• sailingaway

    by Published on 03-19-2016 11:40 AM

    By Gregory Krieg
    Sat March 19, 2016




    New York (CNN)Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Friday that the party outsmarted itself in passing a 2012 rule that he said was aimed at blunting his influence on that summer's convention.

    The GOP's "Rule 40(b)" requires candidates win the "support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight or more states" in order to have their named placed on the nominating ballot. The raised threshold -- it had previously been a plurality from five states -- helped to prevent Paul's supporters from upstaging or distracting from the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, on national television.

    "They did not want my name to come up and so they changed the rules because we had the votes," Paul told CNN "At This Hour" anchors Kate Bolduan and John Berman. "We had the numbers to allow my name to be put into nomination, but they wouldn't do it."

    Four years later, the same establishment figures who spearheaded the 2012 rules changes are facing a different kind of challenge: Donald Trump. But this time around, the requirement threatens to undermine a late effort to derail the billionaire front-runner.

    "I think it's a bit of an irony and they deserve the problem," Paul said. "They're terrified of competition, and now the establishment has competition that really looks strong and there's a lot of people behind Trump. So this is a big problem for them."

    more:
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/18/politi...ion/index.html
    by Published on 06-15-2013 09:11 PM

    National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.


    NSA director Keith Alexander says his agency's analysts, which until recently included Edward Snowden among their ranks, take protecting "civil liberties and privacy and the security of this nation to their heart every day."
    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

    If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

    Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

    Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler's disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

    The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

    There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."
    more, and internal links here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...hout-warrants/
    by Published on 06-14-2013 06:28 PM



    Truth as always. He notes as I did as soon as Obama started justifying giving Rebels military aid based on reports of chemical use, that a couple of weeks ago the administration seemed to agree with the UN investigators that it was the Rebels, not Assad using the gas. Not that I think Assad is wonderful, just that we don't want to be responsible for the actions of either.

    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...BjCSeE.twitter
    by Published on 06-02-2013 11:55 PM


    http://the-free-foundation.org/tst6-3-2013.html

    Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism

    May was Iraq’s deadliest month in nearly five years, with more than 1,000 dead – both civilians and security personnel -- in a rash of bombings, shootings and other violence. As we read each day of new horrors in Iraq, it becomes more obvious that the US invasion delivered none of the promised peace or stability that proponents of the attack promised.

    Millions live in constant fear, refugees do not return home, and the economy is destroyed. The Christian community, some 1.2 million persons before 2003, has been nearly wiped off the Iraqi map. Other minorities have likewise disappeared. Making matters worse, US support for the Syrian rebels next door has drawn the Shi’ite-led Iraqi government into the spreading regional unrest and breathed new life into extremist elements.

    The invasion of Iraq opened the door to Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which did not exist beforehand, while simultaneously strengthening the hand of Iran in the region. Were the “experts” who planned for and advocated the US attack really this incompetent?

    Ryan Crocker, who was US Ambassador to Iraq from 2007-2009, still speaks of the Iraqi “surge” as a great reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite in Iraq. He wrote recently that “[t]hough the United States has withdrawn its troops from Iraq, it retains significant leverage there. Iraqi forces were equipped and trained by Americans, and the country’s leaders need and expect our help.” He seems alarmingly out of touch with reality. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...rab-insurgents

    It is clear now that the “surge” and the “Iraqi Awakening” were just myths promoted by those desperate to put a positive spin on the US invasion, which the late General William Odom once called, “the greatest strategic disaster in American history." Aircraft were loaded with $100 dollar bills to pay each side to temporarily stop killing US troops and each other, but the payoff provided a mere temporary break. Shouldn’t the measure of success of a particular policy be whether it actually produces sustained positive results?

    Now we see radical fighters who once shot at US troops in Iraq have spilled into Syria, where they ironically find their cause supported by the US government! Some of these fighters are even greeted by visiting US senators.

    The US intervention in Iraq has created ever more problems. That is clear. The foreign policy “experts” who urged the US attack on Iraq now claim that the disaster they created can only be solved with more interventionism! Imagine a medical doctor noting that a particular medication is killing his patient, but to combat the side effect he orders an increase in dosage of the same medicine. Like this doctor, the US foreign policy establishment is guilty of malpractice. And, I might add, this is just what the Fed does with monetary policy.

