• sailingaway

    by Published on 03-19-2016 11:40 AM

    By Gregory Krieg
    Sat March 19, 2016

    New York (CNN)Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Friday that the party outsmarted itself in passing a 2012 rule that he said was aimed at blunting his influence on that summer's convention.

    The GOP's "Rule 40(b)" requires candidates win the "support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight or more states" in order to have their named placed on the nominating ballot. The raised threshold -- it had previously been a plurality from five states -- helped to prevent Paul's supporters from upstaging or distracting from the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, on national television.

    "They did not want my name to come up and so they changed the rules because we had the votes," Paul told CNN "At This Hour" anchors Kate Bolduan and John Berman. "We had the numbers to allow my name to be put into nomination, but they wouldn't do it."

    Four years later, the same establishment figures who spearheaded the 2012 rules changes are facing a different kind of challenge: Donald Trump. But this time around, the requirement threatens to undermine a late effort to derail the billionaire front-runner.

    "I think it's a bit of an irony and they deserve the problem," Paul said. "They're terrified of competition, and now the establishment has competition that really looks strong and there's a lot of people behind Trump. So this is a big problem for them."

    by Published on 06-15-2013 09:11 PM

    National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.

    NSA director Keith Alexander says his agency's analysts, which until recently included Edward Snowden among their ranks, take protecting "civil liberties and privacy and the security of this nation to their heart every day."
    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

    If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

    Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

    Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler's disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

    The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

    There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."
    more, and internal links here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...hout-warrants/
    by Published on 06-14-2013 06:28 PM

    Truth as always. He notes as I did as soon as Obama started justifying giving Rebels military aid based on reports of chemical use, that a couple of weeks ago the administration seemed to agree with the UN investigators that it was the Rebels, not Assad using the gas. Not that I think Assad is wonderful, just that we don't want to be responsible for the actions of either.

    by Published on 06-02-2013 11:55 PM


    Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism

    May was Iraq’s deadliest month in nearly five years, with more than 1,000 dead – both civilians and security personnel -- in a rash of bombings, shootings and other violence. As we read each day of new horrors in Iraq, it becomes more obvious that the US invasion delivered none of the promised peace or stability that proponents of the attack promised.

    Millions live in constant fear, refugees do not return home, and the economy is destroyed. The Christian community, some 1.2 million persons before 2003, has been nearly wiped off the Iraqi map. Other minorities have likewise disappeared. Making matters worse, US support for the Syrian rebels next door has drawn the Shi’ite-led Iraqi government into the spreading regional unrest and breathed new life into extremist elements.

    The invasion of Iraq opened the door to Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which did not exist beforehand, while simultaneously strengthening the hand of Iran in the region. Were the “experts” who planned for and advocated the US attack really this incompetent?

    Ryan Crocker, who was US Ambassador to Iraq from 2007-2009, still speaks of the Iraqi “surge” as a great reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite in Iraq. He wrote recently that “[t]hough the United States has withdrawn its troops from Iraq, it retains significant leverage there. Iraqi forces were equipped and trained by Americans, and the country’s leaders need and expect our help.” He seems alarmingly out of touch with reality. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...rab-insurgents

    It is clear now that the “surge” and the “Iraqi Awakening” were just myths promoted by those desperate to put a positive spin on the US invasion, which the late General William Odom once called, “the greatest strategic disaster in American history." Aircraft were loaded with $100 dollar bills to pay each side to temporarily stop killing US troops and each other, but the payoff provided a mere temporary break. Shouldn’t the measure of success of a particular policy be whether it actually produces sustained positive results?

    Now we see radical fighters who once shot at US troops in Iraq have spilled into Syria, where they ironically find their cause supported by the US government! Some of these fighters are even greeted by visiting US senators.

    The US intervention in Iraq has created ever more problems. That is clear. The foreign policy “experts” who urged the US attack on Iraq now claim that the disaster they created can only be solved with more interventionism! Imagine a medical doctor noting that a particular medication is killing his patient, but to combat the side effect he orders an increase in dosage of the same medicine. Like this doctor, the US foreign policy establishment is guilty of malpractice. And, I might add, this is just what the Fed does with monetary policy.

    From Iraq to Libya to Mali to Syria to Afghanistan, US interventions have an unbroken record of making matters far worse. Yet regardless of the disasters produced, for the interventionists a more aggressive US foreign policy is the only policy they offer.

