View Full Version : How come Ron Paul is the only one running who isn't a front runner?
nbhadja
01-11-2008, 05:00 PM
Getting 2.5 percent in Iowa is a front runner (Rudy). Or getting 2 percent in NH (Fred).
I guess we're overachieving
rollingpig
01-11-2008, 05:17 PM
LOL good question :D
jabrownie
01-11-2008, 05:19 PM
Because we're a front sprinter ??? :-P
atilla
01-11-2008, 05:20 PM
duncan hunter
dkim68
01-11-2008, 05:22 PM
If the mainstream media was controlled at the grassroots level (haha) the reporting would show Ron Paul with a much higher percentage of votes than they currently say he has. He most likely IS the front runner but the powers that be are cheating the American people out of the truth on vote counts.
If the mainstream media was controlled at the grassroots level (haha) the reporting would show Ron Paul with a much higher percentage of votes than they currently say he has. He most likely IS the front runner but the powers that be are cheating the American people out of the truth on vote counts.
That's not true.
Keep rounding up names from your voter list.
The system sucks, people are dumb.
Bring Paul voters to the polls and hope for the best.
back on topic... Ron Paul COULD be doing MUCH better if they'd actualy talk about him and not laugh.
angrydragon
01-11-2008, 05:33 PM
The polls.
UnReconstructed
01-11-2008, 05:33 PM
he raised to much money
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.