    From Iraq to Libya to Mali to Syria to Afghanistan, US interventions have an unbroken record of making matters far worse. Yet regardless of the disasters produced, for the interventionists a more aggressive US foreign policy is the only policy they offer.

    We must learn the appropriate lessons from the disaster of Iraq. We cannot continue to invade countries, install puppet governments, build new nations, create centrally-planned economies, engage in social engineering, and force democracy at the barrel of a gun. The rest of the world is tired of US interventionism and the US taxpayer is tired of footing the bill for US interventionism. It is up to all of us to make it very clear to the foreign policy establishment and the powers that be that we have had enough and will no longer tolerate empire-building. We should be more confident in ourselves and stop acting like an insecure bully.

    Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.


    Picture from Ron's facebook page which you can like here: http://facebook.com/ronpaul
    by Published on 05-25-2013 07:52 PM

    "This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the "enabling act” principle.

    The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

    He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

    He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

    He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

    The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal."


    read the rest of the article at the RPI site: http://t.co/K4NouiYwTY

    Ron Paul ‏@RonPaul 4h
    My comments on Obama's recent speeches -- only at my Ron Paul Institute site:
    http://tinyurl.com/qfqp7o5


    https://twitter.com/RonPaul/status/338359742219046912
    by Published on 05-15-2013 10:35 AM



    New Directive:
    Feb. 27, 2013:
    DoD Instruction 3025.21 Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

    [From link below] "...For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

    The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled “Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

    The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

    Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.
    Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

    A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” Moreover, he insists the Pentagon doesn’t “want to get involved in civilian law enforcement. It’s one of those red lines that the military hasn’t signed up for.” Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the new procedures that govern military command on the ground in the event of a civil disturbance relates to authority. Not only does it fail to define what circumstances would be so severe that the president’s authorization is “impossible,” it grants full presidential authority to “Federal military commanders.” According to the defense official, a commander is defined as follows: “Somebody who’s in the position of command, has the title commander. And most of the time they are centrally selected by a board, they’ve gone through additional schooling to exercise command authority.”

    As it is written, this “commander” has the same power to authorize military force as the president in the event the president is somehow unable to access a telephone. (The rule doesn’t address the statutory chain of authority that already exists in the event a sitting president is unavailable.) In doing so, this commander must exercise judgment in determining what constitutes, “wanton destruction of property,” “adequate protection for Federal property,” “domestic violence,” or “conspiracy that hinders the execution of State or Federal law,” as these are the circumstances that might be considered an “emergency.”

    “These phrases don’t have any legal meaning,” says Afran. “It’s no different than the emergency powers clause in the Weimar constitution [of the German Reich]. It’s a grant of emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

    Afran also expresses apprehension over the government’s authority “to engage temporarily in activities necessary to quell large-scale disturbances.”

    “Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” says Afran. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

    The U.S. military is prohibited from intervening in domestic affairs except where provided under Article IV of the Constitution in cases of domestic violence that threaten the government of a state or the application of federal law. This provision was further clarified both by the Insurrection Act of 1807 and a post-Reconstruction law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (PCA). The Insurrection Act specifies the circumstances under which the president may convene the armed forces to suppress an insurrection against any state or the federal government. Furthermore, where an individual state is concerned, consent of the governor must be obtained prior to the deployment of troops. The PCA—passed in response to federal troops that enforced local laws and oversaw elections during Reconstruction—made unauthorized employment of federal troops a punishable offense, thereby giving teeth to the Insurrection Act.

    Together, these laws limit executive authority over domestic military action. Yet Monday’s official regulatory changes issued unilaterally by the Department of Defense is a game-changer.

    The stated purpose of the updated rule is “support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act,” but in reality it undermines the Insurrection Act and PCA in significant and alarming ways. The most substantial change is the notion of “civil disturbance” as one of the few “domestic emergencies” that would allow for the deployment of military assets on American soil.

    To wit, the relatively few instances that federal troops have been deployed for domestic support have produced a wide range of results. Situations have included responding to natural disasters and protecting demonstrators during the Civil Rights era to, disastrously, the Kent State student massacre and the 1973 occupation of Wounded Knee.

    Michael German, senior policy counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), noted in a 2009 Daily Kos article that, “there is no doubt that the military is very good at many things. But recent history shows that restraint in their new-found domestic role is not one of them.”

