• Text of FCC rules published

    The text of the internet “regulation” has been released and I thought it was worthy to post a couple of relevant cuts here for people’s consumption and information. There was so much fervor and debate about the evil intent behind the government “taking over” the internet that it was making my head spin – especially since no one had even seen the regulations! Turns out, it WAS all hype.

    In all, 49 instances of the word “tax” occur, fully 36 of them in the “dissenting opinion” section of the regulation – an indication of the fury and suspicion with which this effort was met. The appearances of the word tax in the actual content of the document are basically there to reassure the masses that it is not, nor was it previously the FCC’s goal to implement some sort of devilish tax scheme on the net – nor do they seek to control it in any other way other than to ensure that net neutrality remains a principle that continues since the net’s inception, until long in the future.

    The below are some relevant cuts which should help alleviate concern on this site about the “intent” of the government to tax the “new internet.”

    pg 13:
    This includes no unbundling of last-mile facilities, no tariffing, no rate regulation, and no cost accounting rules, which results in a carefully tailored application of only those Title II provisions found to directly further the public interest in an open Internet and more, better, and open broadband. Nor will our actions result in the imposition of any new federal taxes or fees; the ability of states to impose fees on broadband is already limited by the congressional Internet tax moratorium.
    Pg 224:
    We reject the argument that “potential state tax implications” counsel against the classification of broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service. Our classification of broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service appropriately derives from the factual characteristics of these services as they exist and are offered today. At any rate, we observe that the recently reauthorized Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) prohibits states and localities from imposing “[t]axes on Internet access.” This prohibition applies notwithstanding our regulatory classification of broadband Internet access service. Indeed, the legislative history of ITFA emphasizes that Congress drafted its definition of “Internet access” to be independent of the regulatory classification determination in order to “clarify that all transmission components of Internet access, regardless of the regulatory treatment of the underlying platform, are covered under the ITFA’s Internet tax moratorium.”
    Now, for the parts which I’ve been saying all along the effort was about:

    The Verizon court further affirmed the Commission’s conclusion that “broadband providers represent a threat to Internet openness and could act in ways that would ultimately inhibit the speed and extent of future broadband deployment."
    Threats to Internet openness remain today. The record reflects that broadband providers hold all the tools necessary to deceive consumers, degrade content, or disfavor the content that they don’t like. The 2010 rules helped to deter such conduct while they were in effect. But, as Verizon frankly told the court at oral argument, but for the 2010 rules, it would be exploring agreements to charge certain content providers for priority service. Indeed, the wireless industry had a well-established record of trying to keep applications within a carrier-controlled “walled garden” in the early days of mobile applications. That specific practice ended when Internet Protocol (IP) created the opportunity to leap the wall. But the Commission has continued to hear concerns about other broadband provider practices involving blocking or degrading third-party applications.
    Because the record overwhelmingly supports adopting rules and demonstrates that three specific practices invariably harm the open Internet—Blocking, Throttling, and Paid Prioritization—this Order bans each of them, applying the same rules to both fixed and mobile broadband Internet access service.
    15. No Blocking. Consumers who subscribe to a retail broadband Internet access service must get what they have paid for—access to all (lawful) destinations on the Internet. This essential and well-accepted principle has long been a tenet of Commission policy, stretching back to its landmark decision in Carterfone, which protected a customer’s right to connect a telephone to the monopoly telephone network. Thus, this Order adopts a straightforward ban:

    A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or nonharmful devices, subject to reasonable network management.

    16. No Throttling. The 2010 open Internet rule against blocking contained an ancillary prohibition against the degradation of lawful content, applications, services, and devices, on the ground that such degradation would be tantamount to blocking. This Order creates a separate rule to guard against degradation targeted at specific uses of a customer’s broadband connection:

    A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

    17. The ban on throttling is necessary both to fulfill the reasonable expectations of a customer who signs up for a broadband service that promises access to all of the lawful Internet, and to avoid gamesmanship designed to avoid the no-blocking rule by, for example, rendering an application effectively, but not technically, unusable. It prohibits the degrading of Internet traffic based on source, destination, or content. It also specifically prohibits conduct that singles out content competing with a broadband provider’s business model.

    18. No Paid Prioritization. Paid prioritization occurs when a broadband provider accepts payment (monetary or otherwise) to manage its network in a way that benefits particular content, applications, services, or devices. To protect against “fast lanes,” this Order adopts a rule that establishes that:

    A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization.
    “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity.


