PDA

View Full Version : Why didn't Sean interview Ron Paul




johnrocks
01-11-2008, 11:35 AM
after the debate. Where was he?

heath.whiteaker
01-11-2008, 11:35 AM
rp declined

traitorist
01-11-2008, 11:36 AM
Ron declined the interview, and rightfully so.

EvilEngineer
01-11-2008, 11:36 AM
He was scheduled to be at a post-debate rally. On the bright side, most people interpreted Dr. Paul not showing up as Fox declining to interview him, not vice versa. So it's working in our favor.

Anti Federalist
01-11-2008, 11:37 AM
He told 'em to pound salt.

Well, he should have anyways.

'Course, he could have stuck around to rub Hannity's "no good poll" in his face.

Paul won at 32 percent.

johnrocks
01-11-2008, 11:37 AM
It made him look like he was afraid IF he didn't have another obligation

itshappening
01-11-2008, 11:52 AM
this will annoy Hannity (and his ego) far more than if he went on

he won't shut up about him now

JS4Pat
01-11-2008, 11:54 AM
Ron declined the interview, and rightfully so.

I disagree - VERY VERY VERY BAD MOVE!

He has to continue to spread our message and expose these clowns for who and what they are!

How do you know he declined the interview?

Catatonic
01-11-2008, 12:01 PM
He viewed honoring his obligation to speak with his supporters as more important than talking with a snake like Hannity.

Even if he left just for the sake of leaving, I would view that as letting the debate poll speak for itself. He doesn't need Hannity, though I always love watching him rub Hannity's face in their own poll.

With the help of the media we'd win for sure, but that will never happen. Worrying about their take on things isn't very productive.

SteveMartin
01-11-2008, 12:05 PM
Hannity did announce at around 11:55 that they offered to have RP on, and that RP declined citing another event/conflict.

I thought it was a GREAT MOVE for RP. He has shown me that he will not just take their crap lying down, and he showed his supporters that they are more important to him than goofballs like Hannity.

I love this man!