PDA

View Full Version : Why the GOP should embrace Ron Paul




Sematary
07-28-2007, 08:36 AM
It has become obvious, over the last few years, that the Republican party has grown stale. It is out of ideas. There is hardly any new blood coming into the party because the 20 something crowd, in large part, doesn't want anything to do with the war and the Republican party has become a one issue party - the war. It doesn't appear to stand for anything else any more.
Gone are the days when the Republican party stood for personal responsibility, small government, fiscal conservativeness. That has all disappeared as the old guard of the Republican party has metastacized into a big government behemoth which has only one goal - to seek and hold onto power at any cost, including the lives of Americans.
In steps Ron Paul - an intelligent, consistent, grandfather with "new" ideas - ideas of upholding the constitution and limited government and personal responsibility and weening America off the cradle to grave welfare state. Who does he attract? It's not the stodgy older generation of Republicans which have bought into the concept of fear to win elections. It is the younger generation - the 18 to 34 year olds who swell the ranks of Ron Paul supporters. They ARE the new generation and the GOP is missing a golden opportunity to bring them into the GOP camp by not backing the one candidate that this demographic feel comfortable with in the Republican party. Those who know of Ron Paul are active and joining the Republican ranks but will quickly jump ship if he is not nominated and join the ranks of independent, or worse yet - Democrats.
This is the opportunity the GOP has been waiting for - and they are blowing it. When candidates refuse to debate in the CNN/Youtube debates, they are disenfranchising an entire generation of people who are wired into the world wide web and look more to the internet for their news and views than they do to the MSM which has repeatedly lied to them and marginalized the issues and candidates important to them.
Ron Paul may not be the man that the GOP wants but it is very clear that a large number of younger voters want him and the GOP should consider that before they simply discard him as a nominal candidate with no chance to win.
He may be the only chance the GOP has of grabbing the ever growing ranks of the young who voted heavier in the last elections because of the war and will vote heavy in this one as well.

NCGOPer_for_Paul
07-28-2007, 09:45 AM
I've been saying this since I joined the board here.

What you are saying is true.

If every young person who is a TRUE CONSERVATIVE would just join the Republican Party, change would come from within. We have them in numbers, and we have them in ideas. We have so much more in common with the "Greatest Generation" than we do with the "Me" generation. We can work with the older folks to take over the party.

quickmike
07-28-2007, 09:57 AM
Problem is, the Republican party leadership was taken over by Neo-Cons back in the late 80's. Neo-Cons are nothing more than far left liberals that attached the Republican name to themselves, so the leadership will never support Ron Paul which means the change will have to come from the people. Its as simple as that.

I dont see the leadership suddenly saying "you know what? That Ron Paul guy is right, we do really need smaller government in all areas." They dont really want that. What they want is larger government but on their terms.

Im afraid this is the best chance we are going to have for a very long time to get the party back to what it used to be, otherwise you might as well just leave the party and become a Constitutionalist or Libertarian party member, and hope that their numbers grow enough over the years to actually have effect.

Sematary
07-28-2007, 10:12 PM
Problem is, the Republican party leadership was taken over by Neo-Cons back in the late 80's. Neo-Cons are nothing more than far left liberals that attached the Republican name to themselves, so the leadership will never support Ron Paul which means the change will have to come from the people. Its as simple as that.

I dont see the leadership suddenly saying "you know what? That Ron Paul guy is right, we do really need smaller government in all areas." They dont really want that. What they want is larger government but on their terms.

Im afraid this is the best chance we are going to have for a very long time to get the party back to what it used to be, otherwise you might as well just leave the party and become a Constitutionalist or Libertarian party member, and hope that their numbers grow enough over the years to actually have effect.


I've ALWAYS been a Libertarian. I only give a shit about the Pubs now because I want RP elected.

LibertyEagle
07-28-2007, 10:38 PM
This is what I've been posting on Republican web sites. They're at a loss for words. Well, most of 'em. ;)

---------------------------------------------------

If Republicans want to win in November of 2008, they must nominate Ron Paul.

If they nominate anyone else, they will assuredly lose.

The Reagan coalition has turned into the Ron Paul Revolution.

---------------

“...the two American political figures Ron Paul strikes me as being the most similar to are Thomas Jefferson and Barry Goldwater.” – Chuck Muth

“I strongly support Ron Paul. We very badly need to have more Representatives in the House who understand in a principled way the importance of property rights and religious freedom” – Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize Economist

"If the framers of the Constitution were somehow to come back, Ron Paul is one of possibly only three people in Congress that they'd even talk to," said Mr. Williams, adding that most politicians have a "generalized contempt" for the values of the Constitution. – Walter Williams

“...in his heart and in his head, in his character and in his intellect, in what he has done and in what he will become, the Thomas Jefferson of our day, Ron Paul is one of us!" --Judge Andrew Napolitano
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8QwTKKSvR8

"Texas Congressman Ron Paul's pro-gun credentials are impeccable and he has been a leading proponent of rolling back the past 40 years of gun control." -- Gun Owners of America

Ron Paul for President '08 -- "HOPE FOR AMERICA"
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/index.php
http://www.ronpaulaudio.com/
http://www.ronpaulnation.com/tv.html
http://gunowners.org/pres08/paul.htm

His new book on foreign policy:
http://www.mises.org/store/Foreign-Policy-of-Freedom-A-P359C0.aspx?AFID=2

kylejack
07-28-2007, 10:43 PM
Why They Might Not:

They no longer care much about controlling spending.
They like protectionist trade policies.
They're jingoistic.
They want a never-ending global war on Radical Islam.
They like government programs.

Its sad, but I'm worried it might be true.