    19. The record demonstrates the need for strong action. The Verizon court itself noted that broadband networks have “powerful incentives to accept fees from edge providers, either in return for excluding their competitors or for granting them prioritized access to end users.” Mozilla, among many such commenters, explained that “[p]rioritization . . . inherently creates fast and slow lanes.” Although there are arguments that some forms of paid prioritization could be beneficial, the practical difficulty is this: the threat of harm is overwhelming, case-by-case enforcement can be cumbersome for individual consumers or edge providers, and there is no practical means to measure the extent to which edge innovation and investment would be chilled. And, given the dangers, there is no room for a blanket exception for instances where consumer permission is buried in a service plan—the threats of consumer deception and confusion are simply too great.
    Additionally, consumers on unlimited data plans may be confused by slowed data speeds because broadband providers have not adequately communicated contractually-imposed data management practices and usage thresholds.136 Switching costs are also a critical factor that negatively impacts mobile broadband consumers, in particular due to the informational uncertainties mentioned below, among other reasons.137 Ultimately, when consumers face this kind of friction in switching to meaningful competitive alternatives, it decreases broadband provider’ responsiveness to consumer demands and limits the provider’s incentives to improve their networks.138 Additionally, 45 percent of households have only a single provider option for 25 Mbps/3 Mbps broadband service, indicating that 45 percent of households do not have any choices to switch to at this critical level of service.
    Though we have the rules now, I'm sure it won't alleviate all concerns. I'm just glad to see that the rules are working in favor of the consumer.

    You can find the entire text here: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Rele...CC-15-24A1.pdf


    Continue / discuss in the forums Read More

  • Top Activist Efforts

  • Ron Paul & Rand Paul: News & Discussion

    Brian4Liberty

    Tucker Carlson Interviews Ron Paul

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    1762644273814532371 https://twitter.com/RonPaul/status/1762644273814532371

    Last Post By: unknown Today, 04:30 AM Go to last post
    Brian4Liberty

    Congressional Omnibus is Like a Bad Hollywood Movie Sequel

    Thread Starter: Brian4Liberty

    Congressional Omnibus is Like a Bad Hollywood Movie Sequel by Ron Paul | Mar 25, 2024

    Last Post By: osan Yesterday, 01:02 AM Go to last post
  • General News & Politics

    CaptUSA

    Francis Scott Key Bridge Collapse

    Thread Starter: CaptUSA

    Cargo ship hits bridge in Baltimore causing bridge to collapse with several cars still on the bridge. Dramatic footage of collapse at link: https://www.the-sun.com/news/10887766/maryland-francis-scott-key-bridge-collapses/

    Last Post By: PAF Today, 12:05 PM Go to last post
    Occam's Banana

    Joe Lieberman dead at 82

    Thread Starter: Occam's Banana

    AP: Former Sen. Joe Lieberman, Democrats’ VP pick in 2000, dead at 82 https://twitter.com/3YearLetterman/status/1773103663835234572

    Last Post By: A Son of Liberty Today, 12:04 PM Go to last post
    unknown

    Feds raid P. Diddy's homes. He flees the country.

    Thread Starter: unknown

    . Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' Holmby Hills mansion raided by Feds.

    Last Post By: Brian4Liberty Today, 11:56 AM Go to last post
    Suzu

    FTX Files For Bankruptcy. What will be the effect of this?

    Thread Starter: Suzu

    I don't know what it means for crypto in general, but maybe you do: https://twitter.com/binance/status/1590449161069268992 https://twitter.com/binance/status/1590449161069268992

    Last Post By: Anti Federalist Today, 11:53 AM Go to last post
    Occam's Banana

    Judge Rules Trump Committed Fraud, Stripping Control of Key Properties

    Thread Starter: Occam's Banana

    Judge Rules Trump Committed Fraud, Stripping Control of Key Properties The decision in a lawsuit that could go to trial next week is a major win for Attorney General Letitia James, who says former President Donald J. Trump overvalued his holdings by as much as $2.2 billion. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/nyregion/trump-james-fraud-trial.html https://archive.ph/3nOQd] {Jonah E. Bromwich &...

