Lucille

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-08/something-wrong-hillary-bizarre-behavior-seizure-allegations-raise-doubts-about-her- Pharmaceutical Exec: Hillary Clinton Has Parkinson’s Disease "Involuntary movements" and difficulty walking is a form of dyskinesia http://www.infowars.com/pharmaceutical-exec-hillary-clinton-has-parkinsons-disease/

    Last Post By: Lucille Yesterday, 11:39 AM Go to last post

    Donald Trump rejects 'categorically false' charges of raping teenage girl

    Thread Starter: CPUd


    Last Post By: The Rebel Poet Today, 02:16 AM Go to last post

    Wikileaks Release: The Podesta Emails

    Thread Starter: Lucille

    The Podesta Emails, Part 1: John Podesta and The Uranium One Story https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release 784491543868665856 784531001284362240 LOL

    Last Post By: Champuckett Yesterday, 04:58 PM Go to last post

    Trump tweets image depicting Clinton, cash and the Star of David

    Thread Starter: cindy25

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-star-david-225058 intentional? slip up? trial balloon?

    Last Post By: RonPaulMall Today, 10:28 AM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics

    Anti Federalist

    Memories of 'Lady Who Beat the Government'

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Memories of 'Lady Who Beat the Government' http://articles.latimes.com/1998/apr/05/news/mn-36156 Flood control: When the U.S. tried to seize Alice Ramsdell's home 30 years ago, she threatened them with a shotgun. The project proceeded as she stood her ground. But her home is about to be demolished. April 05, 1998|DIANE SCARPONI | ASSOCIATED PRESS THOMPSON, Conn. — Alice Azubah...

    Last Post By: phill4paul Today, 02:07 PM Go to last post

    What a Time To Be Pro-Liberty!

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    What a Time To Be Pro-Liberty! ​By Chris Rossini - 10/21/2016

    Last Post By: CCTelander Today, 01:59 PM Go to last post

    "The Government Can", Tim Hawkins - So True !

    Thread Starter: ChristianAnarchist

    I've had this on my youtube channel for years and it really doesn't get the views it deserves. Tim did an excellent job of making a very funny but oh so true commentary on how we get the short shaft in EVERYTHING the "government" does... Watch, enjoy, cry... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQUBSTfCmbg

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 12:34 PM Go to last post
    tod evans

    Arrested after saying verboten word

    Thread Starter: tod evans

    From Drudge; Veteran TV reporter harassed with racial slurs; man arrested http://www.wyff4.com/news/Veteran-TV-reporter-harassed-with-racial-slurs-man-arrested/42171586 CHARLESTON, S.C. —Racial slurs against a veteran TV news reporter were caught on camera by the reporter’s videographer, and the man who is accused of hurling the insults was arrested. Longtime reporter and...

    Last Post By: tod evans Today, 08:08 AM Go to last post

    Cyberattack Knocks Out Access to Websites

    Thread Starter: Zippyjuan

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/denial-of-service-web-attack-affects-amazon-twitter-others-1477056080 Retaliation for cutting off Assange's internet access? Outage map:

    Last Post By: otherone Today, 06:43 AM Go to last post

    New Clinton 3% PAYROLL TAX Planned For Middle Class To Funnel Your Money To Wall Street

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    Billionaire Clinton "Hillblazer" Pushes New Tax That Funnels Middle Class Money To Wall Street http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-20/billionaire-clinton-hillblazer-pushes-new-tax-funnels-middle-class-money-wall-street

    Last Post By: enhanced_deficit Today, 05:04 AM Go to last post

    Air Force Chief Foresees Decades More US Wars

    Thread Starter: Lucille

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/air-force-chief-foresees-decades-more-us-wars The 'war on terror' - by design - can never end https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/04/war-on-terror-endless-johnson

    Last Post By: enhanced_deficit Today, 04:53 AM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    TASER Inc. to roll out taser equipped drone for US police

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Alarmed? Maybe for minute or two. Until they are told to move along...that coupled with the fact that Idiot AmeriKa has the attention span of a potato...rest assured, these will be commonplace in a few years. A police drone zapping suspects with a stun gun? It may be coming http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-police-drone-zapping-suspects-with-a-stun-gun-it-may-be-coming-2016-10-20

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist Yesterday, 08:19 PM Go to last post

    Fred Reed: Ronald McDonald or Lucretia Borgia?: In the Long Run, We Are all Dead

    Thread Starter: Lucille

    Fred sure has a way with words! http://fredoneverything.org/ready-ronald-mcdonald-or-lucretia-borgia-in-the-long-run-we-are-all-dead/ Click through for more!

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist Yesterday, 06:25 PM Go to last post

    Why Donald Trump Should Challenge Election Fraud

    Thread Starter: Smaulgld


    Last Post By: cajuncocoa Yesterday, 06:15 PM Go to last post
  • 2016 Election Calendar

  • Gold Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion


    America’s Hidden Unemployment Crisis

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    Millions have stopped looking for work yet go uncounted in the Unemployment Figures http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2163987-americas-hidden-unemployment-crisis/ Full article, links to sources and better formatting on link at top. Now, where is Zippy to point at the U3 and tell us everything is awesome?

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 02:07 PM Go to last post

    The Litepresence Report on Cryptocurrency

    Thread Starter: presence

    CLICK HERE FOR HIGH RESOLUTION I've had multiple requests to create a unified location for my charts, predictions, forecasts, etc. so here it is. I'll update the thread whenever I'm trading. You can chat w/ me live at the btce trollbox. Best of luck my friends!

    Last Post By: kfarnan Today, 10:29 AM Go to last post

    President Obama: We'll be debating unconditional free money 'over the next 10 or 20 years'

    Thread Starter: goldenequity

    President Obama: We'll be debating unconditional free money 'over the next 10 or 20 years' ... In a recent interview , President Barack Obama reaffirmed his belief that universal basic income will get harder to ignore in the coming decades. Boom. WAT ME WURRY? :D

    Last Post By: H. E. Panqui Yesterday, 12:03 PM Go to last post

    2016 Has Been an Ugly Year For Tech Layoffs, and It's Going To Get Worse

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://news.slashdot.org/story/16/10/14/1613238/2016-has-been-an-ugly-year-for-tech-layoffs-and-its-going-to-get-worse-says-analyst There is almost zero IT work where I live and has not been any for quite a while.

    Last Post By: Spikender Yesterday, 06:24 AM Go to last post

    Student loans diverted to clothing, phone, survey finds

    Thread Starter: timosman


    Last Post By: Zippyjuan 10-20-2016, 09:12 PM Go to last post
    Henry Rogue

    Hidden Secrets of Money - Currency vs Money

    Thread Starter: Henry Rogue

    You Tube video by Mike Maloney called Hidden Secrets of Money - Currency vs Money. It's pretty good, but uses a lot of absolutes, (example at 44 seconds; "wealth is never destroyed, it is merely transferred." In IMHO wealth can be destroyed, essence of Broken window fallacy.) which will be ammunition for Zippy and the rest of the trolls.

    Last Post By: Son_of_Liberty90 10-20-2016, 10:27 AM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Chart

  • Living Free and Healthy


    I am building a wood fired (pizza) oven.

    Thread Starter: luctor-et-emergo

    I have been making pizza's weekly for over a decade. It all started when I was in Southern France and had the best pizza ever. We returned there a few years in a row so I have had a good sample of them... They were really good. I've been trying to make the same pizza's but I always lacked one thing, a wood fired oven. I can make pretty nice pizza's using a pizza stone in an electric oven but it...

    Last Post By: luctor-et-emergo Today, 03:09 AM Go to last post

    Nurses In Australia Face Punishment For Promoting Anti-Vaccination Messages Via Social Media

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://news.slashdot.org/story/16/10/21/0410203/nurses-in-australia-face-punishment-for-promoting-anti-vaccination-messages-via-social-media Thought Police. Do not talk about what you are not allowed to talk about. To be fair, I've never read Australia's Constitution, so, not sure if / how their Free Speech is protected at all. If it is not, however, absolute evidence for Thought...

