• sailingaway

    by Published on 03-19-2016 11:40 AM

    By Gregory Krieg
    Sat March 19, 2016




    New York (CNN)Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Friday that the party outsmarted itself in passing a 2012 rule that he said was aimed at blunting his influence on that summer's convention.

    The GOP's "Rule 40(b)" requires candidates win the "support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight or more states" in order to have their named placed on the nominating ballot. The raised threshold -- it had previously been a plurality from five states -- helped to prevent Paul's supporters from upstaging or distracting from the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, on national television.

    "They did not want my name to come up and so they changed the rules because we had the votes," Paul told CNN "At This Hour" anchors Kate Bolduan and John Berman. "We had the numbers to allow my name to be put into nomination, but they wouldn't do it."

    Four years later, the same establishment figures who spearheaded the 2012 rules changes are facing a different kind of challenge: Donald Trump. But this time around, the requirement threatens to undermine a late effort to derail the billionaire front-runner.

    "I think it's a bit of an irony and they deserve the problem," Paul said. "They're terrified of competition, and now the establishment has competition that really looks strong and there's a lot of people behind Trump. So this is a big problem for them."

    more:
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/18/politi...ion/index.html
    by Published on 06-15-2013 09:11 PM

    National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.


    NSA director Keith Alexander says his agency's analysts, which until recently included Edward Snowden among their ranks, take protecting "civil liberties and privacy and the security of this nation to their heart every day."
    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

    If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

    Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

    Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler's disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

    The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

    There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."
    more, and internal links here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...hout-warrants/
    by Published on 06-14-2013 06:28 PM



    Truth as always. He notes as I did as soon as Obama started justifying giving Rebels military aid based on reports of chemical use, that a couple of weeks ago the administration seemed to agree with the UN investigators that it was the Rebels, not Assad using the gas. Not that I think Assad is wonderful, just that we don't want to be responsible for the actions of either.

    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...BjCSeE.twitter
    by Published on 06-02-2013 11:55 PM


    http://the-free-foundation.org/tst6-3-2013.html

    Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism

    May was Iraq’s deadliest month in nearly five years, with more than 1,000 dead – both civilians and security personnel -- in a rash of bombings, shootings and other violence. As we read each day of new horrors in Iraq, it becomes more obvious that the US invasion delivered none of the promised peace or stability that proponents of the attack promised.

    Millions live in constant fear, refugees do not return home, and the economy is destroyed. The Christian community, some 1.2 million persons before 2003, has been nearly wiped off the Iraqi map. Other minorities have likewise disappeared. Making matters worse, US support for the Syrian rebels next door has drawn the Shi’ite-led Iraqi government into the spreading regional unrest and breathed new life into extremist elements.

    The invasion of Iraq opened the door to Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which did not exist beforehand, while simultaneously strengthening the hand of Iran in the region. Were the “experts” who planned for and advocated the US attack really this incompetent?

    Ryan Crocker, who was US Ambassador to Iraq from 2007-2009, still speaks of the Iraqi “surge” as a great reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite in Iraq. He wrote recently that “[t]hough the United States has withdrawn its troops from Iraq, it retains significant leverage there. Iraqi forces were equipped and trained by Americans, and the country’s leaders need and expect our help.” He seems alarmingly out of touch with reality. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...rab-insurgents

    It is clear now that the “surge” and the “Iraqi Awakening” were just myths promoted by those desperate to put a positive spin on the US invasion, which the late General William Odom once called, “the greatest strategic disaster in American history." Aircraft were loaded with $100 dollar bills to pay each side to temporarily stop killing US troops and each other, but the payoff provided a mere temporary break. Shouldn’t the measure of success of a particular policy be whether it actually produces sustained positive results?

    Now we see radical fighters who once shot at US troops in Iraq have spilled into Syria, where they ironically find their cause supported by the US government! Some of these fighters are even greeted by visiting US senators.

    The US intervention in Iraq has created ever more problems. That is clear. The foreign policy “experts” who urged the US attack on Iraq now claim that the disaster they created can only be solved with more interventionism! Imagine a medical doctor noting that a particular medication is killing his patient, but to combat the side effect he orders an increase in dosage of the same medicine. Like this doctor, the US foreign policy establishment is guilty of malpractice. And, I might add, this is just what the Fed does with monetary policy.

    From Iraq to Libya to Mali to Syria to Afghanistan, US interventions have an unbroken record of making matters far worse. Yet regardless of the disasters produced, for the interventionists a more aggressive US foreign policy is the only policy they offer.

    We must learn the appropriate lessons from the disaster of Iraq. We cannot continue to invade countries, install puppet governments, build new nations, create centrally-planned economies, engage in social engineering, and force democracy at the barrel of a gun. The rest of the world is tired of US interventionism and the US taxpayer is tired of footing the bill for US interventionism. It is up to all of us to make it very clear to the foreign policy establishment and the powers that be that we have had enough and will no longer tolerate empire-building. We should be more confident in ourselves and stop acting like an insecure bully.

    Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.


    Picture from Ron's facebook page which you can like here: http://facebook.com/ronpaul
    by Published on 05-25-2013 07:52 PM

    "This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the "enabling act” principle.

    The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

    He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

    He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

    He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

    The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal."


    read the rest of the article at the RPI site: http://t.co/K4NouiYwTY

    Ron Paul ‏@RonPaul 4h
    My comments on Obama's recent speeches -- only at my Ron Paul Institute site:
    http://tinyurl.com/qfqp7o5


    https://twitter.com/RonPaul/status/338359742219046912
    by Published on 05-15-2013 10:35 AM



    New Directive:
    Feb. 27, 2013:
    DoD Instruction 3025.21 Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

    [From link below] "...For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

    The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled “Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

    The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

    Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.
    Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

    A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” Moreover, he insists the Pentagon doesn’t “want to get involved in civilian law enforcement. It’s one of those red lines that the military hasn’t signed up for.” Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the new procedures that govern military command on the ground in the event of a civil disturbance relates to authority. Not only does it fail to define what circumstances would be so severe that the president’s authorization is “impossible,” it grants full presidential authority to “Federal military commanders.” According to the defense official, a commander is defined as follows: “Somebody who’s in the position of command, has the title commander. And most of the time they are centrally selected by a board, they’ve gone through additional schooling to exercise command authority.”

    As it is written, this “commander” has the same power to authorize military force as the president in the event the president is somehow unable to access a telephone. (The rule doesn’t address the statutory chain of authority that already exists in the event a sitting president is unavailable.) In doing so, this commander must exercise judgment in determining what constitutes, “wanton destruction of property,” “adequate protection for Federal property,” “domestic violence,” or “conspiracy that hinders the execution of State or Federal law,” as these are the circumstances that might be considered an “emergency.”

    “These phrases don’t have any legal meaning,” says Afran. “It’s no different than the emergency powers clause in the Weimar constitution [of the German Reich]. It’s a grant of emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

    Afran also expresses apprehension over the government’s authority “to engage temporarily in activities necessary to quell large-scale disturbances.”

    “Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” says Afran. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

    The U.S. military is prohibited from intervening in domestic affairs except where provided under Article IV of the Constitution in cases of domestic violence that threaten the government of a state or the application of federal law. This provision was further clarified both by the Insurrection Act of 1807 and a post-Reconstruction law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (PCA). The Insurrection Act specifies the circumstances under which the president may convene the armed forces to suppress an insurrection against any state or the federal government. Furthermore, where an individual state is concerned, consent of the governor must be obtained prior to the deployment of troops. The PCA—passed in response to federal troops that enforced local laws and oversaw elections during Reconstruction—made unauthorized employment of federal troops a punishable offense, thereby giving teeth to the Insurrection Act.

    Together, these laws limit executive authority over domestic military action. Yet Monday’s official regulatory changes issued unilaterally by the Department of Defense is a game-changer.

    The stated purpose of the updated rule is “support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act,” but in reality it undermines the Insurrection Act and PCA in significant and alarming ways. The most substantial change is the notion of “civil disturbance” as one of the few “domestic emergencies” that would allow for the deployment of military assets on American soil.

    To wit, the relatively few instances that federal troops have been deployed for domestic support have produced a wide range of results. Situations have included responding to natural disasters and protecting demonstrators during the Civil Rights era to, disastrously, the Kent State student massacre and the 1973 occupation of Wounded Knee.

    Michael German, senior policy counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), noted in a 2009 Daily Kos article that, “there is no doubt that the military is very good at many things. But recent history shows that restraint in their new-found domestic role is not one of them.”

    At the time German was referring to the military’s expanded surveillance techniques and hostile interventions related to border control and the War on Drugs. And in fact, many have argued that these actions have already upended the PCA in a significant way. Even before this most recent rule change, the ACLU was vocal in its opposition to the Department of Defense (DoD) request to expand domestic military authority “in the event of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents.” The ACLU’s position is that civilian agencies are more than equipped to handle such emergencies since 9/11. (ACLU spokespersons in Washington D.C. declined, however, to be interviewed for this story.)