    Last Post By: Occam's Banana Today, 10:14 AM Go to last post
    DamianTV

    New Polling Shows The Real Results Of The 2020 Election Before The Voter Fraud For Biden

    Thread Starter: DamianTV

    https://www.banned.video/watch?id=65cfb17f0d63da299ef55888 Just watch the video Is anyone watching the TREND of current Election Polls? Noticing any patterns? You know, same states trending toward TRUMP? Is this not OBVIOUS? I swear the ONLY thing they can do now to prevent losing power is CANCEL / SUSPEND THE ELECTION DUE TO WAR.

    Last Post By: PAF Today, 09:24 AM Go to last post
    acptulsa

    Subversion Into Hypocrisy

    Thread Starter: acptulsa

    https://twitter.com/Inversionism/status/1708200884818030648 1708200884818030648

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 09:12 AM Go to last post
    donnay

    Joe Biden's Pig Latin

    Thread Starter: donnay

    1322239388324032512 ROFLMAO!!!

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 09:04 AM Go to last post
    PAF

    Trump Promises a “100% Tariff” on Cars Made Outside the US

    Thread Starter: PAF

    During Biden’s term in office —-> ban TicTok Trump, if elected again —-> effectively bans free trade on automobiles. Ban ban ban. “When America can’t/won’t compete, it conquers.” “When goods don’t cross borders, Soldiers will.”

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 09:02 AM Go to last post
    Anti Federalist

    NYC-Woman locks out squatters in her home, gets arrested for changing the locks

    Thread Starter: Anti Federalist

    Anarcho tyranny. The invading unwholesome flood will carry out this work in the future, bypassing even the cops who never fail to show their loyalty to the system, but even that will not enough to save them. Squatter standoff captured on camera in Queens | 7 On Your Side Investigates Monday, March 18, 2024 5:01PM https://abc7ny.com/squatters-standoff-queens-new-york-city/14540298/

    Last Post By: PAF Today, 08:50 AM Go to last post
  • Gold Price Chart

    [Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
  • Silver Price Chart

  • Economics News & Discussion

    Matt Collins

    CPI jumps 5% in May of 2021, fastest since 2008

    Thread Starter: Matt Collins

    If they are admitting a 5% jump, the true number is probably more like 15%-20% https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/10/business/consumer-price-index-may-2021.html

    Last Post By: ClaytonB 03-26-2024, 10:20 AM Go to last post
  • Bitcoin Price Chart

  • Education & Thought Power

    Madison320

    Thought experiment to show why protectionism damages the economy

    Thread Starter: Madison320

    I've heard a lot of people say the problem with free trade is that it only works when both countries are allowing trade. That's wrong. For example even if China sells to us but doesn't allow us to sell to them, it still benefits us (and hurts China). Suppose in the US, a strange new volcano started spewing perfectly formed free high grade steel. Should the US ban the free steel because it...

    Last Post By: acptulsa Today, 06:36 AM Go to last post
    Occam's Banana

    Ayn Rand & the Austrian economists

    Thread Starter: Occam's Banana

    Ayn Rand and the Austrian Economists | Edward W. Younkins https://odysee.com/@mises:1/ayn-rand-and-the-austrian-economists:a {Mises Media | 23 March 2024} Henry Hazlitt Memorial Lecture. Sponsored by Shone and Brae Sadler. Recorded at the Austrian Economics Research Conference, 22 March 2024, in Auburn, Alabama. Includes an introduction by Joseph T. Salerno. Chapters:

    Last Post By: Occam's Banana 03-26-2024, 07:34 PM Go to last post
    PAF

    Squatters’ Rights: What to Know as a Landlord & Laws per State

    Thread Starter: PAF

    Published February 8, 2024 By: Jealie Dacanay As a landlord, understanding squatters’ rights and regulations is crucial to protecting your property and ensuring a smooth tenancy. Squatting is an often misunderstood property ownership aspect, but in this guide, I provide a roadmap for landlords to safeguard their investments. I delve into why squatters’ rights exist, when they apply,...

    Last Post By: Occam's Banana 03-26-2024, 07:29 PM Go to last post
    A Son of Liberty

    Dave Smith / Part of the Problem

    Thread Starter: A Son of Liberty

    I'll endeavor to post each episode of Dave Smith's, Part of the Problem podcast here, going forward. Feel free to discuss/opine.

    Last Post By: Occam's Banana 03-26-2024, 06:53 PM Go to last post
    acptulsa

    Politics Is...

    Thread Starter: acptulsa

    Last Post By: ClaytonB 03-25-2024, 08:34 PM Go to last post
  • Follow us on Twitter! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed!