View Full Version : Put this in your signature, please - RonPaulIsWrong.com
aspiringconstitutionalist
01-12-2008, 06:16 PM
The essay entitled "Self Evident Truths" at http://www.RonPaulIsWrong.com/ is quickly spreading as a WMD against pro-war, neo-conservative political philosophy. Help convert pro-war "conservative" voters today!
Put this line in your forum signature to help spread the word, please:
Send this to any and all pro-war voters you know - http://www.RonPaulIsWrong.com/ (why Ron Paul is right!)
Oh, and don't forget to DIGG the article: http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/RonPaulisWrong_com_Why_Ron_Paul_Is_Right_Common_Se nse_2_0
aspiringconstitutionalist
01-12-2008, 06:21 PM
bump
ecliptic
01-12-2008, 06:24 PM
Ron Paul is wrong? You want me to promote a website called "Ron Paul is wrong"????
That article is massive - how about you give me a viable synopsis?
aspiringconstitutionalist
01-12-2008, 06:26 PM
Ron Paul is wrong? You want me to promote a website called "Ron Paul is wrong"????
That article is massive - how about you give me a viable synopsis?
The title is a misnomer. At the top of the webpage it says:
RonPaulIsWrong.com - Why Ron Paul is Right
An answer for those conservative voters who "like Ron Paul on a lot of issues, but think he's just flat out wrong on foreign policy."
wohoo
01-12-2008, 06:28 PM
No one is going to read that and all they'll remember is that there was A LOT of text on a website called RonPaulIsWrong.com
This is not helpful.
uncle saddam
01-12-2008, 06:30 PM
I think the title will perfectly get the attention of the target audience - war hawks who already have an opinion formed.
1789Redux
01-12-2008, 06:33 PM
This essay really does work. Will do. :D
bcreps85
01-12-2008, 06:38 PM
The article is good, and it has a catchy ring to those who are currently against RP...to get their attention.
However, how many of them are going to take the time to read something so long? I find it more likely that in their simple little existence they will simply read the website title and make that conclusion...
1789Redux
01-12-2008, 06:40 PM
The article is good, and it has a catchy ring to those who are currently against RP...to get their attention.
However, how many of them are going to take the time to read something so long? I find it more likely that in their simple little existence they will simply read the website title and make that conclusion...
Well, if an anti-Ron Paul voter doesn't read the full website, it's no vote lost. But if they do, there seems to be a good chance that it will help them understand Ron Paul's political philosophy.
uncle saddam
01-12-2008, 06:41 PM
I think that's a legitimate concern, although the layout of it is really easy to even browse over quickly (intro with announcement of various topics, topics separated into a couple paragraphs each).
Overall a really well-written piece.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.