• Mexico president urges North American integration after Brexit

    Ottawa (AFP) - Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto on Monday called for greater integration with Canada and the United States in the wake of Britain's vote to split with the European Union.

    Nieto, who spoke during a stopover in Quebec City, is scheduled to attend a North American leaders summit in Ottawa on Wednesday with his US and Canadian counterparts.

    The three countries are economic partners in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and work closely on security matters.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/mexico-pr...200300558.html


    Sign up for a free account to add your comment!


    Comments 52 Comments
    1. otherone's Avatar
      otherone -
      Quote Originally Posted by alucard13mm View Post
      If you don't care about your borders, you don't care about your sovereignty. Why have borders in the first place? hehe
      Why do zoos have cages? If they'd just chip all of us, they wouldn't even need borders.
    1. AngryCanadian's Avatar
      AngryCanadian -
      Quote Originally Posted by erowe1 View Post
      To be fair, so does Ron Paul.
      After few years of following Ron Paul, i see nowhere where Paul has supported the idea of NAU.
    1. Champuckett's Avatar
      Champuckett -
      Looks like political leaders and pseudo political journalists are being exposed for what they are and what they believe in thanks to brexit. Leeches.

      Anytime someone else does the work for you at minimal cost, you are in an advantageous position and these folks, much like the Mexican presidente here, are seeing the tide turn on there globalist strategy. They are losing ground and they are feeling it.
    1. rprprs's Avatar
      rprprs -
      The news conference currently underway from the North American Leaders summit is enough to turn one's stomach.
    1. susano's Avatar
      susano -
      Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
      Flashback:

      Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?
      http://www.wnd.com/2006/06/36586/#bxo8eRRj1TfLAkLi.99
      Department of Commerce needs to go. One of many.

      Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American Union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.

      Referring to the SPP joint declaration, the report, entitled “Building a North American Community,” stated:



      The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

      To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that “our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary.” Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.



      Exactly like the EU which is goods, services, people and capital with a supranational, unelected, unaccountable beats of a government (as if our own isn't bad enough) to run the show.

      CFR is the US version of The Royal Institute of International Affairs, a.k.a., Chatham House. Their creation and the League of Nations was the beginning of global government.

    1. susano's Avatar
      susano -
      Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
      Flashback:

      Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?
      http://www.wnd.com/2006/06/36586/#bxo8eRRj1TfLAkLi.99
      In that article, the link to the SPP site is dead. That's how these snakes work. They're always re-naming the projects, even when they haven't changed. Makes it harder to keep up with what they're doing.

      One person we know who was on one of the committees was Heidi Cruz:

      http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/ted-cruz-...-against-wife/
    1. susano's Avatar
      susano -
      Quote Originally Posted by otherone View Post
      Why do zoos have cages? If they'd just chip all of us, they wouldn't even need borders.
    1. TheTexan's Avatar
      TheTexan -
      It could work. A single government, to rule them all,

      my precious....
    1. timosman's Avatar
      timosman -
      Quote Originally Posted by susano View Post
      In that article, the link to the SPP site is dead. That's how these snakes work. They're always re-naming the projects, even when they haven't changed. Makes it harder to keep up with what they're doing.
      The entire domain is gone. Here is an archived copy - https://web.archive.org/web/20060702...ort_to_leaders
    1. susano's Avatar
      susano -
      Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
      The entire domain is gone. Here is an archived copy - https://web.archive.org/web/20060702...ort_to_leaders

      On the Working Groups page, it starts right off with double talk:

      Explore new approaches to enhance the competitiveness of North American industries by promoting greater cooperation in sectors such as autos, steel, and other sectors identified through consultations.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20060704...perity_working

      You don't enhance competition through harmonization. The only competitiveness these people care is driving down wages for workers and flooding everybody with immigrant labor so the natives are forced to compete. It's the old race to the bottom for the plantation and more profits for the massah.
    1. erowe1's Avatar
      erowe1 -
      Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
      if the open borders advocacy was not enough to earn you a ban, this comment sure does.
      You called it.

      I actually just posted that as bait and intended to defend it after it got people riled up, but never got the chance, the ban came too fast.

      It was a true statement though. You don't have to be for any kind of super-state over North America to want free movement of people and goods throughout it. I saw nothing objectionable in what the Mexican president said.
    1. Anti Federalist's Avatar
      Anti Federalist -
      Quote Originally Posted by erowe1 View Post
      You called it.

      I actually just posted that as bait and intended to defend it after it got people riled up, but never got the chance, the ban came too fast.

      It was a true statement though. You don't have to be fore any kind of super-state over North America to want free movement of people and goods throughout it. I saw nothing objectionable in what the Mexican president said.
      On the first day of his state visit, Pena Nieto also signaled Mexico's intention to join a fledgling continental carbon market with Quebec, Ontario and the US state of California.

      He is also expected to announce matching cuts to US methane emissions, which Canada agreed to in March.
      If you don't think this will not result in whole new rafts of rules, regulations and unrepresentative fatwas that will directly impact the people of the United States, you're nuts.


    Sign up for a free account to add your comment!





    Continue / discuss in the forums Read More

  • Follow us on Twitter! Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our top news RSS Feed! New! Subscribe to us on YouTube!