    But while outcomes of military interventions have varied, the protocol by which the president works cooperatively with state governments has remained the same. The president is only allowed to deploy troops to a state upon request of its governor. Even then, the military—specifically the National Guard—is there to provide support for local law enforcement and is prohibited from engaging in any activities that are outside of this scope, such as the power to arrest.

    Eric Freedman, a constitutional law professor from Hofstra University, also calls the ruling “an unauthorized power grab.” According to Freedman, “The Department of Defense does not have the authority to grant itself by regulation any more authority than Congress has granted it by statute.” Yet that’s precisely what it did. This wasn’t, however, the Pentagon’s first attempt to expand its authority domestically in the last decade.


    the whole thing is worth reading. http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/...s-into-effect/

    Old directive:
    Jan. 15, 1986:
    DoD Instruction 5525.5 DoD Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Officials
    by Published on 05-03-2013 01:15 AM

    MSNBC's Laurence O'Donnell: Ron Paul is a Paranoid Liar: "No Guns Pointed at Families, No Tanks, No Forced Lockdown!"

    video of proof of the truth of Ron's words is interspersed with O Donnell's hit piece. We didn't make this, and I personally would have left out some of the graphics at the end as polarizing, but I'm with it right through the 'it isn't about left or right, but about what is right... and what is wrong...:

    Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
  • Activism News & Discussion

    USAFCapt

    Best candidates for Libertarian Party 2020

    Thread Starter: USAFCapt

    Give us your thoughts on who would be the best for libertarians to run for president in 2020 and why.

    Last Post By: PierzStyx Yesterday, 02:33 PM Go to last post
    max

    Do Not Underestimate The Disgust Of The American People!

    Thread Starter: max

    This is not another gloating attack against the naysayers of V day. But if yesterday taught us anything it is this: the American people are STARVING for an alternative. They are mad as hell at the government and the present situation. The average houshold carries $9,000 in credit cards. people are mortgaged to the hilt (a direct result of our debt based Monetray System - The Fed. We are taxed...

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist 05-21-2018, 04:37 AM Go to last post
  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion

    kona

    Ron Paul on Infowars 5/23/18

    Thread Starter: kona

    https://youtu.be/weXPXFqA4BE Always fun to see him on there, even though I watch Liberty Report daily. Seems to have some warmth for Alex. Was asked what he would do if he was Trump right now. Veto all spending, and end the Fed. Said if you wanna find out who the deep state is, auditing the Fed will tell you everything. I'm still amazed how the first thing I think about when I see Dr. Paul...

    Last Post By: Anti Globalist Today, 05:31 PM Go to last post
    kona

    Rand may not be Ron, but can he finish the mission?

    Thread Starter: kona

    As far out as it sounds, I don't think it is totally unrealistic. I'm no expert (thank god for that!), but from an optimistic viewpoint, I think one could argue that in some strange way we are closer to liberty than we really believe. Part of it is Trump...he is helping our cause I think, even if it's just to destroy the deep state and empty the establishment. He's basically removing barriers to...

    Last Post By: brushfire Today, 11:33 AM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics

    AuH20

    McCain Trailer Released

    Thread Starter: AuH20

    Riveting! A man for the ages.

    Last Post By: Anti Globalist Today, 05:38 PM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    Trump cancels meeting with Kim Jong Un

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Trump cancels Singapore summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/24/trump-says-singapore-summit-with-north-korea-leader-kim-is-cancelled-.html President Donald Trump has canceled his historic summit in Singapore with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un next month. The meeting, which would have marked the first face-to-face encounter between a sitting U.S....

    Last Post By: dannno Today, 05:22 PM Go to last post
    Thor

    This is how we get Sharia law in the US

    Thread Starter: Thor

    "Absolutely" a blue Muslim wave coming, says Michigan congressional candidate Rashida Tlaib https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rashida-tlaib-blue-muslim-wave-michigan-13-congresional-district/ Rashida Tlaib, who is running for the Congress in the 13th district in Michigan, said Wednesday she "absolutely" sees a "blue Muslim wave" in the 2018 midterm elections. Tlaib is one of more than 90...

    Last Post By: Raginfridus Today, 05:02 PM Go to last post
    enhanced_deficit

    Media cartoons cross the line as White House Coins honoring NKorea's Supreme Leader go on sale

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    Media cratoons have started to cross the line again as White House gift shop offers sale prices on historic Coins to memorialize Peace Talks with North Korea's 'Supreme Leader'. Not too surprising considering how parts of media had mocked recent Peace Process ceremony in Jerusalem using very controversial depictions. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/998839663807942656

    Last Post By: TheCount Today, 04:58 PM Go to last post
    Swordsmyth

    Conoco Begins Confiscating Venezuela Oil Assets, Infuriating China

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    On April 25, ConocoPhillips won a ruling that said the US major was entitled to more than $2 billion from Venezuela’s insolvent state oil company, PDVSA, over the country’s expropriation of several oil projects more than a decade ago. The drawn-out international legal struggle began in 2007 when ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil refused to cede control of their major oil production ventures to...

