CFR= problem

[acroso]

Did anyone else notice that Bush concealed the fact that Cheney was president of CFR when they ran in 2000?

That SPP plan for a North American Union came up through the pipeline via Cheney along with all these plans for guest workers plans, open-borders, and amnesty plans.

Every frickin' candidate is CFR except Paul.....

[weatherbill]

the media is cfr controlled too....

great point! i DDIN'T KNOW CHANEY WAS CFR PRES....ANY DOCUMENTATION ON THAT?

[integrity]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg

[Naraku]

I don't know if all the media is involved. However, ABC News, News Corp, General Electric (who own NBC Universal), and Time Warner are all corporate members of the CFR. It's possible the others are involved in other organizations though.

[Kingfisher]

All candidates arent CFR, but all the frontrunners have CFR approval.

[acroso]

Kingfisher- they have secret membership though so a lot of the candidates who speak before them and hire CFR as advisers like Huckabee we know they are probably members.

[integrity]

michelle obama is CFR so Barak is in bed with the CFR...

[MAGICKAL]

Angelina Jolie is too, that is just weird.

[InLoveWithRon]

Huckabee' top campaign advisor is the president of the CFR.. Google haase and huckabee.. Haase is the president of the CFR

Also youtube cfr huckabee

.

[Smiley Gladhands]

Angelina Jolie is too, that is just weird.

Maybe that's where she learned to carry around vials filled with Billy Bob's blood.

They probably have Billy Bob blood orgies on the 2nd tuesday of each month.

[jdrochon]

All candidates arent CFR, but all the frontrunners have CFR approval.
All the Front Runners are CFR affiliated. End of Story

[RickNHouston]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SORRY GUYS ... JUST RAN ACROSS THIS !!! FUCKING GEEDUBYA IS AT IT AGAIN!!

MUST READ !!!



Bush Shakes Up ‘08 Iraq Debate
By: Nicole Belle on Sunday, January 13th, 2008 at 7:00 AM - PST Apparently, Bush has a plan to take away the Democratic frontrunners’ plans to use Iraq as a campaign issue.

Of course, the Republican candidates are entirely unaffected–seeing as they want to stay away from Iraq as much as possible–but Bush’s actions are non-political, make no mistake about that.

(A)s Bush rallied U.S. troops at the base here on Saturday with a “Hoo-ah” and conferred with his Iraq dream team, Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker, he indicated that he was setting in motion policies that could dramatically affect the presidential race–and any decisions the next president makes in 2009.

In remarks to the traveling press, delivered from the Third Army operation command center here, Bush said that negotiations were about to begin on a long-term strategic partnership with the Iraqi government modeled on the accords the United States has with Kuwait and many other countries. Crocker, who flew in from Baghdad with Petraeus to meet with the president, elaborated: “We’re putting our team together now, making preparations in Washington,” he told reporters. “The Iraqis are doing the same. And in the few weeks ahead, we would expect to get together to start this negotiating process.” The target date for concluding the agreement is July, says Gen. Doug Lute, Bush’s Iraq coordinator in the White House–in other words, just in time for the Democratic and Republican national conventions.

Most significant of all, the new partnership deal with Iraq, including a status of forces agreement that would then replace the existing Security Council mandate authorizing the presence of the U.S.-led multinational forces in Iraq, will become a sworn obligation for the next president. It will become just another piece of the complex global security framework involving a hundred or so countries with which Washington now has bilateral defense or security cooperation agreements. Last month, Sen. Hillary Clinton urged Bush not to commit to any such agreement without congressional approval. The president said nothing about that on Saturday, but Lute said last fall that the Iraqi agreement would not likely rise to the level of a formal treaty requiring Senate ratification. Even so, it would be difficult if not impossible for future presidents to unilaterally breach such a pact.

As far as the number of U.S. troops that would remain in Iraq under such a pact, the administration is considering changes that could also pre-empt anything the Democrats have in mind.[..] In fact, one Pentagon contractor who is working on the long-term U.S. plans for Iraq says that the administration is considering new configurations of forces that could reduce troop levels to well under 100,000, perhaps to as few as 60,000, by the time the next president takes office.

The upshot is that the next president, Democrat or Republican, is likely to be handed a fait accompli that could well render moot his or her own elaborate withdrawal plans, especially the ones being considered by the two leading Democratic contenders.

It’s not bad enough the damage he’s done in the eight years he’s occupied the White House, he needs to continue the damage beyond his term

[MikeFallopian]

Ah yes, the good old CFR. The organization that magically makes Cheney, Carter, Krugman, Soros, Clinton, Wolfowitz and Angelina Jolie political allies in the nefarious pursuit of a NWO global government. (or maybe it's just another think tank, albeit one that attracts intelligent and powerful contributors).