    We must learn the appropriate lessons from the disaster of Iraq. We cannot continue to invade countries, install puppet governments, build new nations, create centrally-planned economies, engage in social engineering, and force democracy at the barrel of a gun. The rest of the world is tired of US interventionism and the US taxpayer is tired of footing the bill for US interventionism. It is up to all of us to make it very clear to the foreign policy establishment and the powers that be that we have had enough and will no longer tolerate empire-building. We should be more confident in ourselves and stop acting like an insecure bully.

    Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

    Picture from Ron's facebook page which you can like here: http://facebook.com/ronpaul
    by Published on 05-25-2013 07:52 PM

    "This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the "enabling act” principle.

    The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

    He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

    He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

    He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

    The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal."

    read the rest of the article at the RPI site: http://t.co/K4NouiYwTY

    Ron Paul ‏@RonPaul 4h
    My comments on Obama's recent speeches -- only at my Ron Paul Institute site:

    by Published on 05-15-2013 10:35 AM

    New Directive:
    Feb. 27, 2013:
    DoD Instruction 3025.21 Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

    [From link below] "...For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

    The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled “Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

    The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

    Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.
    Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

    A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” Moreover, he insists the Pentagon doesn’t “want to get involved in civilian law enforcement. It’s one of those red lines that the military hasn’t signed up for.” Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the new procedures that govern military command on the ground in the event of a civil disturbance relates to authority. Not only does it fail to define what circumstances would be so severe that the president’s authorization is “impossible,” it grants full presidential authority to “Federal military commanders.” According to the defense official, a commander is defined as follows: “Somebody who’s in the position of command, has the title commander. And most of the time they are centrally selected by a board, they’ve gone through additional schooling to exercise command authority.”

    As it is written, this “commander” has the same power to authorize military force as the president in the event the president is somehow unable to access a telephone. (The rule doesn’t address the statutory chain of authority that already exists in the event a sitting president is unavailable.) In doing so, this commander must exercise judgment in determining what constitutes, “wanton destruction of property,” “adequate protection for Federal property,” “domestic violence,” or “conspiracy that hinders the execution of State or Federal law,” as these are the circumstances that might be considered an “emergency.”

    “These phrases don’t have any legal meaning,” says Afran. “It’s no different than the emergency powers clause in the Weimar constitution [of the German Reich]. It’s a grant of emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

    Afran also expresses apprehension over the government’s authority “to engage temporarily in activities necessary to quell large-scale disturbances.”

    “Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” says Afran. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

    The U.S. military is prohibited from intervening in domestic affairs except where provided under Article IV of the Constitution in cases of domestic violence that threaten the government of a state or the application of federal law. This provision was further clarified both by the Insurrection Act of 1807 and a post-Reconstruction law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (PCA). The Insurrection Act specifies the circumstances under which the president may convene the armed forces to suppress an insurrection against any state or the federal government. Furthermore, where an individual state is concerned, consent of the governor must be obtained prior to the deployment of troops. The PCA—passed in response to federal troops that enforced local laws and oversaw elections during Reconstruction—made unauthorized employment of federal troops a punishable offense, thereby giving teeth to the Insurrection Act.

    Together, these laws limit executive authority over domestic military action. Yet Monday’s official regulatory changes issued unilaterally by the Department of Defense is a game-changer.

    The stated purpose of the updated rule is “support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act,” but in reality it undermines the Insurrection Act and PCA in significant and alarming ways. The most substantial change is the notion of “civil disturbance” as one of the few “domestic emergencies” that would allow for the deployment of military assets on American soil.

    To wit, the relatively few instances that federal troops have been deployed for domestic support have produced a wide range of results. Situations have included responding to natural disasters and protecting demonstrators during the Civil Rights era to, disastrously, the Kent State student massacre and the 1973 occupation of Wounded Knee.

    Michael German, senior policy counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), noted in a 2009 Daily Kos article that, “there is no doubt that the military is very good at many things. But recent history shows that restraint in their new-found domestic role is not one of them.”

    At the time German was referring to the military’s expanded surveillance techniques and hostile interventions related to border control and the War on Drugs. And in fact, many have argued that these actions have already upended the PCA in a significant way. Even before this most recent rule change, the ACLU was vocal in its opposition to the Department of Defense (DoD) request to expand domestic military authority “in the event of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents.” The ACLU’s position is that civilian agencies are more than equipped to handle such emergencies since 9/11. (ACLU spokespersons in Washington D.C. declined, however, to be interviewed for this story.)