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Today, 03:44 PM Go to last post
    goldenequity

    Fraud Upon the FISA Court Confirmed

    Thread Starter: goldenequity

    continued from here: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518161-Rep-Jim-Jordan-18-questions-in-2018-about-Russia-and-the-FBI ===================== FRAUD upon the COURT :mad: Confirmation: DOJ and FBI Used “Steele Dossier” for Application To FISA Court for Search Authority on Trump Campaign…...

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Today, 03:36 PM Go to last post
    Swordsmyth

    House to take up Dodd-Frank rewrite 'soon'

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    The U.S. House of Representatives will soon take up a bill easing banking rules adopted after the decade-old global financial crisis, House Speaker Paul Ryan said on Tuesday. "We will be moving the Dodd-Frank bill," Ryan told reporters at his weekly news conference, without specifying a timeline. The bill will be voted on "soon," he said. The Senate voted 67-32 in March to endorse a...

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Today, 01:40 PM Go to last post
    juleswin

    Pence Says U.S. to Provide $16 Million in Aid to Venezuelan Refugees

    Thread Starter: juleswin

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/pence-says-u-s-to-provide-16-million-in-aid-to-venezuelan-refugees-1523666151 Smart man, humanitarian aid, bombs and wars have the same effect on a nation when donated by the imperialist US. Reject it all and you might just have the opportunity to fight another day.

    Last Post By: The Gold Standard Today, 12:44 PM Go to last post
    enhanced_deficit

    How much trust do you put in current President's promises and statements?

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    Based on your view of his personal character, how much trust do you put in current President's promises and statements?

    Last Post By: Ender Today, 12:42 PM Go to last post
    Swordsmyth

    Pentagon Worked with “Private-Sector Organizations” on Plan to Verify Identity with Phones

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    The Defense Department is funding a project that officials say could revolutionize the way companies, federal agencies and the military itself verify that people are who they say they are and it could be available in most commercial smartphones within two years. The technology, which will be embedded in smartphones’ hardware, will analyze a variety of identifiers that are unique to an...

    Last Post By: Occam's Banana Today, 11:37 AM Go to last post
  • Gold Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion

    DamianTV

    Our Economy Is Failing Our Society

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-21/our-economy-failing-our-society Full article at link.

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Today, 05:20 PM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    Number of households that cannot afford $400 emergency expense drops to 40%

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Still pretty stunning, but that's down from just over 50% in 2013 Four in 10 can’t cover an emergency expense of $400, Fed survey finds Published: May 22, 2018 12:36 p.m. ET Small emergency expenses still challenge many Americans after nearly a decade of economic recovery, a new survey released by the Federal Reserve on Tuesday found. The Fed’s new survey of household economics and...

    Last Post By: Kilrain Today, 05:15 PM Go to last post
    Matt Collins

    Kids from the '80s may never recover from Great Recession

    Thread Starter: Matt Collins

    "The net worth of a typical family headed by someone born in the 1980s was 34% below what was expected, according to a new Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis study titled "A Lost Generation?" What's worse, the typical 1980s family lost ground between 2010 and 2016, after the recession ended. These folks, who were in their late 20s and early to mid 30s in 2016, were the only age group to do so...

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 03:59 PM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    GHOST CITY - Inside the Chinese Housing Bubble

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    GHOST CITY - Inside the Chinese Housing Bubble What could possibly go wrong?

    Last Post By: RJB Today, 01:54 PM Go to last post
    anaconda

    Bitcoin Cracks $5000

    Thread Starter: anaconda

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/cbovaird/2017/09/01/bitcoin-price-tops-5000-as-cryptocurrencies-march-higher/#6d8dc42a5a8e

    Last Post By: devil21 Today, 09:38 AM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    Unemployment and Welfare

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    According to some reports, the unemployment rate is now so low that employers can not find workers. This is anecdotal, and there may be more to the story, such as how hard an employer has really tried to find people, but let's assume for a moment that it is true. The next step is to look at the welfare and food stamp roles. How many people are able to work in some capacity, yet are not working...

    Last Post By: angelatc 05-22-2018, 06:34 AM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Chart

  • Living Free and Healthy

    Suzu

    Enhancing your body's stem cell production!

