• sailingaway

    by Published on 03-19-2016 11:40 AM

    By Gregory Krieg
    Sat March 19, 2016




    New York (CNN)Former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Friday that the party outsmarted itself in passing a 2012 rule that he said was aimed at blunting his influence on that summer's convention.

    The GOP's "Rule 40(b)" requires candidates win the "support of a majority of the delegates from each of eight or more states" in order to have their named placed on the nominating ballot. The raised threshold -- it had previously been a plurality from five states -- helped to prevent Paul's supporters from upstaging or distracting from the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney, on national television.

    "They did not want my name to come up and so they changed the rules because we had the votes," Paul told CNN "At This Hour" anchors Kate Bolduan and John Berman. "We had the numbers to allow my name to be put into nomination, but they wouldn't do it."

    Four years later, the same establishment figures who spearheaded the 2012 rules changes are facing a different kind of challenge: Donald Trump. But this time around, the requirement threatens to undermine a late effort to derail the billionaire front-runner.

    "I think it's a bit of an irony and they deserve the problem," Paul said. "They're terrified of competition, and now the establishment has competition that really looks strong and there's a lot of people behind Trump. So this is a big problem for them."

    more:
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/18/politi...ion/index.html
    by Published on 06-15-2013 09:11 PM

    National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.


    NSA director Keith Alexander says his agency's analysts, which until recently included Edward Snowden among their ranks, take protecting "civil liberties and privacy and the security of this nation to their heart every day."
    (Credit: Getty Images)

    The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
    Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

    If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

    Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

    Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, Nadler's disclosure indicates the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

    The disclosure appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

    There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, says Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."
    more, and internal links here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57...hout-warrants/
    by Published on 06-14-2013 06:28 PM



    Truth as always. He notes as I did as soon as Obama started justifying giving Rebels military aid based on reports of chemical use, that a couple of weeks ago the administration seemed to agree with the UN investigators that it was the Rebels, not Assad using the gas. Not that I think Assad is wonderful, just that we don't want to be responsible for the actions of either.

    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...BjCSeE.twitter
    by Published on 06-02-2013 11:55 PM


    http://the-free-foundation.org/tst6-3-2013.html

    Iraq Collapse Shows Bankruptcy of Interventionism

    May was Iraq’s deadliest month in nearly five years, with more than 1,000 dead – both civilians and security personnel -- in a rash of bombings, shootings and other violence. As we read each day of new horrors in Iraq, it becomes more obvious that the US invasion delivered none of the promised peace or stability that proponents of the attack promised.

    Millions live in constant fear, refugees do not return home, and the economy is destroyed. The Christian community, some 1.2 million persons before 2003, has been nearly wiped off the Iraqi map. Other minorities have likewise disappeared. Making matters worse, US support for the Syrian rebels next door has drawn the Shi’ite-led Iraqi government into the spreading regional unrest and breathed new life into extremist elements.

    The invasion of Iraq opened the door to Al-Qaeda in Iraq, which did not exist beforehand, while simultaneously strengthening the hand of Iran in the region. Were the “experts” who planned for and advocated the US attack really this incompetent?

    Ryan Crocker, who was US Ambassador to Iraq from 2007-2009, still speaks of the Iraqi “surge” as a great reconciliation between Sunni and Shi’ite in Iraq. He wrote recently that “[t]hough the United States has withdrawn its troops from Iraq, it retains significant leverage there. Iraqi forces were equipped and trained by Americans, and the country’s leaders need and expect our help.” He seems alarmingly out of touch with reality. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...rab-insurgents

    It is clear now that the “surge” and the “Iraqi Awakening” were just myths promoted by those desperate to put a positive spin on the US invasion, which the late General William Odom once called, “the greatest strategic disaster in American history." Aircraft were loaded with $100 dollar bills to pay each side to temporarily stop killing US troops and each other, but the payoff provided a mere temporary break. Shouldn’t the measure of success of a particular policy be whether it actually produces sustained positive results?

    Now we see radical fighters who once shot at US troops in Iraq have spilled into Syria, where they ironically find their cause supported by the US government! Some of these fighters are even greeted by visiting US senators.