    But while outcomes of military interventions have varied, the protocol by which the president works cooperatively with state governments has remained the same. The president is only allowed to deploy troops to a state upon request of its governor. Even then, the military—specifically the National Guard—is there to provide support for local law enforcement and is prohibited from engaging in any activities that are outside of this scope, such as the power to arrest.

    Eric Freedman, a constitutional law professor from Hofstra University, also calls the ruling “an unauthorized power grab.” According to Freedman, “The Department of Defense does not have the authority to grant itself by regulation any more authority than Congress has granted it by statute.” Yet that’s precisely what it did. This wasn’t, however, the Pentagon’s first attempt to expand its authority domestically in the last decade.

    the whole thing is worth reading. http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/...s-into-effect/

    Old directive:
    Jan. 15, 1986:
    DoD Instruction 5525.5 DoD Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Officials
    by Published on 05-03-2013 01:15 AM

    MSNBC's Laurence O'Donnell: Ron Paul is a Paranoid Liar: "No Guns Pointed at Families, No Tanks, No Forced Lockdown!"

    video of proof of the truth of Ron's words is interspersed with O Donnell's hit piece. We didn't make this, and I personally would have left out some of the graphics at the end as polarizing, but I'm with it right through the 'it isn't about left or right, but about what is right... and what is wrong...:

    Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
  • Activism News & Discussion

    John Prewett

    Pope making his claim to be rightful ruler of the world

    Thread Starter: John Prewett

    Pope on verge of launching a GLOBAL "Night of the Long Knives"

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 07:04 PM Go to last post

    Glen Bradley for NC House 7 needs your help

    Thread Starter: GunnyFreedom

    Hello everyone! As most of you know, I am running for NC State House out of the 7th District. What many of you may not know, is on the last day of filing, I received a primary challenge. We did not actually expect a primary challenger, but we do have one. My opponent is wealthy and largely self-funding, but her funds are listed as loans and she will be getting every penny of that back...

    Last Post By: wizardwatson Today, 05:57 PM Go to last post

    Freedom has no hope...

    Thread Starter: osan

    Unless one of two things occur: The "movement" becomes sufficiently organized, or A "reset event" occurs. Addressing point the second, firstly: If worldwide plague, a large meteor strike, Jesus popping back in from wherever, aliens landing on the South Lawn, or something similar occurs, the utter disruption of the status quo would open the door to freedom enough such that if enough...

    Last Post By: osan Yesterday, 11:59 AM Go to last post
    Slave Mentality

    My thirst for liberty will never be quenched

    Thread Starter: Slave Mentality

    Is slavery any less despicable, even if by choice? I had an epiphany last night. My username on here is truly a good example of how I, and millions of others mind you, feel in this day and age. I argue that this is not by choice, but by threat of violence. Here is what I see: 1. We are as free as our government masters, down to the petty tyrant at the DMV, allow us. Test my assertion...

    Last Post By: wizardwatson 03-16-2018, 08:26 PM Go to last post

    What's up with Ben Swann lately? (UPDATE: website & social media accounts deleted)

    Thread Starter: scm

    He was on such a roll. But seemed very quiet this election cycle. He went back to FOX, but His truth in media site hardly gets updated anymore. I feel he and a few other "investigative journalists" had their backs turned as the other team was scoring touchdowns this election cycle. He and someone like Jon Stewart could of changed this election. In 2012, they brought up a lot about the "other...

    Last Post By: brushfire 03-16-2018, 07:28 PM Go to last post
  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion


    Rand Opposes Pompeo and Haspel

    Thread Starter: EBounding

    973937563068223488 --- Rand Paul: Why I’ll Fight Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo Nominations

    Last Post By: eleganz Today, 06:51 PM Go to last post

    [Video] Rand Paul on Face the Nation w/ Margaret Brennan 3/18/18

    Thread Starter: jct74


    Last Post By: RonZeplin Today, 01:08 PM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics


    National debt hits $21 trillion

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    I thought debt would decrease under GOP cut-spending/small gummit regime: Saturday, March 17, 2018 National debt hits $21 trillion Federal borrowing has been on the rise again since February, when Congress passed legislation to suspend the debt ceiling. (Mark...

