PDA

View Full Version : Microsoft seeks patent for office Big Brother-style Spy software (Scary Stuff)




FrankRep
01-15-2008, 11:16 PM
Microsoft seeks patent for office 'spy' software

The Times UK
January 16, 2008


Microsoft is developing Big Brother-style software capable of remotely monitoring a worker’s productivity, physical wellbeing and competence.

The Times has seen a patent application filed by the company for a computer system that links workers to their computers via wireless sensors that measure their metabolism. The system would allow managers to monitor employees’ performance by measuring their heart rate, body temperature, movement, facial expression and blood pressure. Unions said they fear that employees could be dismissed on the basis of a computer’s assessment of their physiological state.

Technology allowing constant monitoring of workers was previously limited to pilots, firefighters and Nasa astronauts. This is believed to be the first time a company has proposed developing such software for mainstream workplaces.

Microsoft submitted a patent application in the US for a “unique monitoring system” that could link workers to their computers. Wireless sensors could read “heart rate, galvanic skin response, EMG, brain signals, respiration rate, body temperature, movement facial movements, facial expressions and blood pressure”, the application states.

The system could also “automatically detect frustration or stress in the user” and “offer and provide assistance accordingly”. Physical changes to an employee would be matched to an individual psychological profile based on a worker’s weight, age and health. If the system picked up an increase in heart rate or facial expressions suggestive of stress or frustration, it would tell management that he needed help.

The Information Commissioner, civil liberties groups and privacy lawyers strongly criticised the potential of the system for “taking the idea of monitoring people at work to a new level”. Hugh Tomlinson, QC, an expert on data protection law at Matrix Chambers, told The Times: “This system involves intrusion into every single aspect of the lives of the employees. It raises very serious privacy issues.”

Peter Skyte, a national officer for the union Unite, said: “This system takes the idea of monitoring people at work to a new level with a new level of invasiveness but in a very old-fashioned way because it monitors what is going in rather than the results.” The Information Commissioner’s Office said: “Imposing this level of intrusion on employees could only be justified in exceptional circumstances.”
...

Microsoft last night refused to comment on the application...



Full Source:
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article3193480.ece

FrankRep
01-15-2008, 11:18 PM
Alex Jones isn't so crazy after all, huh? (http://www.infowars.com/)


...

Kludge
01-15-2008, 11:21 PM
lol... Well, employees would have to agree to this. Capitalism in action. Way to be, Microsoft.

FrankRep
01-15-2008, 11:22 PM
lol... Well, employees would have to agree to this. Capitalism in action. Way to be, Microsoft.

If they want a job, you mean. :rolleyes:

Kludge
01-15-2008, 11:27 PM
If they want a job, you mean. :rolleyes:

Of course. This is no different then the argument against the minimum wage.

Employer A: I offer $8,000 a month... But... You have to have a chip inserted into you so we can better monitor you.
Employer B: I offer $6,000 a month. No strings.

Your choice. Go with who you want.

Fox McCloud
01-15-2008, 11:34 PM
I can see when they're at work, but not at home.

*shrug* I don't like it, but it's Microsoft's right to do so....and I don't want to legislate any business in any form.

FrankRep
01-15-2008, 11:37 PM
I can see when they're at work, but not at home.

*shrug* I don't like it, but it's Microsoft's right to do so....and I don't want to legislate any business in any form.

It's our right the boycott them because of unconstitutional practices.

Fox McCloud
01-15-2008, 11:38 PM
It's our right the boycott them because of unconstitutional practices.

um, how is it unconstitutional?

and yes, it's our right to boycott them.

Kludge
01-15-2008, 11:39 PM
What's unconstitutional about it? A corporation is made of people. The government is sub-human and needs to be restricted. Thus, the constitution tends (not always) to only apply to the government. Wal-Mart has the right to restrict guns in their store, doesn't mean they're infringing on the right to bear arms.

Fox McCloud
01-16-2008, 01:06 AM
What's unconstitutional about it? A corporation is made of people. The government is sub-human and needs to be restricted. Thus, the constitution tends (not always) to only apply to the government. Wal-Mart has the right to restrict guns in their store, doesn't mean they're infringing on the right to bear arms.

I'm waiting for a store to make a point and making it so that you can't enter the store unless you have a gun (ie: gun required).

of course, then someone will attempt to sue them because it's "discriminatory". At this point, they could counter-sue (to make a point only) that the stores that don't allow people to carry weapons is discriminatory. *chuckles* it could really backfire on them.