Put this in your signature, please - RonPaulIsWrong.com

[aspiringconstitutionalist]

The essay entitled "Self Evident Truths" at http://www.RonPaulIsWrong.com/ is quickly spreading as a WMD against pro-war, neo-conservative political philosophy. Help convert pro-war "conservative" voters today!

Put this line in your forum signature to help spread the word, please:

Send this to any and all pro-war voters you know - http://www.RonPaulIsWrong.com/ (why Ron Paul is right!)



Oh, and don't forget to DIGG the article: http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/RonPaulisWrong_com_Why_Ron_Paul_Is_Right_Common_Se nse_2_0

[aspiringconstitutionalist]

bump

[ecliptic]

Ron Paul is wrong? You want me to promote a website called "Ron Paul is wrong"????

That article is massive - how about you give me a viable synopsis?

[aspiringconstitutionalist]

Ron Paul is wrong? You want me to promote a website called "Ron Paul is wrong"????

That article is massive - how about you give me a viable synopsis?

The title is a misnomer. At the top of the webpage it says:


RonPaulIsWrong.com - Why Ron Paul is Right
An answer for those conservative voters who "like Ron Paul on a lot of issues, but think he's just flat out wrong on foreign policy."

[wohoo]

No one is going to read that and all they'll remember is that there was A LOT of text on a website called RonPaulIsWrong.com

This is not helpful.

[uncle saddam]

I think the title will perfectly get the attention of the target audience - war hawks who already have an opinion formed.

[1789Redux]

This essay really does work. Will do. :D

[bcreps85]

The article is good, and it has a catchy ring to those who are currently against RP...to get their attention.

However, how many of them are going to take the time to read something so long? I find it more likely that in their simple little existence they will simply read the website title and make that conclusion...

[1789Redux]

The article is good, and it has a catchy ring to those who are currently against RP...to get their attention.

However, how many of them are going to take the time to read something so long? I find it more likely that in their simple little existence they will simply read the website title and make that conclusion...

Well, if an anti-Ron Paul voter doesn't read the full website, it's no vote lost. But if they do, there seems to be a good chance that it will help them understand Ron Paul's political philosophy.

[uncle saddam]

I think that's a legitimate concern, although the layout of it is really easy to even browse over quickly (intro with announcement of various topics, topics separated into a couple paragraphs each).

Overall a really well-written piece.