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 07:19 PM Go to last post

    79 Cloture Votes Used Against Trump Nominees Compared to 17 in Past 4 Administrations Combined

    Thread Starter: Swordsmyth

    White House Legislative Affairs Director Marc Short complained of Senate Democrats’ obstruction of President Donald Trump’s nominees, saying at this rate, it will take 11 and a half years for his nominees to be given an up-or-down vote. In the last four administrations combined, the Senate held 17 cloture votes of presidential nominees compared to the 79 cloture vote in the first 14...

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 05:54 PM Go to last post

    L.A.'s Massive Homeless Problem

    Thread Starter: Marenco

    For more: http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-homelessness-impact-on-others-20180301-htmlstory.html

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 05:37 PM Go to last post

    Brennan unleashes Twitter Tirade on Trump

    Thread Starter: AuH20

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 05:36 PM Go to last post

    Sessions Fires FBI’s Disgraced Andrew McCabe Before He Can Officially Retire

    Thread Starter: goldenequity

    Sessions Poised to Fire FBI’s Disgraced Andrew McCabe Before He Can Officially Retire https://truepundit.com/sessions-poised-fire-fbis-disgraced-andrew-mccabe-can-officially-retire/ NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/14/us/politics/andrew-mccabe-fbi-firing-recommendation-justice-department.html?smid=tw-nytpolitics&smtyp=cur Mr. Sessions is the final arbiter of Mr. McCabe’s dismissal,...

    Last Post By: AuH20 Today, 05:07 PM Go to last post

    Shocking! Food Stamp Fraud Rings Busted in Jacksonville

    Thread Starter: angelatc

    https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/jacksonville/jacksonville-busts-organized-fraud-ring?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar 198 ensnared in Jacksonville food stamp fraud totaling $3.7M

    Last Post By: oyarde Today, 05:01 PM Go to last post

    Russia: US Deploys Warships For Imminnt Attack OnSyria, Trains Militants For False Flag Attack

    Thread Starter: charrob

    Russia Claims US Deploys Warships For Imminent Attack On Syria, Trains Militants For False Flag Attack: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-17/russia-claims-us-training-syrian-militants-false-flag-chemical-attack-justify

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Today, 04:25 PM Go to last post

    Fraud Upon the FISA Court Confirmed

    Thread Starter: goldenequity

    continued from here: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?518161-Rep-Jim-Jordan-18-questions-in-2018-about-Russia-and-the-FBI ===================== FRAUD upon the COURT :mad: Confirmation: DOJ and FBI Used “Steele Dossier” for Application To FISA Court for Search Authority on Trump Campaign…...

    Last Post By: goldenequity Today, 04:22 PM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    IL - Chicago yoots protesting guns decide to trash Wal Marx store instead

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Chicago students trash Walmart during walkout over gun violence http://www.fox5ny.com/news/chicago-students-trash-walmart-during-walkout-over-gun-violence By: Dane Placko Posted: Mar 15 2018 10:04PM EDT Video Posted: Mar 16 2018 08:28AM EDT

    Last Post By: Raginfridus Today, 04:21 PM Go to last post
    r3volution 3.0

    What Is The Current US Policy In Syria?

    Thread Starter: r3volution 3.0

    A half of a million people have died. ...why? ...for what purpose? I create this thread so that Trump surrogates can make their case. Go

    Last Post By: RonZeplin Today, 03:50 PM Go to last post
  • Gold Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion


    Toys R Us To Close All 800 of Its US Stores

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/18/03/14/237248/toys-r-us-to-close-all-800-of-its-us-stores Everything is awesome! Its okay tho since you can just go to Amazon and get all the same $#@!! Screw Toys Were Us, they had a bad business model! Its their own fault and the economy is STRONG! Jesus, I keep talking like that, I will probably deserve some negative rep!

    Last Post By: jkr Today, 07:08 PM Go to last post

    Is The U.S. Economy Really Growing? (Spoiler Alert: No!)

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-16/us-economy-really-growing Full article on link. --- Everything is awesome!

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 10:28 AM Go to last post

    Bitcoin Cracks $5000

    Thread Starter: anaconda


    Last Post By: Zippyjuan Yesterday, 07:07 PM Go to last post

    Watch the debt rise over the next few months.