    The US intervention in Iraq has created ever more problems. That is clear. The foreign policy “experts” who urged the US attack on Iraq now claim that the disaster they created can only be solved with more interventionism! Imagine a medical doctor noting that a particular medication is killing his patient, but to combat the side effect he orders an increase in dosage of the same medicine. Like this doctor, the US foreign policy establishment is guilty of malpractice. And, I might add, this is just what the Fed does with monetary policy.

    From Iraq to Libya to Mali to Syria to Afghanistan, US interventions have an unbroken record of making matters far worse. Yet regardless of the disasters produced, for the interventionists a more aggressive US foreign policy is the only policy they offer.

    We must learn the appropriate lessons from the disaster of Iraq. We cannot continue to invade countries, install puppet governments, build new nations, create centrally-planned economies, engage in social engineering, and force democracy at the barrel of a gun. The rest of the world is tired of US interventionism and the US taxpayer is tired of footing the bill for US interventionism. It is up to all of us to make it very clear to the foreign policy establishment and the powers that be that we have had enough and will no longer tolerate empire-building. We should be more confident in ourselves and stop acting like an insecure bully.

    Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.


    Picture from Ron's facebook page which you can like here: http://facebook.com/ronpaul
    by Published on 05-25-2013 07:52 PM

    "This past Thursday and Friday, President Obama delivered two speeches designed to outline his new thinking on national security and counter-terrorism. While much was made in the media of the president’s statements at the National Defense University and the US Naval Academy suggesting that the most active phase of US military action overseas was coming to an end, this “new” approach is but the same old policy wrapped in new packaging. In these addresses, the president panders to the progressives, while continually expanding and solidifying the "enabling act” principle.

    The president will continue and even expand drone attacks overseas because they are “less deadly” than ground invasions. He promises to be more careful in the future.

    He is entertaining the introduction of “kill courts” which will meet in secret to decide who is to be executed without trial or charge. He promises these will have sufficient oversight.

    He will seek a new and updated Authorization for the Use of Military Force to expand his legal authority to wage war wherever and whenever he wants. He promises it will one day be repealed.

    He will continue to indefinitely detain at Guantanamo individuals who have been neither charged nor convicted of any crime, and who cannot even be tried because they were tortured and thus the evidence is tainted. He promises to “commit to a process of closing GTMO.”

    The speech speaks of more war and more killing and more interventionism all masked in the language of withdrawal."


    read the rest of the article at the RPI site: http://t.co/K4NouiYwTY

    Ron Paul ‏@RonPaul 4h
    My comments on Obama's recent speeches -- only at my Ron Paul Institute site:
    http://tinyurl.com/qfqp7o5


    https://twitter.com/RonPaul/status/338359742219046912
    by Published on 05-15-2013 10:35 AM



    New Directive:
    Feb. 27, 2013:
    DoD Instruction 3025.21 Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

    [From link below] "...For the past 30 years, police departments throughout the United States have benefitted from the government’s largesse in the form of military weaponry and training, incentives offered in the ongoing “War on Drugs.” For the average citizen watching events such as the intense pursuit of the Tsarnaev brothers on television, it would be difficult to discern between fully outfitted police SWAT teams and the military.

    The lines blurred even further Monday as a new dynamic was introduced to the militarization of domestic law enforcement. By making a few subtle changes to a regulation in the U.S. Code titled “Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies” the military has quietly granted itself the ability to police the streets without obtaining prior local or state consent, upending a precedent that has been in place for more than two centuries.

    The most objectionable aspect of the regulatory change is the inclusion of vague language that permits military intervention in the event of “civil disturbances.” According to the rule:

    Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances.
    Bruce Afran, a civil liberties attorney and constitutional law professor at Rutgers University, calls the rule, “a wanton power grab by the military,” and says, “It’s quite shocking actually because it violates the long-standing presumption that the military is under civilian control.”

    A defense official who declined to be named takes a different view of the rule, claiming, “The authorization has been around over 100 years; it’s not a new authority. It’s been there but it hasn’t been exercised. This is a carryover of domestic policy.” Moreover, he insists the Pentagon doesn’t “want to get involved in civilian law enforcement. It’s one of those red lines that the military hasn’t signed up for.” Nevertheless, he says, “every person in the military swears an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States to defend that Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.”

    One of the more disturbing aspects of the new procedures that govern military command on the ground in the event of a civil disturbance relates to authority. Not only does it fail to define what circumstances would be so severe that the president’s authorization is “impossible,” it grants full presidential authority to “Federal military commanders.” According to the defense official, a commander is defined as follows: “Somebody who’s in the position of command, has the title commander. And most of the time they are centrally selected by a board, they’ve gone through additional schooling to exercise command authority.”

