Uncategorized

Originally Posted by jabowery

Now lemme get this straight:

Reality: Individuals in a state of nature have a natural right to contract with each other to unite their individually controlled territories in a mutual insurance company that defends their joint territories against trespass.

Immigration Enthusiast: No they don't have any such right to contract. That's collectivism!


Reality: Even if we assume there is no right to contract, if we open borders before we enable individuals

...

Originally Posted by jabowery

TO THE CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

We the people of the United States who are committed to the present U.S. Constitution, recognizing that a conspiracy's unconstitutional control over Congress has resulted in the passage of unconstitutional "laws" far too numerous to be tested in the courts, hereby state our grievances and our petition that two specific steps be taken by Congress to correct this condition. Compliance with this petition requires that

...

Originally Posted by jabowery

If you mean Nystrom redirects DP traffic to a site someone else sets up to take out FreeRepublic.com, then yes, someone else should step in and provide Nystrom with a place to redirect traffic.

If you mean someone other than Nystrom should set up a site without Nystrom redirecting traffic there, then that site will fail.

Really, Nystrom needs to approve of this new site (which most likely means he has ownership of it of course).

People need to understand

...

.

If, as reported in this article, there are genetic influences for individualism vs collectivism, how can we expect individualism to prevail under an open immigration policy? On what basis can we reasonably claim that atomized individuals will successfully compete for resources against gangs?