LA Times Poll

[luvthedoc08]

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/ Dr. Paul needs us on this one

[brumans]

He's winning by a percentage more than double of anyone else.. I don't think he needs us that bad
If he wins by too much it looks more unlegitimate

[j.b.]

If the election were today, who would you vote for?
17.8% Hillary Clinton
9.4% John Edwards
2.0% Rudy Giuliani
2.3% Mike Huckabee
2.6% Dennis Kucinich
4.6% John McCain
18.7% Barack Obama
37.9% Ron Paul
3.6% Mitt Romney
1.2% Fred Thompson

[luvthedoc08]

when i look at it it says he is at 3.6 %....

[Mystile]

when i look at it it says he is at 3.6 %....

you're looking at it the wrong way, it's the bar ABOVE the candidate's name. Yeah, I know it's stupid and inconsistent. :rolleyes:

[barbz]

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k168/msbarb517/RP/latimes2.jpg

[linusPAULing]

bump

we have some serious work to do on this poll

[luvthedoc08]

you're looking at it the wrong way, it's the bar ABOVE the candidate's name. Yeah, I know it's stupid and inconsistent. :rolleyes:

oooohhhhhhh, ya wow that's annoying, ok we're good my bad

[TaiwanGuy]

what we need to do is go all out for mitt romney. that way it will look like paul is winning.

what a stupid format!

[TaiwanGuy]

i cant help believe that they purposefully did this. the distances from the names to the bars implies to the mind that the lower bar represents the candidate. DECEPTION!

[kutibah]

That's soooo BULL**** I also first thought it was Paul @ 3.6%....

[louisiana4liberty]

geez, I also at first glance thought RP's percentage was 3.6%. Is it that hard to put the candidates name onside the bar/%. It is very deceiving.