    At the time German was referring to the military’s expanded surveillance techniques and hostile interventions related to border control and the War on Drugs. And in fact, many have argued that these actions have already upended the PCA in a significant way. Even before this most recent rule change, the ACLU was vocal in its opposition to the Department of Defense (DoD) request to expand domestic military authority “in the event of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents.” The ACLU’s position is that civilian agencies are more than equipped to handle such emergencies since 9/11. (ACLU spokespersons in Washington D.C. declined, however, to be interviewed for this story.)

    But while outcomes of military interventions have varied, the protocol by which the president works cooperatively with state governments has remained the same. The president is only allowed to deploy troops to a state upon request of its governor. Even then, the military—specifically the National Guard—is there to provide support for local law enforcement and is prohibited from engaging in any activities that are outside of this scope, such as the power to arrest.

    Eric Freedman, a constitutional law professor from Hofstra University, also calls the ruling “an unauthorized power grab.” According to Freedman, “The Department of Defense does not have the authority to grant itself by regulation any more authority than Congress has granted it by statute.” Yet that’s precisely what it did. This wasn’t, however, the Pentagon’s first attempt to expand its authority domestically in the last decade.


    the whole thing is worth reading. http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/...s-into-effect/

    Old directive:
    Jan. 15, 1986:
    DoD Instruction 5525.5 DoD Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Officials
    by Published on 05-03-2013 01:15 AM

    MSNBC's Laurence O'Donnell: Ron Paul is a Paranoid Liar: "No Guns Pointed at Families, No Tanks, No Forced Lockdown!"

    video of proof of the truth of Ron's words is interspersed with O Donnell's hit piece. We didn't make this, and I personally would have left out some of the graphics at the end as polarizing, but I'm with it right through the 'it isn't about left or right, but about what is right... and what is wrong...:

    Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
  • Top Activist Efforts

  • Activism News & Discussion

    Montana Patriot

    What should the grassroots theme song be

    Thread Starter: Montana Patriot

    I personally like the following Lynerd Skynerd Red,White and Blue or Chris Cagle You might want to think about

    Last Post By: Jan2017 Yesterday, 01:33 AM Go to last post
    CaseyJones

    Action Alert: Tell Your Federal Rep. To Join The Cannabis Caucus

    Thread Starter: CaseyJones

    http://www.weednews.co/action-alert-tell-your-federal-rep-to-join-the-cannabis-caucus/

    Last Post By: CaseyJones 01-20-2017, 04:57 PM Go to last post
    CaseyJones

    Action Alert: Thomas Massie for USPTO Director!

    Thread Starter: CaseyJones

    America Needs Startup Experience in the USPTO Director http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/01/18/america-needs-startup-experience-uspto-director/id=77194/

    Last Post By: Matt Collins 01-20-2017, 08:29 AM Go to last post
    ChristianAnarchist

    Maidsafe encrypted internet beta is up! Lets test it!

    Thread Starter: ChristianAnarchist

    I downloaded the app and installed it with a "blog" service that I don't have properly running yet. If others here are interested in exploring what we can do with this new platform lets use this thread to report progress. I've just started so there's not much progress to report. I'm not even sure how to configure my new blog yet. Maybe I can simply copy all the files from my old blog?? I'm...

    Last Post By: kpitcher 01-19-2017, 11:59 PM Go to last post
    LibertyClick

    Liberty Memes

    Thread Starter: LibertyClick

    :toady: ** post your liberty memes here ** :toady: I'm hoping for some good ones to post: http://www.libertyclick.org/tag/meme/

    Last Post By: HitoKichi 01-19-2017, 02:42 PM Go to last post
  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion

    jct74

    Ron Paul weighs in on Trump's inauguration - CNBC 1/19

    Thread Starter: jct74

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ui1G97G3vg

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 03:15 AM Go to last post
    jct74

    Rand Paul on Morning Joe 1/20

    Thread Starter: jct74

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzxMPnhrkVM&t=21s

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 03:04 AM Go to last post
    jct74