    As it is written, this “commander” has the same power to authorize military force as the president in the event the president is somehow unable to access a telephone. (The rule doesn’t address the statutory chain of authority that already exists in the event a sitting president is unavailable.) In doing so, this commander must exercise judgment in determining what constitutes, “wanton destruction of property,” “adequate protection for Federal property,” “domestic violence,” or “conspiracy that hinders the execution of State or Federal law,” as these are the circumstances that might be considered an “emergency.”

    “These phrases don’t have any legal meaning,” says Afran. “It’s no different than the emergency powers clause in the Weimar constitution [of the German Reich]. It’s a grant of emergency power to the military to rule over parts of the country at their own discretion.”

    Afran also expresses apprehension over the government’s authority “to engage temporarily in activities necessary to quell large-scale disturbances.”

    “Governments never like to give up power when they get it,” says Afran. “They still think after twelve years they can get intelligence out of people in Guantanamo. Temporary is in the eye of the beholder. That’s why in statutes we have definitions. All of these statutes have one thing in common and that is that they have no definitions. How long is temporary? There’s none here. The definitions are absurdly broad.”

    The U.S. military is prohibited from intervening in domestic affairs except where provided under Article IV of the Constitution in cases of domestic violence that threaten the government of a state or the application of federal law. This provision was further clarified both by the Insurrection Act of 1807 and a post-Reconstruction law known as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (PCA). The Insurrection Act specifies the circumstances under which the president may convene the armed forces to suppress an insurrection against any state or the federal government. Furthermore, where an individual state is concerned, consent of the governor must be obtained prior to the deployment of troops. The PCA—passed in response to federal troops that enforced local laws and oversaw elections during Reconstruction—made unauthorized employment of federal troops a punishable offense, thereby giving teeth to the Insurrection Act.

    Together, these laws limit executive authority over domestic military action. Yet Monday’s official regulatory changes issued unilaterally by the Department of Defense is a game-changer.

    The stated purpose of the updated rule is “support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act,” but in reality it undermines the Insurrection Act and PCA in significant and alarming ways. The most substantial change is the notion of “civil disturbance” as one of the few “domestic emergencies” that would allow for the deployment of military assets on American soil.

    To wit, the relatively few instances that federal troops have been deployed for domestic support have produced a wide range of results. Situations have included responding to natural disasters and protecting demonstrators during the Civil Rights era to, disastrously, the Kent State student massacre and the 1973 occupation of Wounded Knee.

    Michael German, senior policy counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), noted in a 2009 Daily Kos article that, “there is no doubt that the military is very good at many things. But recent history shows that restraint in their new-found domestic role is not one of them.”

    At the time German was referring to the military’s expanded surveillance techniques and hostile interventions related to border control and the War on Drugs. And in fact, many have argued that these actions have already upended the PCA in a significant way. Even before this most recent rule change, the ACLU was vocal in its opposition to the Department of Defense (DoD) request to expand domestic military authority “in the event of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or high yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents.” The ACLU’s position is that civilian agencies are more than equipped to handle such emergencies since 9/11. (ACLU spokespersons in Washington D.C. declined, however, to be interviewed for this story.)

    But while outcomes of military interventions have varied, the protocol by which the president works cooperatively with state governments has remained the same. The president is only allowed to deploy troops to a state upon request of its governor. Even then, the military—specifically the National Guard—is there to provide support for local law enforcement and is prohibited from engaging in any activities that are outside of this scope, such as the power to arrest.

    Eric Freedman, a constitutional law professor from Hofstra University, also calls the ruling “an unauthorized power grab.” According to Freedman, “The Department of Defense does not have the authority to grant itself by regulation any more authority than Congress has granted it by statute.” Yet that’s precisely what it did. This wasn’t, however, the Pentagon’s first attempt to expand its authority domestically in the last decade.


    the whole thing is worth reading. http://www.longislandpress.com/2013/...s-into-effect/

    Old directive:
    Jan. 15, 1986:
    DoD Instruction 5525.5 DoD Cooperation with Civilian Law Enforcement Officials
    by Published on 05-03-2013 01:15 AM

    MSNBC's Laurence O'Donnell: Ron Paul is a Paranoid Liar: "No Guns Pointed at Families, No Tanks, No Forced Lockdown!"

    video of proof of the truth of Ron's words is interspersed with O Donnell's hit piece. We didn't make this, and I personally would have left out some of the graphics at the end as polarizing, but I'm with it right through the 'it isn't about left or right, but about what is right... and what is wrong...:

    Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
  • Activism News & Discussion

    Bryan

    A new site vision; a new era

    Thread Starter: Bryan

    . Same Mission; New Vision The genesis of this website came in 2007 in support of Ron Paul’s 2008 presidential campaign. While the campaign itself was not successful, it achieved more for liberty than anyone could have imagined. In 2009/2010 the site rallied behind Rand Paul to help him win a seat in the U.S. Senate. Ron Paul’s 2011/2012 campaign again provided new focus and new goals for...

    Last Post By: phill4paul 05-01-2016, 12:40 PM Go to last post
    eleganz

    Liberty activist Lisa Marie receives stage 4 cervical cancer diagnosis *crowd fund*

    Thread Starter: eleganz

    Just saw the information now and wanted to share in case anybody on RPF wanted to help. She has been in the trenches from the beginning and it sucks to see this happen to each other. We gotta have each others' back in one way or another. Donate if you would like to play a part in her healing. Small or large, doesn't matter. https://www.crowdrise.com/help-lisamarie-johnson-beat-cancer

    Last Post By: presence 05-01-2016, 08:50 AM Go to last post
    Xerographica

    NOT Preaching To The Choir

    Thread Starter: Xerographica

    Let's dedicate this thread to sharing links to other websites where we are not preaching to the choir. Personally, I would be very interested in reading other people's sales pitches. Here's my most recent sales pitch... Popular vs Valuable* To be very clear... I want to see interactions! Please do not post links to your articles, blog entries or Youtube videos... unless you are actively...

    Last Post By: Xerographica 04-30-2016, 04:28 AM Go to last post
  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion

    unknown

    What are our actual rights?

    Thread Starter: unknown

    List our actual rights. What are we really "entitled" to? Dr. Paul routinely mentioned some of them: our right to be safe in our person, our property; our right to the fruits of our labor. What else?

    Last Post By: timosman Today, 07:48 PM Go to last post
    jct74

    Sen. Rand Paul Demands Hillary Clinton Apologize To Kentucky For Anti-Coal Comments

    Thread Starter: jct74

    read more: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/04/25/exclusive-sen-rand-paul-demands-hillary-clinton-apologize-kentucky-anti-coal-comments-opens-office-state/

    Last Post By: eleganz Today, 07:44 PM Go to last post
    tsai3904

    Ron Paul: Drafting Women Means Equality in Slavery

    Thread Starter: tsai3904

    More: http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2016/may/01/drafting-women-means-equality-in-slavery/ There is a bill in Congress that would repeal The Military Selective Service Act and abolish Selective Service: H.R. 4523 The bill only has six cosponsors:

    Last Post By: unknown Today, 07:36 PM Go to last post
    liberty_nc

    When will the inevitable endorsement come?

    Thread Starter: liberty_nc

    Whether you like it or not, Trump is 99% guaranteed the GOP Nomination, and Rand has pledged to support the nominee, saying multiple times after dropping out that he would. The question is when will Rand endorse Trump and what would be the best time? Either now, at the 1237 point or at the convention. Don't diss me as a trump troll, it's just realism.

    Last Post By: CaptUSA Today, 07:31 PM Go to last post
    younglibertarian

    Torture: Stopping Terrorism...Or Is It Terrorism?

    Thread Starter: younglibertarian

    Last Post By: bunklocoempire Today, 12:35 PM Go to last post
    vita3

    Going after Clinton & Cruz

    Thread Starter: vita3

    I follow Dr.Paul on Facebook & he rarely if ever goes after Hillary Clinton or Ted Cruz. Why is that? He has attacked Sanders & Trump weekly, but almost NEVER goes after Clinton or Cruz..

    Last Post By: vita3 Today, 05:36 AM Go to last post
  • 2016 Presidential Election

    randomname

    "Libertarians for Trump"

    Thread Starter: randomname

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/walter-e-block/libertarians-trump/ Dr. Donald Miller (donaldwmiller@gmail.com) and I (wblock@loyno.edu) are starting up a new group to be called Libertarians for Trump. LFT has its work cut out for it in mobilizing massive support for Donald Trump within the libertarian community. For there are some libertarians who oppose supporting any politician for...

