Blog Comments

awesomeness!

congrats-- you make us all proud!

The refinement of what 'regulated' means needs to happen in the US Congress. We have strong allies there already who can start the argument. A State House can't redefine federal regulations, but we can firewall constitutional overreaches.

Yeah, I figure it's a necessary evil in order for the bill to protect any commerce at all. I guess it's a good first step - maybe if we do it with enough products, we get the FedGov off the backs of the states and we will no longer need to protect any industries from their meddling with a temporary state-level solution.

Appreciate all the hard work, Glen!

Everybody assumes that the Interstate Commerce Clause gives the Federal Government power to control anything that moves from State To State. However, according to Judge Napolitano, that is not what the Founding Fathers intended.

The Judge said it means to keep regular...to keep States from putting tariffs on other States imports into their States, and to treat all equally (equally not meaning redistribution). Why doesn't any of the States Attorneys seem to understand this?

Originally Posted by malkusm

I like it. Want to point out that in your Section 4 (or rather, Section 5 now), you have a typo - should be "Class 1A" instead of "Cass".

Also, your inserted Section 4 - explain that to me a bit more. "All affected packaging will..." sounds like a mandate. I'm not sure if I like the idea of a food producer or packer being required to stamp it on their product, although I'm not sure if that's what it actually says.

I think it's more like a shield of protection against Federal regulators insinuating themselves. It's like the labeling component of the Firearms Freedom Act. Discern the supply chains so that you can actually enforce the Act.

This should be read in concert with the Intrastate Commerce Act.

I like it. Want to point out that in your Section 4 (or rather, Section 5 now), you have a typo - should be "Class 1A" instead of "Cass".

Also, your inserted Section 4 - explain that to me a bit more. "All affected packaging will..." sounds like a mandate. I'm not sure if I like the idea of a food producer or packer being required to stamp it on their product, although I'm not sure if that's what it actually says.

I think labeling and notice are an important part of this Act, no? Discern the two supply chains, and it will be easier to differentiate all trade, intrastate vs interstate.

Be it hereby resolved, that the Republican Party of Youngsville West #2 Precinct, will by delegation process reform our Republican Party organizations Party Platform to amend the Party Platform Preamble such:

"The Republican Party of Franklin County North Carolina hereby asserts that our primary and dominant goal is to affect the strict and equal enforcement of the United States and the North Carolina Constitutions into State and Federal Law, in accord with the founding vision of Republican Party Co-Founder Frederick Douglass."

"The Republican Party of the Second Congressional District of North Carolina hereby asserts that our primary and dominant goal is to affect the strict and equal enforcement of the United States and the North Carolina Constitutions into State and Federal Law, in accord with the founding vision of Republican Party Co-Founder Frederick Douglass."

"The Republican Party of the State of North Carolina hereby asserts that our primary and dominant goal is to affect the strict and equal enforcement of the United States and the North Carolina Constitutions into State and Federal Law, in accord with the founding vision of Republican Party Co-Founder Frederick Douglass."

We by these presence voting "Aye" will work as a caucus to perform the platform amendments as set out above at the County, District, and State Republican Party Conventions.

The North Carolina deadline for registration to attend the GOP Conventions is January 31st. Please register now, and contact your County GOP organization to inquire about precinct conventions.