PDA

View Full Version : The most dangerous candidate??




Kludge
01-21-2008, 03:58 PM
So... Who do you believe would be the most dangerous candidate to liberty if put into power? Note that the poll is public ;)

RedLightning
01-21-2008, 04:15 PM
Obama, becuase of his positions and the fact it seems the people who vote for him really have no idea what he stands for other then "change". Hillary people will fight but they will go along with Obama.

Kludge
01-21-2008, 04:25 PM
I was torn for a while, Obama was my second choice, but felt guilty for being white and went with Edwards instead.

While McCain and Clinton are (for the most part) the polar opposite of Ron Paul, I don't think they'd actually change much.

PaultheSaint
01-21-2008, 04:30 PM
Don't the "establishment" candidates all answer to the same power anyways?

I guess if ihad to choose, it would be McCain. I seriously think this guy has a screw loose. Bu then there is Huck and his religion, rudy and authority, Clinton is well, a Clinton.....tough choice really.


edit:/ I switch to Huckasleeze. This guy is just bad news.

Elliott
01-21-2008, 04:39 PM
I think Giuliani is the worst, but all of them (McCain, Clinton, Huckabee, Romney, Obama) are absolute disasters. I took a politics test a while ago and my views match RP about 95% and the worst match was Giuliani at -70%. ...everyone was negative except Ron Paul and Obama very slightly positive with about 5%.

However, all of them except Paul are lying about most of their positions. So they are probably almost all -100% with most of the world population.

inibo
01-21-2008, 04:57 PM
Giuliani by far. He'd do an even better job than Bush of making me yearn for the days of Nixon.

jclay2
01-21-2008, 05:39 PM
I don't know to much about who would be worst for our freedom. I do know, though, that all of them will not do anything to preven our coming economic crisis.

Kludge
01-21-2008, 11:32 PM
Bump.

Joe3113
01-21-2008, 11:38 PM
Giuliani and Clinton win equal first imo.

jsu718
01-22-2008, 12:21 AM
On the surface I would say McCain, but the one thing you have to give McCain is that he is straight forward about his craziness. In reality, Hillary would be by far the scariest. She outright lies about herself and her views.

JohnnyWrath
01-22-2008, 01:22 AM
Clinton easily....even in her original "hillarycare" project, there was a minimum of five years in prison for you and the doctor if you sought health care outside her system.

Clinton family also has the connections and network to do the damage....they are far more connected than when Bill took office. Socialism nd a one world government would be the new American agenda if she is elected. Edwards may have even more a socialist agenda, but would not get very far lacking a network like the Clintons have built....even neocons are backing their corrupt asses. Owner of FOX news has thrown fundraisers for her.

Kludge
12-16-2008, 06:05 PM
It seems we were lucky :p

mediahasyou
12-16-2008, 06:10 PM
Remember kids.

Power corrupts. Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.

brandon
12-16-2008, 06:11 PM
Toss up between Giuliani and Huckabee.

The thing is, I think everyone would hate Giuliani. He really has no base of support. Republicans, Democrats and Independents hate him. He couldn't get away with very much. But if he could get away with what he wanted to he would be the worst president we could possibly have. Except for maybe Lieberman.

Huckabee on the other hand would get a lot of support from middle America, and could get away with a lot more. He also has a really down to earth likable personality which I think would fool a lot of democrats into liking him.