    Last Post By: Ender Today, 07:07 PM Go to last post
    acptulsa

    Never Have We Had a Better Crop of Lemons

    Thread Starter: acptulsa

    The Democrats are about to superdelegate a treasonous madwoman into their nomination. And Fox is playing the anti-establishment fervor we stirred up in the GOP masterfully--not only is their halfhearted but constant and unrelenting criticism of Trump (which always and mysteriously seems to fall wide of the target as if accurate gunnery is forbidden in those hallowed halls) working perfectly to...

    Last Post By: acptulsa Yesterday, 03:00 PM Go to last post
    Jan2017

    Cruz family Canada records could be available . . .

    Thread Starter: Jan2017

    As an expatriate to Canada for almost a full two years now, Ted Cruz does not have the same protection from Canada authorities in Ottawa as when The Dallas Morning News first requested records from them a couple years back. All the Ted Cruz lies can start catching up with him

    Last Post By: Zippyjuan 05-01-2016, 06:39 PM Go to last post
    angelatc

    Woman Prays For Her Life As Trump Protestors Destroy Her Car

    Thread Starter: angelatc

    I hope he buys her a tank. VIdeo:

    Last Post By: Ender 05-01-2016, 10:34 AM Go to last post
    CPUd

    Donald Trump rejects 'categorically false' charges of raping teenage girl

    Thread Starter: CPUd

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/trump-rejects-categorically-false-charges-raping-teen-girl-article-1.2618137

    Last Post By: nikcers Today, 12:46 PM Go to last post
    r3volution 3.0

    Trump Opposition Research Thread

    Thread Starter: r3volution 3.0

    A lot of great information has been posted in recent weeks, but it's scattered about the forum. How about we aggregate it all in one place, for easy access? Post what you got (repetition is fine, having multiple sources is a good thing) *material for jokes, witticisms, insults, memes, etc also welcome, in addition to policy issues :toady: is the beginning of the end of...

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Yesterday, 10:02 PM Go to last post
    RonPaulMall

    Rand Paul and endorsement of presumptive nominee

    Thread Starter: RonPaulMall

    Please take any personal pro-Trump or anti-Trump emotions out of the equation and lets look at it from a purely practical standpoint. Rand has already said he's going to endorse the eventual nominee no matter who it is. If Trump romps tonight as expected, he'll almost certainly be that person barring any GOPe dirty tricks at the convention that Rand wouldn't want to be associated with anyway. ...

    Last Post By: Ender 04-30-2016, 02:17 PM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics

    DamianTV

    Snowden: 'Governments Can Reduce Our Dignity To That Of Tagged Animals'

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://yro.slashdot.org/story/16/05/03/200220/snowden-governments-can-reduce-our-dignity-to-that-of-tagged-animals "Without Privacy, everything becomes subject to approval, and thereby convert all Rights into Privileges." -me --- "When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing;

    Last Post By: mrsat_98 Today, 06:32 PM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    Scientific silencers on the left are trying to shut down climate skepticism

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    Scientific silencers on the left are trying to shut down climate skepticism By George F. Will - April 22

    Last Post By: Madison320 Today, 04:11 PM Go to last post
    phill4paul

    Long-time Iowa farm cartoonist fired after criticizing big-ag....

    Thread Starter: phill4paul

    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/2016/05/02/cartoonist-says-his-work-got-him-axed/83841760/

    Last Post By: phill4paul Today, 04:11 PM Go to last post
    J.Michael

    Made in America

    Thread Starter: J.Michael

    Please try to support American Workers by buying products from the directory below. Click on a letter below to go to that category (example to find American Made Jeans click C for Clothes or J for Jeans.) If you know of a good American Made Product not on the list use the Submit Product Formfor consideration of listing here. http://americansworking.com/ Additionally there is a good list of...

    Last Post By: J.Michael Today, 02:58 PM Go to last post
    AZJoe

    State Department Jokesman: 'Obama Never Said No Boots on Ground in Syria!'