    Executive Power In The Age Of Trump

    Thread Starter: jct74

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZjvnYd_lDQ

    Last Post By: CPUd Yesterday, 07:54 PM Go to last post
    jct74

    Rand Paul Plan to Repeal and Replace Obamacare

    Thread Starter: jct74

    read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/obamacare-repeal-trump-rand-paul-233351 -------- A Health-Care Plan the GOP Could Get Behind by Michael Tanner - January 11, 2017

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist Yesterday, 02:37 PM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    Antiwar And Anti-Violence: The Revolutionary MLK

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    Antiwar And Anti-Violence: The Revolutionary MLK

    Last Post By: osan 01-20-2017, 09:40 AM Go to last post
  • 2016 Presidential Election

    ApathyCuredRP

    Clinton Foundation - Pedophile Sex Ring

    Thread Starter: ApathyCuredRP

    WIKILEAKS JUST DID IT ! They connected Clintons to pedophile ring. Developing... Laura Silsby! It is happening. FBI / Wikileaks are working together. The_Donald sub reddit is leading the charge. BE A PART OF HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Go to twitter - Wikileaks account. I can't access on work computer. I saw the feed on mobile twitter.

    Last Post By: staerker Yesterday, 10:29 AM Go to last post
    dannno

    Stefan Molyneux Defends Trump on "Terrorist families" Remark and Others

    Thread Starter: dannno

    Not really interested in the knee-jerk reactions to his explanation without actually listening to it. I had thought this was one of the worst statements Trump made, but I do now generally agree that this whole notion people are yammering on about Trump going after children and grandparents of terrorists is total bull$#@!, that isn't what he said he was going to do, that is something that people...

    Last Post By: dannno 01-18-2017, 01:40 AM Go to last post
    katsung47

    Donald Trump is a false flag

    Thread Starter: katsung47

    Donald Trump is a candidate of the Feds.(1) (4/30/2016) I say so because in this campaign there is a lot of comedy show done by S.S.G.. Those rallies, either for trump or against him, have the purpose to raise his popularity. What is S.S.G.?

    Last Post By: katsung47 01-19-2017, 11:44 AM Go to last post
    AuH20

    Glenn Greenwald: Media is 100% United To Stop Trump

    Thread Starter: AuH20

    Greenwald is uncomfortable with this ruthless frenzy: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/15/glenn-greenwald-u-s-media-essentially-100-percent-united-donald-trump/

    Last Post By: angelatc 01-16-2017, 07:03 PM Go to last post
    timosman

    Trump Thinks Obama Says ‘ISIL’ Instead of ‘ISIS’ Because He Wants to ‘Bother People’

    Thread Starter: timosman

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/03/23/trump-thinks-obama-says-isil-instead-of-isis-because-he-wants-to-bother-people/

    Last Post By: enhanced_deficit 01-17-2017, 11:18 PM Go to last post
    dannno

    Presidential Candidate Astrologies

    Thread Starter: dannno

    First five minutes of the video he gets through the candidates individually, then he does two minutes of election predictions, then he goes onto other things (including Ali). Pretty interesting. "I'm a Ron Paul guy" Video here: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?496584-Presidential-Candidate-Astrologies&p=6257738&viewfull=1#post6257738

    Last Post By: dannno 01-20-2017, 03:41 PM Go to last post
    TheCount

    Melania Trump: Ending social media bullying would be focus as first lady

    Thread Starter: TheCount

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/03/politics/melania-trump-speech-pennsylvania/ Step 1: Take away Donald's internet privileges? Step 2: Alt-right something something something?

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist Today, 03:20 AM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics

    Zippyjuan

    Trump Inauguration Attendance 2017: How Many People Watched Donald Trump Get Sworn In As Presi

    Thread Starter: Zippyjuan

    http://www.ibtimes.com/trump-inauguration-attendance-2017-how-many-people-watched-donald-trump-get-sworn-2478874

    Last Post By: unknown Today, 06:17 AM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    On His Way Out the Door, Obama Bombs Libya One Last Time

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    On His Way Out the Door, Obama Bombs Libya One Last Time At least 80 people were killed in a strike approved by the president earlier this week without congressional approval

    Last Post By: unknown Today, 06:13 AM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    Cummins diesel and Dodge accused of emissions "cheating"

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    And Now Cummins. . . http://ericpetersautos.com/2016/11/16/and-now-cummins/ By eric - November 16, 2016 It takes a lot for a major car company or engine manufacturer to deliberately circumvent a regulatory fatwa. As policy. Not a “rogue engineer.” The entire engineering department; the upstairs bosses… everyone in on it. It is happening a lot lately.