    Thread Starter: Suzu

    I've come across a new product that stimulates stem cell production. The potential is to heal just about any condition! I am seeing it work for friends and have started using it myself. I have a $100 discount coupon to give away for a 3-month supply. PM me if interested. a brief introduction -- three and a half minutes:

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Today, 04:01 PM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    Egg a day tied to lower risk of heart disease

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Egg a day tied to lower risk of heart disease https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-heart-eggs/egg-a-day-tied-to-lower-risk-of-heart-disease-idUSKCN1IM2G9 (Reuters Health) - People who eat an egg just about every day may have a lower risk of heart attack and stroke than individuals who don’t eat eggs at all, a large Chinese study suggests. Researchers examined survey data on egg...

    Last Post By: farreri Today, 02:08 PM Go to last post
    Danke

    It is gonna be a cold winter.

    Thread Starter: Danke

    This fall the Indians on a remote reservation asked their new Chief Oyarde if the coming winter was going to be cold or mild. Since he was a chief in a modern society, he’d never learned the old tribal secrets. He couldn’t look at the sky to predict what the winter was going to be like. "It's going to be a very cold winter." So just to be on the safe side, Oyarde told his tribe that the...

    Last Post By: Suzanimal Today, 11:18 AM Go to last post
    donnay

    Why fever can be your friend in times of illness

    Thread Starter: donnay

    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/321889.php?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fzen.yandex.com

    Last Post By: donnay Yesterday, 02:52 PM Go to last post
    farreri

    Why Eggs Are NOT Healthy

    Thread Starter: farreri

    Things the video points out: - Pro-egg studies are funded by the Egg Industry - Multiple poor study designs, such as used participants already with high cholesterol that can't be raised much higher (see here how pro-saturated fat studies manipulated their studies too.) - Debunks a Kris Gunnar's pro-egg article. - Shows how even egg whites are unhealthy.

    Last Post By: farreri Yesterday, 10:21 AM Go to last post
    Swordsmyth

    Childhood leukemia linked to lack of childhood infections

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    Lack of infections during childhood is a common trend in obsessively clean environments that the babies grow up in today. According to Prof Mel Greaves from the Institute of Cancer Research in London, winner of the Royal Society’s prestigious Royal Medal, childhood leukemias are caused not just due to aberrant genetics or due to exposure to dangerous radiation but also due to lack of common...

    Last Post By: donnay Yesterday, 07:27 AM Go to last post
    donnay

    Dieting, Skipping Meals Actually LEADS To Weight Gain In Long Run, Say Researchers

    Thread Starter: donnay

    https://www.studyfinds.org/dieting-irregular-eating-habits-weight-gain/

    Last Post By: farreri 05-22-2018, 10:41 PM Go to last post
  • Education & Thought Power

    Krugminator2

    Think You're Smart About Politics? You Might Be Libertarian

    Thread Starter: Krugminator2

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-03-28/study-of-politics-and-analytical-thinking-puts-libertarians-on-top Everything seems to check out. Libertarians are just smarter.

    Last Post By: The Rebel Poet Yesterday, 06:09 PM Go to last post
    timosman

    What Happens to Free Speech in the Public Square When It's Owned by a Private Monopoly.

    Thread Starter: timosman

    https://www.barneslawllp.com/charles-johnson-vs-twitter-case/

    Last Post By: timosman Yesterday, 05:29 PM Go to last post
    Madison320

    The free market solution to school shootings.

    Thread Starter: Madison320

    How about privatizing the schools and letting the parents decide which schools are safest? As far as I can tell I'm the only one here with this idea, which is a little disconcerting since this is supposed to be a libertarian forum. It's bad enough that kids are getting shot at schools, but the fact that the government forces your kids to attend makes it even worse.

    Last Post By: Swordsmyth Yesterday, 02:50 PM Go to last post
    timosman

    There was No Switch between the Democrat Party & Republican Party in the 1960s

    Thread Starter: timosman

    Last Post By: Tywysog Cymru 05-22-2018, 06:26 PM Go to last post
    timosman

    Is USA still governed by the crown?

    Thread Starter: timosman

    How would you prove/disprove it?

    Last Post By: timosman 05-21-2018, 10:21 PM Go to last post
    Republicanguy

    Mr Yang democatic candidate

    Thread Starter: Republicanguy

    This hopeful candidate would like to implement that welfare initiative universal basic income. https://www.yang2020.com/meet-andrew/

    Last Post By: VIDEODROME 05-21-2018, 08:16 PM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!