    Last Post By: DamianTV Today, 01:19 AM Go to last post

    I'm ordering a pizza oven

    Thread Starter: Danke

    With Amazon Prime, it should be here in a couple of days.

    Last Post By: tod evans Yesterday, 05:46 PM Go to last post

    I'm starting the 3-day Apple Cleanse this Wednesday (3/12). Want to join me?

    Thread Starter: Lucille

    Watch me deny myself and detox here. If anyone wants to join me, come along! (Deborah said she might, but it's probably a little soon.) Diet is as follows: Eat as many early, organic apples as you want for three days. Drink lots of water (I'm going with warm).

    Last Post By: Danke Yesterday, 05:18 PM Go to last post
    tod evans

    Vegan friendly picture thread

    Thread Starter: tod evans

    And just 'cause I like being a wiseass;

    Last Post By: opal 10-20-2016, 09:44 PM Go to last post

    Dutch may allow assisted suicide for those who feel they have 'completed life'

    Thread Starter: timosman


    Last Post By: Anti Federalist 10-20-2016, 08:35 PM Go to last post

    The Problem With the Paleo Diet Argument

    Thread Starter: farreri

    It's time to put all this Paleo and other animal-based low-carb diet nonsense to rest once and for all. The Problem With the Paleo Diet Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx0pOGVMntM Early human ancestors were not predominantly meat eaters, but frugivores just like most of the other great apes. Teeth Show Fruit Was The Staple; No Exceptions Found BALTIMORE PRELIMINARY studies...

    Last Post By: donnay 10-19-2016, 05:20 PM Go to last post
  • Education & Thought Power

    r3volution 3.0

    A Libertarian Case For Global Government?

    Thread Starter: r3volution 3.0

    As libertarians, we care about what the government does (e.g. how much it taxes, regulates, inflates, wars, etc). We care about how the government is structured (e.g. whether it is local or global) only insofar as it affects what the government does. If local government would tend to behave in a more libertarian fashion (e.g. less taxing, regulating, inflating, warring, etc), then we as...

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Today, 01:37 PM Go to last post
    A Son of Liberty

    The Consequences of Darwinism

    Thread Starter: A Son of Liberty

    Well I've had a very enlightening discussion with a group of leftists at another discussion board, which lead me to the most profound - as I consider it - revelation. First, a little background on myself, and then the discussion which produced this insight: I went through and graduated college a dedicated leftist, like many, in the late 90's, but gradually drifted to a "centrist" the more...

    Last Post By: Mr Tansill Today, 11:52 AM Go to last post

    This day in history: Canadians burned down teh White House. :D

    Thread Starter: heavenlyboy34

    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/today-we-celebrate-the-time-canada-burned-down-the-white-house-127844144/#hC9PJfFgUOBXZs3y.01 Today We Celebrate the Time Canada Burned Down the White House Two hundred years ago today, a 36-year old America declared war, for the second time, against Great Britain. The plan was to conquer Canada and wrest North America for the United States ...

    Last Post By: oyarde Yesterday, 03:53 PM Go to last post

    Post your Consitutional Amendment ideas here

    Thread Starter: RCA

    1) There should be an amendment that outlaws all forms of torture, both foreign and domestic. This would immediately clear up all the BS floating around in the news today. 2) Electronics in the voting process needs to be outlawed. The includes diebold touchscreens as well as electronic scanners. 3) Political parties should be outlawed or somehow put on a level playing field with...

    Last Post By: Jerry C Yesterday, 09:44 AM Go to last post

    Is 'hate speech' protected under the 1st Amendment?

    Thread Starter: Cabal

    Sorry, kids, the 1st Amendment does protect 'hate speech' First Amendment to the United States Constitution

    Last Post By: Jerry C Yesterday, 09:27 AM Go to last post

    Default v. repudiation

    Thread Starter: osan

    A member made a comment in another thread about how we should default on our national debt. I pointed out to him why this was the worst possible idea and after posting it occurred to me that this is a bit of information that should be more widely disseminated, so I decided I should repeat myself here. This is what I wrote in response: I do not know how to sufficiently impress upon all of...

    Last Post By: osan Yesterday, 09:09 AM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!