Finally... decent proof polls are trash

[MikeSmith]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/nevada-primary.html
Romney McCain Huckabee Giuliani Thompson Paul
25.7 20.7 12.3 11.7 10.7 7.3

vs real results (as of 5:27 78% of precincts reporting)

http://www.politico.com/nvcaucuses/nvmap-popup.html
Romney Paul McCain Thompson Huckabee Giuliani
52.5 13.0 12.9 7.7 7.6 4.6

[Ron Paul Fan]

It's harder to poll a caucus than a primary. The polls have been fairly accurate thus far except for Clinton over Obama in NH. To point out one state, and a caucus where little polling had been done nonetheless, is just stupid.

[MikeSmith]

It's harder to poll a caucus than a primary. The polls have been fairly accurate thus far except for Clinton over Obama in NH. To point out one state, and a caucus where little polling had been done nonetheless, is just stupid.

Yea, I guess you're right. It's not proof. However, you can still show this to people who don't think Paul has any chance to win. Polls aren't always accurate.

[nbhadja]

How dare you question the all mighty polls!!!!!!

[BeFranklin]

How dare you question the all mighty polls!!!!!!

Ron Paul can beat the scientific polls, because Ron Paul is magic :D