    Thread Starter: AZJoe

    State Department Jokesman: 'Obama Never Said No Boots on Ground in Syria!' Here is State Department Jokesperson Spokesperson John Kirby denying Obama ever said such, and it draws laughter from the press group: Here is Obama saying (One example out of a hundred):

    Last Post By: Contumacious Today, 12:47 PM Go to last post
    timosman

    Russian Jet Does a Barrel Roll Over U.S. Recon Plane in the Baltic

    Thread Starter: timosman

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/04/17/russian-jet-does-a-barrel-roll-over-us-recon-plane-in-the-baltic/

    Last Post By: enhanced_deficit Today, 12:10 AM Go to last post
    unknown

    Wisconsin town will fine parents of school bullies.

    Thread Starter: unknown

    Parents of bullies to be fined. What do you guys think? My initial feeling is that the fines should start at something like $25 and go up from there. Shouldnt be a revenue generation tool for schools nor give them an incentive to label everything as "bullying". Needs to be more consistency. If youre going to hold them responsible for this, more things should be under the control...

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Today, 12:09 AM Go to last post
  • Gold Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion

    Smaulgld

    When FDR Confiscated SILVER

    Thread Starter: Smaulgld

    The story of FDR's confiscation of gold is well known. Little known, is that FDR also confiscated silver. Here is the story. https://smaulgld.com/silver-confiscation/

    Last Post By: Smaulgld Today, 05:05 PM Go to last post
    Ecolibertarian

    Better than Gold? Theoretically Ideal Monetary Standards

    Thread Starter: Ecolibertarian

    On this site, even those of us who don't wholeheartedly embrace some implementation of a gold standard are somewhat familiar with the arguments advanced in favor of gold as money, as a unit of value, as a bulwark against inflation and hidden taxation, etc. Historically, even those who have agreed that pure fiat monetary regimes are unacceptable have differed on specific policies when it comes to...

    Last Post By: presence Today, 04:37 PM Go to last post
    DamianTV

    A New Digital Cash System Was Just Unveiled At A Secret Meeting For Bankers In New York

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/a-new-digital-cash-system-was-just-unveiled-at-a-secret-meeting-for-bankers-in-new-york (Full article on link) Without financial privacy, the Right to interact with others is converted into a Permission, and that Permission is very close to being denied entirely.

    Last Post By: J.Michael Today, 03:28 PM Go to last post
    Danke

    Deficit 1 Trillion in 6 Months?

    Thread Starter: Danke

    Wow http://cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/6-months-budget-deal-debt-more-1-trillion

    Last Post By: presence Today, 03:25 PM Go to last post
    H. E. Panqui

    Obstacles to Clear Thinking About 'the Economy'

    Thread Starter: H. E. Panqui

    ....this is one of the best 'political forums' i've found...some great people here... ....if ever there was a place i might find some insight about 'my problem' it is here... ....fellow monetary realist(s), have any of you ever found any successful teaching/communication techniques regarding the subject of 'monetary reality'?... ...it has been my experience that THE VAST MAJORITY of...

    Last Post By: H. E. Panqui Today, 07:13 AM Go to last post
    mrsat_98

    Charts show the great “progress” of Soetoro

    Thread Starter: mrsat_98

    http://www.ini-world-report.org/2016/04/27/charts-show-the-great-progress-of-soetoro/ CHARTS SHOW THE GREAT “PROGRESS” OF SOETORO Obama’s Recovery In Just 9 Charts Put another Democrat/Progressive/Socialist in the White House, and just extend the trend lines out 8 more years!!!!! Argue if you like but all the figures are from the Fed… Obama graphs

    Last Post By: NorthCarolinaLiberty Today, 06:44 AM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Chart

  • Living Free and Healthy

    donnay

    De Niro axes anti-vaccination film from Tribeca after scrutiny

    Thread Starter: donnay

    De Niro axes anti-vaccination film from Tribeca after scrutiny Published March 27, 2016 Actor Robert De Niro announced Saturday he is yanking the anti-vaccination documentary “Vaxxed” from the Tribeca Film Festival, after initially defending its inclusion. “Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Conspiracy” was set to be part of the film festival when it opened next month. The decision to include the...

    Last Post By: NorthCarolinaLiberty Today, 06:59 PM Go to last post
    tod evans

    Attn. women! Prostate cancer is your fault.

    Thread Starter: tod evans

    I knew it.........:cool: Does sex protect men against prostate cancer? http://www.foxnews.com/health/2016/04/22/does-sex-protect-men-against-prostate-cancer.html?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&intcmp=obnetwork Men who ejaculate often may have a lower risk of prostate cancer than their peers who don't do it as frequently, a U.S. study suggests.

