PDA

View Full Version : I need a list of videos/pictures that proove MSM censorship for big documentary




anarchy
01-21-2008, 01:12 PM
This is important! It's for a documentary that we are working on which will be broadcast in several european countries and maybe beyond. I will make sure it gets subtitled for you guys.

Redcard
01-21-2008, 01:13 PM
It's already been made.

It's called "OutFoxed"

yongrel
01-21-2008, 01:14 PM
It's already been made.

It's called "OutFoxed"

Good movie.

anarchy
01-21-2008, 01:15 PM
This needs to be specifically about Ron Paul

Soccrmastr
01-21-2008, 01:16 PM
It's already been made.

It's called "OutFoxed"

Wish that guy knew before he planned out airing a documentary cross Europe... and why would Europeans care about Ron Paul, from the United States, MSM censorship?

ronpaulfollower999
01-21-2008, 01:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_sW1yGcIz0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pOFGkrHoVQ

dannno
01-21-2008, 01:18 PM
This is a great idea.

Staupostek
01-21-2008, 01:20 PM
Wish that guy knew before he planned out airing a documentary cross Europe... and why would Europeans care about Ron Paul, from the United States, MSM censorship?

Maybe because Europe has been down the socialist road, and they know what it can do to a country. And if we head down that road, and are bankrupted, who will defend them all as we have been doing for the last 60 year. Ron Paul may be the one to turn us down a different road.

ronpaulfollower999
01-21-2008, 01:22 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xB-Vrf7ThDw

anarchy
01-21-2008, 01:34 PM
Wish that guy knew before he planned out airing a documentary cross Europe... and why would Europeans care about Ron Paul, from the United States, MSM censorship?

Because right now there is an almost hatred of europeans against bush, and if your media is trying to censor a candidate which is giving a possible way out it is clear that this will be eaten like candy overhere. Next to that the US foreign policy is influencing the world in such a negative way and everyone here wants it to stop.

You know, we have had so many interesting documentaries - even ones about how the US propaganda machine is blatantly trying to manipulate the media here. If they were translated I'd have them tubed.

mysticgeek
01-21-2008, 01:36 PM
Make sure and include this education video about when Ron Paul talks about BLOWBACK:
http://ronpaulvids.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/blowback-from-iran/

acptulsa
01-21-2008, 02:17 PM
You could take a screenshot of Slate.com's piece on the Rebel flag in South Carolina. They're owned by the Washington Post.

Delain
01-21-2008, 02:32 PM
Maybe because Europe has been down the socialist road, and they know what it can do to a country. And if we head down that road, and are bankrupted, who will defend them all as we have been doing for the last 60 year. Ron Paul may be the one to turn us down a different road.

Eugh... same like the Sovjets "defended" Eastern Europe for 50 years?

At least the Sovjets left in the nineties huh. :rolleyes:

Don’t kid yourself, the US presence in Europe and around the world is not to defend those countries, to bring democracy or whatever noble justification they pull out of the high hat. That presence is necessary for the US Empire to exist. It allows the United States, with 4 percent of the world's population, to account for 22 percent of world energy consumption.

Your empire has served you well so why would any American want to end that? Why on earth vote for Ron Paul?


Imagine this created empire completely in the hands of people who believe in a world order where a financial elite rules over a world divided in several regional blocks. And they can only accomplish that dream when nation states and national sovereignty has become a thing of the past.

Wouldn’t that empire be a marvelous, powerfull tool to bring about the necessary conditions in the world for that new order to arise?
Of course that Empire, having a nation state as its centre, would have to self-destruct in the process. For them, it exist only to end the very thing it is itself.

Kissinger: "The United States is in a key position to shape this [...] emergence of a new international order."

What they forget to mention that in their new international order there will be no room for the United States itself.

Now the party is over either way. The US cant sustain this empire much longer even if it wanted to. The only question is in what way it will end. I dont think any American would like the option the globalists have in mind if they knew about it.

ronpaulfan
01-21-2008, 02:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8m6N53nidw

Psych0t
01-21-2008, 02:35 PM
msm = Murdoch and Some Media?

lol, I looked it up to find out it meant Mainstream Media

Deborah K
01-21-2008, 03:00 PM
This interview by Larry King never got aired:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bhVyB_kbmc&feature=related


Neither did this one by John Stossel's 20/20:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wz80H5Su8AA (there are 6 parts to this)

Here is interesting research done on censoring Ron Paul:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ4HHy5yqpY&feature=related


WHY WEREN'T THESE INTERVIEWS AIRED??? IS IT BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE HAD A HUGE IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC??? Probably.

theswedishchef
01-21-2008, 03:03 PM
This is important! It's for a documentary that we are working on which will be broadcast in several european countries and maybe beyond. I will make sure it gets subtitled for you guys.


Subtitles hahaha =) we all know english mate.

.....hmmm on second thought make one with french subs =P

randomname
01-21-2008, 03:07 PM
time and newsweek are also pretty bad

Goeran
01-21-2008, 03:07 PM
Here's a collection of some MSM Ron Paul censorship examples:

Ron Paul censorship / media manipulation (http://switzerland4ronpaul.blogspot.com/search/label/Medienmanipulation) (it's in German, I hope it helps anyway)

clintontj72
01-21-2008, 03:09 PM
How is this bullcrap...

http://photos1.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/5/b/c/5/highres_3023493.jpeg

Cindy
01-21-2008, 03:12 PM
Something I would consider maybe adding to that documentray is this.


How is it that before the primaries, Rudy was a NATIONAL front runner, polling around 23% in the "scientific polls" , yet when it came time for people to vote, in the first 5 states, Rudy actually had only about 4% of the vote.

I really think the scientific polls were fudged to prop Rudy up and that he never really had that sort of leading support at any time.

theswedishchef
01-21-2008, 03:12 PM
This is how it is in Sweden =(

http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=3070

you might not know Swedish but as you can see no picture of Ron Paul.

Delain
01-21-2008, 03:22 PM
This is how it is in Sweden =(

http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=3070

you might not know Swedish but as you can see no picture of Ron Paul.

Same over here (Netherlands)

http://www.nos.nl/nosjournaal/amerikakiest2008/

Not one mention of Ron Paul, not even listed as a candidate.