[weatherbill]

Angelina Jolie might just be a CFR pawn.....then again, she might run for office too.....LOL

you just never know in the shady world of the CFR hidden motives.....

what would be priceless is to sit in on one of their secret meetings and hear their plans.....now that would be really interesting!

[alexa doherty]

Angelina Jolie is too, that is just weird.

It's not really that weird. The Cfr is an incredibly cultural marxist outfit with a huge emphasis on socialism and globalism. Angelina as my mom rightly points out, can't act to save her life. Plus shes very scary adopting third world kids and what not like she is pretending to be mudonna or something.

Jolie probably is probably the one who gets passed around and used at the "eyes wide shut" cfr orgies. lol ugh

[nosebruise]

(or maybe it's just another think tank, albeit one that attracts intelligent and powerful contributors).

Angelina Jolie, intelligent??

shes a dolt. and she's batshit.

here i am thinking CFR can't leave a more sour taste in my mouth and then i learn Angelina Jolie is associated with them. ughhgghghhgbleh.




i think i'm gonna throw up.



(also... conspiracy theory aside, CFR is highly influencial in our current foreign policy... that should be enough to dislike them, whether or not they're run by aliens, corporate profiteers, NWO conspirators, or just a bunch of idiots.)

[CountryboyRonPaul]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SORRY GUYS ... JUST RAN ACROSS THIS !!! FUCKING GEEDUBYA IS AT IT AGAIN!!

MUST READ !!!



Bush Shakes Up ‘08 Iraq Debate
By: Nicole Belle on Sunday, January 13th, 2008 at 7:00 AM - PST Apparently, Bush has a plan to take away the Democratic frontrunners’ plans to use Iraq as a campaign issue.

Of course, the Republican candidates are entirely unaffected–seeing as they want to stay away from Iraq as much as possible–but Bush’s actions are non-political, make no mistake about that.

(A)s Bush rallied U.S. troops at the base here on Saturday with a “Hoo-ah” and conferred with his Iraq dream team, Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker, he indicated that he was setting in motion policies that could dramatically affect the presidential race–and any decisions the next president makes in 2009.

In remarks to the traveling press, delivered from the Third Army operation command center here, Bush said that negotiations were about to begin on a long-term strategic partnership with the Iraqi government modeled on the accords the United States has with Kuwait and many other countries. Crocker, who flew in from Baghdad with Petraeus to meet with the president, elaborated: “We’re putting our team together now, making preparations in Washington,” he told reporters. “The Iraqis are doing the same. And in the few weeks ahead, we would expect to get together to start this negotiating process.” The target date for concluding the agreement is July, says Gen. Doug Lute, Bush’s Iraq coordinator in the White House–in other words, just in time for the Democratic and Republican national conventions.

Most significant of all, the new partnership deal with Iraq, including a status of forces agreement that would then replace the existing Security Council mandate authorizing the presence of the U.S.-led multinational forces in Iraq, will become a sworn obligation for the next president. It will become just another piece of the complex global security framework involving a hundred or so countries with which Washington now has bilateral defense or security cooperation agreements. Last month, Sen. Hillary Clinton urged Bush not to commit to any such agreement without congressional approval. The president said nothing about that on Saturday, but Lute said last fall that the Iraqi agreement would not likely rise to the level of a formal treaty requiring Senate ratification. Even so, it would be difficult if not impossible for future presidents to unilaterally breach such a pact.

As far as the number of U.S. troops that would remain in Iraq under such a pact, the administration is considering changes that could also pre-empt anything the Democrats have in mind.[..] In fact, one Pentagon contractor who is working on the long-term U.S. plans for Iraq says that the administration is considering new configurations of forces that could reduce troop levels to well under 100,000, perhaps to as few as 60,000, by the time the next president takes office.

The upshot is that the next president, Democrat or Republican, is likely to be handed a fait accompli that could well render moot his or her own elaborate withdrawal plans, especially the ones being considered by the two leading Democratic contenders.

It’s not bad enough the damage he’s done in the eight years he’s occupied the White House, he needs to continue the damage beyond his term

If spun right, this could really help Ron Paul's campaign...

"Well George Bush just announced a few days ago he wants to cut troop levels in half, my plan would just speed things up"

Plus it would make all the pro-surge people look like idiots.

[Lexx78]

cfr, fed and aipac, the basis of the corruption :rolleyes:

[Signzit]

http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/CFRMembers.html


the most current list I could find- and great website IMHO

If someone knows of a more detailed list or a newer one please post it!

Thank you and happy reading!!!