    Last Post By: kpitcher Today, 03:51 PM Go to last post
    angelatc

    Why Cities Can't Grow All Their Own Food

    Thread Starter: angelatc

    http://conservationmagazine.org/2016/01/this-is-why-cities-cant-grow-all-their-own-food/

    Last Post By: stuntman stoll Today, 01:51 PM Go to last post
    donnay

    Big pHARMa knows people are waking up about Statins...

    Thread Starter: donnay

    So they invent another way to use them. :rolleyes: Statins slash risk of death by cancer: They slow tumour growth by up to 50% reveal major studies Statins shrink your brain and cause brain damage and destroys muscle tissue and other really bad side effects Sure you won't die of cancer, you'll die from what statins do to you body! You are much better off with alternative approaches to...

    Last Post By: donnay Today, 09:45 AM Go to last post
    Danke

    It is gonna be a cold winter.

    Thread Starter: Danke

    This fall the Indians on a remote reservation asked their new Chief Oyarde if the coming winter was going to be cold or mild. Since he was a chief in a modern society, he’d never learned the old tribal secrets. He couldn’t look at the sky to predict what the winter was going to be like. "It's going to be a very cold winter." So just to be on the safe side, Oyarde told his tribe that the...

    Last Post By: oyarde 05-01-2016, 09:06 PM Go to last post
    donnay

    Food Revolution Summit 2016 Day 1: Top Keys To Radiant Health

    Thread Starter: donnay

    Food Revolution Summit 2016 Day 1: Top Keys To Radiant Health Are you sick and tired of being sick and tired? Very enlightening and powerful information for getting healthy and staying healthy. If you get a chance, kick back an listen to this summit. Guest doctors:

    Last Post By: donnay 05-01-2016, 02:57 PM Go to last post
    Suzanimal

    How to Survive an Elevator Free Fall

    Thread Starter: Suzanimal

    I have an irrational fear of elevator free falls but I feel better knowing what to do. Instead of laying flat, what about sitting like they tell you during tornado drills. My mom used to call it the stick your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye pose. ...

    Last Post By: GunnyFreedom 05-01-2016, 11:44 AM Go to last post
  • Education & Thought Power

    PaleoConPrep

    The Dark Enlightenment

    Thread Starter: PaleoConPrep

    If you look at my other threads, I've said that I'm a mix of Paleoconservative and Traditionalist Conservative. Now, I am also a member of the Dark Enlightenment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment So my political ideology now contains a mix of Paleoconservatism, Traditionalist Conservatism, and Dark Enlightenment views. What are your thoughts on the Dark Enlightenment? What am...

    Last Post By: otherone Today, 06:44 PM Go to last post
    Son_of_Liberty90

    Where will the "Free Market" be when Robots Take over?

    Thread Starter: Son_of_Liberty90

    Serious question: What happens to all of the low-skilled humans (and high skilled)? F***ing software bots..

    Last Post By: MelissaWV Today, 04:40 PM Go to last post
    r3volution 3.0

    Basic Principles of Libertarian Ethics

    Thread Starter: r3volution 3.0

    I'm working on a concise statement of basic libertarian ethical principles, for eventual inclusion in the Foundational Knowledgebase. Take a look at my current draft and let me know what you think. (The parts in parentheses are eventually going to contain links to side-articles on controversial topics) Basic Principles of Libertarianism What Is Ownership: 1. To own something is to...

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Today, 03:12 PM Go to last post
    Ronin Truth

    Libertarian Priorities

    Thread Starter: Ronin Truth

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/05/laurence-m-vance/libertarian-priority/ Copyright © 2016 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are provided.

    Last Post By: r3volution 3.0 Today, 02:34 PM Go to last post
    presence

    How Zoning Rules Would Work in a Free Society

    Thread Starter: presence

    https://mises.org/library/how-zoning-rules-would-work-free-society

    Last Post By: tod evans Today, 10:53 AM Go to last post
    Ronin Truth

    Reasons to Doubt the Official Osama Raid Story — Five Years Later

    Thread Starter: Ronin Truth

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/05/russ-baker/doubt-osamas-death-tale/

    Last Post By: younglibertarian Today, 08:28 AM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!