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 04:39 AM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    How we got to here

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    You can thank "mad moms" and "protesting pussies", for a great deal of it, the likes of which are out in force around the world today. How We Got To Here http://ericpetersautos.com/2017/01/21/how-we-got-to-here/ By eric - January 21, 2017 America is in trouble because Americans got lazy. Not so much physically but morally. They began to care more about some passing thing than about...

    Last Post By: NorthCarolinaLiberty Today, 04:17 AM Go to last post
    69360

    Is Sean Spicer the new Baghdad Bob?

    Thread Starter: 69360

    Was that press conference odd or what? This is going to be a crazy 4 years. https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-house-slams-shameful-tweets-for-downplaying-trumps-inaugural-crowd-size-232820494.html

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 04:16 AM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    The OFFICIAL Inaugural Support and/or Protest March Thread

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    With so many going on, thought it would be better to combine 'em all in one. Meet the biker hosting the biggest pro-Trump demonstration at the inauguration https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/meet-the-biker-hosting-the-biggest-pro-trump-demonstration-at-the-inauguration/2017/01/13/e6d3abec-d69d-11e6-9f9f-5cdb4b7f8dd7_story.html?utm_term=.26cae46357c4#comments By Perry Stein January 13...

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 04:12 AM Go to last post
    goldenequity

    Women's March

    Thread Starter: goldenequity

    CHICAGO BOISE

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist Today, 03:30 AM Go to last post
    timosman

    CBS News Ben Swann does a "Reality Check" on Pizzagate

    Thread Starter: timosman

    - Video from Ben's official youtube channel

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 03:21 AM Go to last post
    jct74

    Marijuana reforms flood state legislatures

    Thread Starter: jct74

    read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/314051-marijuana-reforms-flood-state-legislatures

    Last Post By: jct74 Today, 03:14 AM Go to last post
    jct74

    Recreational marijuana for New Jersey? Lawmakers to check out Colorado's budding law

    Thread Starter: jct74

    read more: http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/10/top_nj_leaders_are_making_pot_reconnaissance_trip.html

    Last Post By: jct74 Today, 03:07 AM Go to last post
  • Gold Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion

    eredeath

    Lawful money (redeem your fed notes)

    Thread Starter: eredeath

    char

    Last Post By: David Merrill Yesterday, 11:24 PM Go to last post
    toathis

    Peter Schiff 'Before Obama Leaves Office' Prediction

    Thread Starter: toathis

    Last Post By: AZJoe Yesterday, 10:57 PM Go to last post
    anaconda

    Bitcoin Back Up To $1000

    Thread Starter: anaconda

    Sell price is $1000 here on New Years Day 2017 at around 1:20 PM Pacific time. https://www.coinbase.com/charts

    Last Post By: RonPaulIsGreat Yesterday, 09:21 PM Go to last post
    Madison320

    Schiff thinks Trump deficits will be huge.

    Thread Starter: Madison320

    Peter Schiff just wrote an article predicting big deficits under Trump. He thinks the driver of the deficits will be Trump and the republicans will go along. I think deficits will rise but not for the same reason. I think the republicans will want to boost spending but there's a chance Trump will be against them. If someone like Jeb Bush was elected I'd be 100% certain that we'd be in for massive...

    Last Post By: Krugminator2 Yesterday, 08:05 PM Go to last post
    Origanalist

    The Budget; 9 Trillion in new spending, thanks republicans

    Thread Starter: Origanalist

    (If there's a thread on this already please merge.) This is the bottom line on government growth, the more they spend the bigger they get and the smaller you become. So what gain is there to electing republicans if they are going to outspend the dems? This crap has me pissed off. Here is a graph from a Justin Amash email, (one of only 9 to vote against, roll call here...

    Last Post By: oyarde Yesterday, 02:49 PM Go to last post
    presence

    The Litepresence Report on Cryptocurrency

    Thread Starter: presence

    CLICK HERE FOR HIGH RESOLUTION I've had multiple requests to create a unified location for my charts, predictions, forecasts, etc. so here it is. I'll update the thread whenever I'm trading. You can chat w/ me live at the btce trollbox. Best of luck my friends!