    Thread Starter: Madison320

    I'm curious to see how fast the debt rises over the next few months before we hit the next debt ceiling. We normally borrow a trillion a year, so that would put us at about 20.9 trillion by year's end, plus we got hit by 3 hurricanes. The debt is only at 20.2 so we'd have to borrow another 800 billion or so before the end of the year to catch up. Although my guess is they can't borrow that much...

    Last Post By: DamianTV 03-16-2018, 08:28 PM Go to last post

    It's Just Starting: Moody's Warns A Deluge Of Retail Bankruptcies Is Coming

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-15/its-just-starting-moodys-warns-deluge-retail-bankruptcies-coming Full article and references on link at top.

    Last Post By: DamianTV 03-16-2018, 06:01 AM Go to last post

    Will The Banksters Try and Take Out Bitcoin

    Thread Starter: Smaulgld


    Last Post By: Mordan 03-16-2018, 03:11 AM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Chart

  • Living Free and Healthy


    The Link Between Potassium Deficiency and Cancer

    Thread Starter: donnay


    Last Post By: oyarde Today, 08:25 AM Go to last post

    Study: America is on a binge - Excessive drinking claims 1 in 10 deaths in working-age adults

    Thread Starter: enhanced_deficit

    This study sends bit different message than the one in news few days ago that covered longevity promoting effects. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/america-binge-175-billion-drinks-worth-study/story?id=53795860

    Last Post By: acptulsa Yesterday, 01:09 PM Go to last post

    It is gonna be a cold winter.

    Thread Starter: Danke

    This fall the Indians on a remote reservation asked their new Chief Oyarde if the coming winter was going to be cold or mild. Since he was a chief in a modern society, he’d never learned the old tribal secrets. He couldn’t look at the sky to predict what the winter was going to be like. "It's going to be a very cold winter." So just to be on the safe side, Oyarde told his tribe that the...

    Last Post By: oyarde Yesterday, 09:29 AM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    Drinking alcohol key to living past 90

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Drinking alcohol key to living past 90 http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/drinking-alcohol-key-living-90-article-1.3829634 Monday, February 19, 2018, 12:07 PM Cheers to life — seriously. When it comes to making it into your 90s, booze actually beats exercise, according to a long-term study.

    Last Post By: acptulsa Yesterday, 08:37 AM Go to last post
  • Education & Thought Power


    Time is here.

    Thread Starter: osan

    As I read and see and hear the rhetoric of those we may conversationally label as "the left", it becomes clearer with each passing day that America is nigh upon what may be its most critical nexus to date, one possible result standing to see the dismantling of the last hope for humanity to escape global, technologically-enabled servitude of a nature and completeness never before experienced. ...

    Last Post By: Original_Intent Today, 03:41 PM Go to last post

    What's The Plan?

    Thread Starter: osan

    I was confabbing with my little brother the other day - brother of another mother, that is. He is one of the more brilliant men I have known in my lifetime. We were discussing the hows and whys of the successes of the so-called "left" vis-à-vis the predictable failures of the so-called "right". I made the point that the left is well funded and well-organized, whereas the right appear to be...

    Last Post By: wizardwatson Today, 02:26 PM Go to last post

    My Lai Massacre 50 Year Anniversary

    Thread Starter: AZJoe

    Today, March 16, Marks the 50 Year Anniversary of the My Lai Massacre March 16 marks the 50th anniversary of the date that does not live in infamy. … In 1968, American soldiers slaughtered animals, raped villagers, and murdered 109 "Oriental human beings" in My Lai. That was the number cited in a court-martial 18 months later. The memorial there today, however, lists 504 men, women, and...

    Last Post By: Jan2017 Today, 10:56 AM Go to last post

    Did George Washington Predict Donald Trump?

    Thread Starter: timosman


    Last Post By: oyarde Today, 10:19 AM Go to last post

    Has Western Civilization Already Ended?

    Thread Starter: Raginfridus

    Provincial life continued much as it had in districts like Cornwall. Frontier villas remained profitable for a time, commerce didn't just disappear when Odoacer took Rome in the 400s. Even after violence done upon them, by man or by nature, civilization doesn't need to just stop either - it can continue - but at some time Western Roman civilization collapsed. As a rule, we don't just point to...

    Last Post By: Raginfridus Yesterday, 04:24 PM Go to last post

    Does the ACLU Any Longer Defend Civil Liberty?

    Thread Starter: shakey1


    Last Post By: Ender 03-15-2018, 10:16 AM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!