PDA

View Full Version : Daily Kos Poll --- Hillary Vs. Paul




Joe Knows
07-25-2007, 03:57 PM
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/7/17/03841/4491

freelance
07-25-2007, 04:00 PM
This poll is in a link from the DKos poll.

http://poll.pollcode.com/Xwrn

Syren123
07-25-2007, 04:13 PM
Wow. That's some Kool Aid saturated ranting there.

Broadlighter
07-25-2007, 04:17 PM
RP beats Hillary hands down.

Barack talks a good game, but he never quites get to the heart of things.

bygone
07-25-2007, 04:41 PM
I can't think of a RP vs Hillary debate without laughing.

FreedomLover
07-25-2007, 04:45 PM
dailykos has some of the most hardcore liberals on the interwebs. While some of them might be open to a message of liberty and less government, I would say most of them have already drank the extra-strength koolaid, and are past the point of no return.

Syren123
07-25-2007, 04:46 PM
It's interesting to see how liberals think, and how they justify their positions. It's definitely a case of a fish being oblivious to water because he's in it.

I wonder if any of those die-hard liberals are at all aware of or interested in the CFR/Trilateral Commission/Federal Reserve thing. I mean the more you learn about all that, the more appalled one becomes...normally. It's like how you gonna keep them down on the farm - once they learn the truth about what's going on?

Hm.

Syren123
07-25-2007, 04:48 PM
dailykos has some of the most hardcore liberals on the interwebs. While some of them might be open to a message of liberty and less government, I would say most of them have already drank the extra-strength koolaid, and are past the point of no return.

OMG it sure looks that way. In my other post I wondered how that's possible.

MsDoodahs
07-25-2007, 04:48 PM
Yes, and these ARE our "fellow" americans.

Which is why I think the country ... will eventually splinter...

Syren123
07-25-2007, 04:49 PM
Yes, and these ARE our "fellow" americans.

Which is why I think the country ... will eventually splinter...

If Ron Paul is not elected, I'm moving to New Hampshire. No doubt about it.

www.freestateproject.com

SeanEdwards
07-25-2007, 04:52 PM
I really hate the people on that site. They think they're do-gooders, and yet they're totally demented and evil. So many of their posters have this kind of wierd jacobin frenzy. It's like they they literally want to draw and quarter Paul, because they think he once wrote something racially insensitive. Crazy. :(

angelatc
07-25-2007, 04:53 PM
It is a website for progressive socialists. THey do not want the minions to think, and they openly say that. Instead of building a community based on why people should vote for Democrats, their mantra is specifically "only vote for Democrats. They keep it really simple.

Has anybody been watching them v Bill O' Reilly over the Jet Blue sponsership?

SeanEdwards
07-25-2007, 05:04 PM
The people on that site don't like Hillary that much because they think shes not progressive enough to satiate the rabid 16-30 year old socialists and aging hippies who populate sites like that.

Makes you wonder who would be their ideal candidate :eek:

The corpse of Pol Pot maybe?

FreedomLover
07-25-2007, 05:16 PM
The corpse of Pol Pot maybe?

Or perhaps a Marx/Trotsky ghost ticket? :cool:

freelance
07-25-2007, 05:23 PM
From what I can gather, they're leaning toward John Edwards.

They have grown disillusioned with this Congress, but they can't seem to grasp that there's not a dime's worth of difference between the mainstream Democrats and Republicans--with the possible exception of who receives the welfare.

inibo
07-25-2007, 05:51 PM
Hillary Clinton (D) 128 votes - 29 %
Ron Paul (R) 283 votes - 65 %
Third Party 23 votes - 5 %

434 Total Votes

I'm sending a link to huffpo and drudge, not that they'll do anything with it.

They both ignored the SPAM campaign. Fuckwads.

kalami
07-25-2007, 06:01 PM
I like the rationality that seethes through the comments, such as "Ron Paul is against the war for the wrong reasons. Hilary was for the war for the right reasons and against the war for the right reasons."

FreedomLover
07-25-2007, 06:04 PM
I like the rationality that seethes through the comments, such as "Ron Paul is against the war for the wrong reasons. Hilary was for the war for the right reasons and against the war for the right reasons."

you'll see that kind of comment alot browsing that site.

angelatc
07-25-2007, 08:07 PM
http://poll.pollcode.com/Xwrn - the poll is now amended. Paul is still ahead, 75 to 10.

hard@work
07-25-2007, 09:28 PM
I just wanted to point out, unfortunately yet again, that the best thing Ron Paul supporters can be doing is embracing the "left" for their mistakes and letting them know we want to unify. Ron Paul represents unity, and truth to power. Sometimes truth takes a while to get through to someone when their version of the truth is backed by a just heart.

Discussion is greater than division.

I think we've had enough of the punditry, the talking heads, and the right vs. left "if you disagree with my obviously intelligent decision then you are *curse word* stupid and a morAn" partisanship.

angelatc
07-25-2007, 09:48 PM
I wonder if any of those die-hard liberals are at all aware of or interested in the CFR/Trilateral Commission/Federal Reserve thing. I

They're globalists, so the CFR serves their agenda just fine even if they don't believe in it.

Also, they trust the government with our money, so why would the Fed be a problem?

nexalacer
07-25-2007, 09:58 PM
There really is no reason to give that site any consideration. The folks on that site are your typical 10-20% of die hards that hold their beliefs not because of logic and rational thought, but because of a need to be part of a group of like-minded individuals (sheep?). They are irrelevant as far as main-stream society goes, and highly marginalized even among the rest of the collectivists. Daily KOS is a joke.

constituent
07-26-2007, 10:33 PM
didn't kos have some job w/ the reagan admin?

It seems like motherjones mentioned that they were being paid by the DNC or someone along those lines. worth looking into if you care, i suppose.

LibertyEagle
07-26-2007, 10:39 PM
They're still stuck on that BS charge against him of being racist. Now, they've added homophobe. Where in the hell are they getting that one?

austin356
07-26-2007, 10:50 PM
They're still stuck on that BS charge against him of being racist. Now, they've added homophobe. Where in the hell are they getting that one?



??? He voted against the Constitutional Amendment for defining marriage........ makes you wonder if the Koolaid they been drinkin is spike with everclear.

d991
07-27-2007, 12:32 AM
You have to really watch out for the far left...a group of them spawned into the neoconservative movement. Who knows what will come out next.