    Last Post By: presence Yesterday, 02:09 PM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Chart

  • Living Free and Healthy

    brandon

    Dr Paul questions the CDC vaccine guidelines

    Thread Starter: brandon

    Clickbait title... Some strange twist of life events has led me to being a giant fan of youtube videos from Dr. Paul Thomas. = Check out his channel. He's a really great engaging pediatrician who has me questioning the CDC vaccine schedule. Wanna see some ear wax removed?:

    Last Post By: Firestarter Yesterday, 05:23 AM Go to last post
    Suzanimal

    Blood Type Diet

    Thread Starter: Suzanimal

    I've decided to give it a shot. I thought about a month but I think I'm going to start with a week, per Ender's recommendation, and see how it goes first. I don't expect to see health benefits in a week but my energy should be up - I've been dragging ass lately. I'm not sure if it's a lazy spell or what but I've been a sloth. Anyway, I figure there's no time like the present so I start today....

    Last Post By: Suzanimal 01-19-2017, 11:51 PM Go to last post
    LibForestPaul

    Where would you settle, if at all

    Thread Starter: LibForestPaul

    If you had $X amt of savings, would you pack up (give up US citizenship) to another country, and which country would you settle on? If you could live/retire in any state, which would you pick, and why? And, which state do you believe is currently the "free-est" based on(in order) - schooling laws, property laws(castle doctrine), pensions (lack of or fully funded), taxes...

    Last Post By: oyarde 01-19-2017, 08:22 PM Go to last post
  • Education & Thought Power

    spudea

    History: Did Ron Paul '08 + '12 give us Trump '16

    Thread Starter: spudea

    The anti-establishment sentiment and distrust of corporate media is quite pervasive this election. Whether you believe Trump to be the real deal or a Hillary plant, he was able to capitalize on these themes perfectly. "there is no future for a system where they laugh at Ron Paul" "theres other ways to fix the country but Ron Paul is a big part of it" "Even if you don't totally agree...

    Last Post By: fr33 Yesterday, 11:10 PM Go to last post
    Zippyjuan

    First known photo of a US Presidential Inauguration

    Thread Starter: Zippyjuan

    https://www.dpreview.com/news/0886693812/heres-the-first-known-photo-of-a-us-presidential-inauguration

    Last Post By: nobody's_hero Yesterday, 10:13 PM Go to last post
    osan

    Is One-World Government Mala In Sé?

    Thread Starter: osan

    I am watching "Things To Come" for about the 4,179th time. It is a most interesting film - curious one, as well. There is a line where the Boss declares, "we're an independent sovereign state". Cabal retorts, "we don't approve of independent sovereign states", a clear indication of a one-world government bent. This has raised the same question for me many times, so why not pose it here: Is...

    Last Post By: timosman Yesterday, 09:52 PM Go to last post
    osan

    An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals by David Hume [BOOK]

    Thread Starter: osan

    Here, for your edification and the expansion of knowledge, I present the above captioned work of David Hume. Subsequent sections shall follow as time allows. Note to readers: given the work presented here is about 300 years old, bear in mind that the linguistic and expressive conventions employed are not always familiar. Our greatly diminished comparative linguistic skills leave us at some...

    Last Post By: osan Yesterday, 08:35 PM Go to last post
    Deborah K

    "Social decay is caused by a widespread decay in the clarity of thought"

    Thread Starter: Deborah K

    "What a man cannot state he does not perfectly know, and conversely the inability to put his thoughts into words sets a boundary to his thought... . English is not merely the medium of our thought; it is the very stuff and process of it." —Report of the Departmental Committee on the Teaching of English in England ; H. M. Stationery Office (1921) The Impact Of Social Decline Upon Language...

    Last Post By: NorthCarolinaLiberty Yesterday, 05:13 AM Go to last post
    Sam I am

    The public option.

    Thread Starter: Sam I am

    Some of you may or may not be surprised by this, But I was a supporter of the public option, back when it was still a part of the health insurance bill. 2 facts about the public option as it was written 1. It's optional to be enrolled 2. It's optional to pay for it. So, In general, to receive public option benefits, you would have to pay a premium, just like any other insurance...

    Last Post By: NorthCarolinaLiberty Yesterday, 02:07 AM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!